# data[].attributes.body
- Good job Kaitlyn with backing up your reasons with evidence.

-Good job Ryan showing a chain of events. Same with Kenzie.

-Good job Zach showing evidence from our day and age.

-Good job Becca with showing your sources.

-Good point Isabella.

-It sounds like not everyone is taking this seriously.

-Good rebuttal Colin.

-Good reasons Becca and Colin.

-

# data[].attributes.body
-strong start

-nobody is disagreeing with each other

- I agree with Isabella

-I agree with Zachery

-again i agree with Zachery

-good job not interrupting each other

-good job including each other into the conversation

-I agree with Bonnie

-

# data[].attributes.body
Good job Kenzie with your reason and using evidence and siting the text.
Good rebuttal Kaitlyn with good claim.
Good reason and example Katherine.
Nice sentence starters Danielle and good citing the text.
Good rebuttal Isabella and nice job sounding confident.
Nice reasons Kenzie.
Good point Bonnie and nice job adding examples.
Nice job going back to the main point Danielle.
Nice job siting the text Becca.
Nice rebuttal aitlyn and Danielle with evidence and examples.
Good point Kenzie.
Nice rebuttal Katherine and great example to a common problem with life today.
Good job staying with your claim and kept and rebutting
Nice job connecting ancient Rome with today Bonnie
Nice agreeing with examples from a text plus citing Danielle.
Nice changing the discussion topic with a new and just as important topic Isabella.
Some people need to give others that didn't speak as much a chance to speak.

# data[].attributes.body
- Nice job with not interrupting each other (never mind)
- Way better volume and voice projection
- I like how they are using laughter and humor to create a low stress environment
- What does language have to do with the EQ?
- Different kind of debate Macenzie

# data[].attributes.body
Good going back to evidence.
Kaitlyn supported other people who have the same topic.
Danielle has a good point about the roads.
They allowed other people to talk.
Everyone is providing evidence.
Colin provided exact measurements.
Bonnie brought the essential question to the inquiry.
Everyone was giving a chance to talk.
A lot of disagreement about the roads
I agree with Katherine.
Colin made a good point
Zachary made a good point about the tolls and the roads.
Everyone is projecting the voice so even the people in the outer circle can hear.
There is a lot of auguring when the noise was higher.
Bonnie went back to something she said.

# data[].attributes.body
~Good claim and evidence everyone
~ disagreeing with each other with evidence
~ Good job referring back to a source(s)
~Good sentence starters and connecting the claim to the evidence
~ Starting off the topic/claim with I agree/disagree
~ no body is mumbling
~ everyone is talking no one is being left out
~good job connecting back to modern day society
~ most people are connecting their claims to inventions
~ Good evidence but "I think" isn't very convincing
~ some people are referring mostly back to resources or materials, and how they got them
~ People are referring roads to safety
~It's starting to get a little confusing what their claims are and/or what they are supporting
~ what part of government roads or military is the language? I'm guessing it's government.
~ Language to create road names (answering my question).
~this conversation at points is getting a little off topic
~

# data[].attributes.body
- I agree with Ryan because if we didn't have roads we would not have the freedom to go out or go to the store.
- I agree with Bonnie because we do thing like the Roman empire like our army we took a lot of things and used them in our normal everyday life.
- I also agree with Zach because if they didn't have a good government they would not have any roads or they would be really bad made.

- I think taxes are fare because how would our government pay for schools or roads and garbage pick up our world would be so messed up with out taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
- good evidence and start
- i like how different topics add on to each other
- great clear talking Isabella and Bonnie
- good rebuttal Colin
- they helped other people talk
- good connection to modern society and inventions
- nice counterclaim Zach
- need a little bit of evidence
- nice piggy backing and connecting to inventions
- i like how Bonnie changed the subject instead of talking about one topic.
- getting off topic and need to wrap up quickly.

# data[].attributes.body
- Group had a good start with evidence
- I agree with the point that roads would make travelling easier because like the group said if it was raining it would make the movement of the army way harder because of all the mud.
- Group is interrupting each other.
- Zachary is doing a nice job proving his main points.
- Group is doing a nice job helping group mates support their points.
- I agree with Katherine because if there is a another state next to us that need help we would't be able to help them because we wouldn't have something to guide us to get there quickly.
- The group is doing a nice job using "I agree" but they are not using "I disagree".
- Everyone is talking but they aren't waiting for their turn.

