# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Genesis and the Nature of God as Creator

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Saint Augustine- Introduction St. Augustine (AD 354-430), who lived mostly in North Africa in what is now Algeria, was the most influential theologian of both the ancient patristic and later medieval church (two periods in church history that met during his lifetime). More than a millennium later, he was a major resource for the Protestant Reformers, and today he continues to influence people from many different denominations and cultural backgrounds.

Yet, in recent years, questions have arisen concerning the nature of Augustine's Christianity. As medieval scholar Etienne Gilson has noted, "A great deal of discussion has raged over the testimony of the Confessions [Augustine's autobiography], some considering that Augustine was converted to Neoplatonism rather than to Christianity, others that his conversion was genuinely Christian." ¹

What are we to make of this? Was this great spiritual leader truly converted to Christ, or was he converted to what might be labeled in academic jargon a Neoplatonic monistic mysticism? By this is meant an outlook based on the Greek philosopher Plato as interpreted by Plotinus, who taught in Rome (AD 245-270). Plotinus's Neoplatonism considered God and creation simply as one great unity (monism), not known through the revelation of Scripture, but through personal introspection and an experience of mystical union with the One (mysticism). The implications are profound, especially when we consider the growing influence of the non-Christian alternative. The increasingly popular Eastern mysticism of Hinduism and Buddhism runs along those lines, as does the widely influential New Age movement, which, in Shirley MacLaine's words, would have everyone believe, "You are God."

Illustrating the relevance of this issue, a student in my course on Augustine had considered herself a Christian although she was in fact a pantheist, believing that God was incarnate in everyone, not just in Jesus. During a lecture based on an early draft of this article, she came to realize that she had not been a Christian at all, but was, indeed, a monistic mystic. In her seminar report to the class, she marked that lecture as the occasion of her conversion to the incarnate Christ as her Savior!

Saint Augustine- Early BeliefsTo pursue these concerns, we need to go back to Augustine's youth, when for several years he had been involved in Manicheism. This was an ancient religion from Persia that accounted for all the world's disharmony in terms of an eternal struggle between physical light and darkness. After several years as an adherent of the Manichean religion, Augustine read the writings of Neoplatonists such as Plotinus. That philosophy helped him move beyond the materialism of Manicheism. Then, at the age of 32, Augustine embraced Jesus Christ, whom he professed to serve the rest of his life as a pastor and writer. 2

For answers to the role of Neoplatonic and Christian ideas in Augustine's mature views, we turn to the Confessions, the classic account of his conversion, written when he was 43-47 years old. Here lies the key to Augustine's concept of (1) God, (2) evil, (3) the Logos, or divine Word, and (4) spirituality. A comparison of Augustine's beliefs with Neoplatonic mysticism will help in evaluating the assertions of many historians and biblical scholars who regard him a Neoplatonic mystic. A closer look at Augustine's faith will also help those who - like my above mentioned student - seek to clarify the object of their own faith.
Saint Augustine and GOD
According to Augustine's own account, from his youth onward he was driven by a quest for true wisdom. When the young Augustine read Cicero's Hortensius, it "stimulated, and enkindled, and inflamed to love, seek, obtain, hold, and embrace, not this or that sect, but wisdom itself . . . ." 3 Hungering for wisdom (Latin sapientia, changeless truth), he turned to the Manichees and "they instead of Thee, [O God,] served up the sun and the moon, beautiful works of Thine, but yet Thy works, not Thyself." 4 Fed on the husks of materialistic fantasies Augustine could not understand how ultimate reality (God) could be spirit. "Nearly nine years passed in which I wallowed in the slime of that deep pit and the darkness of falsehood, striving often to rise, but being all the more heavily dashed down." 5

After hearing Ambrose, the great bishop of Milan, preach, Augustine came to realize that the Christian faith did not hold, as Manicheans had supposed, that God was bounded by human form. He blushed that for so many years he had "barked" at a straw man. But, "what was the nature of a spiritual substance I had not the faintest or dimmest suspicion." ⁶ Although he now did not think of God in a human body, he "could not avoid a concept of something corporeal in space, either infused into the world, or infinitely diffused beyond it." ⁷ However, he was given certain books of the Platonists, and through them was able to ascend "from bodies to the soul . . . on to the reasoning faculty . . . And thus, with the flash of a trembling glance . . . saw Thy invisible things." ⁸ In the judgment of Whitney J. Oates, "The Platonic tradition [of the new Academy of Plotinus] unquestionably prepared the way for him to accept and realize the meaning of Christianity's doctrine of God as Spirit." ⁹

From Plotinus, however, Augustine learned to think of God as "a transcendent absolute principle" about which no positive attribute derived from human experience can be asserted. ¹⁰ "The Absolute is none of the things of which it is the source. Its nature is that nothing can be affirmed of it - not existence, not essence, not life - since it is that which transcends all these . . . Once you have uttered 'Good,' add no further thought to it: by any addition . . . you introduce a deficiency." ¹¹

