# data[].attributes.body
For me I would consider this one in the Justice v Mercy with attention to the long term effects. I would want to show mercy for the girls in their situation while also making sure that their futures are not affected in too negatively a way from this situation or the future stability of the school.

# data[].attributes.body
As others have noted this one seems tricky to identify just one paradigm to see this case through. I think I would place it in Truth v Loyalty. The loyalty aspect for me is what I find to be the most paramount. I believe when people give their loyalty and dedication to a company though they should expect the same in return. Why I would tie in other paradigms because I believe that loyalty builds community, and will be good for the long term situation of any organization.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this one to be a case of Individual v Community. An individually minded person might choose to divulge the information they have to their client out of concern for that individual. On the other hand a more community minded person would see the effect that counselors revealing private information would have on the community at large.

# data[].attributes.body
This one appears to be Justice vs Mercy. The tropper chooses mercy over what 'justice' might compel him to do by the law of not taking a life.

# data[].attributes.body
This predicament falls under Individual/Community. Mr. Endicott and Miss Loring both made private decisions with the potential to have impact on their community. In Miss Loring's situation, it is difficult to determine if the individual or community needs should come first, but they are surely at odds with one another.

# data[].attributes.body
This fell under the Justice/Mercy paradigm for me. Allen had to choose between making an example of the girls and their choice to engage in underage drinking, or show them mercy and provide them with the help they desperately need. I struggle with this paradigm and the need for it to be so black and white. I believe we just aim for both - give appropriate consequences, but keep in mind these are children in need of support and learning, not to just be written off as troublemakers.

# data[].attributes.body
Truth/Loyalty stands out quite a bit to me here. Bill is faced with two choices: stay loyal to Maud and her time, dedication, and personal loyalty to the college, or be truthful with Maud and let her know that unfortunately her skill sets just don't align with their current needs. I also see Individual/Community, but in terms of the direct conflict with Maud as the individual, truth/loyalty pulled ahead!

# data[].attributes.body
This falls under the Truth/Loyalty paradigm for me. It was described that May does have a loyalty to her profession, but she is also compelled to share the truth in an attempt to care for the health and well-being of the young woman in her care. So, should she compromise her professional integrity? Or should she share the truth?

# data[].attributes.body
I see the Justice/Mercy paradigm here. The trooper experienced the internal struggle between what is legally right and what he felt was morally right. His quick thinking allowed him to end the driver's suffering without compromising his moral or ethical values by ending the life of the driver with his own hands.

# data[].attributes.body
Individual/Community - the teacher and the principal had full autonomy to make the choices that benefitted them personally that evening without considering the community. However, their actions have huge potential to affect the community greatly. Should Ms. Loring's work be found out, it could risk the education of her students. However if Mr. Endicot's actions are discovered, many would question his ability to lead.

# data[].attributes.body
The basketball team is an example of Justice/Mercy. The players displayed clearly problematic behavior in a very public manner, and were already more visible in the community anyway. Holding such a role means that whatever consequence is given will be taken as the "rule" for all future incidents. However, despite whether their actions were a cry for help, they are still developing teenagers and do not have the mental capacity to see long-term consequences. This could a teachable moment for all, if the girls were approached with some compassion and understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
This one was more difficult for me. I vacillated between Self/Community and Short term/long term paradigms. I thought self/community because it seemed that Bill was struggling to balance the needs of Maud with those of the school community. On the other hand, he was also trying to figure out the best long-term plan for school while focusing on Maud's short-term needs.

# data[].attributes.body
This falls under the Self/Community paradigm. I argue this because May's conflict seems to arise from her desire to protect both herself and the community. She recognizes that by admitting her past relationship with the boyfriend, she protects the community, but leaves herself vulnerable to consequences such as loss of income. On the other hand, not admitting it protects herself, but leaves the patient and community at a risk she is well aware of.

# data[].attributes.body
I see the Justice/Mercy paradigm at play here. The trooper clearly struggled with this paradigm, specifically the laws around killing another person. In my opinion, he wanted to extend the driver mercy by killing him before he endured any more pain or terror, but also didn't want to jeopardize his dedication to justice by doing the deed himself.

# data[].attributes.body
The Endicot and Loring falls under Indvidual/Community. Community standards may say that Mr Endicot and Loring should not be at the bar because they hold influencial roles in the lives of their students. Individual standards of both should they are choosing their own path based on their own needs and wants.

