# data[].attributes.body
ANALYSIS #7: THE USUAL SUSPECTS (1995)

As usual, please place you analyses in your padlets, and please send the link for your full padlet page, not just your entries for the week. Thank you!

Please also provide a list of all references you used in your discussion.

THE USUAL SUSPECTS (1995) is a much lauded and reviewed thriller film of the 90s, and a favorite among many cinephiles. This film is a great example for the interaction of setting, staging and performance because first, the ensemble cast is comprised of stellar actors, and some of the characterizations are the type that get richer upon a rewatch (or two) because of the layers in characterization and presentation. However, based on your initial viewing of the film and our discussions on Staging and Performance, discuss:

The ensemble cast of this film includes the characters of Verbal Kint, Agent Kujan, Dean Keaton, Michael McManus, Fred Fenster and Todd Hockney. Select three characters from this list and discuss the specifics of the following things they used to bring their characters to the screen:

1. Figure Expressions

2. Figure Movements

3. Sound Elements

Select two scenes from the film that you feel made great use of blocking and explain why you think it was presented so well. What did these two presentations convey to you as an audience member watching the film?

McManus, based on what I’ve seen on the film, is the annoying type of person who loves to nag other people. His expressions are perfect, especially in the part where they are all standing for a line up and then suddenly, out of nowhere, he made fun of the lines given to them and made unnecessary expressions in front of the police men. His facial expressions are on point and it matches his raspy voice. I don’t know if it’s just me but he kinda does the famous Ryan Gosling face/expression. Lastly, the way he stands screams confidence and charm plus he looks like he’s always ready to throw punches at anyone who gets in his way.

Todd Hockney, he looks bored at everything. When the police visited his place his facial expression was like “oh here we go again,” it seems like he’s tired of seeing these people in his place and accusing him of stuff randomly. He’s chill, the way he talks in a slow pace manner but the way he stands up also screams confidence and calmness. He looks calm to me while McManus looks like he’s about to pounce at anyone. He always looks tired and sleepy to me and he looks clueless at times.

Kint, figure expressions are not that much because he talks and acts in a limited way. His facial expressions are almost the same in every scene of the film except for the part where he shot a drug dealer inside his car, he kinda looks sad but he had no choice so he shot him. He kinda acts like a robot and stands like a robot except he’s limping. The way he stands, his actions, and movements screams introverted, he looks kind, and gentle. He’s always in the corner and looks scared but in the eternity of the film he’s the one who’s scary. I was really shocked that he shot the guy, he does not give off that vibe. Plus he’s calm just like when the police are interrogating him. He looks calm while answering some questions and smoking.

I don’t quite like the sound effects used, I just like the sound effects of any action film because it’s too much for my ears but I think the sound effects used are perfect for their genre and for the scenes.

The first scene that I liked is when they all stood up for a line up because it basically shows their personality and how they are as a character just by standing there, they’re already acting out as their characters. Verbal Kint, he looks at the camera with that face saying “I know I’m not one of them” while Dean Keaton’s face was like “Do they really have to pull me out in a business meeting with my girlfriend? That’s embarrassing” He looks stressed because maybe he was not able to impress other people in the meeting or he missed the chance to get along with his girlfriend. Or he’s just simply tired of the accusations of the police. Fred Fenester was standing cool like a model, then McManus was questioning himself “how did I end up in a line up?” He was just sleeping and the next thing he knew he’s at the police station. Give the man a break. Lastly is Todd Hockney, he was standing there while raising his one eyebrow and was like “really? Me? You could have done better.”

The second scene is the blocking of the drug dealer, Dean Keaton, and Verbal Kint while he’s holding the gun. It kinda gives us the perspective of a victim and being shot by Verbal Kint and it was a bit of surprise for me, as a viewer, ‘cuz I never would have thought he could do something like that but at that scene it kinda reminded me that at the end of the day, he’s still a criminal.

# data[].attributes.body
ANALYSIS #6: CHUNGKING EXPRESS (1994)

As usual, please place you analyses in your padlets, and please send the link for your full padlet page, not just your entries for the week. Thank you!

Please also provide a list of all references you used in your discussion.

