# data[].attributes.body
Year 1974-1975

# data[].attributes.body
Ten students were suspended from school for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. The principal suspended the children without a hearing. A federal court appealed the principals decision and then the case was appealed to the Supreme Court.

# data[].attributes.body
This ruling upheld the ideology that students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter the schoolhouse. this impacts us today by providing us further proof that our rights extend into school.

# data[].attributes.body
Lewis Powell thought that Ohio had granted the children the right to an education with discipline, thus their punishment was allowed.

# data[].attributes.body
A three judge district court, from Southern Ohio, found that the children were withheld from due process. The school appealed this decision to the Supreme Court.

# data[].attributes.body
Byron R White authored the decision. their rationale was that the students deserved due process before having their education taken from them.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this is an example of Judicial Restraint because the Supreme Court based their decision on previous rulings that claimed students maintain their constitutional rights within school.

# data[].attributes.body
Did the principle violate due process and the 14th amendment by not providing a hearing for the students.
They eventually decided the president had done so.

# data[].attributes.body
The district court believed the school violated the 14th amendment rights of the students. Without providing notice and a hearing for a suspension

# data[].attributes.body
The school petitioned this case to the Supreme Court because they believed the principal acted within his scope of power.

# data[].attributes.body
Burger, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Rehnquist