# data[].attributes.body
During the london 2012 Olympics, there was 3.4 million tons of CO2, which is six times the amount of annual omission in the UK.

More than half of the CO2 emissions associated with the games came from the construction process even though they planned to reuse or recycle 90% of their construction waste.

There was also 17,000 tons of waste.

# data[].attributes.body
Two phases to prepare the beach front.
Phase 1 - Before the event happened, they moved fisherman and other locals out of their area in order to work on the beach front. Promised that they would be back in 2010, but were not back until 2013. Lost the Blue Flag status due to ineffective water management procedures and weak environmental monitoring strategies.
Phase 2 -  After the event, people were so unhappy about the effects from phase 1, that phase 2 was never executed.

Upgraded the hotel system so that more people were willing to go.

# data[].attributes.body
Negative:
1. located next to the St. Johns River - rising water levels & flooding
2. potential trash/ pollutants entering water due to nearby tailgating
3. Driving emissions - traffic congestion
4. Water usage for grass field
Positive:
1. first team in FL to use a plastic waste program - single use plastics not ending up in landfill/ocean

# data[].attributes.body
Positive:
-you might not need to use artificial snow, natural landscape

Negative Impact:
-do not have the existing stadium for ppl;
-not having sufficient hotel supply
-solid pollution
-too cold

# data[].attributes.body
The environmental impacts :
1. Artificial snow poses risks for the local ecosystem by impacting water cleanliness and making land unstable and prone to erosion.
2. it can harm the vegetation and delay its growing process.
3. large amounts of energy used that will be costly and will also put a strain on water resources.
4. the production of artificial snow can increase water runoff which can cause floods.