But later as a Christian, Augustine "does not follow Plotinus in ascribing to God such complete transcendence as would remove him from contact with human experience and render theology impotent to assign his attributes." ¹² Once converted, Augustine turned to the personal, living, and active divine Spirit, a major step beyond Neoplatonism. He discovered that the God who has revealed Himself in Scripture is not indescribable. Augustine learned to preach and write of God's attributes, such as His holy love. He knew that God loved him and forgave his sins. Augustine's frequent prayers express his deep affection for the One who was not only transcendent, but knowable, describable, and active in his transformed life. "Thou awakest us to delight in Thy praise; for Thou madest us for Thyself, and our heart is restless, until it repose in Thee." ¹³
Saint Augustine and EVIL
In the stormy period before Augustine's conversion, the problem of evil greatly perplexed him. The adolescent became aware of his unjustifiable maliciousness. He stole pears, for example, not because he was hungry or to give to the starving, but just to be sinful. As a Manichean materialist, he blamed his sexual immoralities on a "sort of substance possessed of its own foul and misshapen mass." 14 Influenced by Neoplatonists, he came to think that everything emanated from God, like light rays from the sun. Evil, then, became "no substance at all but simply a defection in substance. Evil had no being whatever apart from good, for all things are good in so far as they exist." ¹⁵ Consequently, he dismissed his sins as unreal appearances, much like Christian Scientists do today.

But when he became a Christian his world view began with creation rather than with emanation. "I perceived, therefore, and it was made clear to me, that Thou didst make all things good, nor is there any substance at all that was not made by Thee." ¹⁶ Analyzing his own moral conflicts, he realized that evil was far more than privation of good. It was "a perversion of the will, bent aside from Thee, O God." ¹⁷ "Because of a perverse will was lust made; and lust indulged in became custom; and custom not resisted became necessity." ¹⁸ So his habitual selfish choices strengthened an already evil nature. Holding now that evil was not mere privation of good but a responsible choice to disobey the Creator, he had taken a second major step beyond Neoplatonism. ¹⁹

Given such a radically different view of evil, we would expect a convert to Christ to sense a radically different prescription for its cure. Neoplatonists thought they emanated from God like light rays from the sun, and they imagined they could reverse that impersonal process by thinking. They tried to alter their consciousness of themselves from that of a finite body to an individual soul. Next they had to convince themselves they were one with the world soul (something like psychologist Carl Jung's collective unconscious). Finally, the spiritually elite imagined that they could achieve a mystical experience of unity with the Good. ²⁰

Augustine discovered experientially and biblically that his problem was more than one of knowledge (Greek gnosis) or wrong thinking. His affections and will also reacted against what God knew, loved, and willed. He realized that he could not by his own thinking transform the depravity of his own nature, overcome his estrangement from God, or remove his verdict of guilt before God's justice. Coming to his senses, the prodigal son realized his need for help from above.
Saint Augustine and THE LOGOS
In contrast to the meaninglessness of a Manichean world view, Neoplatonic philosophy supplied an important step in Augustine's understanding of life's ultimate significance. In the Platonic writings he read - not in the same words, but to the same effect - that the logos (Greek for "Word") was eternal with God, the unchanging source of all being, the light that lightens every one coming into the world. He found Plato's world of ideas in the Christian Logos (John 1:1-3) with one glaring exception - the Platonic logos did not become incarnate (1:14)! ²¹ Although the Platonic mystics had discovered the forms (changeless patterns or blueprints) of particular kinds of things, they had detected neither God's hand in history nor His gracious plan of salvation.

Nowhere did Augustine read in those books that the eternal logos became flesh (John 1:14) so that sinners might become children of God (1:12). Only from biblically informed Christians did he learn that Jesus humbled Himself to death for the ungodly, forgiving all their sins, and saying, "Learn of me, for I am meek and lowly in heart" (Matt. 11:29). By missing the historical incarnation of the Messiah and His death for our sins, Plotinus had ignored the ground of hope for people struggling personally with the problem of moral evil.

Moreover, Plotinus so despised matter that he would not even mention his conception, birthday, or parents! For such unearthly mystics the historical life of Christ may have seemed unimportant or repugnant. But the believing Augustine took a giant step beyond their mysticism when he gloried in the miraculous, once-for-all historical conception and birth of Jesus the Messiah. 22 Had Augustine been converted to Neoplatonism rather than to Christ, he would never have written his autobiographical Confessions and philosophy of history, The City of God.

An individual life for a Neoplatonist was of negligible value and had no lasting purpose. For the Christian Augustine, the struggle of one solitary person with intellectual and moral issues has significance for time and eternity.
Saint Augustine and SPIRITUALITY
Having dispensed with corporeal views of God and evil and having glimpsed the invisible Creator and Redeemer in a spiritual manner, Augustine confesses, "I sought a way of acquiring sufficient strength to enjoy Thee; but I found it not until I embraced that Mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus." ²³ Assured that God existed as the infinite, immutable source of all things, he was too weak to enjoy Him. 24 Although a successful professor of rhetoric, his life amounted to "longing for honors, gains and wedlock." At 30 he suffered increasing anxiety, a silent trembling, a loathing of self, an internal war. Inwardly consumed and confounded, he wrote, "I became to myself an unfruitful land" ²⁵ - a figure significant for T. S. Eliot in his poem "The Wasteland."

