# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Should late submissions of PDF annotations be permitted?

# data[].attributes.body
write down your questions as you read your paper and try to answer them. Don’t be to quick to summarize the paper if you want to get a deeper understanding of it.

# data[].attributes.body
They should start taking notes what they didn’t understand in the paper.

Then again read the paper and try to stop at that point on which question or part they didn’t got and then start using other sources to find answer for there understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Make sure you understand the authors' justification for each experiment described in the paper

# data[].attributes.body
Underline any words/concepts you aren’t familiar with and study those

# data[].attributes.body
Not be afraid to ask questions, and to go through more research papers and textbooks

# data[].attributes.body
To identify the main objective and central question.

# data[].attributes.body
Read it once through without looking up terms, highlighting all the ones that need looking up. And read it a second time after searching them up for a better understanding

# data[].attributes.body
Meet up with each other and discuss it together because something you were struggling with might make sense to someone else!

# data[].attributes.body
Reading review articles in the field to understand some of the basic concepts. Read the referenced material in the introduction.

# data[].attributes.body
Read the article in a way that helps you contextualize and understand the information, instead of just always reading it straight through

# data[].attributes.body
Don’t ignore the figures!!

# data[].attributes.body
Start with what you know. Try to find what is familiar and start from there. If it’s a completely new topic start with reviewing the scientific concepts before starting paper

# data[].attributes.body
Pay attention to the figures and ask how the methods answer their questions.

# data[].attributes.body
really be able to identify the hypothesis and understand specifically what they’re asking

# data[].attributes.body
They must understand the reasoning behind the research, understanding the terminologies and the techniques used. It is also important to understand the hypothesis

# data[].attributes.body
dont hesistate to find background information to support your understanding of the paper

# data[].attributes.body
I need to understand the technical terminology and methods being used to be able to develop questions that critically analyze and assess the paper

# data[].attributes.body
Learn more about the techniques that are used

# data[].attributes.body
I think about the clinical relevance of the overall paper

# data[].attributes.headline
Thoroughly analyze the data to fully grasp what the authors are trying to accomplish

# data[].attributes.subject
Thoroughly analyze the data to fully grasp what the authors are trying to accomplish

# data[].attributes.body
I need to have some bullet point of the main purpose of the paper and understand the figures and table and relate them with the theory.

# data[].attributes.body
I first read the abstract and examine the figures. If it captures my interest, then I read the entire paper

# data[].attributes.body
I need to learn more of the techniques used in the papers so I can understand the data.

# data[].attributes.body
Read papers multiple times and take the time to find review articles and other resources that can fill in the gaps of my understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Review the research with more of a critical eye - I often get so caught up in trying to understand what was done that I don't spend time thinking on if what they did was the best course, or what alternatives there were.

# data[].attributes.body
I go through supplementary figures since they provide useful data on additional experiments that didn’t make it into the main paper

# data[].attributes.body
Highlight unknown terms and look them up- I like to define the terms in the margins. If the paper focuses on a specific process that I don’t know about I like to read a review on how the process works.

# data[].attributes.headline
Skim through the paper and try to get a surface level understanding. I highlight any i think maybe important and annotate a tiny question mark on confusing parts. I then re-read the paper and make notes such as definitions of terms and concepts. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Skim through the paper and try to get a surface level understanding. I highlight any i think maybe important and annotate a tiny question mark on confusing parts. I then re-read the paper and make notes such as definitions of terms and concepts. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Ask questions and discuss complicating points with someone more knowledgeable than me.

# data[].attributes.subject
Ask questions and discuss complicating points with someone more knowledgeable than me.

# data[].attributes.body
I need to have more general knowledge so I don’t need to search up so many terms through throughout the paper and learn how to read figures more easily

# data[].attributes.body
Read the results figures and discussions first to help understand the goal of the paper

# data[].attributes.headline
I need to understand the logic behind the authors reasoning behind the research

# data[].attributes.subject
I need to understand the logic behind the authors reasoning behind the research

# data[].attributes.body
I need to look up definitions of words I don’t understand and look up techniques I’m not familiar with. I also read some of the referenced material to better understand what has been happening in the field.

# data[].attributes.body
I first Highlight the word/ idea that are not familiar to me, the second time I go look for the infos and read the papers and then I read the paper and go in between the fig and additional information to understand it better.

