# data[].attributes.body
Based on the reading text, What is your opinion about AGEISM?

write your opinion in a new page (press add button...),

or you can make a comment in below as a form of reply!

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the reading text, What is your opinion about AGEISM?

write your opinion in a new page (press add button...),

or you can make a comment in below as a form of reply!

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the reading text, What is your opinion about AGEISM?

write your opinion in a new page (press add button...),

or you can make a comment in below as a form of reply!

# data[].attributes.body
Ageism is undeniably bad.

It is a form of discrimination based on age, most commonly experienced by older adults, but it can also affect younger people in certain contexts. Ageism can manifest in the workplace, in healthcare, in media representation, and even in social interactions. It perpetuates harmful stereotypes, such as the belief that older individuals are less competent, less innovative, or resistant to change. These assumptions not only diminish the dignity and worth of older adults, but they also exclude them from opportunities to contribute meaningfully to society.

In the workplace, ageism can lead to unfair hiring practices, limited professional development, and forced early retirements. In healthcare, it can result in older patients receiving inadequate treatment simply because of assumptions about aging. Ageism in media often portrays older people as irrelevant or burdensome, further reinforcing negative perceptions.

Some might argue that ageism is “nothing” — that it’s a natural social dynamic or a minor issue compared to other forms of discrimination. However, dismissing it ignores the very real impact it has on millions of people. Ageism affects mental health, self-esteem, financial stability, and even life expectancy. It contributes to isolation and depression, particularly among the elderly.

Tackling ageism requires cultural change, intergenerational empathy, and policy reform. We must promote awareness that aging is not a decline, but a continuation of life with experience, wisdom, and value. Recognizing and combating ageism is not just about protecting the elderly — it’s about building a society that values all people, at every age.

한국어 번역

에이지즘(Ageism, 연령차별)은 분명히 나쁩니다.

이는 나이를 기준으로 한 차별의 한 형태이며, 주로 노인들이 많이 경험하지만 젊은 세대에게도 특정 맥락에서는 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 에이지즘은 직장, 의료, 미디어, 일상 대화 등 다양한 영역에서 나타나며, 나이든 사람은 능력이 떨어지거나 변화에 저항하고 창의성이 없다는 고정관념을 강화합니다. 이러한 편견은 노인의 존엄성과 가치를 깎아내릴 뿐만 아니라, 그들이 사회에 기여할 기회를 박탈합니다. 직장에서는 에이지즘으로 인해 공정하지 않은 채용, 경력 개발의 기회 제한, 조기 퇴직 강요 등이 발생합니다. 의료 분야에서는 노인이라는 이유만으로 적절한 치료를 받지 못할 수 있습니다. 미디어에서는 노인을 시대에 뒤처진 존재, 짐스러운 존재로 묘사해 부정적인 인식을 더욱 강화합니다.

일부는 에이지즘이 “아무것도 아니다”, 즉 자연스러운 사회 현상이라고 주장할 수도 있습니다. 하지만 그렇게 치부하는 것은 수많은 사람들이 겪는 실제 피해를 외면하는 것입니다. 에이지즘은 정신 건강, 자존감, 경제적 안정성, 심지어 기대 수명에까지 영향을 미치며, 특히 노인층의 고립감과 우울증을 심화시킵니다. 에이지즘을 극복하려면 문화적 인식 변화, 세대 간 공감, 정책 개선이 필요합니다. 우리는 나이가 든다는 것이 ‘쇠퇴’가 아니라, 경험과 지혜, 가치를 가진 삶의 연속임을 인식해야 합니다. 에이지즘을 인식하고 맞서는 것은 단순히 노인을 보호하는 것이 아니라, 모든 연령대의 사람을 존중하는 사회를 만드는 일입니다.

# data[].attributes.body
Ageism, or discrimination based on age, is a harmful social bias that affects both older and younger people. It can lead to unfair treatment in workplaces, healthcare, and daily life, often limiting individuals' opportunities simply because of their age. Ageism reinforces stereotypes—like assuming older people are less capable or younger people are irresponsible—which prevents society from recognizing each person’s unique value. Combating ageism requires promoting respect across generations, changing negative perceptions, and creating policies that support equal treatment for all ages.