When Augustine cried, "What shall a wretched man do?" he found no solace in mystical philosophy. "This those writings contain not. Those pages contain not the expression of this piety - the tears of confession, Thy sacrifice, a troubled spirit, a broken and contrite heart, the salvation of the people, the espoused city, the earnest of the Holy Ghost, the cup of our redemption. No man sings there." ²⁶

Gilson eloquently points up Neoplatonic spirituality's impotence:

That Plotinus should advise us to rise above sense, to rule our passions, and to adhere to God, that is all well and good! But will Plotinus give us the strength to follow this excellent advice? And what does it avail to know the good without power to put it into practice? What kind of physician is this who recommends health, and knows neither the nature of the illness nor the name of the remedy? What really completed the conversion of St. Augustine was the perusal of St. Paul and the revelation of grace: 'For the law of the spirit of life in Jesus Christ freed me,' he argues, 'from the law of sin and death.' It was not an intellect that agonized in the night in the garden of Cassiciacum: it was a man. ²⁷

In conclusion, Neoplatonism helped the perceptive Augustine move away from a secular world view in four ways. But in becoming a Christian he went well beyond the four areas of monistic mysticism that we have reviewed. His teaching is unmistakably Christian concerning (1) the ultimate Reality's personal nature, (2) sin as perversion of the will, (3) the once-for-all incarnation and atonement, and (4) the need for grace-filled, authentic spirituality beginning with regeneration from above, a supernatural transformation of nature from the inside out.

New Age, Eastern, and liberal Christian monistic mysticisms have helped many to move beyond a simply physical or secular world view. But they are not a permanent answer to the human quest for the Transcendent. Augustine noted that seekers of great acuteness and ability in the school of Plotinus either "were corrupted by curious inquiries into magic" or "passed into the service of Christ." 28

If, like Augustine, we would avoid such deceptions, we need to know, love, and follow the eternal Logos incarnate on earth - Jesus of Nazareth, whom we know from the pages of the Bible. As the Evangelist John puts it in his second letter, "Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. . . . Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son" (2 John 7-9). Gordon R. Lewis is senior professor of Theology and Philosophy at Denver Seminary.
NOTES
¹Etienne Gilson, The Spirit of Medieval Philosophy (London: Sheed and Ward, 1950), 29. ²For a more chronological, popular account of Augustine's conversion, consult my "See Yourself in Augustine," Collegiate Challenge, May-June 1962, 8-9. Also read Augustine's classic Confessions for yourself! ³Augustine, Confessions book 3, section 4, in The Basic Writings of St. Augustine, Whitney J. Oates, ed., 2 vols. (New York: Random House, 1948), 32. All other citations from the Confessions are from this source. ⁴Ibid., 3, 6, 33. ⁵Ibid., 3, 11, 40. ⁶Ibid., 6, 3, 76. ⁷Ibid., 7, 1, 91. ⁸Ibid., 7, 17, 105. ⁹Ibid., from Oates's Introduction, xvi-xvii. ¹⁰Edwin A. Burtt, Types of Religious Philosophy (New York: Harper, 1939), 66. ¹¹Plotinus, Ennead III, 8-10; cited by W. J. Sparrow Simpson, St. Augustine's Conversion (New York: Macmillan, 1930), 51. ¹²Burtt, Types, 78. ¹³Augustine,1,1, 7. ¹⁴Ibid., 5, 10, 69. ¹⁵Roy W. Battenhouse, ed., A Companion to the Study of St. Augustine (New York: Oxford, 1955), 30. ¹⁶Augustine, 7, 12, 102. ¹⁷Ibid., 7, 16, 104. ¹⁸Ibid., 7, 5, 116. ¹⁹For a contemporary look at Augustinian doctrines of sin and salvation, see Gordon R. Lewis and Bruce A. Demarest, Integrative Theology, 3 vols. in 1(Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 2:205-43. ²⁰Frederick Copleston, A History of Philosophy: Greece and Rome,vol. 1 (Westminster, MD: The Newman Press, 1953), 464-75. Note the similarities to Anthony Campbell's Seven States of Consciousness: A Vision of Possibilities Suggested by the Teaching of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (New York: Harper and Row, 1974), 91-92. ²¹Augustine, 7, 9, 99. ²²For more on Augustine's classical view of faith and reason, see G. R. Lewis, "Faith and History in Augustine," Trinity Theological Journal 1,3 (NS 1982), 39-50 and "Faith and Reason in the Thought of St. Augustine," unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse University, 1959. ²³Ibid., 7, 18, 105. ²⁴Ibid., 7, 20, 107. ²⁵Ibid., 8, 5-7; 116-20. For clarification of his relation to existentialism see G. R. Lewis, "Augustine and Existentialism," Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 8,1 (Winter 1965): 13-22. ²⁶Augustine, 7, 21, 108. ²⁷Gilson, 30. ²⁸Augustine, "Letter CXVIII [118]," 3, 17 in St. Augustine, vol. 1, Philip Schaff, ed., Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1956), 450.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Saint Augustine - Christian Research Institute

