# data[].attributes.body
>> Topic is clear, creative, and interesting (makes me think further about the concept)
>> Topic is not too narrow or too broad
>> Topic fits the scope of the completed annotated bibliography

# data[].attributes.body
>> Topic is clear, creative, and interesting
>> Topic is not too narrow or too broad
>> Topic fits the scope of the completed annotated bibliography, with some gaps

# data[].attributes.body
>> Topic is unclear and unoriginal
>> Topic is too broad/narrow
>> Topic does not fit the scope of the completed annotated bibliography

# data[].attributes.body
>> Topic is unclear and unoriginal
>> Topic was changed without Professor's consent
>> Topic is too broad/narrow
>> Topic does not fir the scope of the completed annotated bibliography

# data[].attributes.body
>> Types of information sources selected directly relate to the topic

# data[].attributes.body
>> Types of information sources selected relate to the topic

# data[].attributes.body
>> Types of information sources mostly relate to the topic

# data[].attributes.body
>> Types of information sources do not relate to the topic

# data[].attributes.body
>> It is clear that the student has used effective and well-defined search strategies for their assignment

# data[].attributes.body
>> It is clear that the student has used effective search strategies to find sources for their assignment

# data[].attributes.body
>> It is clear that the student has used only one or two search strategies to find sources for their assignment

# data[].attributes.body
>> It is clear that the student only used one type of search strategy to find sources for their assignment

# data[].attributes.body
>> Searches a variety of appropriate retrieval tools to find and access their information

# data[].attributes.body
>> Searches appropriate retrieval tools to find and access their information

# data[].attributes.body
>> Only searches through a few appropriate retrieval systems but predominantly uses Google or other search engines

# data[].attributes.body
>> Only searches through retrieval systems such as Google or other search engines

# data[].attributes.body
>> Information sources are properly annotated
>> Annotations make sense and are clearly worded
>> Annotations give the reader a good idea of what the source is about

# data[].attributes.body
>> Information sources are properly annotated
>> Annotations make sense and are clearly worded
>> Annotations give the reader an okay idea of what the source is about

# data[].attributes.body
>> Information sources are not completely annotated properly
>> Annotations do not make much sense based on the source being described

# data[].attributes.body
>> Information sources are not properly annotated
>> Annotations do not make sense based on the source being described
>> Annotations do not give the reader any idea whatsoever of what the source is about

# data[].attributes.body
>> All elements of APA format are present in assignment

# data[].attributes.body
>> A good amount of elements of the assignment are in APA format

# data[].attributes.body
>> More than half of the elements of APA format are missing from this assignment

# data[].attributes.body
>> Only one or two elements of the assignment are in APA format

# data[].attributes.body
>> No plagiarism

# data[].attributes.body
>> Unintentional plagiarism

# data[].attributes.body
>> Overlooked Plagiarism

# data[].attributes.body
>> Intentional plagiarism throughout