Ageism isn’t harmless. It’s a social problem that needs to be challenged, not ignored.

If you meant “Is ageism bad or not a big deal?”—then yes, it's bad.
If you meant something else by “bad or nothing,” feel free to clarify!

Ageism is not nothing—it is a serious and harmful form of discrimination. It negatively affects people of all ages, especially the elderly and the young, by limiting their opportunities and devaluing their contributions to society. Older adults may be seen as less capable or outdated, while younger people may be dismissed as inexperienced or immature. These stereotypes can lead to unfair treatment in workplaces, healthcare, and social settings. Ageism not only harms individuals but also weakens society by ignoring the value of diversity across generations. Therefore, ageism should not be taken lightly—it is a real problem that needs to be addressed through awareness, respect, and inclusive policies.

# data[].attributes.body
20113 안재우

Do Media and Smart Devices Reinforce Ageism?

When I was in my first year of high school, I explored the relationship between media and stress among adolescents as part of a school research presentation. Through this project, I developed a growing interest in the psychological impact of media on teenagers. At the time, the research was centered on adolescents, but as I delved deeper, a question came to mind: “What kind of influence does media have on the elderly?” This question was closely tied to my everyday experiences within my family. My grandfather often struggled with using smartphones and digital technologies, and while I tried to help him, I sometimes found myself feeling frustrated. These personal experiences made me take a closer look at the digital divide between the elderly and media, and eventually led me to wonder whether smart devices might actually contribute to or reinforce age-based discrimination.

First, it is important to define what ageism means. Ageism refers to stereotypes, prejudices, and discriminatory behaviors based on a person's age. This term was first introduced in 1969 by American sociologist Robert Butler, who described it as encompassing negative perceptions of older adults, social exclusion, and denial of opportunities. Although the concept has since expanded to include discrimination against young adults and even children, the most prominent victims of ageism within social structures and systems remain the elderly. With the rapid transition to a digital and smart society, older generations are now facing new dimensions of exclusion.

Modern society has developed a diverse media environment thanks to advances in digital technology. Younger generations, especially teenagers and young adults, have naturally adapted to these technologies, gaining new opportunities for daily communication, information access, and cultural engagement through media. In contrast, older generations, who struggle to adapt to digital transformation, find themselves increasingly excluded from these evolving environments. According to the 2024 Digital Information Gap Survey published by Statistics Korea, the digital literacy level of those aged 60 and older is only about half that of people in their 20s and 30s. This disparity goes beyond mere device usage. It extends to differences in social participation, access to information, and opportunities for digital expression.

Such a gap significantly influences societal perceptions of the elderly. Media is a powerful tool in shaping how people think and act. In various media content—including dramas, commercials, news, YouTube videos, and social media posts—older adults are often portrayed as outdated, technologically incompetent, or dependent on others. These portrayals reinforce an image of older people as "inefficient" or "old-fashioned" in the minds of younger generations. Even if media does not explicitly promote discrimination, it continuously and unconsciously imprints fixed stereotypes through repeated exposure.

Moreover, the user interface and design of smart devices often do not take older users into consideration. Most interfaces are designed with younger users in mind, including elements like font size, color contrast, touch interaction, and voice guidance. As a result, elderly users repeatedly experience failure when attempting to use digital media, which eventually leads them to internalize statements like, “I just can’t do this,” or “This is only for young people.” This self-doubt leads to a loss of confidence, which in turn causes social withdrawal, isolation, and even depression. A study conducted with 1,500 older adults in the UK found that more than half reported feeling lonelier when using digital technologies.