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Saint Augustine- IntroductionSt. Augustine (AD 354-430), who lived mostly in North Africa in what is now Algeria, was the most influential theologian of both the ancient patristic and later medieval church (two periods in church history that met during his lifetime). More than a millennium later, he was a major resource for the Protestant Reformers, ...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Saint Augustine- Introduction St. Augustine (AD 354-430), who lived mostly in North Africa in what is now Algeria, was the most influential theologian of both the ancient patristic and later medieval church (two periods in church history that met during his lifetime). More than a millennium later, he was a major resource for the Protestant Reformers, and today he continues to influence people from many different denominations and cultural backgrounds.

Yet, in recent years, questions have arisen concerning the nature of Augustine's Christianity. As medieval scholar Etienne Gilson has noted, "A great deal of discussion has raged over the testimony of the Confessions [Augustine's autobiography], some considering that Augustine was converted to Neoplatonism rather than to Christianity, others that his conversion was genuinely Christian." ¹

What are we to make of this? Was this great spiritual leader truly converted to Christ, or was he converted to what might be labeled in academic jargon a Neoplatonic monistic mysticism? By this is meant an outlook based on the Greek philosopher Plato as interpreted by Plotinus, who taught in Rome (AD 245-270). Plotinus's Neoplatonism considered God and creation simply as one great unity (monism), not known through the revelation of Scripture, but through personal introspection and an experience of mystical union with the One (mysticism). The implications are profound, especially when we consider the growing influence of the non-Christian alternative. The increasingly popular Eastern mysticism of Hinduism and Buddhism runs along those lines, as does the widely influential New Age movement, which, in Shirley MacLaine's words, would have everyone believe, "You are God."

Illustrating the relevance of this issue, a student in my course on Augustine had considered herself a Christian although she was in fact a pantheist, believing that God was incarnate in everyone, not just in Jesus. During a lecture based on an early draft of this article, she came to realize that she had not been a Christian at all, but was, indeed, a monistic mystic. In her seminar report to the class, she marked that lecture as the occasion of her conversion to the incarnate Christ as her Savior!

Saint Augustine- Early BeliefsTo pursue these concerns, we need to go back to Augustine's youth, when for several years he had been involved in Manicheism. This was an ancient religion from Persia that accounted for all the world's disharmony in terms of an eternal struggle between physical light and darkness. After several years as an adherent of the Manichean religion, Augustine read the writings of Neoplatonists such as Plotinus. That philosophy helped him move beyond the materialism of Manicheism. Then, at the age of 32, Augustine embraced Jesus Christ, whom he professed to serve the rest of his life as a pastor and writer. 2

For answers to the role of Neoplatonic and Christian ideas in Augustine's mature views, we turn to the Confessions, the classic account of his conversion, written when he was 43-47 years old. Here lies the key to Augustine's concept of (1) God, (2) evil, (3) the Logos, or divine Word, and (4) spirituality. A comparison of Augustine's beliefs with Neoplatonic mysticism will help in evaluating the assertions of many historians and biblical scholars who regard him a Neoplatonic mystic. A closer look at Augustine's faith will also help those who - like my above mentioned student - seek to clarify the object of their own faith.
Saint Augustine and GOD
According to Augustine's own account, from his youth onward he was driven by a quest for true wisdom. When the young Augustine read Cicero's Hortensius, it "stimulated, and enkindled, and inflamed to love, seek, obtain, hold, and embrace, not this or that sect, but wisdom itself . . . ." 3 Hungering for wisdom (Latin sapientia, changeless truth), he turned to the Manichees and "they instead of Thee, [O God,] served up the sun and the moon, beautiful works of Thine, but yet Thy works, not Thyself." 4 Fed on the husks of materialistic fantasies Augustine could not understand how ultimate reality (God) could be spirit. "Nearly nine years passed in which I wallowed in the slime of that deep pit and the darkness of falsehood, striving often to rise, but being all the more heavily dashed down." 5

After hearing Ambrose, the great bishop of Milan, preach, Augustine came to realize that the Christian faith did not hold, as Manicheans had supposed, that God was bounded by human form. He blushed that for so many years he had "barked" at a straw man. But, "what was the nature of a spiritual substance I had not the faintest or dimmest suspicion." ⁶ Although he now did not think of God in a human body, he "could not avoid a concept of something corporeal in space, either infused into the world, or infinitely diffused beyond it." ⁷ However, he was given certain books of the Platonists, and through them was able to ascend "from bodies to the soul . . . on to the reasoning faculty . . . And thus, with the flash of a trembling glance . . . saw Thy invisible things." ⁸ In the judgment of Whitney J. Oates, "The Platonic tradition [of the new Academy of Plotinus] unquestionably prepared the way for him to accept and realize the meaning of Christianity's doctrine of God as Spirit." ⁹

