# data[].attributes.body
Use the rubric to grade this PSA.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.body
I gave the Pamphlet a 9/16 because they did well by taking from the Constitution and the bill of rights to further their opinion but, they got off topic with their argument and went to ramble on about about other things that showed noting to do with Immigration until the very end.

# data[].attributes.body
I give this pamphlet a 45/50 because I feel like the constitution itself wasn't referenced enough but other than that it was good.

# data[].attributes.body
Grading Pamphlet

# data[].attributes.body
I gave the fifth Amendment PSA a 15/16 because i feel like she touched on every thing the audience needed to know. I also see the creativity in the PSA.

# data[].attributes.body
I gave the PSA 46/ 50 because it was a clear message and very well demonstrated.

# data[].attributes.body
I give the Pamphlet a 9/10
Student gives good sources
Slides are neat and organized
Reasonable ideas but not very detailed

# data[].attributes.body
I give the Psa an 50/50 because I really liked it. I found it to be very informational and they had a lot of good images to support the information.

# data[].attributes.body
I give the pamphlet a 15/16 because the author brings provides most of the requirements in the categories but the author didn;t provide a personal perspective

# data[].attributes.body
I give the pamphlet a 13/16 because they were very informative on the variety of topics and went very in depth. They should improve on providing quotes.

# data[].attributes.body
I give the pamphlet a 14/16 because it was very organized and well put together but it wasn't as detailed as I would have liked.

# data[].attributes.body
I give the pamphlet a 14/16 because the structure and how the information was organized was great. But there wasn't enough personal feelings giving. I feel like the student should have clearly stated how he or she felt using first person.

# data[].attributes.body
I give this a 14/16
The information provided was clear but writing could have been better
The spacing was off on the table of contents

# data[].attributes.body
I gave the PSA a 45/50 because the video was clear and concise with its message. The narrator made sure to touch on and provide context for the audience's knowledge. They also made sure to do it in a creative matter, so all in all, it's a solid video. My only gripe is their vocal tone, but that's justice my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
The student did a fantastic job in giving evidence to their claims.
Some advice I would give is to be less repetitive and try to add more info about more issues involuting the constitution today.

# data[].attributes.body
I gave this student a 46/50 because they stated everything they needed but kept repeating themselves on various occasions. But overall it was great.

# data[].attributes.body
The student used great details and images in their pamphlet. Even though the student did a good job using specificity they could also erase some of the unnecessary details that mainly repeat things that were already stated.

# data[].attributes.body
i give it a 45/50 because the video made a clear point on what it was talking about and it gave evidence

# data[].attributes.body
The PSA was great and i belive that it gave correct and relevent information about the Fifth Amendment but ithey could have gone furhter in depth about the sub categories of the fifth amendment a little more and how they differentiate from each other.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked the video. The narrator stayed on topic and they made sure to elaborate thoroughly on each part. They were very creative with the video and used various pictures, also using music. I would give it a 48/50 because they were moving very fast so I did miss some of the information

# data[].attributes.body
I would give the pamphlet a 45/50 because they said everything important but they did repeat themselves a few times.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the psa deserve like a 47/50 because i love how detailed it was it gave what it was suppose to but i feel like its something missing that left out the narrator getting deeper into it ..or making it interesting .

# data[].attributes.body
i give the pamphlet a 45/50 they went into detail , followed the rubric voiced both sides and showed picture evidence which is very useful for the reader.

# data[].attributes.headline
Student did a great job. I give the pamphlet 48/50 because the Pham-let presented arguments that supported claims of constitution. It included several quotes from the constitution and makes  connections between the ideals in the constitution.

# data[].attributes.subject
Student did a great job. I give the pamphlet 48/50 because the Pham-let presented arguments that supported claims of constitution. It included several quotes from the constitution and makes  connections between the ideals in the constitution.

# data[].attributes.body
The student did very well in making things detailed,and following the rubic.
But they were a bit repedative, so some things could be erased.With that being said i'd give them a 46/50

# data[].attributes.body
I gave it

# data[].attributes.body
Compliment student- Great job on the PSA Robert!
1. Explain what they did well.
2. Provide needs for improvement.

Advice: Pick the rubric of the project you plan to do so that you can get an idea of the expectations.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on Pamphlet and use the rubric to grade.

# data[].attributes.body
Use this rubric to grade the above PSA example.

# data[].attributes.body
Use this checklist to grade the above pamphlet.

# data[].attributes.body
The video PSA the person did a really good job, they did a great job at explaining and making it easy to understand for all audiences. I cant really complain the only thing i can think of is them repeating they self over and over about something that the spoke on.

# data[].attributes.body
I give this project a 47/50 because the video clearly explains the fifth amendment and what you need to know about the rights given to the fifth amendment. The creativity was ok but i feel like the background music and the voice over together was to much. This video was distracting more then informing you on the fifth amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
thus psa gets a grades of 46/50 for me becuase the video had made a clear point to what it was talking bout and the evidence was concise

# data[].attributes.body
Overall I think this pamphlet is well organized and offers useful information. The author included relevant images and created a balance between Constitutional words and personal information. I would appreciate seeing better grammar in a few areas, proper source citations, and editing some information to make it more visually appealing and easily readable.

# data[].attributes.body
I will grade this pamphlet 47/50. They gave great arguments and evidence to support their claims. Their letter to the reader was in great perspective and they stated everything they needed to. Only critiques is they should make sure they aren't repeating statements as much and they keep the readers attention throughout.

# data[].attributes.body
The pamphlet is well written, it contains very little grammatical errors and explicates quotes well (quotes aren't cited!). It's carefully organized as well. The writing could be a little less redundant, but the analyses are still logical so it's fine.

# data[].attributes.body
I would give an 50/50 because some of there improvement.

# data[].attributes.body
I gave this a 48 because the author did very well in making valid points and giving us a lot of information and facts about the constitution, even giving us a slide on the pamphlet to show what to do in case ICE raids a home. Personally my only take away is the author sort of lacked personal perspective and that its not very attention grabbing, they couldve formatted it differently to keep a readers attention.

# data[].attributes.body
I gave the person a 48/50 because she had good evidence and she was giving out what has been happening for the country during the 27th amendment and she had good facts and good pictures and important things about the consitution argument.

# data[].attributes.body
i give this a 45/50 because i feel like the constitution itself wasn't referenced enough and they also gave good evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
No Questions Asked.