In addition, the digitalization of public services presents yet another barrier for the elderly. Tasks such as submitting civil complaints, making hospital appointments, managing bank accounts, or checking public transportation schedules are now primarily handled through smartphone apps or websites. Many elderly individuals struggle with these systems and are therefore either excluded from accessing public services or forced to accept inefficient alternatives. For instance, in the field of sports, particularly professional baseball in Korea, most tickets are sold exclusively online. In 2024, professional baseball achieved a milestone of 10 million spectators, showing tremendous popularity. However, only 13% of the spectators were aged 40 or older, while the majority were between their teens and thirties. This sharp generational divide underscores the ironic reality in which digital technologies, while meant to be inclusive, can actually deepen social exclusion for older adults.

Social media platforms like YouTube and Instagram further reinforce ageism through their algorithms. These platforms primarily recommend content that appeals to younger users, putting the elderly at a disadvantage in terms of content diversity. Content created from the perspective of older people is often ridiculed or dismissed as “boring” or “outdated.” This not only limits the elderly’s ability to express themselves online but also solidifies a one-way communication structure dominated by younger generations.

However, the responsibility does not lie solely with the media or the technology itself. A larger problem is the institutional and cultural neglect of age diversity in the design and management of digital society. For example, digital literacy education is primarily focused on the youth, and smart policies often fail to incorporate the voices of older citizens. Therefore, the phenomenon of media reinforcing ageism is not merely the result of technology’s supposed neutrality, but rather a reflection of how society chooses to structure that technology.

With this understanding, I propose the following solutions. First, media content must expand narratives that respect age diversity. Portraying older adults as active and creative individuals can help weaken age-based stereotypes. A good example is the film The Intern, where a 70-year-old named Ben joins a company run by a young entrepreneur, Jules. His wisdom and experience are depicted in a way that encourages respect and empathy toward the elderly. Second, the design of digital interfaces must incorporate feedback from users of all age groups, following the principles of universal design. Older users often suffer from vision-related discomfort, so interfaces should be larger and simpler. Third, digital education should be lifelong, with customized programs specifically designed for the elderly. Lastly, younger generations should build relationships with older adults based not on one-sided teaching but on mutual understanding and shared learning.

In conclusion, media and smart devices are not inherently discriminatory. However, the way they are designed, used, and embedded within social structures can either reinforce or reduce ageism. As citizens of the digital age, we must work to create a more inclusive media environment. Empathy for the elderly, institutional support, and a cultural shift in how we view aging are all essential. The frustration I felt while helping my grandfather wasn’t just a matter of generational difference—it may have reflected a larger societal failure to bridge technological and cultural divides between generations. Now is the time to take action to close that gap.

# data[].attributes.body
Ageism is a harmful bias that negatively affects both individuals and society, and therefore must be actively challenged and overcome. One major reason is employment discrimination, where many older workers face unfair treatment during hiring and promotions due to stereotypes that they are less adaptable or less productive. This limits their career opportunities and financial security, harming their quality of life. Additionally, ageism leads to inequality in healthcare, as medical professionals may dismiss symptoms or provide less aggressive treatments based solely on a patient’s age rather than their actual health condition, resulting in worse health outcomes. Furthermore, ageist attitudes contribute to social isolation and mental health problems, especially among the elderly, causing loneliness and depression. This not only impacts individuals but also increases societal costs related to mental health care. Therefore, combating ageism is essential for creating a fairer and healthier society

에이지즘은 개인과 사회 모두에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 해로운 편견이기 때문에 적극적으로 맞서서 극복해야 한다. 첫째, 많은 고령 근로자들이 적응력이 떨어지거나 생산성이 낮다는 고정관념 때문에 채용과 승진 과정에서 불공정한 대우를 받는다. 이로 인해 그들의 경력 기회와 경제적 안정성이 제한되어 삶의 질이 저하된다. 둘째, 에이지즘은 의료 분야에서도 불평등을 초래한다. 의료진이 환자의 실제 건강 상태보다 나이를 기준으로 증상을 경시하거나 덜 적극적인 치료를 제공하는 경우가 있어 건강 결과가 나빠질 수 있다. 셋째, 나이에 대한 편견은 특히 노인층에서 사회적 고립과 정신 건강 문제를 일으켜 외로움과 우울증을 초래한다. 이는 개인에게만 영향을 미치는 것이 아니라 정신 건강 관련 사회적 비용 증가로 이어지기도 한다. 따라서 에이지즘에 맞서 싸우는 것은 보다 공정하고 건강한 사회를 만들기 위해 반드시 필요하다.

