# data[].attributes.headline
To Jason: I disagree with your argument because he or she  already got a warning from their parents. Do you know any parents that don't tell their child to not bully others.   

# data[].attributes.subject
To Jason: I disagree with your argument because he or she  already got a warning from their parents. Do you know any parents that don't tell their child to not bully others.   

# data[].attributes.body
No and yes if you cyber bulling someone who is younger than you then yes if you are cyber bulling someone that older than you, then you should warnings if you only get caught. 3 warnings only. and then you get jail time.

Shouldn't it be equal for everyone? Also yes and no is not a good argument. you should be decisive  in your decision. Punctuation would be a good start too. :)

# data[].attributes.body
Hey anne,

I disagree with you because any type of bullying is a crime and cyber bullying can affect you really badly. I also say if someone does bully you they should be fined or either be put in jail.

# data[].attributes.body
in all honesty, it depends on the situation, though i deem jail time or a fine unnecessary in most circumstances. minor cyberbully crimes, such as swearing at someone or calling someone names, or a one-off time, i don’t believe they should be punished. this goes the same for minors. i deem prison or a fine unnecessary for people under 16 although there should be other smaller punishments in place. on the other hand, adults and young adults doing major crimes should be an offence. for example, being racist or sexist, should result in some form of punishment other than jail or a fine. however, major crimes such as revenge pornography or doing something to risk their career or personal lives should result in either a fine or jail.

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on how this situation is I mean like if someone post things about you which is not appropriate and of cause if you do wrongs things online swearing saying stuff's which your not supposed to say

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on

# data[].attributes.body
No and yes if you cyber bulling someone who is younger than you then yes if you are cyber bulling someone that older than you, then you should warnings if you only get caught. 3 warnings only. and then you get jail time.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because the punishment is a bit too harsh because if your kid was cyber-bullying and you didn't know you'll have to either pay 50k or wait two years for your son or daughter to come back from jail.
You should at least get a warning or have the cyber-bully to be suspended from the internet.

# data[].attributes.body
it really depends on how bad the cyberbulying was/is and how old you are  as if you are under age of 18 you cant be put in jail but you will be put in juvi

# data[].attributes.body
i think it depends on how bad it is and how it effects the person that is getting bullied. and also your age matters s

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on how cyberbullying can affect you, not every bullying can affect people that much but there are some bullying that you can called it a crime that must result in jail that can hurt

# data[].attributes.body
In all honestry, it depends

# data[].attributes.body
It depends. If the person has only done minor offences or have only done it once, then they should only have to be fined a very small amount. But if they have done something terrible, such as push someone to suicide, then they should be prosecuted and put in jail.

# data[].attributes.body
It really depends on the situation they are in. It is a good idea to have a punishment but not to the point where you get jailed for 2 years or fined 50k. However there can be a few rarer circumstances were it is necessary. Cyber bullying is much like real life bullying except it can get much worse in certain areas of your life. The punishment should be made worse if you are 18 or above. Everyone has probably bullied some time in their life, maybe not intentionally bullying them but intentionally trolling them or stuff like that. This would create a fear for many people I believe as you never know what someone might consider bullying. Whatever you say could be severe punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
I agreed, cyberbullying is a crime.Cyberbullying can experience negative physical, school, and mental health issues. They should be put in jail because this is a good way to stop bullying.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't really agree with this to an extent. Yes they should be punished over it, but $50,000 dollars is a bit excessive! Maybe some community serves and $200 dollars is a but reasonable. If they continuously do it then yes maybe jail time.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the punishment is a bit much. but it depends on how bad it is.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that cyberbullies should go to jail for 2yrs or being fined up to 50k. Cyberbullying can cause depression and suicide. Also with this law it could reduce the amount of cyberbullying, they would be to afraid of being fined or going to jail.

# data[].attributes.body
yes I think they must go to jail because

# data[].attributes.body
We think It should be jail time for 2 years because if you cyber bully someone, no one would do anything about it so something needs to be done.

# data[].attributes.body
No because if someone

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that they should be punished but not upto 2 years in jail, I mean I know people who have got 6 monthsten six months for assult with a weapon

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this because, don't you think it's a bit too much when it comes to money i mean yeah it's because they have bullied someone but kids aren't going to jail when they bully each-other in school, plus most of the time people are too scared to ask others for help. Another reason is the 'victim' may actually say that someone is 'bullying' them but not telling the truth, therefore getting said person into lots of trouble. The 'victim' should be asked to send screen-shots to the service. Even though it is a good idea, it can be dangerous in multiple ways and should be monitored closely.

