# data[].attributes.headline
Support your claims with multiple quote sandwiches.

# data[].attributes.subject
Support your claims with multiple quote sandwiches.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Introduce the quote:
i) Are you elaborating on your initial claims in a way that leads to your first source?
OR
ii) Are you connecting to the evidence/analysis of your previous quote sandwich?

# data[].attributes.headline
Each body paragraph needs to include both a claim and a closing sentence.

# data[].attributes.subject
Each body paragraph needs to include both a claim and a closing sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
A.  Is there a clear claim related to and in support of your thesis?
B. Does it set up the connection between primary and secondary source material?
C. Can you identify whether the claims are often focused on
1) the pitch: (what the source or sources want you to believe or the tactics of persuasion)
2) the complaint: (the larger argument or debate that surrounds the material
3) the moment: the larger historical context(s) that lend meaning to the material?

# data[].attributes.body
A.  Does your introduction use one/some mix of the following to establish relevance?

1. A pathos argument about the emotion you and others attach to the subject.

2. A logos argument using facts or logical deduction to explain the significance of your subject.

3. An ethos argument about what standing you have to address the subject.

B.  Thesis (usually)--Is it an argument (one that we could reasonably agree or disagree with) about some combination of your propaganda or its topic (secondary sources)?

# data[].attributes.body
B. Each paragraph should end with a closing sentence: Does that sentence tie together what we read in the previous paragraph together?

# data[].attributes.body
2. Direct quotes or paraphrasing:
i) Are you including enough relevant material from your sources (primary and secondary) to give your analysis authority?
ii) Are you citing secondary sources (with MLA parenthetical citations--ex: (Doe 78).
iii) Are you giving credit to anything you would have not known (fully) before reading your sources.

# data[].attributes.body
i) Are you using the 10 on 1 exercise (saying more than your initial thought) to explain the 'So What?" of the quote by adding context or elaboration?
ii) Do you have ideas or analysis that connects each of your quote sandwiches

# data[].attributes.body
Did you include a basic conclusion that attempts to answer the question ‘So what?’ using one of the methods below

# data[].attributes.body
Did you include a separate (separate from your 5-7 pages) Works Cited page, in MLA format, alphabetized, without annotations?

# data[].attributes.body
Return to an earlier idea in your introduction or analysis with the benefit of new information.

# data[].attributes.headline
Connecting to a Broader Argument: What’s in it for us?

# data[].attributes.subject
Connecting to a Broader Argument: What’s in it for us?

# data[].attributes.body
Broaden the view from the here and now of the paper by looking outward to the wider world and forward to the future.

# data[].attributes.headline
Acknowledging Limits of the Argument: What other questions/concerns need to be addressed?

# data[].attributes.subject
Acknowledging Limits of the Argument: What other questions/concerns need to be addressed?

# data[].attributes.body
Not everything can be handled within the scope of your research. Acknowledge outside factors that might affect the significance of your analysis.

# data[].attributes.body
I do have a works cited page that is separate from the rest of my paper. I made sure to cite every source I referenced/quoted in my paper and also made sure that my citations were in alphabetical order.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose a few sources from the bibliography and skimmed/read over those sources trying to find information that was most relevant to my primary and secondary sources. I feel like I was able to find a sufficient amount of evidence. I made sure to quote everything using MLA that came from my sources. Any information that is not my own words and thoughts, I made sure to give credit.

# data[].attributes.body
I had the most difficulty with creating a conclusion, but throughout the entire process of writing my conclusion, I was trying to answer the “So What?” the best I could. I feel like I was able to answer the “So What?” adequately.

# data[].attributes.body
My first body paragraph addresses the question: "What propagandistic techniques did nativists use to target the Irish and Chinese in the late 19th century and how have attitudes towards immigrants changed?" and my claim was:  Throughout our nation’s history, immigrants were heavily targeted in times of national and economic distress. My primary source was White and Bauer's cartoon, called “The Great Fear of the Period That Uncle Sam may be Swallowed by Foreigners”. I connected this primary source with my secondary source, a journal article, called,

"No Irish Need Apply": A Myth of Victimization". Both sources discuss anti-immigration against the Irish and Chinese, mostly focusing on the Irish. Most of my paper and claims focus on the moment. To be more specific, on anti-Irish and Chinese immigration in the late 18th century and how its changed over the years.

# data[].attributes.body
I introduced my quote by elaborating on my initial claims in a way that led to my first source. However, I'm not sure if I did it effectively:
Although immigrants comprise a vital part of our society today, this was not always the case. Throughout our nation’s history, immigrants were heavily targeted in times of national and economic distress. One of the most prominent examples of this phenomenon took place in the late 19th century. Chinese and Irish immigrants, in particular, were seen as a major threat to America’s economy and prosperity. Notorious humor magazines and cartoons such as Puck and The Wasp used racist propaganda by characterizing the Irish as apes and street filth and the Chinese as parasitic locusts upon their arrival.