# data[].attributes.body
Ageism: Discrimination Hidden as Kindness

A 2025 article from The Guardian introduces the concept of “elderspeak.” This refers to speaking to older adults using words like “sweetheart” or “dear,” and using a tone as if talking to a child. While this may seem friendly, the article explains that it is actually a form of benevolent ageism—a hidden form of discrimination against older people. Such behavior can harm their confidence and make them feel disrespected, even though the speaker may think they are being kind.

After reading this article, I believe that ageism is a serious problem, not just a small issue. Treating people differently just because they are older—or younger—is clearly a form of discrimination. Ageism doesn’t affect only older people; young people also experience it when others ignore their opinions or underestimate their abilities due to their age.

Therefore, I think people should be judged by their thoughts, experiences, and personality—not their age. Whether someone is young or old, they deserve to be treated as a respected individual, not defined by the number of years they have lived.

나이차별: 친절함에 숨겨진 차별

가디언의 2025년 기사는 "장로 말하기"의 개념을 소개한다. 이것은 "여보" 또는 "사랑하는"과 같은 단어를 사용하여 노인들에게 말하고, 마치 어린이와 이야기하는 것처럼 어조를 사용하는 것을 말합니다. 이것은 우호적으로 보일 수 있지만, 기사는 그것이 실제로 자비로운 연령 차별의 한 형태, 즉 노인들에 대한 숨겨진 형태의 차별이라고 설명합니다. 그러한 행동은 화자가 친절하다고 생각할지라도 자신감을 손상시키고 무례하다고 느끼게 할 수 있습니다.

이 기사를 읽은 후, 나는 나이 차별이 단지 작은 문제가 아니라 심각한 문제라고 생각한다. 사람들을 나이가 많거나 젊다는 이유만으로 다르게 대하는 것은 분명히 차별의 한 형태입니다. 연령차별은 노인들에게만 영향을 미치는 것이 아니다; 젊은이들도 다른 사람들이 자신의 의견을 무시하거나 나이 때문에 자신의 능력을 과소평가할 때 그것을 경험한다.

그러므로 나는 사람들은 나이가 아니라 생각, 경험, 성격으로 판단되어야 한다고 생각한다. 누군가가 젊든 늙든, 그들은 그들이 살았던 세월의 수로 정의되지 않고 존경받는 개인으로 대우받을 자격이 있다.

# data[].attributes.body
20115 이믿음

Title: Ageism – A Harmful Bias We Must Overcome

Ageism is a form of discrimination based on a person's age. It can affect both the elderly and the young, often limiting their opportunities, voices, and self-worth. In my opinion, ageism is harmful and should not be accepted in any society.

Firstly, ageism in the workplace is a serious issue. Older people are often seen as less capable of adapting to new technologies or ideas, even though many are just as competent as younger workers. This leads to unfair hiring practices and early retirements, wasting valuable experience and knowledge.

Secondly, young people can also be victims of ageism. Their ideas are sometimes ignored simply because they are considered “too young to understand.” This discourages innovation and limits their chances to contribute meaningfully.

Furthermore, ageism can affect mental health. When people are treated as if they are less valuable because of their age, they may start to believe it themselves. This can lead to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and even depression.

Some argue that certain age-based rules are necessary, such as driving or voting ages. While age limits can be helpful in some legal situations, using age as a reason to judge someone’s ability or character is unfair.

In conclusion, ageism is a harmful bias that causes inequality and suffering. We must recognize it and take steps to treat people of all ages with respect and fairness. Age should never be used as a reason to exclude or underestimate someone.