# data[].attributes.body
-Zach has good points
-Bonnie also has a convincing argument
-More people should speak
-Cars could have been created without roads.
-Bonnie is doing a good job with evidence
-A lot of agreements
-How could the Roman army not be great without Roads.
-North Korea has roads they don't have a  good Government.
-Kaitlyn has great points about Government.
-Slave's didn't make the road
-I think you mean paths
-What about Democracies
-The Colonies had paths they won
-Egypt did it
-The Group has a Great volume
-You should probably stop talk at the same time
-One person talking at a time not ten
-Not necessarily but good point.

# data[].attributes.body
-Good opening, but "I believe" isn't a strong starting phrase
-Zachary has convincing points
-Kaitlyn has good volume
-The group has a good volume overall
-Sometimes too quiet
-Sometimes they stutter
-Ryan has a good volume
-Danielle has good points and volume
-Started off kind of weak, but he turned it into a good point
-Everyone is interrupting each other
-Someone is trying to interrupt others points with rebuttals
-Ryan's ideas are intriguing
-Danielle has good evidence
-Our president is actually trying to lower taxes
- Zach has good counters
-While the argument is good, they are interrupting each other a little too much

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the point that militaries would be weaker without roads because they helped trasnport the army around the empire allowing them to get to battle quicker.
-Chloe did bring up a good point. Not only did roads help the army but the governent did too.
-People are remembering to give evidence to back up their opinion. Good Job!
-Nick and Sarah did a nice job in making sure everybody was participating
-What people are saying leads to me to believe that because of the army, roads were created
-Ruby brought up a good counter argument "how would a government grow without the citizens paying taxes,"
-Vito did a nice job at bringing up information he knew prior to learing about Ancient Rome
-Jonathan said a really good point. If the only thing left in Rome was the government, Rome would still be able to go back to its former self
-Everybody is using good trasitional words.
-Sarah asked a good question to the opposing side
-Sebastian is remebering to use good evidence.
-

# data[].attributes.body
-I like how the group is giving evidence to support what they are saying
- Agreeing and disagreeing nicely
- Everyone is listening and not interrupting each other
-Great job getting other people to talk
-Good counterclaims
-Talking polity
-Good transitioning to another point
-Good job using examples of why we need roads today and not just back then
-Good job finishing with your conclution

# data[].attributes.body
-Good job Chloe by supporting with what you are saying.
- I agree with Chloe.
- I agree with Chloe.
- I agree with Ruby

# data[].attributes.body
Sarah involved other topics like the military to show how roads are superior

I like how Sebastian supported with multiple pieces of evidence

Sarah connected Romes contribution with roads and connected back to our society today so that she is sticking to the main idea of how Rome is influencing us

Everybody is reaching back and not forgetting what people said a couple times back and they can use there evidence to agree or disagree
Vito showed a situation that the military took over the government and and they took the power of influencing people so he circled back to the influential part

some people are talking to the group when expressing a point and when agreeing or disagreeing they talk to that person

# data[].attributes.body
The group had a good start with and evidence.
Good transitions into sentences and main ideas.
Agreeing and disagreeing causes new thoughts and opinions.
Supporting others ideas with more evidence.
Supporting their claim with modern day and olden day evidence.
No one in the group is interrupting the speaker.
They are all taking into consideration everyone's ideas and opinions.
The group needs to let others speak.
Good job including others into the conversation.
Good points from government.
Good points from roads.
I like how the group is including counterclaims.
Staying on topic.
Good job including others.
The group is staying on topic and sharing their perspective on the idea.
Talking politely.
Doing a good job using the two people talk before you talk again rule.
Everyone is making good points.
Good job listening then responding.
Strong evidence.
Good job taking the claim back to today's world.
Good comeback.
The group needs to source where their evidence comes from.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Bonnie, good job Sarah.

Good job backing up your claim with support Ruby and Chloe.

