# data[].attributes.body
I think its 1 because all of the information in the passage is true

# data[].attributes.body
I think it's 1 because all of the information is factual. The text doesn't say think or maybe.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the rating scale should be 2 . I think this because it says for 2 that the information is reliable. The information in this passage is almost all true. But it is not all true because there are some options mixed in if you analyze closely. It is mostly reliable. But you do not know if this passage is totally true. You might have to do some research on the passage . That is why I think the rating scale number should be 2.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the answer is 2 because the passages facts are not all true because there are some opinions mixed into the passage.

# data[].attributes.body
2 because there are some opinions in the passage and thoughts of the machine. Next, there are also facts which would make this passage not totally all opinions. Next, it tells precise facts. For example, the passage states that the Guillotin's first victim was Nicolas Jacques Pelletier. Overall, those are my three reasons why I picked number two on the BIAS rating scale.

# data[].attributes.body
2.beacuse there are some opinions  in the passage and some facts beacuse some facts
are not true.

# data[].attributes.body
1 because the author told everything correctly. He told word from word letter from letter s

# data[].attributes.body
2 because the information is somewhat true but we don't know unless we do some research.

# data[].attributes.body
1because it says EXACTLY who it was named after and the EXACT date like when it says 1772 and 1939 and Joseph Ignace Guillotine, And tobias Schmidt.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this should be rated a 2 because its neutral and it didn't tell the EXACT dates.
Also, some of the text is true but to find the EXACT answer we might have to do research.

# data[].attributes.body
I belive the rating should be a 2 because of the calm attitude but it still shows attitude, and it shows date. And criminals wouldn't feel pain.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is a 2 there is a neutral attitude and, it does state exact years. But, there still is a attitude and there still are some questions that are unknown. For example, when did the device end? Or, did the device ever not work? And more questions to be asked.

# data[].attributes.body
I think 2 because there isn't really a bias.  But then again there kinda is a favorable way it's written. There might be a bias because she said it benefited humanity,but also she say it was supposed to benefit humanity which also tells me she might think it doesn't so you could go both ways with this argument.  And it is kinda reliable because there was such thing as the guillotine.

# data[].attributes.body
2 becuase in the text it states a time periods which is 1789,1792,and 1939. It also talks about men in history. There is also facts in the text.

# data[].attributes.body
2 because it's back in the 1789 when they got their heads chopped off they  will get hurt this is accurate because it says the exact date and it's reliable because you don't know what it was like back then so it can be mostly true you have to trust the author it's informational too

# data[].attributes.body
2: because it's a fact that this topic was in 1789 and 1792. It is also 2 because it says mostly facts.

# data[].attributes.body
2 because there are more facts than opinions and the author is not on eather side.

# data[].attributes.body
2 because the criminals they might feel pain after there head  get chopped off. You don't know.

# data[].attributes.body
2
Beacuse the criminal doesn't any pain and the paragraph states that "it was used to take lives it was not generally veiwed as an instrument that benefitted humanity"
The statement is going on both sides.

# data[].attributes.body
2 because  the criminals did not feel anything when the head was chopped of there is