# data[].attributes.headline
Satire is complicated because it's not very easy to identify. when you don't understand it starts to hold your interest and thats when you find humor in it which leads to paradox. McKenzie, Aviva, Itzel

# data[].attributes.subject
Satire is complicated because it's not very easy to identify. when you don't understand it starts to hold your interest and thats when you find humor in it which leads to paradox. McKenzie, Aviva, Itzel

# data[].attributes.headline
Satire is complicated because there are many hidden meanings in it and it isn't always easy to decode. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Satire is complicated because there are many hidden meanings in it and it isn't always easy to decode. 

# data[].attributes.body
Anthony F, Caroline W, Denise A.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Gladwell transitions between Enfield and Colbert to compare and contrast the different types of satire techniques that they both use.

2. Satire is complicated because they mock people sometimes. Weapons with irony and technique. Also some people might not find it as funny and might take it literally.

# data[].attributes.body
Satire is complicated because there are a number amount of weapons that can be involved as well as different scenarios. The reasoning behind why it is paradox is because a majority of satire is mockery.

# data[].attributes.body
Gladwell defines satire as a joke which can eventually can evoke change in society where as now in the west it has become simply for the sake of making a joke. Also Gladwell points out how satire has become very targeted in the west

# data[].attributes.body
Satire is complicated because at it's core its goal is to cause the viewer to think about their own lives in relationship to the satire. This is paradoxical as typically in satire it portrays the opposite of what would be considered a good change in the world.

# data[].attributes.headline
In his podcast episode "The Satire Paradox" Canadian journalist Malcom Gladwell uses real world examples and personal annecdotes to convince people in the West that satire is becoming less effective on that side of the world and wants them to create more Juvenalian Satire.

# data[].attributes.subject
In his podcast episode "The Satire Paradox" Canadian journalist Malcom Gladwell uses real world examples and personal annecdotes to convince people in the West that satire is becoming less effective on that side of the world and wants them to create more Juvenalian Satire.

# data[].attributes.body
Denise, Caroline, Anthony

# data[].attributes.body
Gladwell says that in the West the focus of satire is more about being funny instead of delivering an important message.

# data[].attributes.body
The complication in satire is the ability to be interpreted, where the creator may stand for one thing, and individual people or organizations can take the humor as support for their cause, case in point Loadsamoney, who was used by both left and right-wing newspapers. This is the same for any other type of media, writing, poetry, music, art. Not just comedy. Also the message may be warped by the comedy used in perception to the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Satire can be complicated because if it is not received the way its intended, it can be seen as supporting the idea its condemning.

# data[].attributes.body
Satire is intended to shock the viewer into thinking about making a change, however now we just use satire to get a laugh without much thought  of how it can affect the real world.

# data[].attributes.body
He means that in the West, people tend to weaken their purpose and meaning when that issue is put right in their face. They are very easy to back down as opposed to other forms of satire around the world. In different places, their satire can be ruthless. They are not opposed to shine light on the brutal truth even if it isn’t received well. The reception is not the point. The purpose of satire is to use comedy to help an issue spread to the public.