# data[].attributes.headline
Today, children can get so much information from the internet, so schools are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

# data[].attributes.subject
Today, children can get so much information from the internet, so schools are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

# data[].attributes.body
In today's digital age, the internet has revolutionized the way we access information. With just a few clicks, children can learn about virtually any topic imaginable. Consequently, some argue that traditional schooling has become obsolete. While the internet offers unparalleled access to knowledge, I contend that schools continue to play a vital role in a child's education.

Undeniably, the internet has democratized access to information. Online resources, educational platforms, and digital libraries provide a wealth of knowledge that was once confined to physical textbooks and libraries. Moreover, the internet offers a more personalized learning experience, allowing students to learn at their own pace and explore their interests in depth. However, while the internet can supplement traditional education, it cannot replace it entirely.

Schools provide a structured learning environment that is essential for developing essential skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and effective communication. Teachers play a crucial role in guiding students through complex concepts, providing feedback, and fostering a love of learning. Moreover, schools offer opportunities for social interaction and collaboration that are difficult to replicate online. These interactions help children develop important social skills, such as teamwork, empathy, and respect for others.

Furthermore, schools instill in students a sense of discipline and routine that are essential for success in both academic and professional pursuits. The structured nature of schooling helps children develop time management skills, work ethic, and the ability to meet deadlines. These skills are invaluable in today's fast-paced world.

In conclusion, while the internet has undoubtedly transformed education, it cannot fully replace the role of schools. Traditional schooling provides a structured learning environment that is essential for developing critical thinking, social skills, and a love of learning. While the internet can supplement education, it should not be seen as a replacement for the human interaction and guidance that teachers provide. Therefore, I believe that schools will continue to play a vital role in educating future generations.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of learning different musical instruments among school children across three years: 2005, 2010, and 2015.

Overall, it is immediately noticeable that the percentage of school children learning to play Piano and Guitar increased the most over the period while the figure for learning Violin decreased a little bit.

The bar chart reveals contrasting trends for Drums and Violin. While the percentage of school children learning Drums remained consistent at 5% in the initial two years, it experienced a notable increase of 4% in 2015. In contrast, Violin witnessed a steady decline from 8% in 2005 to 4% in the final year, making it the least popular instrument among students by 2015.

Guitar and Piano emerged as the most coveted musical instruments among school children during the study period. Piano consistently held the top spot in 2005 and 2010, its popularity surging from 11% in 2005 to a peak of 20% in 2010. Despite this impressive growth, the piano's reign was challenged by the guitar. The guitar, exhibiting even more rapid growth, overtook the piano in 2015, rising from 9% in 2005 to a remarkable 40%.

In conclusion, the bar chart provides a clear overview of the changing trends in musical instrument learning among school children over the given period.

# data[].attributes.body
depths: độ sâu

accessible: có thể truy cập được

astronomers: các nhà thiên văn học

naked eye: mắt thường

telescope: kính thiên văn

instruments: nhạc cụ

trillions: nghìn tỷ

vacuum: chân không

penetrate: thâm nhập

curious: tò mò

investigators: các nhà điều tra

have long been fascinated: đã bị mê hoặc từ lâu

observe: quan sát

overgeneralize: khái quát quá mức

off topic: lạc đề

extremity: cực điểm

outer extremity: ngoài cùng

accurately: chính xác

measure: đo lường

pre empting: chiếm đoạt trước

pre emption: quyền ưu tiên

whether it is because of: cho dù đó là bởi vì

submerged: bị chìm

demonstrate: chứng minh

justifications: biện minh

excellent: xuất sắc

transmitting: truyền tải

the key rationale is that: lý do chính là

overwhelmed: bị choáng ngợp

so overwhelmed: quá choáng ngợp

# data[].attributes.headline
Governments should make laws about people's nutrition and food choives. Others argue that it is their choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

# data[].attributes.subject
Governments should make laws about people's nutrition and food choives. Others argue that it is their choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
The issue of whether governments should legislate on people's nutrition and food choices has been a subject of much debate.

# data[].attributes.body
nostalgic:

impersonal:

retail:

construction:

architecture:

forced to:

facade:

illuminates:

toll:

bland:

cityscapes:

surrounded by:

unattractive:

element: yếu tố

# data[].attributes.headline
Làm Reading test 4 _ Làm ko hết thì làm passage 2 cũng dc

# data[].attributes.subject
Làm Reading test 4 _ Làm ko hết thì làm passage 2 cũng dc

# data[].attributes.headline
The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the fuel cost. Do you agree or disagree?

# data[].attributes.subject
The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the fuel cost. Do you agree or disagree?

# data[].attributes.body
One school of thought holds that raising the price of fuel is the best method to address the environmental issues facing the planet. While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I would argue that it is not a panacea.

On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that raising fuel prices can act as a powerful incentive for individuals and industries to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels. When the cost of driving or operating fuel-intensive machinery increases, consumers are more likely to explore alternative transportation options, such as public transit or electric vehicles. Moreover, businesses may be compelled to invest in energy-efficient technologies to minimize their operating expenses. Consequently, a hike in fuel costs can potentially lead to a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution.

On the other hand, I am convinced that this approach is not without its drawbacks. One significant concern is the disproportionate impact on low-income households. For many people, especially those in rural areas or with limited access to public transportation, a car is a necessity for work and daily life. Imposing higher fuel costs on such individuals would exacerbate economic inequalities and place an undue burden on their budgets.

Furthermore, the effectiveness of increasing fuel costs is contingent upon several factors, including the availability of viable alternatives and the overall economic climate. In regions with limited access to public transportation or renewable energy sources, raising fuel prices may simply shift the burden onto consumers without significantly reducing emissions. Additionally, in times of economic recession, higher fuel costs can stifle economic growth and job creation, potentially exacerbating social and political tensions.

In conclusion, while raising fuel costs can be a useful tool in the fight against climate change, it is not a panacea. A more effective approach would involve a combination of measures, including investments in renewable energy, improvements in public transportation infrastructure, and stricter regulations on industrial emissions. Furthermore, governments should implement policies that support a just transition to a low-carbon economy, ensuring that the burden of environmental protection does not fall disproportionately on vulnerable populations. By adopting a multifaceted strategy, we can hope to achieve a more sustainable and equitable future.

# data[].attributes.body
graphite: Than chì

sharper: sắc hơn

harder:cứng hơn

precise:Chính xác hơn

softer:mềm hơn

thicker:dày hơn

darker:tối hơn

eventually: cuối cùng

gave rise to a system: đã tạo ra một hệ thống

fineness:mịn

Pencil mark: Dấu bút chỉ

manufactures: Sản xuất

grading: phân loại

# data[].attributes.body
The table shows/illustrates/gives information about the number of people in four different nations in 2003 and the projection to 2050.

(The table shows demographic information of four nations in 200 as well as predicting how their population will change in 2025 and 2050.)

Overall, it is evident that Argentina and Indonesia are expected to experience significant population growth, while Italy's population is projected to decline. The Republic of Korea’s population is anticipated to remain relatively stable.

( Overall, /generally, all countries will see their populations increase by varying degrees, with the exception of Italy. besides, Indonesia will remain by far the most populous nation throughout./over the period shown.)

In 2003, Indonesia had the largest population among the four countries, with 238 million people. This figure is projected to increase to 274 million by 2025 and further to 312 million by 2050. Argentina’s population, starting at 34 million in 2003, is expected to rise to 48 million in 2025 and reach 62 million by 2050.

# data[].attributes.body
Cách để viết Body

1. Bội

2. Surpass

3. Ranking

4. Remain/ top/ bottom

5. Combo