# data[].attributes.body
Discuss, reader average (2 scores) was 25.5, staff score was 28. GMC discussion around # of reviewers, and whether to round up or down for scores.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
New England Grassroots Environmental Fund, Inc. © 2021 All rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
2021 Fall YL GMC Agenda (Sarah's Subgroup)

# data[].attributes.body
Score - % funding - $ funding
26-28          100%        $6,000
22-25          85%          $5,100
18-21           70%          $4,200
14-17           50%          $3,000
11-13           discuss
1-10                   0%  $0

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 70-85% 

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 70-85% 

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss. Readers and staff misaligned between 70 and 85%. Discussion around relying on youth to build bridges to BIPOC communities more effectively than existing membership, and the transition to youth-focused organizing

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
New England Grassroots Environmental Fund, Inc. © 2021 All rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 50-70%

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 50-70%

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss. Readers and staff misaligned. Discussion around demographics of group membership, late incorporation of community in creation of project. Fund range 50-70%.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
New England Grassroots Environmental Fund, Inc. © 2021 All rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 70-85%

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 70-85%

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss, readers and staff misaligned. Discussion around low # of reviewers, change vs. charity and Just Transition

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
New England Grassroots Environmental Fund, Inc. © 2021 All rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 50-85%

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 50-85%

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss. Readers and staff misaligned between 50 and 85% fund. Discussion around equity in participation and shifting power, outlier score.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
New England Grassroots Environmental Fund, Inc. © 2021 All rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 70-85% 

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 70-85% 

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss, staff score and reader score misaligned between 70 and 85% funding, discussion around limited ability to articulate/provide accessibility beyond physical means (ADA compliance, etc)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
New England Grassroots Environmental Fund, Inc. © 2021 All rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 50-85%

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 50-85%

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss as staff and readers are misaligned between 50 and 85%, discussion around new information from review call addressing reader concerns about community partnership and youth leadership.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Log in | New England Grassroots Environment Fund

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Sometimes, robots try to join the site to post spam. This helps us weed them out.

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding rec: discuss funding range 50-100%

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding rec: discuss funding range 50-100%

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss 50 to 100% as reader average score and staff score misaligned. Discussion around the minimum bar for youth leadership to be considered leadership, and the dynamic of school projects managed by faculty with students

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
New England Grassroots Environmental Fund, Inc. © 2021 All rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.headline
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 70-85%

# data[].attributes.subject
Funding rec: discuss partial funding 70-85%

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss, staff and readers are misaligned between 70 and 85%, but leaning toward 70%. Discussion around missing equity piece and vagueness of theory of change - application and review call miss much of the 'why' question.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Log in | New England Grassroots Environment Fund

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Sometimes, robots try to join the site to post spam. This helps us weed them out.