제목: 연령차별 – 우리가 극복해야 할 해로운 편견

연령차별은 사람의 나이를 기준으로 차별하는 형태입니다. 이는 노인뿐 아니라 젊은 사람들에게도 영향을 미치며, 종종 그들의 기회, 목소리, 자존감을 제한합니다. 제 생각에 연령차별은 해롭고, 어떤 사회에서도 받아들여져서는 안 됩니다.

첫째, 직장에서의 연령차별은 심각한 문제입니다. 나이 많은 사람들은 새로운 기술이나 아이디어에 적응하지 못할 것이라는 인식이 있지만, 실제로는 많은 경우 젊은 사람들만큼 능력이 있습니다. 이로 인해 불공정한 채용이나 조기 퇴직이 일어나며, 귀중한 경험과 지식이 낭비됩니다.

둘째, 젊은 사람들도 연령차별의 피해자가 될 수 있습니다. 그들의 생각은 단지 “너무 어려서 이해 못 할 것”이라는 이유로 무시되기도 합니다. 이는 혁신을 저해하고 그들이 의미 있게 기여할 수 있는 기회를 제한합니다.

또한, 연령차별은 정신 건강에도 영향을 줄 수 있습니다. 나이 때문에 덜 가치 있는 사람처럼 대우받으면, 본인도 그렇게 느끼게 됩니다. 이는 고립감, 낮은 자존감, 심지어 우울증으로 이어질 수 있습니다.

일부는 운전이나 투표처럼 연령 기준이 필요한 경우도 있다고 주장합니다. 법적 상황에서 나이 제한이 필요한 경우도 있지만, 나이를 이유로 사람의 능력이나 성격을 판단하는 것은 공정하지 않습니다.

결론적으로, 연령차별은 불평등과 고통을 초래하는 해로운 편견입니다. 우리는 이를 인식하고 모든 연령의 사람들을 존중하고 공정하게 대우하기 위한 조치를 취해야 합니다. 나이는 누군가를 배제하거나 과소평가하는 이유가 되어서는 안 된다고 생각합니다.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, ageism is not right. Whether young or old, age is simply a stage of life that every person experiences. If we think negatively of others solely because of their age, we must take a moment to reflect on what we were like when we were young, or consider what we will be like in the future. Everyone has a childhood, and everyone will eventually grow old. Holding a negative view of a stage of life that we have already lived through or will eventually experience shows a self-centered way of thinking. People of all ages are from different times. They are simply living according to the era they belong to. Each generation has its own strengths. Older people, having lived through many years, are rich in experience and knowledge. On the other hand, younger people are more adaptable, creative, and quick to learn. We need to understand and appreciate the strengths and values of each age group.

에이지즘은 옳지 않다고 생각한다. 나이가 많든 어리든 모든 사람이 겪는 시기일 뿐이다. 나이가 많거나 어리다는 이유로 부정적이게 생각한다면 자신은 미래에 어떨지, 자신이 어렸을 때는 어땠는지 생각해볼 필요가 있다. 모두에게는 어린 시절과 노후 시절이 있다. 자신이 겪을 것이거나, 이미 겪은 시기에 대해 부정적으로 생각하는 것은 자기중심적인 사고가 포함된 결과라고 생각한다. 또, 모든 연령대의 사람들은 서로 다른 시대의 사람들이다. 모두 저마다 자신의 시대에 맞게 살아가는 것일 뿐이다. 각자의 장점 또한 존재한다. 나이든 사람은 오랜 세월을 살아온만큼 경험과 지식이 풍부하다. 반면 어린 사람들은 창의력과 학습에 유리하다. 우리는 각자의 시대와 장점을 이해할 필요가 있다.

# data[].attributes.body
20109 박종범

Ageism in the Age of Longevity: A Challenge for Modern Society

In recent years, South Korea has rapidly approached an ultra-aged society, with projections suggesting that by 2025, over 20% of the population will be 65 years or older. This demographic shift is often discussed in economic or healthcare terms, yet a deeper issue lies in the attitudes and structural biases embedded within society—namely, ageism. Originally coined by Robert Butler in 1969, ageism refers to discrimination or prejudice based on age, especially against older adults. It is a complex social phenomenon that not only marginalizes the elderly but also undermines the ethical foundations of a democratic and inclusive society.