# data[].attributes.body
The Basketball Team falls under the Justice/Mercy.  Justice says the girls should be suspended immediately, given significant detention when they return and kicked off the team.  On the other hand, mercy says to pay attention to the circumstances of the case noting the incident may have been a cry for help.  Mercy looks at the home life of the girls and domestic situation and detox program and counseling.

# data[].attributes.body
The Trooper falls under individual/community.  The state trooper had to decide whether to abide by the community standards of “you must not kill” or to do everything in his power to relieve the suffering of the mechanic.

# data[].attributes.body
The Social Counselor falls under Truth/Loyalty.  On one hand, May has loyalty to her profession and it requires her to avoid personal involvement with her clients and to provide them with objective counsel untainted by bias of any sort.  On the other she could tell the truth about her ex boyfriends diseases.

# data[].attributes.body
The loyal employee falls under the Individual/Community.  Maud worked for the school for 20 years but was unable to grasp the newer technologies.  Bill thought about how the requirements of the community made it plain that she should be released but the needs of the individual urged Bill to keep her in place for another six years.

# data[].attributes.body
Individual Vs Community  Both Endicott and Loring have taken personal steps to find themselves in the bar that evening. For Ms. Loring, her presence there serves a specific purpose, while for Mr. Endicott, it represents a choice he regrets.

# data[].attributes.body
Justice Vs Mercy

In the case of the four high school basketball players suspended for getting drunk, the ethical response involves carefully considering both justice and mercy. It's crucial to weigh the need for accountability and the benefits of compassion and understanding. Mr. Allen must provide justice and still consider mercy throughout the discipline process

# data[].attributes.body
"Balancing Truth and Loyalty": In this scenario, a social counselor finds herself at the crossroads of adhering to her professional and ethical code and her obligation to disclose the truth about her client's relationship dynamics with their partner.

# data[].attributes.body
This whole thing's about figuring out the tough choice between sticking to the rules (justice) and being kind (mercy). It's a tough spot to be in, and honestly, I can only see a few folks handling it smoothly, especially with how things are these days. If I were in the trooper's shoes, I'd lean towards being kind, even though I'd be really torn up about bending the rules. Life's full of these moments where you're caught between doing what's strictly correct by the book and what feels right in your heart. Sometimes, the world isn't just black and white; these decisions can weigh heavy on you. Even talking about it or thinking it through doesn't make a choice any easier because, deep down, you know, either way, it comes with its own set of what-ifs and consequences. But at the end of the day, it's about what you can live with, choosing compassion over compliance, even when it's the more challenging path.

# data[].attributes.body
In the Ms. Loring and Mr. Endicott Scenario I would apply the paridigm of "Individual vs. Community." Both educators have made the choice to spend time and associate one's self in this questionable environment. Their personal choices could have a direct impact on their professional lives if the community is to hear about their actions. They should consider the ramifications if their personal choices start to affect their reputations as educators.

# data[].attributes.body
The Basketball Team scenario would fall under the paridigm of "Justice vs. Mercy." There would need to be a course of action that provides supports for the girls as well as a clear consequence for the behavior. In this case a balance of mercy and justice could be warranted. They could earn a place on the team if they can demonstrate good behavior with counseling and supports in place to help them be successful.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Social Counselor Scenario-Kari Solarz

# data[].attributes.subject
The Social Counselor Scenario-Kari Solarz

# data[].attributes.body
The Social Counselor Scenario would fall under the paradigm of "Truth vs. Loyalty." The counselor's loyalty to the profession requires her to avoid personal involvement with her clients. She must remain loyal to her profession if she is to ethically conduct herself as a counselor that keeps professionalism at the forefront of her work.

# data[].attributes.body
The tropper scenario would fall under the paradigm of "Justice vs. Mercy." The trooper acts quickly by using the fire extinguisher to take away any pain for the driver as the anticipated moment of death arrives. This quick act showed mercy to the driver in that moment and the trooper did not take the live of the driver into his own hands by using the gun.

# data[].attributes.body
The Loyal Employee Scenario falls under the paradigm of "Individual vs. Community." Bill must decide if he should take care of the individual (the loyal employee) or free up resources for the university community. The loyal employee's job can be replaced by new computer equipment and there doesn't seem to be a position to move the employee into at that time. The position is no longer needed and the good of all seems to outweigh the decision of keeping one unnecessary position.

# data[].attributes.body
"Individual vs. Community:" Both Ms. Loring and Mr. Endicott made a decision as individuals that night at the bar that have potential impact on the community. I would want to use this framework in my discussions with both (or in my reflection as Mr. Endicott) to fully consider the impact on the community.

