# data[].attributes.headline
Framing the 1:1 feedback as a conversation

# data[].attributes.subject
Framing the 1:1 feedback as a conversation

# data[].attributes.body
As written the 1:1 feedback may seem one-sided. Framing it as a conversation where the recruit is offering their unique perspective on the content and the organizer is learning from them as well could foster more engagement.

# data[].attributes.body
- Movement building
- Epistemics & rationality
- Suffering risks
- Wild animal suffering
- Moral circle expansion (related to the above)
- Mental health
- Aging (?)

# data[].attributes.body
Could you directly incentivise the relatively large asks? Even with money?
* Might get the wrong type of people
* But getting the right type of people is notoriously difficult, so maybe just getting more fairly cheaply is a big win

# data[].attributes.body
Invert the education model, start with why -> How -> what

# data[].attributes.body
I worry about having standard curricula for career paths. Especially for problems that are bottlenecked by creativity and people thinking differently--that is to say, most problems. Perhaps for each career path, try to include a few different perspectives on how to get into the field and make progress?

# data[].attributes.body
Love the idea! One thing I'd note is that the intro fellowship is a pretty easy on ramp into EA without much prior knowledge or commitment required. The workflow seems higher commitment because off the bat you are on a path to work or gain knowledge in a specific field (...a field in which the person may not even be aware the broader sort of ethical importance of if they've never been around EA ideas before!)

So: I'd recommend a bigger focus on a easy, light hearted, broad intro to EA ideas and making sure they feel comfortable and unpressured there before diving into the specific subfield.

# data[].attributes.body
Some EA concepts are crucial, in my opinion (e.g. choosing an area that is neglected, looking at counterfactuals, trying to measure the effect of your actions). Where in the workflow do these get taught ?

# data[].attributes.body
EDIT: Sofya said to me that actually this is supposed to be used alongside group discussions. (So this comment is moot.) One thing that's missing, compared to the intro program I was in (EA Helsinki Spring 2021), is discussion in groups. That gives the intro program a socialization aspect that might be beneficial, or at least it was for me. The 1-on-1 with the organizer would feel more like a student-teacher relationship, while small group discussion (4-5 people) has a different vibe

# data[].attributes.body
Mandatory journaling sounds painful but there is a fad of bullet journaling. How might the marketing message be improved?

# data[].attributes.body
I really like the idea of having some specific guides for 'testing your fit'. Like, people are told so often that they should test their fit, but how that's actually done (except for spending a few years in a career path). Seems usefwl.

# data[].attributes.body
- Participants not changing their minds / views in significant ways
- Participants not applying EA to their lives in concrete ways after the fellowship
- Attendance - there tend to be some people who miss a large chunk of the program or drop out completely

# data[].attributes.body
we tried running some one of the main problems faced was getting regular attendance which was due to some country specific problems

# data[].attributes.body
• You can scroll down for more space.

# data[].attributes.body
Do you have any good articles or projects that the workflows are missing?

# data[].attributes.body
What other cause areas do you think could be represented?

# data[].attributes.body
What is something that you find unintuitive and could be improved?

# data[].attributes.body
What is something you like about the workflow?

# data[].attributes.body
You can find the Workflows on this Notion page.

# data[].attributes.body
• You can also right-click the notes and link them with arrows to express what's related to what.

• Feel free to add notes with sources/links to the right side of the padlet.

• Most of all, just optimise for being helpfwl!

# data[].attributes.body
• Click the + sign bottom-right to start a new note.

• You can get the URL for this padlet top-left.

• You can also Like and Comment below each note.

"You said you think P, but I think not-P because XYZ."

"If you're interested in X, you should check out Y or reach out to me at [link]."

"I really liked the speaker's point about how A has really been B all along."