From Plotinus, however, Augustine learned to think of God as "a transcendent absolute principle" about which no positive attribute derived from human experience can be asserted. ¹⁰ "The Absolute is none of the things of which it is the source. Its nature is that nothing can be affirmed of it - not existence, not essence, not life - since it is that which transcends all these . . . Once you have uttered 'Good,' add no further thought to it: by any addition . . . you introduce a deficiency." ¹¹

But later as a Christian, Augustine "does not follow Plotinus in ascribing to God such complete transcendence as would remove him from contact with human experience and render theology impotent to assign his attributes." ¹² Once converted, Augustine turned to the personal, living, and active divine Spirit, a major step beyond Neoplatonism. He discovered that the God who has revealed Himself in Scripture is not indescribable. Augustine learned to preach and write of God's attributes, such as His holy love. He knew that God loved him and forgave his sins. Augustine's frequent prayers express his deep affection for the One who was not only transcendent, but knowable, describable, and active in his transformed life. "Thou awakest us to delight in Thy praise; for Thou madest us for Thyself, and our heart is restless, until it repose in Thee." ¹³
Saint Augustine and EVIL
In the stormy period before Augustine's conversion, the problem of evil greatly perplexed him. The adolescent became aware of his unjustifiable maliciousness. He stole pears, for example, not because he was hungry or to give to the starving, but just to be sinful. As a Manichean materialist, he blamed his sexual immoralities on a "sort of substance possessed of its own foul and misshapen mass." 14 Influenced by Neoplatonists, he came to think that everything emanated from God, like light rays from the sun. Evil, then, became "no substance at all but simply a defection in substance. Evil had no being whatever apart from good, for all things are good in so far as they exist." ¹⁵ Consequently, he dismissed his sins as unreal appearances, much like Christian Scientists do today.

But when he became a Christian his world view began with creation rather than with emanation. "I perceived, therefore, and it was made clear to me, that Thou didst make all things good, nor is there any substance at all that was not made by Thee." ¹⁶ Analyzing his own moral conflicts, he realized that evil was far more than privation of good. It was "a perversion of the will, bent aside from Thee, O God." ¹⁷ "Because of a perverse will was lust made; and lust indulged in became custom; and custom not resisted became necessity." ¹⁸ So his habitual selfish choices strengthened an already evil nature. Holding now that evil was not mere privation of good but a responsible choice to disobey the Creator, he had taken a second major step beyond Neoplatonism. ¹⁹

Given such a radically different view of evil, we would expect a convert to Christ to sense a radically different prescription for its cure. Neoplatonists thought they emanated from God like light rays from the sun, and they imagined they could reverse that impersonal process by thinking. They tried to alter their consciousness of themselves from that of a finite body to an individual soul. Next they had to convince themselves they were one with the world soul (something like psychologist Carl Jung's collective unconscious). Finally, the spiritually elite imagined that they could achieve a mystical experience of unity with the Good. ²⁰

Augustine discovered experientially and biblically that his problem was more than one of knowledge (Greek gnosis) or wrong thinking. His affections and will also reacted against what God knew, loved, and willed. He realized that he could not by his own thinking transform the depravity of his own nature, overcome his estrangement from God, or remove his verdict of guilt before God's justice. Coming to his senses, the prodigal son realized his need for help from above.
Saint Augustine and THE LOGOS
In contrast to the meaninglessness of a Manichean world view, Neoplatonic philosophy supplied an important step in Augustine's understanding of life's ultimate significance. In the Platonic writings he read - not in the same words, but to the same effect - that the logos (Greek for "Word") was eternal with God, the unchanging source of all being, the light that lightens every one coming into the world. He found Plato's world of ideas in the Christian Logos (John 1:1-3) with one glaring exception - the Platonic logos did not become incarnate (1:14)! ²¹ Although the Platonic mystics had discovered the forms (changeless patterns or blueprints) of particular kinds of things, they had detected neither God's hand in history nor His gracious plan of salvation.

Nowhere did Augustine read in those books that the eternal logos became flesh (John 1:14) so that sinners might become children of God (1:12). Only from biblically informed Christians did he learn that Jesus humbled Himself to death for the ungodly, forgiving all their sins, and saying, "Learn of me, for I am meek and lowly in heart" (Matt. 11:29). By missing the historical incarnation of the Messiah and His death for our sins, Plotinus had ignored the ground of hope for people struggling personally with the problem of moral evil.