CHUNGKING EXPRESS (1994) is one of Wong Kar Wai's tributes to Hong Kong and urban loneliness. The four characters' stories are woven together but also never really meet each other. Part of the director's methods to present this together-but-separate feel is through the way he and his DOP, Christopher Doyle, plays with lighting throughout the film. Based on our discussions on Lighting Quality, Direction, Source and Color, in your analysis for Chungking Express, discuss:

How did the film's lighting distinguish the scenes concerning the four main characters' POV?  Discuss in terms of Lighting Quality, Direction, Source and Color.

Woman in the Blonde Wig

He QiWu (Pineapple Man)

Cop 663

Faye

What do these specific lighting choices for each character convey to you, as a viewer?

Whose lighting setup, among our four characters, gave you the clearest idea of the character you were watching?

As a matter of personal preference, which character's lighting scheme was your favorite?

As a matter of personal preference, who was your favorite character and why?

Wong Kar-Wai films is one of the greatest. I usually see his films on pinterest and tiktok and the next thing I know I’m already watching every film that he has. But, I am here to talk about lighting, direction, and colour. Wong Kar-Wai’s films are famous not only because they have a good story but also because of the unmatched cinematography. In the first scene, the lighting was a bit dark, the colour was a mixture of green, red, and  a bit blue, the camera movement was fast-paced, and the cut was ECUS (extreme close up shot which makes the scene more tense and dramatic. It had a blurry background, you can really feel as a viewer that something not right is happening which actually makes sense when you realise the real purpose of the camera movement, lighting, colour used in that scene. You can really feel the emotions and the panic of the Woman in the Blonde Wig in that specific scene. The Woman in the Blonde Wig is a mysterious girl that works in the world ruled by drugs. For the eternity of the film, in one of the articles I’ve read, Wong Kar-Wai mostly used natural lighting which I think gave extra flavour to the cinematography of the film. Now going back to the Woman in the Blonde Wig and He QiWu (Pineapple Man). The Woman In The Blonde Wig usually has low-key lighting, especially the chasing part while the use of colour blue is more appealing compared to other colours because that part of the film is supposed to capture the terror and charisma The Woman in the blonde wig has. While for He QiWu, he’s a charming guy, I’ve seen a lot of high-key lighting used in some of his scenes especially when he’s talking to different women on the telephone while there are times just like in the running scene where they used low-key lighting to capture the right angle and lighting for that exact scene. Cop 663 and Faye is interesting because the scene where Cop 633 was still in love compliments the lighting and colour used and Faye has a little crush on him. The direction of the camera usually uses hip-level shot and close up shot in this part of the film, the light source used for the two is usually front lighting. The best lighting setup was with the woman in the blonde wig because it actually convinced the viewers to be more interested in the story or what was about to happen. And I love how they used speed of motion lighting in both part of the film, first the chase and second is where Cop 663 and Faye is talking to each other at the small restaurant where Faye is working and other people are just walking and it’s all blurred, the focus is just the two of them. They are all memorable for me and they all have the best cinematography that matches their characteristics, but I will always love Faye. Her energetic vibe just gave it away. It’s like after watching the chasing between He QiWu and The Woman in the Blonde Wig, Faye and Cop 663 have this cute, heartbreaking, then back to cute love story.

# data[].attributes.body
Why did you think the directors of the three films chose their specific color palettes for the sets and props?

What do you think these choices for the set are meant to convey to the audience?

In your opinion as an audience member, were these choices for the setting used effectively?

For you as a viewer, what were the standout costume and makeup choices in these films?

What were these costume or makeup choices meant to say about the characters we were watching?

Of all three shorts, which film did you like best and why?

Dumplings, Cut, & Box (2004)