That is good information Sebastian

If people didn't have roads, they wouldn't be able to go anywhere.

Very nicely disagreeing and agreeing with what others are saying

Having strong evidence is important in this type of discussion

The people that are disagreeing have strong evidence.

No one is talking over each other, great job keeping you pace and letting everybody get a turn talking!

I agree with Ryan, this does let them get to battle quicker

good job agreeing and disagreeing

Everyone is talking, and letting them have their turn speaking

I feel that they started the discussion with not as strong of evidence, now that it is toward the end, there is greater and stronger evidence to rebuttal.

very strong evidence is being tossed around

They are repeating why roads are important

Good job Sebastian, good evidence to support your claim

Good rebuttal Chloe and ruby

Sarah has been having really good evidence so far

Jonathan has very strong evidence

Sarah is making a strong point

I like how sebastian answered sarahs question with his own evidence that he has found

I like how people are adding onto what people are saying with their own evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Good job using evidence to support your reasoning.

Chloe is doing a really good job with stating her claim and her main points.

Good job Ruby with citing your evidence.

Everyone is doing a nice job arguing polity without interrupting each other.

They all have strong rebuttals with evidence to prove their point.

Good job acknowledging counterclaims.

Their strong evidence helps prove their points.

Good job Chloe relating to modern times.

# data[].attributes.body
- Nobody is interrupting
- Mostly everybody has spoken
- Everybody is backing up their claim with evidence and their evidence with reasoning.
- Good job Jonathan for supporting that you think that the senate is the most important part of the government
- Good job Chloe for saying that you agree with Jonathan about the government being the most influential, but disagreeing by saying that you think the laws were the most important part of the government and supporting it with evidence.
- "No government, no army."  Why?
- Sebastian ended the conversation strongly

# data[].attributes.body
- The group did a nice job starting the conversation.
-People in the group are stating the most influential contribution clearly and with supporting evidence.
- People are making a friendly argument whether or not that Rome's roads and Rome's government is the most influential contribution.
-Sarah is doing a nice job connecting events from the past to what we do today in the future.
-People have respect for one another. When they disagree, they say why they disagree in a nice way. Also, when they disagree, they back their points up with evidence.
-People add on to other people's thinking with clear evidence.
-Good transition between Rome's roads and Rome's government. People in the group also use transition words like 'I want to add on..." and "I agree/disagree".
-People in the group ask questions that helps people who didn't speak that much talk about their opinion.
-Johnathan has done a great job making a possible prediction about Rome's government.
-People are citing their evidence with reliable sources.
-The argument that this group is having right now is like a ping-pong course because there is a very good transition between Rome's roads and government.
-Overall, the groups did a nice job with their meeting. The only thing though that the group needed to work on was their conclusion.
-Good job everyone!!!

# data[].attributes.body
- Good evidence and reasoning Chloe. You really supported your idea
- Great transition into another topic and why you feel that roads were the most influential contribution to today. Good job Sarah.
- Good job with sentence starters Nick and Chloe
- Good job everyone with supporting your ideas and why you feel it was important .
- Good job giving quotes and sources.
- Nice job reading off of your notes everyone.
- Polite agreements and disagreements
- Nice job, Nick, bringing people who haven't talked into the conversation.
- Nice job Sarah bringing in evidence from multiple sources
- very good job including others who haven't spoken Sarah
- great job getting right to the reasoning and evidence and not saying a lot before.
- nice job remembering things from texts that we have read before, Jack
-  Nice job asking clarifying questions Sarah.
- Good citations everyone
- Great job supporting your thoughts and ideas Johnathan.
- Amazing job leaving everyone thinking Sarah
- Great job everone

# data[].attributes.body
Great job chole starting the conversation and stating the essential question. Everyone's doing a great job stating their claim and supporting it with evidence. Great use of words everyone. Chole great job connecting our modern world.Good word choice ruby and very clear understanding.Good job making sure that people talk and trying to follow the three before me rule.great evidence shows clear understanding of subject.Good point sebastian. Very polite disagreeing with each other and backing up counterclaim with understandable evidence. Great job connecting subjects together. Great job talking politely. Good job helping other people speak and talk about different subjects.