# data[].attributes.headline
PEER EVALUATION by David, Kiundy, Rian, Leo, 

# data[].attributes.subject
PEER EVALUATION by David, Kiundy, Rian, Leo, 

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1: Juling
A:6
D:6
Feedback:
have a complete understanding.

Group 3: Infinity Room
A:7
D:6
Feedback:

Group 4:
A:7
D:6
Feedback:

Group 2: open white mouth
A:6
D:6
Feedback:

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1: Juling
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback:
They give a great understanding of the art.
Group 3: Infinity Room
A: 7
D:5
Feedback:
Able to provide a good information, but need to put the references
Group 4:
A:7
D:6
Feedback:

Group 2: open white mouth
A:
D:
Feedback:

# data[].attributes.headline
PEER EVALUATION Auryn, Destha, Jessie, Hector

# data[].attributes.subject
PEER EVALUATION Auryn, Destha, Jessie, Hector

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1: Juling
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 3: Infinity Room
A: 6
D: 5
Feedback: Is able to provide clear information about the artist, but need to attach the source.

Group 2: Beetle Sphere
A:
D:
Feedback:

Group 5: ASEAN +
A:  4                                                              D:  3
Feedback:
Informations and understanding are still lacking, could have done a deeper research on both internal and external information.

# data[].attributes.headline
PEER EVALUATION Arcilla Tamara, Laras, Michael

# data[].attributes.subject
PEER EVALUATION Arcilla Tamara, Laras, Michael

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1: Juling
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback:

Group 2: Open white Mouth
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback:

Group 4: Beetle Sphere
A: 7
D: 6
Feedback:

Group 5: ASEAN +
A:
D:
Feedback:

# data[].attributes.headline
PEER EVALUATION Ruttia, Nadya, Tama, Noa

# data[].attributes.subject
PEER EVALUATION Ruttia, Nadya, Tama, Noa

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1: Juling
A: 7
D:7
Feedback:
They were able to give a clear understanding of the

Group 3: Infinity Room
A:7
D:7
Feedback:
The group provided detailed description of the artwork as well as the external

Group 4: beetlesphere
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback: They outlined the internal and the external information and presented

Group 5: ASEAN +
A: 5
D: 4
Feedback:
They provide substantial information, and they have substantial understanding and knowledge towards their artwork. They should provide more internal and external information. They have a simple description/explanation towards their artwork

# data[].attributes.body
Group 2: Open White Mouth
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback: They outlined the internal and the external information and presented it with structured and organized language. However, the judgement is lack of theory or comparison with other works.

Group 3: Infinity Room
A: 7
D: 7
Feedback:
Very detailed description about the artwork. It is interesting about how the artist created her work and it was explained through an interview. Overall, we think that this art critique is well-composed.

Group 4: A Father is Trying to Collect the Memory of His Own Family
A: 8
D: 8
Feedback: This group included a detailed explanation on the internal and external information of the piece, using inclusive terminologies and provided an extensive understanding of the artwork in the context. They have also provided a comprehensive judgement of this artwork with another artwork that is under the same theme; art and society, which picks up the theme of the communism and dictatorship era. The interpretation is also considered complete because this group has judged on the artwork because they have also connected this artwork with real life events.

Group 5: ASEAN +
A: 4
D: 5
Feedback:
More accuracy in terms of content and significant relationship between subject matters and the rest of artistic components, and lack of knowledge and sources about the artwork. (ASEAN)

# data[].attributes.body
0 | The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.
1 — 2
The student demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of the artwork, limited use of subject-specific terminology, demonstrates limited understanding of the role of the artwork in original context.
3 — 4
The student demonstrates adequate knowledge and understanding of the artwork, adequate use of subject-specific terminology, demonstrates adequate understanding of the role of the artwork in original context.
5 — 6
The student demonstrates substantial knowledge and understanding of the artwork, substantial use of subject-specific terminology, demonstrates substantial understanding of the role of the artwork in original context.
7 — 8
The student demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of the artwork, excellent use of subject-specific terminology, demonstrates excellent understanding of the role of the artwork in original context.

# data[].attributes.body
0 | The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.
1 — 2
+incomplete description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) and external information (contextual understanding)
+simple Interpretation based on some of the information
+no Judgement
3 — 4
+simple description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) and external information (contextual understanding)
+simple Interpretation based on some of the information
+Judgement (based on personal opinion)
5 — 6
+Description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) and external information (contextual understanding)
+Interpretation based on the information
+Judgement (based on standard, convention, theory, or comparison with other artwork)
7 — 8
+Detailed description of internal information of the artwork (subject matter, medium, and form) and external information (contextual understanding)
+Comprehensive Interpretation based on the information
+Judgement (based on relevant standard, convention, theory, Or comparison with other artwork)

# data[].attributes.body
Each group will try to evaluate the other 5 groups using the Task Specific Clarification.
Each group will also give feedbacks.

# data[].attributes.body
To make sure everyone would get the grade as fair as possible,
Each one of you will write the evaluation of the whole process INDIVIDUALLY (click the link below):
1. Each group member's contribution in percentage.
(for example: Kania 20%, Tania 10%, Zania 30%, Sania 20%, Rania 20%, = total 100%. Note: This is confidential, between each one of you and ibu Kania )
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1zaGy8WOZl-HTwVremryDo-oVHFN-iYEgkgj8mbzPuKg/edit