# data[].attributes.body
Explain how “Separate but Equal” was used in Plessy v. Ferguson, and how it provided a legal grounds for segregation in the South.

# data[].attributes.body
Explain how “Separate but Equal” was used in Plessy v. Ferguson, and how it provided a legal grounds for segregation in the South.

# data[].attributes.body
Explain how “Separate but Equal” was used in Plessy v. Ferguson, and how it provided a legal grounds for segregation in the South.

# data[].attributes.body
Explain how “Separate but Equal” was used in Plessy v. Ferguson, and how it provided a legal grounds for segregation in the South.

# data[].attributes.body
Explain how “Separate but Equal” was used in Plessy v. Ferguson, and how it provided a legal grounds for segregation in the South.

# data[].attributes.body
Explain how “Separate but Equal” was used in Plessy v. Ferguson, and how it provided a legal grounds for segregation in the South.

# data[].attributes.body
What effect did Brown v. Board of Education have on the legality of the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" created in Plessy v. Ferguson

# data[].attributes.body
What effect did Brown v. Board of Education have on the legality of the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" created in Plessy v. Ferguson

# data[].attributes.body
What effect did Brown v. Board of Education have on the legality of the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" created in Plessy v. Ferguson

# data[].attributes.body
What effect did Brown v. Board of Education have on the legality of the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" created in Plessy v. Ferguson

# data[].attributes.body
What effect did Brown v. Board of Education have on the legality of the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" created in Plessy v. Ferguson

# data[].attributes.body
What effect did Brown v. Board of Education have on the legality of the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" created in Plessy v. Ferguson

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Loving v. Virginia Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
4. The operation of the Twenty-first Amendment does not alter the application of equal protection standards that otherwise govern this case. The Court has never recognized that application of that Amendment can defeat an otherwise established claim under the Equal Protection Clause, the principles of which cannot be rendered inapplicable here by reliance upon statistically measured but loose-fitting generalities concerning the drinking tendencies of aggregate groups.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Shmoop: Craig v. Boren in Equal Protection. Craig v. Boren story and analysis by PhD and Masters students from Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley

# data[].attributes.body
Which two clauses of the 14th Amendment did the Court decide Virginia had violated when convicting the Lovings.

# data[].attributes.body
A. Explain how the court used "Selective Incorporation" when making their decision.
B. Which two clauses of the 14th Amendment did the Court decide Virginia had violated when convicting the Lovings.