# data[].attributes.headline
Finding new sources of money for forest management, which is so underfunded

# data[].attributes.subject
Finding new sources of money for forest management, which is so underfunded

# data[].attributes.body
Low income neighborhoods near polluters in CA who don’t benefit from healthy forests in Maine

# data[].attributes.body
Additional money for working forests. Large parcel landowners who are already managing their forests for ecosystem services.

# data[].attributes.body
The high cost to join the program. Smaller private forest owners would experience these high costs with not enough incentive to join the program.

# data[].attributes.headline
So if I understand correctly, higher social economic status would benefit more

# data[].attributes.subject
So if I understand correctly, higher social economic status would benefit more

# data[].attributes.body
How are third parties verified/trusted themselves to provide verification?

# data[].attributes.headline
If California purchased offsets through Alaska, it wouldn't help with the air quality issues in CA. I think that it would honestly lead to decrease in air quality because now they can purchase more offsets

# data[].attributes.subject
If California purchased offsets through Alaska, it wouldn't help with the air quality issues in CA. I think that it would honestly lead to decrease in air quality because now they can purchase more offsets

# data[].attributes.body
fewer risks

# data[].attributes.headline
initial expenses could price out a lot of participants

# data[].attributes.subject
initial expenses could price out a lot of participants

# data[].attributes.headline
 I would assume that the most carbon efficient businesses are probably large corporations. I can see that being socially and economically problematic, especially if that extra pressure on small businesses leads to their closure and the formation of monopolies.

# data[].attributes.subject
 I would assume that the most carbon efficient businesses are probably large corporations. I can see that being socially and economically problematic, especially if that extra pressure on small businesses leads to their closure and the formation of monopolies.

# data[].attributes.headline
It may not be feasible for everyone based on opportunity/wealth

# data[].attributes.subject
It may not be feasible for everyone based on opportunity/wealth

# data[].attributes.body
High cost of entry, which means smaller land owners are excluded

# data[].attributes.body
Globally, it is an advantage to have a large economy like CA reducing thier emissions or offsetting them

# data[].attributes.headline
seems like it doesnt work for small tracts of land

# data[].attributes.subject
seems like it doesnt work for small tracts of land

# data[].attributes.headline
What are some of market tools used to gauge the value of CDR and how can we use that to compare it to other land uses?

# data[].attributes.subject
What are some of market tools used to gauge the value of CDR and how can we use that to compare it to other land uses?

# data[].attributes.headline
Large costs restricts the ability for smaller land owners to benefit

# data[].attributes.subject
Large costs restricts the ability for smaller land owners to benefit

# data[].attributes.body
Forest landowners receive money in exchange for responsible management

# data[].attributes.body
The high cost of entry might prevent lower income or smaller firms from entering

# data[].attributes.headline
How big of a carbon emitter do you have to be to be required to offset your emissions/buy permits

# data[].attributes.subject
How big of a carbon emitter do you have to be to be required to offset your emissions/buy permits

# data[].attributes.headline
Do you think the 25,000 ton cap it too generous considering the current climate emergency?

# data[].attributes.subject
Do you think the 25,000 ton cap it too generous considering the current climate emergency?

# data[].attributes.body
Higher carbon sequestration would benefit everyone globally

# data[].attributes.headline
always consider the counterfactual... even with drawbacks forest offsets and the CA carbon market are better than not doing it at all

# data[].attributes.subject
always consider the counterfactual... even with drawbacks forest offsets and the CA carbon market are better than not doing it at all

# data[].attributes.body
Is there any motivation for the Federal government or state subsidizing the verification process to help reduce barriers to entry?

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that this carbon market is a step in the right direction and once perfected, it can be transferrable to other states/countries potentially

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that this carbon market is a step in the right direction and once perfected, it can be transferrable to other states/countries potentially

# data[].attributes.body
How are disturbances like fire that release carbon accounted for in the 100 year minimum requirement?