# data[].attributes.body
pros: -Examine different people’s views
-Members feel involved
-strategies easily share ideas.
-When employees are involved in the decision
making process, they are more eager work toward meeting goals.

Cons: -Slow and time consuming
-Security (If this is an issue, this
leadership style could compromise it because too many people are involved.

# data[].attributes.headline
autocratic is a good thing because people learn things 

# data[].attributes.subject
autocratic is a good thing because people learn things 

# data[].attributes.body
This type of leadership is said to be synonymous with dictatorship, where only one person presides with complete authority over the followers or workers. Their decision has to be taken as the golden rule and is never to be questioned or challenged. They plan out everything and order their subordinates to work according to their rules. For instance, if a company has an authoritarian leader as the managing director, the employees in the company would have to work as per the rules set by him. They would not be allowed to participate in any kind of decision-making process. This may hinder the growth of the company by enhancing the productivity. In short, the authoritative leader has full control on those around him and has complete authority to treat them as he wants.

# data[].attributes.body
Parcipitave leadership fuels employee motivation
because it knows how to share decision making control using knowledge, skills
and ability level for making a given decision effectively.

# data[].attributes.body
Laissez-faire leadership, also known as delegative leadership, is a type of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and allow group members to make the decisions. Researchers have found that this is generally the leadership style that leads to the lowest productivity among group members.An example of laissez faire are the economic policies held by capitalist countries.

Benefits of Laissez-Faire Leadership

Laissez-faire leadership can be effective in situations where group members are highly skilled, motivated and capable of working on their own. While the conventional term for this style is 'laissez-faire' and implies a completely hands-off approach, many leaders still remain open and available to group members for consultation and feedback.

Downsides of Laissez-Faire Leadership

Laissez-faire leadership is not ideal in situations where group members lack the knowledge or experience they need to complete tasks and make decisions. Some people are not good at setting their own deadlines, managing their own projects and solving problems on their own. In such situations, projects can go off-track and deadlines can be missed when team members do not get enough guidance or feedback from leaders.

# data[].attributes.body
Autocratic leadership is a form of management where one leader typically has complete control over a work area

or project. In a small business environment, the owner may implement this form of leadership when the operation

is relatively small and he has a limited number of employees. While an autocratic style is considered more traditional,

and in some instances, outdated form of leadership, it still offers a variety of benefits.

# data[].attributes.body
Involves a team guided by a leader where all individuals are involved in the decision-making process to determine what needs to be done and how it should be done. The group's leader has the authority to make the final decision of the group.

Advantages: Democratic leadership techniques generally will do a better job creating job
satisfaction because it fosters a sense of participation, control and autonomy.
Greater employee participation in decision-making may also lead to greater
innovation and creative solutions to problems that will better serve an
organization.

Disadvantages:
A democratic approach to management may not be as efficient as a more
traditional centralized and authoritarian form of direction. Consequently, it
may be more costly to the organization in time and resources. Accountability may
sometimes present a problem. When responsibility is diffused among several
different individuals or groups, accountability for mistakes or failures may be
harder to determine.

# data[].attributes.body
It is the consultative management method which encourages others

to participate. Leadership decisions are achieved as the end result

of group participation. Participative management is the process of consultative management.

# data[].attributes.body
An autocratic leader is when a leader has unlimited power
or authority.