# data[].attributes.body
Anti - Federalists - weakens state governments does not protect people

# data[].attributes.body
In times of war and fighting, governments can expand as needed with the powers, but still aren't overpowering because government is harmonious and checks/balances exist to reduce an individual or group's power.

# data[].attributes.body
internal order of each state is protected, and this is able to be done with the implications and powers given to the government.

# data[].attributes.body
The Military was seen as a good thing for the union which is the federalist and the anti - federalist didn't support it to much because it was quite nationalized.

# data[].attributes.body
Federalist - want a strong national government

# data[].attributes.body
(1&37) it appears to me as impossible that these powers in the state constitution and those in the general government can exist and work together, as it would be for a man to serve two masters whose interests clash, and secure and approve both.

# data[].attributes.body
(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 40)
This section was talking about how the Anti-federalist did not want the National government to have as much power as the Federalist had made it out to be. They wanted the Constitution to focus the power on state government. On the other hand the Federalist wanted the strong national government.

# data[].attributes.body
(13)everyone was granted rights by the constitution
(35)new law formed on April 19,1775
(45)powers are increasing

# data[].attributes.body
(42) The new powers aren't really "new" but revitalizes the powers already present. In other words, this means that the powers of the national government hasn't changed, but better applies them. Not making the government noticeably stronger still appeals to Anti-Federalists and Federalists, having the same amount of power in the Articles of Confederation, but helps Federalists by slightly increasing powers already existing.