# data[].attributes.body
To an extent, I disagree. Sure cyber bullying shouldn't be accepted, but isn't up to 2 years jail time or up to 50k a bit excessive? Yes, the perpetrator should be punished, but let me remind you. up. to. two. years. jail. time. Thinking about it, wouldn't some community service be a bit more reasonable and benefial in general.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Cyberbullying is a crime that should result in jail time. Cyberbullying can drive people insane leading to regretful choices that can not be undone. It also puts stress of the victim and depending on the victims health conditions it can even lead heart attacks.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with this statement because cyber bullying is a crime and it is taken very seriously in New Zealand. I think is should result in jail time because this crime can harm and sometimes result in suicide for some people. People who are bullied can be mentally harmed. Legally cyber bullying can be fined up to 50K or 2 years in jail. This is a good way to stop people bulling online in New Zealand.

# data[].attributes.body
Cyberbullying should not be a crime because if someone is bullying you online block them and report them for cyberbullying you and stay offline for a couple of days

# data[].attributes.body
"No because they can carry diseases."

I believe your right but what if the diseases could be cured? Also if the diseased was cured they could help the country that they escape into like taking jobs.

# data[].attributes.body
I know it can but  if you had no home  you would scary like they that have a hard life to0

# data[].attributes.body
You have a good reason but, What if that person has a disease a it can put the whole country in danger.

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with it, but i also i do see your point, but i strongly think that

# data[].attributes.body
I think that every country should accept refugees that arrive in there country

I agree with your statement, but some countries don't have the materials, housing and space to look after refugees. Some countries are already overpopulated and dont need any more people.

# data[].attributes.body
Taking in refugees is not a mater of reputation or being nice. Yes, if I was running away from a war I would like a home but their are plenty of other people in the same situation as me that do not get a home.

# data[].attributes.body
Although you are right I disagree Because they can carry harmful disease's into the border or the border shores

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with what you have to say because if we let everyone past the border that country will end up being overpopulated.....

# data[].attributes.body
yes i think they should because they need a home like us but they don't we need to be nice
-------------------------------------------------------
I disagree with your argument. Yes it might be the nice thing to do but if we do let them in but, where are we going to get the food and drinks from. If more refugees come into the country we won’t be able to accommodate them.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally disagree with your statement. It's not a matter of being "mean" or being "nice," some countries just cannot accept everyone that arrives in their country claiming to be a "refugee." The risks of forcing countries to accept everyone costs a lot more than being morally correct. I feel like you're are on the right track with your argument but next time use a couple more reasons and examples to back up your statement.
- Sam

# data[].attributes.headline
JAKITA to AnshNo, Because they can carry harmful diseases into the the border/border shores.

# data[].attributes.subject
JAKITA to AnshNo, Because they can carry harmful diseases into the the border/border shores.

# data[].attributes.body
You have a great point but, what if your family had to escape your country otherwise you and your family could be killed, what will you do then? No county would except you in because you 'have' a type of contagious disease.

# data[].attributes.body
yes all countries should take in all refugees to be known as a good country to go to and would be showing respect for their culture,and that if you were escaping the world war wouldn't you want a home and somewhere to settle in again and rest instead of walking all the time? in conclusion all countries should give refugees a home and  at least a few hundred.

# data[].attributes.body
yes i think they should they need a place to call home like us we need to be nice we cant be mean they need a good life

# data[].attributes.body
yes i think they should they need a place to call home like us we need to be nice we cant be mean they need a good life

# data[].attributes.body
Yes i think they should be allowed, because they have no homes and its hard for them.

# data[].attributes.body
They should be able to stay in our country becasue they would do the exact same for us if we became refuggees

# data[].attributes.body
yes i think they should because they need a home like us but they dont we need to be nice

# data[].attributes.body
No, Because they can carry harmful diesese's into the the border/border shores

# data[].attributes.body
no i think they should accept as many people as they can while also not over crowding their own land

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they should be allowed to to stay because their houses are getting blown up and getting gassed. But they should get checked by security because they can carry guns, knives

# data[].attributes.body
The Syrian refugee crisis is the worst humanitarian crisis since World War II, and there is no sign of the situation improving. If Western countries do not agree to accept Syrian refugees now, the situation may become worse and more lives could be lost. However, I don't agree that certain countries should accept all refugees that arrive at their borders because countries will be at risk of overpopulation. This could lead to further problems unless we take action and spread refugees to all countries evenly.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't agree because if  we do we will become over populated and there will probably be no more food fore us because the refugees will leave none for us because of their hunger issues.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that countries should accept all refugees because it can help their countries in many ways like having jobs that's important.