Moreover, Plotinus so despised matter that he would not even mention his conception, birthday, or parents! For such unearthly mystics the historical life of Christ may have seemed unimportant or repugnant. But the believing Augustine took a giant step beyond their mysticism when he gloried in the miraculous, once-for-all historical conception and birth of Jesus the Messiah. 22 Had Augustine been converted to Neoplatonism rather than to Christ, he would never have written his autobiographical Confessions and philosophy of history, The City of God.

An individual life for a Neoplatonist was of negligible value and had no lasting purpose. For the Christian Augustine, the struggle of one solitary person with intellectual and moral issues has significance for time and eternity.
Saint Augustine and SPIRITUALITY
Having dispensed with corporeal views of God and evil and having glimpsed the invisible Creator and Redeemer in a spiritual manner, Augustine confesses, "I sought a way of acquiring sufficient strength to enjoy Thee; but I found it not until I embraced that Mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus." ²³ Assured that God existed as the infinite, immutable source of all things, he was too weak to enjoy Him. 24 Although a successful professor of rhetoric, his life amounted to "longing for honors, gains and wedlock." At 30 he suffered increasing anxiety, a silent trembling, a loathing of self, an internal war. Inwardly consumed and confounded, he wrote, "I became to myself an unfruitful land" ²⁵ - a figure significant for T. S. Eliot in his poem "The Wasteland."

When Augustine cried, "What shall a wretched man do?" he found no solace in mystical philosophy. "This those writings contain not. Those pages contain not the expression of this piety - the tears of confession, Thy sacrifice, a troubled spirit, a broken and contrite heart, the salvation of the people, the espoused city, the earnest of the Holy Ghost, the cup of our redemption. No man sings there." ²⁶

Gilson eloquently points up Neoplatonic spirituality's impotence:

That Plotinus should advise us to rise above sense, to rule our passions, and to adhere to God, that is all well and good! But will Plotinus give us the strength to follow this excellent advice? And what does it avail to know the good without power to put it into practice? What kind of physician is this who recommends health, and knows neither the nature of the illness nor the name of the remedy? What really completed the conversion of St. Augustine was the perusal of St. Paul and the revelation of grace: 'For the law of the spirit of life in Jesus Christ freed me,' he argues, 'from the law of sin and death.' It was not an intellect that agonized in the night in the garden of Cassiciacum: it was a man. ²⁷

In conclusion, Neoplatonism helped the perceptive Augustine move away from a secular world view in four ways. But in becoming a Christian he went well beyond the four areas of monistic mysticism that we have reviewed. His teaching is unmistakably Christian concerning (1) the ultimate Reality's personal nature, (2) sin as perversion of the will, (3) the once-for-all incarnation and atonement, and (4) the need for grace-filled, authentic spirituality beginning with regeneration from above, a supernatural transformation of nature from the inside out.

New Age, Eastern, and liberal Christian monistic mysticisms have helped many to move beyond a simply physical or secular world view. But they are not a permanent answer to the human quest for the Transcendent. Augustine noted that seekers of great acuteness and ability in the school of Plotinus either "were corrupted by curious inquiries into magic" or "passed into the service of Christ." 28

If, like Augustine, we would avoid such deceptions, we need to know, love, and follow the eternal Logos incarnate on earth - Jesus of Nazareth, whom we know from the pages of the Bible. As the Evangelist John puts it in his second letter, "Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. . . . Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son" (2 John 7-9). Gordon R. Lewis is senior professor of Theology and Philosophy at Denver Seminary.
NOTES
¹Etienne Gilson, The Spirit of Medieval Philosophy (London: Sheed and Ward, 1950), 29. ²For a more chronological, popular account of Augustine's conversion, consult my "See Yourself in Augustine," Collegiate Challenge, May-June 1962, 8-9. Also read Augustine's classic Confessions for yourself! ³Augustine, Confessions book 3, section 4, in The Basic Writings of St. Augustine, Whitney J. Oates, ed., 2 vols. (New York: Random House, 1948), 32. All other citations from the Confessions are from this source. ⁴Ibid., 3, 6, 33. ⁵Ibid., 3, 11, 40. ⁶Ibid., 6, 3, 76. ⁷Ibid., 7, 1, 91. ⁸Ibid., 7, 17, 105. ⁹Ibid., from Oates's Introduction, xvi-xvii. ¹⁰Edwin A. Burtt, Types of Religious Philosophy (New York: Harper, 1939), 66. ¹¹Plotinus, Ennead III, 8-10; cited by W. J. Sparrow Simpson, St. Augustine's Conversion (New York: Macmillan, 1930), 51. ¹²Burtt, Types, 78. ¹³Augustine,1,1, 7. ¹⁴Ibid., 5, 10, 69. ¹⁵Roy W. Battenhouse, ed., A Companion to the Study of St. Augustine (New York: Oxford, 1955), 30. ¹⁶Augustine, 7, 12, 102. ¹⁷Ibid., 7, 16, 104. ¹⁸Ibid., 7, 5, 116. ¹⁹For a contemporary look at Augustinian doctrines of sin and salvation, see Gordon R. Lewis and Bruce A. Demarest, Integrative Theology, 3 vols. in 1(Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 2:205-43. ²⁰Frederick Copleston, A History of Philosophy: Greece and Rome,vol. 1 (Westminster, MD: The Newman Press, 1953), 464-75. Note the similarities to Anthony Campbell's Seven States of Consciousness: A Vision of Possibilities Suggested by the Teaching of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (New York: Harper and Row, 1974), 91-92. ²¹Augustine, 7, 9, 99. ²²For more on Augustine's classical view of faith and reason, see G. R. Lewis, "Faith and History in Augustine," Trinity Theological Journal 1,3 (NS 1982), 39-50 and "Faith and Reason in the Thought of St. Augustine," unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse University, 1959. ²³Ibid., 7, 18, 105. ²⁴Ibid., 7, 20, 107. ²⁵Ibid., 8, 5-7; 116-20. For clarification of his relation to existentialism see G. R. Lewis, "Augustine and Existentialism," Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 8,1 (Winter 1965): 13-22. ²⁶Augustine, 7, 21, 108. ²⁷Gilson, 30. ²⁸Augustine, "Letter CXVIII [118]," 3, 17 in St. Augustine, vol. 1, Philip Schaff, ed., Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1956), 450.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Saint Augustine - Christian Research Institute

