# data[].attributes.body
Is your Housing Element certified? If your Housing Element is certified, how many revision rounds did you go through? 1-3; 3-6; 6+

# data[].attributes.headline
ASK: were you able to adopt or certify housing element?

# data[].attributes.subject
ASK: were you able to adopt or certify housing element?

# data[].attributes.body
May not recognize these by name / separate collaboratives - give an example. Highlight the county-based part, and for list names of the collaboratives (Housing Working Group- Marin)

Heather and Hannah have this list

# data[].attributes.body
Might need to add some specific reference to refresh people's memories.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the resources we used in Alameda Co was decision-maker trainings. I don't see something like that listed.

# data[].attributes.body
sharing best practices

# data[].attributes.body
At least in our collab. we did not talk much about regional, or for that matter county, coordination. It was more sharing experiences and solutions

# data[].attributes.body
Same comment for b that I wrote for "goals of the collaboratives"

# data[].attributes.body
Add or change b, we should have them rate how helpful this was in achieving a certified housing element and/or implementation of housing element as RHNA is just one aspect of the housing element process

# data[].attributes.body
I think it's more informative to ask how long someone has worked as a planner rather than how long at a particular city. I have a manager that has 15 years' experience, but only 1 year in our office.

# data[].attributes.body
Data packets, ADU affordability assessment tools, cohorts

# data[].attributes.body
Only cohort was big 3 and we know who attended it. And best to call it big 3 if we want to ask. Maybe we want to name work group (zoning for affordability, missing middle, x, y , z)

# data[].attributes.body
I know we discussed this being more of a focus in the interviews, but to the extent it works, it might be good to ask a specific questions about changes in relationships.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm worried 10 minutes might scare folks. There might not be any way around this, but in case the estimate is lower even by a few minutes, I would include that instead (in the intro).

# data[].attributes.body
Should also say "workgroup." May make it too complicated but might give examples like "for example, Big 3, Zoning for Affordability, Missing Middle, etc."

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe change d. to something that that specifically calls out whether the resources helped someone complete their work.

# data[].attributes.body
One question suggestion: When new housing legislation is on the horizon, what can ABAG/MTC do differently when providing TA?

# data[].attributes.body
Missing TA documents posted on ABAG site. Maybe this is included under "Used a Communications, Messaging & Community Engagement tool"

# data[].attributes.body
Use the broader term "jurisdiction" instead of "city" since there are counties, towns, etc. Should do throughout. Wonky but they are used to it.

# data[].attributes.body
In questions 8 and 9, we should be specific about what "region" we're referring to - either counties or Bay Area region

# data[].attributes.body
I think collaboratives brought in other educational topics/speakers besides new laws. That might be the best example, but either expand (e) to include other learning opportunities/updates or add one in addition to (e) to capture them