Ageism manifests in both explicit and implicit ways. Explicit ageism can be seen in employment practices where older individuals are denied jobs or forced into early retirement, regardless of their ability or experience. Implicit ageism, on the other hand, operates through unconscious biases—such as assuming all older people are frail, forgetful, or resistant to change. These stereotypes not only shape public discourse but also affect individual self-perception among seniors, leading to lower self-esteem and reduced social participation.

Philosophically, ageism raises profound questions about the value of human life and dignity across the lifespan. A society that equates worth with productivity or youth implicitly violates the principle of equality. As highlighted in recent studies on ageism in Korea, this bias is exacerbated by the legacy of industrialization and hyper-competitive social structures, where the elderly are increasingly viewed as economic burdens rather than as bearers of wisdom and experience. The problem is not merely interpersonal prejudice but a systemic issue that intersects with healthcare access, labor rights, and even digital inclusion.

Indeed, in the digital age, older adults face a new kind of exclusion: technological ageism. Those unfamiliar with ICT tools may find themselves isolated, unable to access essential services or communicate effectively. This digital divide reinforces a cycle of dependency and invisibility, making it critical for public policy to promote digital education and lifelong learning opportunities for seniors.

To counteract ageism, both structural reform and cultural change are needed. First, legal and institutional protections must ensure that seniors are not excluded from the workforce or public life based solely on age. For example, anti-discrimination policies in employment should consider not only equal opportunity but also fair access to retraining and education. Second, society must reframe its cultural narratives around aging. Rather than viewing aging as a decline, we should recognize it as a transformation—an accumulation of experience and insight.

Moreover, ethical reflection demands that we question our own assumptions. As a student interested in political science and philosophy, I believe that justice requires us to dismantle hierarchies based on age just as we do those based on gender or race. Age, like any other human attribute, should not determine one’s rights or opportunities. If democracy means respecting the voice of every citizen, then ignoring or sidelining the elderly contradicts the very spirit of political equality.

In conclusion, the challenge of ageism in a 100-year life era is not just a problem of an aging society, but a test of our social values and philosophical integrity. As we live longer, the way we treat our elderly reflects not only on their quality of life but on the maturity of our collective conscience. Overcoming ageism will require both legislative action and a cultural shift—one that affirms the dignity, agency, and value of every person, at every age.

장수 시대에 나타난 에이지즘: 현대 사회가 직면한 과제

최근 우리나라는 초고령사회로 빠르게 진입하고 있다. 통계에 따르면 2025년에는 전체 인구의 20% 이상이 65세 이상 고령자일 것으로 전망되고 있다. 이러한 인구 고령화는 경제나 복지의 문제로도 중요한 의미를 갖지만, 그보다 더 근본적인 문제는 연령에 대한 사회의 구조적 편견과 차별, 즉 ‘에이지즘(Ageism)’의 문제이다. 에이지즘은 1969년 로버트 버틀러(Robert Butler)가 처음 제안한 개념으로, 주로 노인을 대상으로 하는 연령차별이나 부정적 인식을 의미한다. 이는 단순한 개인의 편견을 넘어, 포용성과 평등을 중시하는 민주 사회의 윤리적 기반을 위협하는 구조적 문제로 간주되어야 한다.

에이지즘은 명시적 차별뿐만 아니라 암묵적 차별의 형태로도 작동하고 있다. 명시적 에이지즘은 고령자에게 취업 기회를 제한하거나 조기 은퇴를 강요하는 방식으로 나타나며, 암묵적 에이지즘은 노인은 느리고 변화에 둔감하다는 고정관념을 바탕으로 일상 속에서 나타나고 있다. 이러한 편견은 고령자의 자존감을 약화시키고, 사회적 참여를 제한하는 결과로 이어진다.