# data[].attributes.body
i think they should be allowed to welcome the refugees because what if they needed a help or they just want to have a normal life that they wanted i think it's unfair if we didn't welcome the refugees in our country because they are still a human like us that still needed a help .

# data[].attributes.body
It depends. If the country has the right space for them, then yes, they should be required to accept refugees. However, if the country is already quite broke and not spacious, then no, they shouldn't have to.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that every country should accept refugees that arrive in there country

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they should only accept refugees if they have enough space and money to help them get started and support them because if they can't support them then whats the point of letting them come and live there. They should als

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they should be allowed in the country because they probably have been in alot maybe like there own family have died anything like a shooting war Well lets just say that Yes they should be aloud

# data[].attributes.body
No, even though that they came from another country, they need to go though security, to check for weapons or anything to harm others.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they should be allowed in. They must've be their for a reason, They could be running from something

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they should be allowed in our country because if New Zealand had a war and we were a refugee they should let us in there country and if they didnt we would not any of them if they dont let us in ther country

# data[].attributes.body
I say no. Refugees come from all sorts of environments and who knows they might have some sort of disease that might put the whole country in danger.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that countries should allowed refugees to come and find cover there. There will be people that families that have gone missing or gotten murdered or have no one else. They should have to prove that they are actually a refuge not a prisoner.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree, because they want a better life and they might carry diseases

# data[].attributes.body
Why to me thats like being racist , lets say i go to japan for a trip and they check my bag to make sure there is  no weapons in my bag. They also check everyone else that is the same as. Checking through refugess not all of them are armed

# data[].attributes.body
I think that refugees  that arive in countrys should be aloud to cross the boarder because they are in need of help to escape the world they have been living in for their lifes, I think it is also unfair to not help people in need I mean what if they have been running for theirs life so they are not assanatied, I mean yes it sounds dumb for people to be assaniated but people really can be assainated for something they have or

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly disagree. They should go through security in case they are carrying any weapons of anything that can harm their country also, since the arrival of over one million migrants and refugees in Europe in 2015, governments across Europe have sought to fortify their countries' borders with fences.

# data[].attributes.body
No, Because people come from all over the world, and who knows the person might have a disease that can put the whole country in danger

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that they should be accepted past the boarder because they are getting out of a country that they could be killed in.

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly disagree with this. Many people would say yes because they think it is morally good. However if you constantly let refugees into your borders your people will begin to run out of food. Some refugees is alright but to many will have many side affects. Your people may begin starving because of overpopulation. Think about it they always have other country's they can go to. If you think its morally right do you also think its morally right to make your normal citizens starve?

# data[].attributes.body
I mostly disagree that countries should accept all refugees. If they are fleeing their country they should be able to move join another country but that dosent mean they would all be accpeted. Countries don't like accepting refugees because of their population. They don't want their country over populated.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree and agree with this question. I agree because these refugees and migrants have fled their countries and came for a better life, and letting them in is another chance to start all over. Plus living in those third world countries you don't have privileges like New Zealand. I disagree because these refugees might carry diseases and letting them into the border risks lives and some people might be faking it just to get into country which means they are not legitimate refugees. So I disagree and agree with this situation.

# data[].attributes.body
No because they can carry diseases.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally, I'm indifferent on this matter, though I don't know much on the subject itself. Saying that all countries must accept all refugees arriving in there country can cause some issues. Things like overpopulation will become more of an issue and not all will have room for more and more people. Under international law, legitimate refugees are not allowed to be sent back to their country that that fled from. I'm not saying all countries should turn all refugees away, I'm saying that a country that can't accept all of them shouldn't be forced to. Also some people fake being refugees so that's even more of a problem. To conclude, countries should try their best to accept as many refugees as they possibly can, turning others away to better suited countries, but should not be forced to accept ALL refugees

# data[].attributes.headline
Since the arrival of over one million migrants and refugees in Europe in 2015, governments across Europe have sought to fortify their countries' borders with fences

# data[].attributes.subject
Since the arrival of over one million migrants and refugees in Europe in 2015, governments across Europe have sought to fortify their countries' borders with fences

