# data[].attributes.body
I noticed that these were my kids that sit there silently and need to be pushed a little more.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, it matched

# data[].attributes.body
No, my data did not match. Most of my students performed better on the Edugence TEKS check vs. Aimsweb.

# data[].attributes.body
Problems with those scoring the same being high on score but low on achievement.

# data[].attributes.body
I noticed that my LP students were low just by 5 points or they performed much lower. It was shocking to see some of my students in this category because the score very HA.

# data[].attributes.body
I noticed that my students who were HA-LP within Aimsweb were overall shocking to me. I say this because their work ethic in class does not match up to the LP score given within Aimsweb.

# data[].attributes.body
I noticed these were the students who have emotional or other things going on that may cause

# data[].attributes.body
Students are remote, quiet, off-task or not on WebEx.

# data[].attributes.body
Many are remote.  I was a bit surprised at who was in this category.

# data[].attributes.headline
NO. Performance in class is exceptional. AIMS and TEKS checks are both low because GT students do not value this type of assessment. They prefer creative higher level thinking. We have discussed as a class that even though we are GT, we have a responsibility to pull high scores for our school and to grow individually 10%

# data[].attributes.subject
NO. Performance in class is exceptional. AIMS and TEKS checks are both low because GT students do not value this type of assessment. They prefer creative higher level thinking. We have discussed as a class that even though we are GT, we have a responsibility to pull high scores for our school and to grow individually 10%

# data[].attributes.body
I noticed that these students aren't showing up. I also noticed SPED with really low fluency but average reading comp.

# data[].attributes.body
Mine seemed inconsistent. I made a big deal about Aimsweb and it seems they performed better on that. Overall, I saw more effort on Aimsweb than Edugence.

# data[].attributes.body
My kids put the same amount of effort into both. Overall, they took them both pretty seriously. However, they took the TEKS Check first and saw how low their grades were and were a little upset. This was tough because 1.) we had handful of kids whose tests got erased and they were told to do the test again. 2.) the test assessed things that were not on our curriculum map or that were given little importance in the curriculum. 3.) many of them did not even know to scroll to see the whole story so they took the test over a paragraph or two! They seemed to line up and nothing surprised me, but I feel like it is hard to compare the two. Aimsweb moved one student down completely based solely off the SRF section! Everything else went up, but overall that put them down. This isn't even something that is used to determine any kind of growth or success in students. So...all in all, they gave the info that one test was supposed to give, but it is hard to measure them up against each other because of all the factors. Either way, it still is hard data that we cannot ignore.