# data[].attributes.body
"Short vs. Long Term": I would give the basketball players a short term consequence of missing a set amount of games and long term support of meeting with a drug and alcohol counselor in order to respond to the clearly present addiction needs. In this situation, rather than choosing one response over the other I think both are necessary to care for the children at multiple levels.

# data[].attributes.body
"Individual vs. Community": The boss has to decide whether to keep employing the individual who is not showing themselves to be fit to continue in the job or prioritize the community which would involve the salary of the employee being used elsewhere. As a boss, I would want to prioritize the needs of the community while also finding a way to humanize the individual with directive coaching or a clear improvement plan.

# data[].attributes.body
"Justice vs. Mercy": The trooper questions whether to stay committed to justice and not take a life or to show mercy on the burning truck driver. The trooper finds a way to enact justice with providing comfort to the driver as he passes out and not taking his life. As the trooper, I would want to provide comfort (mercy) but not kill the driver with my gun with the hope a fire truck could show up in time to save him.

# data[].attributes.body
"Truth vs. Loyalty": The social counselor has a loyalty to the code of ethics she has taken in the role but also questions her responsibility to tell the truth about the client's interactions with her partner. I would hope to creatively find a way to protect privacy laws while also telling the truth to protect the client showing loyalty to her wellness.

# data[].attributes.body
I would use short-term vs long-term: Both have points to consider. I do not believe either of them did anything wrong, because again it is legal and was on their own time outside of work. But there are things to consider and clarify to be sure whatever decisions are made are the best for all impacted.

# data[].attributes.body
Justice vs Mercy because the coach had to decide going with his principles, the rules, suspension or tending to the individual students' needs by sending them to treatment.

Basketball - I would have suspended the players. Rules are rules and the impact of that decision would have set precedent for others.  Why have them sign the sports agreement if it's not upheld.

# data[].attributes.body
Individual vs Community because he had to weigh the individual impact versus the organizations. The impact on Maud outweighed the organization's interests.

Loyal employee - I would have chosen the community. I would have chosen to relieve Maud of her duties for the betterment of the organization, with proof obviously. I do not take that decision lightly.

# data[].attributes.body
Short Term vs Long Term because May has to look at both what consequences would be if she warns its unprofessional yet if she does it may help her client. In the long term it could also have an impact on her professional life and on the clients health physical and psychological. She may feel satisfaction short term but could result negatively long term.

Counselor - I would not reveal the connection to the client. Thinking more long term for both parties.

# data[].attributes.body
Justice vs Mercy because the trooper guided by rules of the position did not shoot, but found another way to relieve the man trapped.

The purpose is to get decision makers into the space of weighing the options using the 4 paradigms, the means to the end. After a decision is made, we often go through the what-ifs.  This helps bring clarity and prioritize the most important point of the dilemma, so we can make the best decisions.

Trooper - I could never shoot someone, so I would have done something similar. Showing mercy is where I lean.

# data[].attributes.body
Public or Private? I believe the paradigms to discuss here are truth / loyalty, individual / community, as well as short/ long term. The first thing I would ask myself is… What am I doing in this bar?” If I have a hard time with my teacher dancing in this bar, it is a little hypocritical if I am a patron of the establishment. Keeping that in the back of my mind it would be hard for me to turn around and discipline Loring for her actions as me entering an establishment such as this could be seen as just as bad. Here is what I believe I would do, not having any other information as far as rules / laws on the subject. I believe I would have a quick conversation with her, and then exit the building. I believe I would follow up with her with a planned meeting regarding her moon lighting. In this meeting she would hear all of her accolades and how those could quickly diminish if this employment was to be made public. It helps that this is out of town. As it currently does not interfere with her role as an educator at our school I would have a conversation regarding the slippery slope that she is on. Jointly, I would let her know that if her employment did affect her teaching credentials (being a role model to kids) we would surely need a follow up conversation and that it would be hard for me to support her as I do not believe that this profession is one that would positively influence kids

# data[].attributes.body
The Basketball Team - The dilemma paradigm discussed both justice and mercy as well as short term / long term. As a school administrator I want to do my best to help raise children to grow into great adults. Kids are kids, they are not adults because in most cases they lack experiences… good and bad. In this scenario I would have the girls do in school suspension with education on alcohol and a testing scenario to see if they need inpatient help. I would use the chemical violation guidelines of a two game suspension and keep them on the team. I believe that solution is a good balance for teachers that want justice, as well as what is right for the girls in the long term.

