# data[].attributes.body
why should they help
1. because if Russia wins it can be really bad for the US.
2. They should help because there are so many Innocent people dying
3.  Because Ukraine wanted to join NATO but they weren't able to make it before Russia invasion.

Why shouldn't NATO help..
1. It could lead to a worst situation.
2. It can start a big conflict between Russia and the United States
3. Ukraine is not part of NATO so they shouldn't get involved

# data[].attributes.body
FOR United States and NATO using direct military intervention in Ukraine:

1) When the United States were in times of attack the US should have an understanding of what its like to be uncontrollably under attack without any direct military intervention, and have that as a lesson to help Ukraine.

2) Providing direct military intervention in Ukraine could discount Vladymir Putin's power and prevent the possibility that Russia grows more powerful and bigger.

3) Since Ukraine is not a part of NATO , the US providing military intervention could result in a gained ally.

AGAINST United States and NATO using direct military intervention in Ukraine:

1) With Russia's large army, every country in NATO could be attacked if the US take charge, risks of turning into a global/ world war

2) The US oil supply will strike since Russia is one of the Unites State's top 5 sources of imported oil.

3) Russia uses nuclear and atomic bombs and could use that at their advantage if The US or NATO takes direct military intervention

# data[].attributes.body
why they should help
1) Russia has a stronger military than Ukraine, so Ukraine is helpless to the attacks of Russia without support.
2)Since the war started 2,899 civilians have died 210 being children. The US and NATO have the capabilities to prevent more deaths from happening so they should use them.
3)Having a better relationship with Ukraine.

why they shouldn't help
1)Ukraine isn't a part of NATO so the US and NATO have no obligation to help Ukraine.
2)It could make the US a target of Russia.
3)It could lead to more deaths.

# data[].attributes.body
FOR
1. to save Ukraine and its people
2. to stop Russia from trying to seize other bordering countries
3. Ukraine is innocent and wants to be a part of NATO

AGAINST
1.Using military intervention can cause WW3
2.Many people will die if a war begins and the war will escalate.We might have to use the nuclear bombs which kills lots of innocent people
3.Ukraine isn't a part of NATO and many people don't want to fight in a war

# data[].attributes.body
US/NATO should use direct military intervention in Ukraine
_ Help Ukraine by giving supplies and supporting them until the war ends might impact Ukraine from loosing less innocent lives in the country
_Without the help of US/NATO Ukraine with not win the war if they only had a small amount of supplies to fight
_Having enough supplies helps Ukraine have more confidence of fighting with Russia
US/NATO shouldn't use direct military intervention in Ukraine
-It might start World war 3
-We should not waste our supplies towards Ukraine
-We might sacrifice even more individuals from the country

# data[].attributes.body
Why we should́́n't help...
1. Ukraine isn't essential for NATO so US isn't committed to help Ukraine.
2. In the event that US chooses to participate in fight, it can bring about WW3.
3. Russia approaches atomic weapons. This can bring about atomic fighting.

Why we should help...
1. Ukraine needed to join NATO some time prior however halted due to issues with Russia.
2. In the event that the US and NATO sits idle, Russia could begin to attack different nations until its past the point of no return for the US and NATO to do anything.
3. US and NATO has previously provided Ukraine with truckload of cash and supplies, should bet everything.

# data[].attributes.body
Why they should help...
1. Because they are in a time of crisis, similar to when we had the 9/11 attacks or pearl harbor attack.
2. It can improve future relationships with Ukraine.
3. Russia could become even bigger and stronger than it is already if someone doesn't stop them now.

Why they shouldn't help...
1. Going into a war against Russia could lead to a massive global conflict.
2. It'll ruin the global economy.
3. I'll get drafted

# data[].attributes.body
Why NATO shouldn't support Ukraine
1. Russia has access to nuclear weapon. This can result in nuclear warfare.
2. If US decides to engage in battle, it can result in WW3.
3. Ukraine is not part of NATO so US is not obligated to support Ukraine

Why NATO and the US should support Ukraine
1. US and NATO has already given Ukraine a lot of money and supplies, might as well go all in.
2. Ukraine wanted to join NATO a while ago but stopped because of issues with Russia.
3. If US and NATO doesn't do anything, Russia might start to invade other countries until its too late for the US and NATO to do anything

# data[].attributes.body
FOR:
1) Innocent Ukrainians are being killed mercilessly, Russia has started bombing cities that are heavily populated with civilians and not military members.
2) Ukraine helped us in our time of need, during 9/11, during the Pearl Harbor bombing. It's the only right thing to do to repay our debt.
3) If we don't stop Russia now, history is about to repeat itself. Russia will start invading small countries and having no consequences done to them, just like Hitler.
AGAINST:
1) If go to war with Russia, we might start a war that includes the use of nuclear bombs, and it would result in a nuclear winter.
2) We could be violating some kind of agreement that will make people around the world furious at us, especially Russia.
3) Our technology has improved since the last World War, now that we have nuclear bombs, this might mean that the world will start using the excuse of defending Ukraine to justify the use of nuclear bombs.