# data[].attributes.body
Read and learn more about molecular methodologies and techniques

# data[].attributes.body
Could not understand what the author really want to communicate so it take lot of time for me to understand the paper and sometimes the main purpose of the paper missed . I want to improve the understanding of main purpose of the paper and why author used the keywords and how can it relate with the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Broaden my knowledge of scientific techniques and their purposes

# data[].attributes.body
I like to skim the paper and then go back and dive into the figures to connect them to the article so I can better understand how the results led to the conclusions the authors made. Then I reread parts that I find connect to the figures to get a better idea of the methods and results.

# data[].attributes.body
I typically hop around a lot as opposed to reading straight through. I usually start by reading the abstract and intro, then the beginning of the discussion section, then the results with figures, then the rest of the discussion section, and then last go back and review the methods.

# data[].attributes.body
I look for the problem the authors are trying to address. I look for their hypothesis, research questions and how they addressed those questions including the technique and the methodology they used. I also look out whether they were able to address their primary research question and what was their conclusion and discuss about their findings

# data[].attributes.body
When I read a primary paper I go through the abstract first and try to understand the background, I will usually still need to search up a lot of terms throughout the reading to understand it.

# data[].attributes.body
read the introduction for background and research questions, then read the results and try to connect them with the questions/hypotheses posed by the authors. I often struggle with interpreting figures and understanding protocols described in the methods section.

# data[].attributes.headline
Reading through the papers with a critical eye, understanding why the authors did each experiment and what the results show. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Reading through the papers with a critical eye, understanding why the authors did each experiment and what the results show. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Highlight key phrases and write notes on a separate sheet of paper. I google terms that are unfamiliar. I try to reread papers at least once. It's not always easy to be disciplined but if I start reading the paper earlier in the week and then come back to it another day this can help my understanding. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Highlight key phrases and write notes on a separate sheet of paper. I google terms that are unfamiliar. I try to reread papers at least once. It's not always easy to be disciplined but if I start reading the paper earlier in the week and then come back to it another day this can help my understanding. 

# data[].attributes.body
read it once to get the main idea, then a second time more thoroughly to make sure I understand every section and figure

# data[].attributes.body
Keep reading more papers, don’t be afraid to ask “silly” questions.

# data[].attributes.headline
Read through the paper twice. Check and supplemental figures as well. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Read through the paper twice. Check and supplemental figures as well. 

# data[].attributes.body
Be more direct with my reading, I tend to get sidetracked by trying to figure out small pieces of the larger puzzle.

# data[].attributes.body
I start with the abstract to understand their goal then look at their figures to understand what they did to answer it.

Then I read it from the beginning and annotate with definitions, thoughts and notes.

# data[].attributes.headline
Learn how to understand the figures of the paper better: the purpose of the experiments, the controls, what the results actually show. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Learn how to understand the figures of the paper better: the purpose of the experiments, the controls, what the results actually show. 

# data[].attributes.body
get better at data analysis

# data[].attributes.body
Highlight any words that I’m unfamiliar with, talk about how the articke or a specific technique may be related to what I do, look at the in text references when I get confused.

# data[].attributes.headline
I usually read through the paper twice. The first time I try to get a general understanding and following of the research being performed and the reasons why. The second time is usually done to get accurate description and knowledge of the methods and results, as well as figure interpretations. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I usually read through the paper twice. The first time I try to get a general understanding and following of the research being performed and the reasons why. The second time is usually done to get accurate description and knowledge of the methods and results, as well as figure interpretations. 

# data[].attributes.body
When I read scientific papers I start by reading the abstract. I then quickly skim the entire paper, and look at the figures and methods. I like to connect the figures and methods to each other before digging in. Once I have a semi good understanding of the figures and methods I read through the entire paper again truly annotating it.

# data[].attributes.body
Read the abstract, then spent most of the time understanding the figures, then the discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
i really like the read the introduction and discussion before the results and methods !

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Have you taken a molecular biology or related course?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Have you used Hypothes.is for social annotation of PDFs?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
With regards to reading primary scientific research papers, I am a

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Novice (I have never previously read primary scientific research papers) 

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Beginner (I have read 1-10 research papers. I need to learn how to read and understand them) 

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Intermediate (I have read 10-20 research papers. I can understand most of the papers that I read)

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Expert (I have read > 20 papers. I understand everything about every research paper I read)

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
For the paper presentations, would you prefer a first come, first served selection OR random assignment of the papers that you present?