# data[].attributes.body
Share the counterargument regardless of if the user asks for it

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of adapting AI to aid in democratic deliberation, AI should be used to showcase the echo chambers

# data[].attributes.body
As you mentioned bringing up both sides of the argument but even then it’s up to the user to be willing to accept the other side

# data[].attributes.body
I think it should be avoided at all costs

# data[].attributes.body
Models that classify information as factual or not (fact checkers)

# data[].attributes.body
AI should be developed with as little bias as possible and should try to expose people to different points of view.

# data[].attributes.body
The same way you eliminate false information and bias in other fields: by either making it abundantly clear that the LLM’s is not absolute or by making sure the dataset the model is trained on is accurate and reliable information.

# data[].attributes.body
While it’s incredibly difficult, guide the responses to be as neutral as possible

# data[].attributes.body
AI experts should test their models more for bias, being aware of their own and seeing if that translates into their model. They should also do some kind of prompt beforehand to the user, allowing them to understand that their FYP or search engine is not the internet, it’s an algorithm based on their use

# data[].attributes.body
It can be so difficult especially given how far we have gotten in terms of political polarization…people have become so unwilling to accept anything else

# data[].attributes.body
im not actually sure, i think its ver hard to avoid echo chambers in any political or sociological space- especially when they are as polarizing as they have been now. It does worry me that alot of this ai generated content has been used in politics- especially when it us as harmful and malicious as it is