철학적 관점에서 에이지즘은 인간 생명의 존엄성과 가치가 어떻게 정의되어야 하는지를 묻는 근본적인 문제를 제기한다. 만약 사회가 젊음과 생산성을 기준으로 인간의 가치를 판단한다면, 이는 평등이라는 민주주의의 원칙과 충돌하게 된다. 국내외의 여러 연구에서도 나타나듯, 산업화와 경쟁 중심의 사회 구조는 고령자를 점점 ‘쓸모없는 존재’로 간주하게 만들고 있다. 이는 단지 노인 개인의 문제가 아니라 정치, 제도, 문화 전반의 개입이 필요한 구조적 문제임을 시사한다.

디지털 시대에 들어서면서 등장한 또 다른 차별은 ‘기술적 에이지즘’이다. 정보통신기술(ICT)에 익숙하지 않은 고령자는 필수적인 사회 서비스를 이용하지 못하거나 의사소통에서 소외되는 경우가 많다. 이는 디지털 문맹으로 이어지며, 고령자가 사회적 효용이 없는 존재로 간주되는 악순환을 낳는다. 따라서 디지털 역량 강화를 위한 평생교육 기회를 제공하고, 기술적 포용을 위한 제도적 장치가 마련되어야 한다.

에이지즘 극복을 위해서는 두 가지 측면의 노력이 병행되어야 한다. 첫째, 제도적 측면에서는 연령에 근거한 불합리한 차별을 방지하는 법적 보호 장치가 필요하다. 단순한 형식적 기회 제공에 그치지 않고, 실질적인 고용 접근성과 재교육 기회를 제공해야 한다. 둘째, 문화적 측면에서는 노화에 대한 인식을 전환하는 사회적 노력이 요구된다. 노년을 ‘쇠퇴’가 아닌 ‘성숙’과 ‘경험의 축적’으로 바라보는 인식 전환이 필요하다.

정치학과 철학에 관심을 두고 있는 한 학생으로서, 에이지즘은 단순한 사회적 편견이 아니라 정치적 정의의 문제라고 판단된다. 나이는 누구에게나 찾아오는 것이며, 그것이 권리의 기준이 되어서는 안 된다. 연령을 이유로 시민이 배제된다면, 이는 정치적 평등의 원리를 훼손하는 것이다.

결론적으로, 100세 시대의 에이지즘은 고령자만의 문제가 아니라 우리 모두가 함께 고민해야 할 윤리적이고 철학적인 과제이다. 인간의 존엄성과 평등의 가치를 지키기 위해서는 누구나 나이에 관계없이 존중받고 참여할 수 있는 사회를 만들어야 한다. 지금 이 순간이야말로, 에이지즘을 극복하기 위한 실질적 대안을 마련할 때이다.

<참고자료>

- https://www.jkpmhn.org/upload/pdf/jkpmhn-9-4-515.pdf

- https://kordi.or.kr/content.do?bid=248&mode=view&page=1&cid=222&sf_category=N107_1&cmsId=173

# data[].attributes.body
I recently learned about the word ageism, and it made me think a lot. Ageism means judging or treating people differently just because of their age. It can include the way we think, feel, and act toward people who are older or younger. I think this is a serious problem in society. In real life, I’ve heard people say things like “You’re too young to understand” or call older people names like “boomer.” These might seem like jokes, but they can hurt someone’s feelings or make them feel left out. After learning more about ageism, I started to wonder if I’ve also had unfair thoughts about people because of their age.I believe that age doesn’t decide how smart or valuable someone is. Young people can have great ideas, and older people have a lot of experience and wisdom. If we respect each other no matter how old we are, I think the world can be a better place. We should focus on each person’s thoughts and actions, not just their age.From now on, I will try not to judge people based on age. I also want to talk about this with my friends and family. Ageism is not only a problem for older people — it can also affect teenagers like me. That’s why I think everyone should care about it. I hope people can see others for who they really are, not just how old they are.

# data[].attributes.body
(김도연) In my opinion, AGEISM is natural in terms of ....

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the reading text, What is your opinion about AGEISM?

write your opinion in a new page (press add button...),

or you can make a comment in below as a form of reply!