DUMPLINGS, 2004

Color palettes are one of the important ingredients in making a film effective and unforgettable to viewers. It basically sets the mood for the viewers. In the first film, dumplings. I have noticed that the color palette of each character shows their status in life. For example, the main character Mrs. Li can be always seen wearing a red colored bag, clothes and lipsticks which signifies elegance while Auntie Mei always wears color faded clothes. I also noticed the colors that they used are a bit greenish tint just like in Wong Kar Wai films. As far as my research can go, it was said that the greenish tint  in horror films signifies death, decay, a sickening feeling, and grotesque. This actually made sense because I’ve noticed while Auntie Mei is cooking the dumplings the green tint is visible in the film especially when Mrs. Li started to eat the dumplings one by one, I think this signifies the sickening feeling Mrs. Li is feeling while eating Auntie Mei’s dumpling for the first time. The set used is actually pretty convincing because this story was not new to me. I grew up with my Ama and my Ama and Angkong are both native Chinese. My Ama always tells me a story about a woman cooking dumplings. I was 13 when she told me this story and I was traumatized. I never wanted to eat dumplings because I always remember the story my Ama told me. Now I’m 20, I’ve realized that the reason she told me that story is to scare me, to avoid teenage pregnancy, and it actually worked. Now going back to the film, as I was saying, the set up they made is pretty convincing,the film also somewhat called out a very taboo topic in every Asian country which is abortion. This reflects our reality and the suffering of every teeanger who does not have access to safe abortion. It’s like this film is saying, this is what happens if we don’t let this teenager have access to safe abortion. The place is perfect for the role of Auntie Mei, the environment and place they used are perfect in any angle. If I could read the mind of the writer and director, they might be thinking, what is the perfect setting for this Auntie Mei who sells dumplings but secretly does illegal abortion?. Then, boom! A very crowded apartment where people who are struggling to make ends meet usually reside. They perfectly portrayed the different worlds Auntie Mei and Mrs Li live in. As a viewer, I think what stands out the most is how they emphasize three things, first is the obsession of Mrs. Li of becoming young, second is how dangerous illegal abortion can be without proper care and proper doctor to do the procedure, third is how obsession of one thing makes us crazy and do unexpected things to others and to ourselves. In terms of visual representation like costume and makeup, I personally like the part where the mother and her daughter went to Auntie Mei to do abortion. The acting itself is very convincing, especially the part where the baby comes out of her womb. It was really convincing. I was listening to my blockmates' reactions. It was full of disgusted with what they saw and some were sympathetic to the young lady, and based on the reactions of my blockmates and to what I’ve witnessed as well, it was pretty convincing and sorted out very well.

CUT, 2004

This film is a rollercoaster of emotions. I can’t believe I got thrilled for a little while then the next I knew I’m laughing already. The actors did an amazing job especially the extra while I was watching the film all I could think of is “man, Im Won Hee who played the extra deserves a lot of awards for this short film.” Aside from the great acting the actors did, I also admired the atmosphere of the film and the colors that they used. They mostly used a blue tint color palette which absolutely fooled me. At first I thought it was all about vampires and cults but it turned out to be nothing like that. The color palette they’ve used can be easily seen as horror or mystery/thriller films. The set and props were pretty amazing too. I thought at first he is a successful director with a vampire wife but it turns out I was fooled. The house is giving dark academia vibes and the house screams elegance. Based on what I’ve seen at the first scene it was unexpected to be a film set and the car scene with a woman inside the directors car confused me more, thinking that this could be a story about cannibalism. So, I think that’s what the director wants us, viewers to think. Well if he does want us to think that way, he did a pretty great job because it took me about 15 minutes to realize what the film's real intention was. They did pretty good in the setting especially when the extra did the same thing as the film the director created. For me as a viewer, besides from the great acting of the actors, I also was shocked with a lot of revelations. For that very short period of time, they give the best. It’s not just a simple mystery/thriller, it’s an experiment that turned out well. The revelations made were absolutely incredible. Now, going back to the makeup choices and setup, the makeup was convincing especially to the little girl the extra brought to the directors house with him. In the whole film I thought that kid is really a girl, I never would have thought it would be something like that. Normally, a film with a lot of plot can be confusing or hard to pull, and would take a lot of brain cells to understand but this film the plot twists are perfectly combined and connected with each other. The costumes and makeup, especially the wife, was nerve-wracking, it’s pretty convincing and with just their clothes and houses one can easily distinguish the difference of the director and extra’s lives. While doing this analysis, I’ve realized how important everything is while filming. Everything should be accurate to a specific scene, from the characters background, clothes, and other things because if one thing goes wrong, everything in the film will go downhill, that’s why everything in the film should have a purpose and a reason for its existence in the film.

