# data[].attributes.body
Quick video lessons followed by guided worksheets for learners to engage at their own pace.

# data[].attributes.body
Flashcards for practice identifying reliable vs. unreliable sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Short animations showing how to cite in APA formats.

# data[].attributes.headline
Write an Essay Using Only TikToks and Wikipedia

# data[].attributes.subject
Write an Essay Using Only TikToks and Wikipedia

# data[].attributes.body
Flipping this bad idea inspired the development of Idea 1, where learners evaluate why those are weak sources.

# data[].attributes.body
From this emerged the idea of a Choose-Your-Path writing simulator that helps learners think more deeply about pacing and planning.

# data[].attributes.body
From this idea, I flipped it into a feedback-driven quiz to reinforce learning — part of Idea 1.

# data[].attributes.headline
Modify Worksheets into Interactive Scenarios

# data[].attributes.subject
Modify Worksheets into Interactive Scenarios

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of worksheets, learners work through branching simulations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Substitute Written Essays with Video Essays

# data[].attributes.subject
Substitute Written Essays with Video Essays

# data[].attributes.body
Optional for learners who express themselves better verbally, while still using citations and structured arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
Learners get initial feedback from AI, then refine based on peer input.

# data[].attributes.body
Gamified module where learners evaluate the credibility of sources with feedback.

Learning Objective: Evaluate sources for credibility.

# data[].attributes.headline
Microlearning Video Series and Reflections

# data[].attributes.subject
Microlearning Video Series and Reflections

# data[].attributes.body
Series of short videos with built-in quizzes and writing prompts.

Learning Objective: Evaluate and apply credible sources; practice synthesis.

# data[].attributes.body
A writing simulator that branches based on decisions about structure, source choice, and depth.

Learning Objective: Create well-supported, organized written responses.

# data[].attributes.body
Students post one credible and one non-credible source, explain their choices, and respond to peers’ evaluations. Ends with a personal reflection.

# data[].attributes.body
Quickly evaluate multiple source types using a checklist. Share results, then reflect on the hardest source to judge and why.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyze a set of sources from a fictional case and decide which are usable. Present findings and reflect on the decision-making process.

# data[].attributes.body
Create a short audio or video sharing how you evaluated sources in a past assignment and what you learned from the process.