# data[].attributes.body
- multi-faced problem
- personalised approaches according to values
- promoting that changing your mind is good!
- there's a role for policies
- is not about regulating speeches, regulate platforms
- policies to help amplify good information
- policies to tackle power imbalances
- people are motivated for care and love
- linking related claims and not addressing pieces of misinformation separately
-

# data[].attributes.headline
can be a conceptual framework for designing misinformation-conscious SN

# data[].attributes.subject
can be a conceptual framework for designing misinformation-conscious SN

# data[].attributes.body
https://trustnet.csail.mit.edu/

# data[].attributes.headline
Disrupting mindless sharing to stopd misinformation before it spreads

# data[].attributes.subject
Disrupting mindless sharing to stopd misinformation before it spreads

# data[].attributes.body
Citizens? Platform? governments?

censorship is a blunt instrument and not a great solution because not only does it infringe on freedom of expression, it also has unintended consequences of driving more people to less regulated platforms, can exacerbate polarization that further erodes social cohesion, and doesn't address the reasons people were sharing harmful narratives in the first place. Also problematical given lack of transparency about these decisions. From a pragmatic perspective too, it's important that public health teams can hear what people are publicly sharing to better understand the main sources of confusion to help adapt health programmes accordingly. So 'takedowns' are harmful in more ways than one. (Christine)

# data[].attributes.body
Chen et al. found that the sharing of misinformation can be connected to socializing and self-expression, i.e. people share misinformation even though they know it is wrong:  Xinran Chen, Sei-Ching Joanna Sin, Yin-Leng Theng, and Chei Sian Lee. 2015. Why do social media users share misinformation?. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries. 111–114.

# data[].attributes.body
encourage users to discuss more online information rather than instant reaction (e.g. share, like)
The system itself should be designed to not provide instantly the options of reactions. Users should show first engagement with the information.

systems that encourage people to shift away from the current simple likes and shares actions. To add clicks where people can express their own opinion.
Look at experiments like quizz before allowing commenting under articles.

For me (Andre) learning how harmful having beliefs about how the world is should be the first step.

# data[].attributes.body
knowledge depends on one's own culture ('situatedness of knowledge')

Some knowledge is not cultural. But there might not be a knowledge, depending on how we define the term (Andre)

# data[].attributes.body
scalable?
Community x global

# data[].attributes.body
How we can make the tools perceived as more relatable to reproduce face-to-face human communication?

# data[].attributes.headline
Redesign of the interaction (with SN platforms)

# data[].attributes.subject
Redesign of the interaction (with SN platforms)

# data[].attributes.body
Only basic on logics will not work - we need to take into account emotions

Human face, which changes according to your group
Many different faces (profiles)

the personal side of things can make a difference - through paltforms that let people state their own opinions

# data[].attributes.body
one-click actions reframed
Quiz before commenting an article
Different solutions
dislike

# data[].attributes.body
Opinions and beliefs from people you know