One particular example of racist propaganda was White and Bauer’s cartoon, released in the 1860s, called “The Great Fear of the Period That Uncle Sam may be Swallowed by Foreigners”. This cartoon features the Irish and Chinese aggressively eating Uncle Sam. The cartoon was primarily targeted towards residents in well-established communities with the intent of warning them that immigrants have the potential to steal their jobs and destroy their communities. Uncle Sam was an important symbol of the U.S. federal government and, more importantly, America and its values. Immigrants were seen as a threat for this exact reason. The next two images proceed to show the Chinese man eating the Irish man, giving the notion that immigrants are not only capable of destroying America’s identity but each other. In the end, the Chinese man is seen wearing the Irish immigrant’s hat, signifying the progression of immigrants’ cultures and values, but not America’s. Additionally, both men get progressively fatter, implying that they are selfish and gluttonous. White and Baker’s main intent behind this cartoon was to antagonize the Irish and Chinese, who were suspected of taking away jobs and contaminating America’s customs and traditions.

# data[].attributes.body
While Spider-Man has come a long way through the decades with different characters, Marvel Universe has found a way to appeal through propaganda strategies to create new characters that allow the audience to truly capture what it means to be Spider-Man with responsibility, sacrifices, adding diversity and still keeping to the core theme of Spider.

# data[].attributes.body
I have a works cited that I have compiled any information used through my paper.

# data[].attributes.headline
Should we include our thesis in the conclusion or closing sentence?

# data[].attributes.subject
Should we include our thesis in the conclusion or closing sentence?

# data[].attributes.body
Nigel Lancaster

# data[].attributes.body
The drive to follow the behaviors and thought processes of the group one belongs to, known as mob/herd mentality, exists in every human being to various degrees. Although people already possess this psychological tendency to favor their own group over others, those with high status in society. fueled by various motives, exploit this mentality through the creation of propaganda which satirizes opposing groups by incorporating stereotypes and exaggerated depictions to form a juxtaposition between the two groups for the purpose of increasing patriotism as well as decreasing sympathy for the opposition. This propaganda is expressed through a multitude of modes including, posters, cartoons, film, and even animation. Animation specifically, is an increasingly uncommon form of propaganda, but around and during WWII, animated propaganda made by large corporations such as Disney and Warner Bros. flourished and had heavy impacts on the political mindset of viewers. Animation was especially effective in America as “those not at war (women, children, those too old or unable to fight) were free to go to the movies without threat of attack unlike European/Asian citizens.” (Cunningham 8).

# data[].attributes.body
The use of stereotypes in propaganda is still present today especially in the depiction of immigrant people when collecting funds for President Donald Trump’s Mexican border wall. These immigrants are depicted as job thieves, intruders, and even vermin; very similar to the antagonization Japanese Americans faced following the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Trump himself has said that “They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” Although they are just as human as anyone, their horrendous depiction in the media creates a dislike for them that causes people to want to fund the border wall due to the aforementioned phenomenon known as herd mentality. This everlasting presence of stereotypes in propaganda insinuates its effectiveness as a persuasive tool especially for antagonization of opposing groups. Thus, it is likely that stereotypes will continue to present themselves in propaganda; although less conspicuous and more veiled in ways that make them seem politically correct.

# data[].attributes.body
Spider-Man was able to be diversified because of the universality of Spider-Man within the films and especially within Spider-Man Homecoming.

# data[].attributes.body
This article won't work with easybib for some reason.
T Thomas – “Let’s Do This One Last Time”

# data[].attributes.body
I have a works cited page, MLA format, thanks to easybib haha! I haven’t really needed to go outside my sources form my annotated Bibliography as I have found those to be quite sufficient in breaking down Blackfish.

# data[].attributes.body
I think we we can learn from my paper is the important of information presentation. How we “frame” the info and the tactics we use to counter the other argument. It’s also important to really understand both sides of an argument and to try and find objective, non-bias research, which can be tricky.

# data[].attributes.body
I will most likely be elaborating in my initial claim (my first sentence) in order to connect everything to my first source, I want to be able to analyze a separate piece while still making connection so it doesn’t feel like my analysis its all over the place. Instead, claims that connect to the bigger picture.

# data[].attributes.body
It has been hard finding the right pieces of RELEVANT information from your sources, what is actually worth it writing about. Even though it is a big paper with large paragraphs, I do not want to sound repetitive or leave things out, while still connecting it to the “so what” or bigger picture.
I have been citing both of my sources.
!!!!ONE QUESTION !!!!, for my primary source, if i want to cite it, do I just say  “ (Joker) “ and do i still create a works cited for it or do I not?