# data[].attributes.body
The Loyal Employee - The dilemma paradigm discussed is Individual / Community. However once again it also teeters on truth / loyalty. Using the books example of individual / community I believe that I would try to find Maud another job within our walls as loyalty is worth a lot! I do believe that a loyal employee is worth saving if at all possible. The employee may need better guidance, but if their heart is there, they belong in that workplace. In the same breath, if it is impossible to save Maude's job, I would do what is right for the community and release her.

# data[].attributes.body
The Social Counselor - The dilemma paradigm discussed here is truth / loyalty, though in this instance there could also be a discussion involving individual / community. Sticking with truth / loyalty, I would side with the counselor and tell the patient. However, I would want the best of both worlds and to not jeopardize my job so I would find some way for her to gain this information other than me directly telling her. I value loyalty strongly, but truth superseeds it.

# data[].attributes.body
This final one would be individual vs. community. Allowing the four seniors a "pass" or "warning" would highlight individualism and I believe the appropriate action here is to consider the individual impact, but act in a way that preserves community. With that, the consequence needs to be one that sets the tone/precedent for future infractions of similar nature.

# data[].attributes.body
Kidder suggests this one lines up with truth vs. loyalty and I can see that argument. We know the truth, and we know there is a certain degree of loyalty involved with the professional duties of a counselor. The question becomes whether or not the counselor is or should be loyal to the individual they are providing care for? I would fall on the side of truth, there has to be a way to communicate he truth and loyalty by having them see a different therapist due to conflict of interest.

# data[].attributes.body
The trick here is to not pick truth vs. loyalty, despite the name. Here, I would choose short-term vs. long-term. While it appears fact that Maud's work could be replaced with computers and it would be a fiscally appropriate decision, playing the long game sends a message to employees that the company will stand by its "people." Meaning, if you remain loyal to the company, we will do what is right by you. There will be plenty of time to shift to computer-based work as Maud eases towards retirement.

# data[].attributes.body
. The Trooper - The dilemma paradigm discussed here is Justice / Mercy. This is a pretty extreme case and I do not believe anyone would handle the situation well especially in this day in age. I believe I would do the same thing as the trooper and choose mercy, but the whole time I would be fighting with the idea of breaking the law. I actually had a similar discussion with my father on the idea of assisted suicide and if it is right or wrong. He is all for assisted suicide and he always says that when he becomes a burden on the ones he loves or himself he would like the choice of siding with mercy. I do not know if I have it in me to make that call for my own family.

# data[].attributes.body
Write something awesome about Kidders 4 paradigms here.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this one connects most closely to individual/community, for me. Both Endicott and Loring have made individual decisions to be at the bar that night. For Ms. Loring it was a means to an end and for Mr. Endicott it was clearly a decision he was not proud of.

# data[].attributes.body
The Trooper - Ch. 3 (pp48-49), (p162)

Short/Long Term is the paradigm I used to determine my actions for this scenario. Short term meant acting quickly to put the driver out of his misery or face the long-term consequences as a result of the actions.

The Social Counselor - Ch. 5 (pp 122-123)

Individual/ Community is the paradigm I used for this scenario because the counselor has a choice to preserve her job and not say anything. Alternatively, she could end up saving a lot more people if she informs her client about what she knows about the boyfriend.

The Loyal Employee - Ch. 6 (p130)

Truth/Loyalty plays a great deal in the decision the principal has to make on whether to keep or terminate the loyal employee. The facts suggest that the employee should be terminated, however because of her positive nature and her time spent at the school, this decision starts to become very difficult.

The Basketball Team – Ch. 6 (p140)

Justice/Mercy paradigm plays here because the principal has to make a choice in determining whether the students should face the consequences of their actions and be refused to be part of the team. On the other hand, should we look at the students' actions as a cry for help and offer them assistance to overcome the larger underlying issues.

Next steps for Endicott (Perspective of Superintendent)

I think any paradigm could play here based on the relationship of Endicott with the teacher and also the superintendent. Also depending on when the information surfaces the decisions might be different. If I were in the position of a supt. who learned about this case about an active principal, I would use the individual/community paradigm to determine my actions. This is because ultimately, private affairs are no longer private once they get out to the public space, and it is something that could impact the school community as trust could be broken.

# data[].attributes.body
This one is justice vs. mercy for me. And I believe the trooper did act out of mercy. They stuck with their principles (justice) by not shooting them, but they did provide care for the individuals needs by helping them suffer less given the gravity of the situation.