Lastly,

Box, 2004

I did not like this. I’ve said this before and I will say it again. I don’t like Japanese horror. I like Japanese films but not the horror ones. For some of my blockmates it’s not that terrifying but as soon as the little girl was shown, I lost it. I never really watched it completely because I can’t handle ghost stuff, I have a vivid imagination plus I often have sleep paralysis, so I really can’t watch this type of film, my only enemy is me, myself, and I. But going back to the film, I’ve noticed that they mostly used two tones in making the film, first is the bright colors like the red but I can see a touch of maroon in the carnival scene and in the present scene used cool tones of blue and green while in the women’s reality, it uses bright colors that you can typically see in a coming of age drama. I think the color palette they used played a big role in identifying what’s currently going on in the film. The makeup and set props were done perfectly because I was really terrified to the point that after the last film, I felt like I’m about to throw up. No matter how terrifying the two girls are while dancing it’s pretty amazing and haunting.

All of the films were done perfectly which made it hard for me to choose. But I would say, I like the Dumplings because it reminded me of my Ama’s stories which I think is biased. Anyhow, I like them all in a certain way. I also like Cut because of the roller coaster of emotions it has given me. I have a love and hate relationship with the Box but it’s pretty amazing too, I personally like the color palette.

# data[].attributes.body
The protagonist, Neo is a very introverted yet intelligent character. He is silent yet observant and I think his character represents every introvert character who is socially awkward in front of a big crowd. The Antagonist, The Agents (Jones, Brown, and Smith) are not normal human beings. They have some kind of power that can control things and switch bodies and teleport. They are designed to kill, they are cold and don't show any emotions just like every villain made. Their goal is to get Neo and kill him, that is what drives them.The Sidekick, Morpheus is always by Neo’s side and never doubted his abilities. The Skeptic, Trinity and his other teammates, at first they doubted Neo as well as Morpheus' belief but at the end of the day believed them. The Guardian, Morpheus and The Oracle because they never left Neo’s side and guided him all the way through while the Oracle made Neo realize things, one of them is making him realize that indeed, he is the one. The Contagonist is Cypher, he was always jealous and wanted what Neo had, Trinity.

# data[].attributes.body
ACT I Setup

The film begins with Paul Sheldon, a writer, writing on his desk. The next scene I can remember is Paul going inside his car while holding a big suitcase with his latest book in it because it is snowing and blizzard kind of hard his car crashes. Now this is where things go north. A new character named Annie was introduced. She "saved" Paul and brought him to her house. She introduced herself as a huge fan and a nurse. Now this is where the real red flag begins, this scene gives us the idea of what this story might be about. Why would you bring an injured man to your house instead of bringing him to the hospital to be treated? This scene made us realize that Paul's life is going to be a hell of a ride. The first day she brings her medicine and treats her with love and care is a big red flag which I think the protagonist also sees that's why he hesitates to accept anything she gives him. The moment the protagonist knew he was in danger was also the moment the viewers realized he was doomed.

ACT II Confrontation

Now, Paul is still in the process of recovery and Annie is giving him medicines that he doesn't know what for. The new chapter of his life with her is starting to become a nightmare and Annie's true color starts to unleash. He tries escaping but he always fails because she's like a magnet beside him, and his disability after the accident is also one of his disadvantages. I think one of his smallest victories and quite dangerous is annoying Annie by telling her she got the wrong paper and asking her to buy a cheaper one which gave him time to escape and learn the ins and outs of the house without getting caught and afterward fooling her from needing or getting addicted to the medicines she's giving him while in fact he is no longer drinking the medicines she's giving him. There are times he thinks of giving up because of how powerful, crazy, and obsessed Annie is, but despite that, he still manages to use his brain and plan something that might help him escape.

ACT III Resolution

The climax where the police officer goes to Annie's house and Annie kills him in front of Paul. This is where he starts to think about a big plan before Annie can kill him. He starts to ask her if he can finish his story before she can kill him which I think is a smart move. Buying yourself time to think before making a move is a very amazing move. The final battle was intense with all of the hitting, bleeding, punching, and smacking. My anger towards Annie was satisfied when Paul hit her head and killed her. The closing of the story shows trauma when he sees Annie in the face of the waitress.

What were your expectations of the film when it began?

My expectations were a bit funny and weird. Before the beginning of the film, when I heard the title Misery, I knew this was going to be exciting. My expectations were the film would be violent, bloodier, and with a lot of twists and turns because it's a psychological horror film and I love movies with a lot of things going on.

After watching the film, were those expectations you had fulfilled, cheated, or disappointed? How so?