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Saint Augustine- IntroductionSt. Augustine (AD 354-430), who lived mostly in North Africa in what is now Algeria, was the most influential theologian of both the ancient patristic and later medieval church (two periods in church history that met during his lifetime). More than a millennium later, he was a major resource for the Protestant Reformers, ...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This is an extract/demonstration from a larger project.Please follow the link below to find out more. http://www.stjohnstimeline.co.uk/ note:some of our extracts loose sound but continue to play as a taster to further content

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO  PART 2  BY JANET SOSKICE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This is an extract/demonstration from a larger project.Please follow the link below to find out more. http://www.stjohnstimeline.co.uk/ note:some of our extracts loose sound but continue to play as a taster to further content

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MS Paint Philosophy: Martin Buber - I and Thou

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
An MS Paint Philosophy on the topic of Martin Buber's I and Thou. The entire video is created using graphics created in MS Paint and images which are in the public domain.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Is God Like?: Crash Course Philosophy #12

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christianity is one of the three major monotheistic world religions. Like Jews and Muslims, Christians believe one God who created the world and takes an interest in the humans who inhabit it.

This article explores what Christians believe about the characteristics and nature of God. The major theological belief that Jews and Muslims do not share - the doctrine of the Trinity - is explored in a separate article.

God in the New Testament

The authors of the New Testament took for granted the existence of the God of the Old Testament. They believed in Yahweh, "the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob," whom the Jews worshipped as the one true God (Ac 13:32; Ro 3:29, 4:3).

Like the Old Testament, the New Testament teaches:

there is only one God (Mk 12:29; Eph 4:6; Jas 2:19)

God is pure spirit (Jn 4:24; 1 Jn 4:12)

God is the creator of the world (1 Ti 4:4; Heb 3:4)

God is holy and good (Ro 3:4; Eph 4:24; Rev 4:8)

God is all-powerful (Mt 19:26; Mk 2:7, 10:18)

God is worthy of mankind's worship and love (Mt 6:24; Mk 11:22; Lk 2:14)

God expects ethical behavior (Jn 6:29; Ac 8:21, 24:16; 2 Co 9:7; 1 Th 4:9; Jas 1:27; 1 Jn 3:9)

God will judge wrongdoers (Ro 2:16, 3:19)

The New Testament especially emphasizes God's love for the world and his desire to save all people (Jn 3:16; Ro 5:5,5:8; Php 4:191 Jn 4:7-9).

Where the New Testament differs from the Old Testament in its teachings about God is in its proclamation that God has chosen to reveal himself to mankind through Jesus Christ.

Especially in the Gospel of John, it is emphasized that Jesus alone knows the Father completely and he came to help humans know God ("the Father") better:

John 3:35 - "The Father loves the Son and has placed everything in his hands." (John the Baptist)

John 7:16: "My teaching is not my own. It comes from him who sent me."

John 14:9-10: Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father?' Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me?"

Romans 1:17: "For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed."

God in Early Christian Theology

The early church fathers made extensive use of reason and philosophy in their attempt to defend Christianity in the cultured world around them. Justin Martyr emphasized the ineffability, omnipotence and impassibility of God, while Athenagoras and Theophilus focused on God's simplicity, indivisibility and universal providence.

Irenaeus developed his doctrine of God in reaction against the Gnostics, and thus emphasized the self-sufficiency and perfection of the one God. By the time of the Council of Nicea, that the bible taught that the chief divine attributes of God as eternity, immutability, omniscience and omnipotence were undisputed by all Christians.

A Personal God

The Christian God is a personal God. This does not mean that God is a human being, but that God has "personality" and the capability of both relationships with other personal beings. This is seen clearly in both the Old and New Testaments, in which God is described in strongly personal terms (father, shepherd, etc.) and establishes relationships with human beings.

