# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider register as an organ donor or already a registered donor? 您會考慮註冊為器官捐贈者還是已經註冊為器官捐贈者？

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Have you changed your mind about organ donation before and after the activity? 活動前後，您對器官捐贈的看法有改變嗎？

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree: (a) Michael has a duty to donate his organs (b) Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael has a duty to donate his organs.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
I agree Michael's unwillingness not to donate should be respected

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree with the action taken by Michael's son (hiding the advance directive of Michael) so that Michael's organs can be donated?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think Michael has/ does not have a duty to donate?

Group Conclusion:

What is your view about "respect"? Under what circumstances that a person's wish should be respected, or could not be followed as wished?

Group Conclusion:

What justifies the action taken by Michael's son as right/wrong?

Group Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Danny was born with a specific purpose unbeknownst to her until adulthood: to save her older sister, Catherine, from a fatal kidney disease. Their mother deliberately conceived Danny as a genetically compatible donor for Catherine, who was expected to need a kidney transplant around the age of 30. Catherine, unaware of the true reason behind Danny's birth, genuinely loves her sister and even risked her own life to save Danny during a sudden blizzard on a hiking trip.

As Danny grows up and discovers her mother's intentions, she feels used and dehumanized, viewing herself as merely an instrument created to save her sister. When the time comes for the kidney transplant that could save Catherine's life, Danny, still feeling betrayed and angry, chooses not to donate her kidney. Unfortunately, Catherine eventually succumbs to her illness, leading to widespread criticism of Danny as selfish.

Ethical dilemma: Is it immoral for Danny to refuse to donate her organ to her sibling, given that she has the right to make her own decisions and autonomy not to donate?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
As Danny's existence can save the life of Catherine, do you agree with what the parents did (having Danny to save Catherine)?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Would you consider Danny's refusal to donate a selfish act and equivalent to killing her sister?

# data[].attributes.body
Why do you think the action taken by Danny's parent (purposely having Danny contribute organs to Catherine) is right/wrong?

Group conclusion:

What makes you think Danny's action is justified (or why do you think Danny is selfish)?

Group conclusion:

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
After this activity, would you consider register as an organ donor? 活動結束後，您會考慮註冊為器官捐贈者嗎？

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE 1: Duty to donate vs. Freedom to donate

# data[].attributes.body
Background:

Michael lives in a country that operates under an opt-out system for organ donation. When Michael was young, he received a life-saving organ transplant. This experience had a deep impact on his life, allowing him to live a long and fulfilling life.  The transplant comes with a condition that when any of Michael’s organs or tissues were found biologically compatible and suitable for a particular recipient, Michael will be contacted to contribute his organ/tissue.

However, as he aged, Michael developed personal beliefs that led him to decide against donating his organs after death. He formalized this decision in an advanced directive, explicitly stating his wish not to donate his organs. When Michael dies, his son, aware of the advanced directive, faces a moral dilemma. The country is experiencing a critical shortage of organs for transplantation, and many lives could be saved if more organs were available. Michael's son believes that his father, having benefited from organ donation, has a reciprocal duty to help others in need. Acting on this belief, he decides to hide Michael's advanced directive, allowing his organs to be donated.

Ethical dilemma: Fulfill the duty to donate or the obligation to honor prior consent and respect for the donor’s autonomy?