This might sound weird, but I was expecting the movie to be more violent, bloodier, and with a lot of twists, but it turned out to be just a normal psychological horror film. The beginning was promising. I love how the film started and the background music they used. It's a very good start, especially the car crash scene. I didn't feel cheated or disappointed with how the film turned out to be, it was pretty decent. The most exciting part is the climax. It was thrilling and exciting. It is a good film all in all but I can't see myself rewatching it.

# data[].attributes.headline
FILM ANALYSIS #2: Robin Hood Men in Tights (1993)

# data[].attributes.subject
FILM ANALYSIS #2: Robin Hood Men in Tights (1993)

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the film's conventions, what genres does the film fit into? Describe at least three elements of the film that showcase these conventions.

Robin Hood Men in Tights falls into comedic films. The character's characteristics are written to have a goofy, stupid, and senseless personality. Their lines are written to amuse people. Although some lines that were supposed to be funny were a bit forced, they still managed to pull it off. The perfect example that I can give is when Robin was fighting against Little John, which was funny but at the same time the acting was a bit cringe, I don't know if that's how the acting is supposed to be but I didn't love it and I did not hate it too. Second is the props they used, the scene where Robin is talking/singing with Lady Marian while his friends and soldiers are watching them both. Second is the plotline, especially the iron underwear which made it more funnier. That made me question a lot of things. They fought over a key for the iron underwear that Lady Marian is wearing??? That last scene made me laugh my head off.

Based on the film's iconography, what genres does the film fit into? Describe at least three elements of the film that showcase these conventions.

Based on the visual aspects they used, the film falls into a comedic adventure, fantasy type of film. First is the setting used in the film is usually seen in adventure movies with sword fighting like The Lord of the Rings, The Legend of Zorro, Willow film (1988),  and other fantasy adventure films. Second, are the costumes they are using, a brave soldier is wearing green tights with a green pointed hat?? He looks more like a dwarf than a soldier. Third is the fight scene, which is very entertaining. Especially the blind man's fight scene.

Having little to no knowledge of swashbuckling films, would you be interested in exploring the classics of the genre?

I think, yes. I grew up watching The Legend of Zorro and the Mask of Zorro because of Catherine Zeta-Jones. But I stopped watching these types of films when I got hooked on horror, psychological, mystery, and thriller types of films.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Based on these details and any additional knowledge you have about Japan in the 1950s, what were your observations of the film?

The years from 1950 to 1970 are considered the Golden Age of Japanese Cinema, as written by Franklinton Underground Cinema. The article consists of famous Japanese films from the years 1950 to 1970, such as "The Human Condition," directed by Masaki Kobayashi in 1959. It gained two wins at the Venice Film Festival in 1960, one award at the International Film Festival Rotterdam in 1989, and one award for Best Actress in the Kinema Junpo Awards in 1960. Seeing this article, I have observed that the stories of the films they made revolve around wars, samurai, and mostly drama, which were quite famous during those years. I think creating films like "The Human Condition," "Ikiru," "Red Beard," and "Rashomon" was a good move for Japanese filmmakers because they captured the interest of people internationally by creating films that people could enjoy and relate to.

Now, coming back to "Rashomon," there are some things I did not like or enjoy, but I did enjoy the story itself. The storytelling is good. I enjoyed the rollercoaster of emotions happening to the characters, the way the story shifts from different people's perspectives and the realistic setting that tackles issues more on reality rather than fantasy. However, for some reason, I missed the horse from the film. The cinematography is not that good but understandable. The shots were not that impressive, but also understandable. The sound is earsplitting; I didn't like it, but again, it's understandable. The editing is good if I am looking through the eyes of people in the 1950s while watching "Rashomon." All in all, they did a pretty decent job in creating a film during the 1950s.

1. Why do you think this Japanese film would have made such a splash internationally?

I think it is because of their culture and the uniqueness of their films. But according to the reviews I've seen, people enjoyed the whole film despite a disappointing ending because it delved into the human conscience of deciding right from wrong. One review stated that they liked the film because the director approached it in a different, non-Japanese style, which makes it beautiful. While other reviews stated that it was a weird movie, some say it's the best, others say it's the worst. But I say it's a film that everyone should enjoy. That is the purpose of films, to be watched and enjoyed.

I think it made such a splash internationally because of the different approach the director took. It is not just a typical movie that will make you cry or laugh. This movie makes you question yourself, reality, and humanity. It makes you see different perspectives from different people. It makes you realize that everyone has different versions of one story, and it is for you to decide who to believe in.