In this belief, Christianity is like Judaism and Islam but very different from deism or the theism of Greek philosophy. In the latter systems, God is an impersonal force that causes the world to exist but does not interact with it.

Is the Christian God Masculine?

Throughout the Christian Bible, masculine language is used to refer to God. The Greek word for God ( theos), the pronouns used to refer to God, and most analogies used to describe God are masculine. But it has never been a part of Christian doctrine that God is male, or that God has gender at all.

In Genesis 1:27, God creates both male and female in his image. God thus incorporates the fullness of both masculinity and femininity within himself. In fact, the notion of God having gender is a pagan one, associated especially with the fertility cults that were explicitly rejected by the authors of the Old Testament.

So why is masculine imagery used for God? Christians explain that traditionally masculine human roles seemed to the biblical writers to provide the best analogies for God. They used masculine language because they wished to emphasize that God is a leader, a provider, and a disciplinarian, all of which were roles associated with men. But as Oxford professor Alister McGrath points out:

The statement that "a father in ancient Israelite society is a suitable model for God" is not equivalent to saying that "God is male" or that "God is confined to the cultural parameters of ancient Israel."[1]

In light of increasing concerns about language and gender, some Christian denominations have made official statements rejecting the notion that God is male (or female). One notable example is the 1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church, which explains:

By calling God "Father," the language of faith indicates two main things: that God is the first origin of everything and transcendent authority; and that he is at the same time goodness and loving care for all his children. God's parental tenderness can also be expressed by the image of motherhood, which emphasizes God's immanence, the intimacy between Creator and creature. ... We ought therefore to recall that God transcends the human distinction between the sexes. He is neither man nor woman; he is God. He also transcends human fatherhood and motherhood, although he is their origin and standard. [4]

Many individual Christians have also begun to emphasize the importance of gender-inclusive language when talking about God. This usually involves replacement of masculine terms such as "Father" and "Son" with neutral terms such as "Parent" and "Child," and avoidance of pronouns for God altogether, both of which can present a linguistic challenge. It is also controversial - critics argue that these changes can result in loss of meaning and do not give enough weight to God's self-revelation. [8]

Denominational Statements about God

Although the theological beliefs described later in this article are broad enough to apply to all mainline Christian denominations, it may be of interest to the reader to explore the manner in which various confessional agencies have chosen to officially express these beliefs. Following, therefore, are excerpts from official doctrinal statements about God made by several Christian traditions.

United Methodist Church

With Christians of other communions we confess belief in the triune God - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This confession embraces the biblical witness to God's activity in creation, encompasses God's gracious self-involvement in the dramas of history, and anticipates the consummation of God's reign. [source] ( http://www.umc.org/interior.asp?mid=1808)

Assemblies of God:

The one true God has revealed Himself as the eternally self-existent "I AM," the Creator of heaven and earth and the Redeemer of mankind. He has further revealed Himself as embodying the principles of relationship and association as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.

Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod:

On the basis of the Holy Scriptures we teach the sublime article of the Holy Trinity; that is, we teach that the one true God, Deut. 6:4; 1 Cor. 8:4, is the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost, three distinct persons, but of one and the same divine essence, equal in power, equal in eternity, equal in majesty, because each person possesses the one divine essence entire, Col. 2:9, Matt. 28:19.

Catechism of the Catholic Church:

The Church never ceases to proclaim her faith in one only God: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Southern Baptist Convention:

There is one and only one living and true God. He is an intelligent, spiritual, and personal Being, the Creator, Redeemer, Preserver, and Ruler of the universe. God is infinite in holiness and all other perfections. God is all powerful and all knowing; and His perfect knowledge extends to all things, past, present, and future, including the future decisions of His free creatures. ... The eternal triune God reveals Himself to us as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, with distinct personal attributes, but without division of nature, essence, or being.

Presbyterian Church (USA):

Through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit, we trust in the one triune God, the Holy One of Israel, whom alone we worship and serve.

Greek Orthodox Archidiocese of America:

While the inner Being of God always remains unknown and unapproachable, God has manifested Himself to us; and the Church has experienced Him as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity, which is central to the Orthodox Faith, is not a result of pious speculation, but the over whelming experience of God. The doctrine affirms that there is only One God in whom there are three distinct Persons. In other words, when we encounter either the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit, we are truly experiencing contact with God.

References

1. McGrath, Christian Theology, 240.

2. Revelations of Divine Love (1373), quoted in McGrath, 242.

3. Quoted in McGrath, 241.

4. See e.g., John Cooper, "Gender-Inclusive Language for God," Theological Forum, Vol. 26, No. 3 & 4, December 1998.

Links on the Christian God

Books on the Christian God

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christianity is one of the three major monotheistic world religions. Like Jews and Muslims, Christians believe one God who created the world and takes an interest in the humans who inhabit it. This article explores what Christians believe about the characteristics and nature of God.