# data[].attributes.body
" I strongly believe that it should be the people's choice, i don't think anyone should be forced to join the army at any age "
I agree with you that each person has the right to choose what they want and what they don't want but I disagree with you at the same time. Because going to boot camp can help a lot of people because of the harsh discipline since everybody shouldn't be a goody two shoes at this age.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree as well but the think is people who's age are 19 they can  but, Military service is service by an individual or group in an army or other militia, It Should be noted that military conscription has not been abolished. At first instance,Every man except as hereinafter excepted, between the ages of (18) years and (60) years, being a British subject, and not an aboriginal native, who shall reside within the colony. But it depends on if they want to or not

# data[].attributes.body
yes teachers should carry guns because they could
help stop school shootings

# data[].attributes.body
I think that you are wrong because i  think being able to be in the army a 19 yrs of age will be a lot of fun because it also is punishment for some of the silly things you've in the past and current yrs.
~Yours Sincerely Marshall~

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because people need a freedom to choose what they want. They can learn self defense by they own not only for joining the military. I agree what you said about that they can join military to be nurse or to cook .

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree because i think the opposite thing to what you are saying ( im right your wrong because mrs richardson said) and i think that we should have to go in the military

# data[].attributes.body
You don't have a good point. And it doesn't really make sense but I know what side you are arguing for. And I strongly disagree. If you do join the army it doesn't necessarily mean you have to go to join the war and if you do get shot? It means that you got shot fighting for your country. Also it means that you can get certain skills that could be useful in other branches  of work.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with your statement as by joining the military does not automatically you are going to die as most of the time in you are just doing things to better your discipline and it also helps you learn new things

# data[].attributes.body
I reckon we should serve the military service at age 19 its not all about war its about discipline respect teamwork you would also do training for if it does happen just preparing for if it possably does happen

# data[].attributes.body
Yes they should have gun just in case there is a school shooting and a bad guy goes on a rage and the police can't get their quickly and the teachers are trying to save the students of the school :-)

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of the things that you learn in the military are just refined from what you learn at young ages. Things like shooting are activities you can take up at school, so you wouldn’t need to learn them later on. People with good discipline should already use that skill in school, not be taught it. However, I do agree with your cons.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that LSV (Limited Service Volunteers) Courses should be compulsory so that they get a taste of what the Army is and they get a few skills. That way they can decide if they want to do or not. This makes it easier than forcing people to do it when they don't want to.

# data[].attributes.body
I think you don't have to be in the military when you turn 19 because some people might like other things apart from the military service and want to do something else

# data[].attributes.body
Hey so I just read both of your comments, And would just like to point out that you had made some errors such as spelling die like dye and beter their should be two T's their because its spelt like better not beter, I would also like to point out in your first comment that you didnt do a full stop for the start, And aslo the second comment should start with a capital letter, Lastly please remember how to spell  properly.Thank you for reading from Sharleze

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that some people are not capable of joining due to their health and fitness and skills. I agree that if you can manage the fitness level and disipline that they should join. I think that It should not be compulsory but highly recomended.
(Beware there may be spelling mistakes)

# data[].attributes.body
I think some people are not good at school so they can't go to university because of this they can be more successful in the Military service.

# data[].attributes.body
I understand where you're coming from, with the fact nobody can force anyone to do anything. But nobody said they have to stay in the military, one or two years could be how long they have to stay, after that, they have free will of what they want to do. Take it this way, it's sort of like the compulsory subjects we have at school at the moment, not everyone wants to do them, but we have to so we get a taste of what it's like, and in the upcoming years we can choose whether or not we want to continue in the subject.

- Sam

# data[].attributes.body
No because we need to get a education and not  learn how to fire different guns when we could be learning how to do could be learning how

# data[].attributes.body
Keep in mind that, you can go there for two years and back and still study, and go to university. And also it doesn't matter if they don't want to do because have a think about it that, you might be forced to do it whether you like it or not.  I would agree with what you have to say. At least you doing something that can take your life away. And you should own it.

# data[].attributes.body
"Military service shouldn't be compulsory at the age of 19 because there are people who can't handle exercise like people with special needs or other reasons." I agree with the side you are on however I disagree with the point you made. The military has many different branches for people with these dissabiliteys or something else like that. For example say someones reason was they were unfit or they had something causing them to do horrible in physical things they could go for a Tactician. There are many opportunity's for these people.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with your writing but I think that people going to the army is a compulsory so they can learn skills and serve their country.

# data[].attributes.body
Do you even know how to spell? also you didn't even give a good reason.

# data[].attributes.body
I totally and utterly disagree with your argument. Every country is in different Situations. Some might not be in danger of attack but some live in constant fear of war. And with enemies waiting for the chance to attack. That is why military service is compulsory in those countries. If military service wasn't compulsory in those countries they would most definitely be attacked and get overwhelmed.