1. What were scenes that stood out to you - whether good or bad and why?

The scenes of the girl crying and the two men fighting. As I mentioned earlier, the story is good, but I can't stand the acting. It was really bad, cringy, and awkward. I admire the actors for doing that with a straight face. The fighting scene was horrendous. I can't watch it without laughing or cringing.

# data[].attributes.body
Was the film well made? Why do you think so?

The story is good. I’ve watched the remake and no matter how much I love Marian, Lovi, Heart, and Solenn, I did not like it. It was funny, yes. But it lacks something. It lacks passion. But this original film has the uniqueness in it. I wouldn’t say I would watch it again. But it is a fun experience watching it. It was very entertaining.

What happens in the film? The story revolves around four ladies with different lives. The first is Dina, a college student who wants to have her own car because she is sick and tired of always waiting for her brothers to pick her up. The second is Suzanne, a beautiful lady with a lavish life and a maid named Maria who always follows her orders. Suzanne loves competition and attention. The third is Bambi, a girl who loves to spend money despite her parents' debts. Her mother wants her to join pageants because of her beauty and brains. Lastly, there's Azenith, a con artist who was planning to use her boyfriend to seduce the judges to let her win and get the money and a house. As Bambi said in her speech, “I’ve been through 4 different pageants, but this has been the most meaningful contest of my life. This contest has allowed us to discover ourselves and each other.” They are all different women, but at the end of the day, they are still women with different stories, pain, happiness, and burdens. They all have different stories, different lives, and different statuses in life, but destiny has its way. It brings people into our lives with a purpose. They can be a blessing, karma, or a lesson. At least, that is how I interpreted the movie.

What were scenes that stood out to you - whether good or bad and why? First, the dancing scene is hilarious. The way Maria dances while the others are busy with their tasks will always be funny to me. It kind of lightens the mood, and that scene is full of wholesomeness, which I love. Maybe other viewers might find it weird or unnecessary, but that's what makes a Filipino film. We love to add something funny to lighten the whole scene. Those seemingly unnecessary lines and scenes are what make it different. It's like our trademark.

Secondly, their pageant speeches. At first, viewers might think it's just a story about four women who have their reasons for joining the pageant and love to turn against each other. In the first half, it reflects how men or society view women. They view us like animals who always fight against each other, pull each other's hair, fight over a man, and slap each other's faces. But their speeches reveal who women really are and what women truly want. In Dina’s speech, she stated “The prime motivation was to stress the important role of women in society, not by merely putting her on a pedestal, but by demonstrating that it is not by beauty alone that a woman becomes a winner. This contest has challenged me to pursue this task.” People might think beauty pageants are just for fun and stupidity, but for us women, beauty pageants are where we can prove ourselves. It's our way of saying that beauty is not the only thing we have; we have beautiful minds and hearts, and the words that come out of our mouths are also important and can bring about change.

The last scene is so satisfying. All three of them got the ending they wanted, including Maria. But why only three? Because of Azenith. I don't think she got the ending she deserved. She should have been with the man who brought out the goodness and the best in her. I hated how her boyfriend said to her, “He’s too good for you.” I think that a good man brings out the best version of herself, and she no longer dreams of big cars, a big house, and a lot of money. She only wanted to live a simple life where she could learn how to knit. But at the end of the story, she still gets to live a simple life but with a different man.

What were the production aspects or details that stood out to you – whether good or bad? Why? The editing and some of the camera angles were a bit off, especially the fire part on the yacht, but given that it's from the early 90s, it's reasonable to have some bad angles and editing. Aside from camera angles and editing, some of the dialogues are a bit cringy, especially the romantic parts. I don't feel the connection between the lovers; maybe that's why there's no "kilig" factor happening. The girl fight was not relatable at all. Who still smacks and pulls each other's hair out today? It's pathetic, but I guess that's how the media portrays women.

Was the film well made? Why do you think so?

The story is good. I’ve watched the remake and no matter how much I love Marian, Lovi, Heart, and Solenn, I did not like it. It was funny, yes. But it lacks something. It lacks passion. But this original film has the uniqueness in it. I wouldn’t say I would watch it again. But it is a fun experience watching it. It was very entertaining.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
TEMPTATION ISLAND 1980: Dina Bonnevie, Azenith Briones & Jennifer Cortez |  Full Movie