# data[].attributes.headline
my thoughts as a parent with kids       -arleen❤︎

# data[].attributes.subject
my thoughts as a parent with kids       -arleen❤︎

# data[].attributes.headline
Sharing-One group to another-comments ,feedback and additions 

# data[].attributes.subject
Sharing-One group to another-comments ,feedback and additions 

# data[].attributes.headline
My thoughts as a parent with no children-Ar

# data[].attributes.subject
My thoughts as a parent with no children-Ar

# data[].attributes.body
I am Jessica and I live in chicago.I believe that the voting age should remain the same which is 18.To begin with,3 reasons why the voting age should remain is kids under 18 aren’t mature enough,there influenced by their parents and because they don’t know much about politics.To add,kids aren’t mature enough because they are still young and they are not adults.According to procon.org it states,”Experts say that 16- and 17-year-olds demonstrate lower interest in politics, have less political knowledge, and lack the experience needed to participate in elections.”This shows how experts say that 16 and 17 year olds have low interest in politics so that means that they are not mature enough.Furthermore,the second reason is they are influenced by their parents.In Information about parents influencing  kids it states “According to research done by CIRCLE (The Center For Information & Research On Civic Learning & Engagement), involving young people in election-related learning, activities and discussion can have an impact on the young person’s household, increasing the likelihood that others in the household will vote.”This piece of evidence supports the fact that 16 year olds would be influenced by their parents vote and would go based off their parents answer that would multiply the vote twice.Lastly,the voting age should remain at 18 because 16 year olds don’t know much about politics.A piece of evidence to support this is ,”According to Annenberg Public Policy Center, only 36% of all Americans adults can name the three branches of government. Most of these adults have presumably graduated high school.”This explains how 16 years old’s don’t know much about politics only 36% knows about branches of government.So if they don’t know the branches of government then how would they know who to vote for.To wrap,this is my personal opinion from a parent  with no children why the voting age should remain at 16.

# data[].attributes.body
I am Kris. I am a student of Canterlot high, it is a theater high school. I play volleyball for sports and I live in Toronto. The topic that I will be focusing on is lowering the voting age. My position on lowering the voting age is negative because I feel as if a lot of teens would just base their vote off of what their parents say, or what their friends say. I'm going to give 3 reasons why I'm against it. To begin with, Number one: Kids under 16 are not old enough or even mature enough to make a huge decision such as choosing a president! 1 piece of evidence to support this is “Experts say that 16- and 17-year-olds demonstrate lower interest in politics, have less political knowledge, and lack the experience needed to participate in elections.” This piece of evidence is explaining why kids under 16 dont have as much knowledge as an older adult would have on voting. My second piece of evidence to explain why I feel as if the voting age should not be lowered is " The 18-29 age group has extremely low voter turnout numbers, suggesting that people aren't ready to vote until later in life. Only 12.5% of 18-year-olds participated in the 2014 midterm election, compared to 42% of the general population. According to the United States Elections Project’s analysis of US Census Bureau data, just 16% of eligible voters ages 18-29 voted in the 2014 election.”  This piece of evidence is explaining all of the percentages and the required age to vote. One last piece of evidence to prove that lowering the voting area is a bad idea is “A 2019 Hill-HarrisX poll found that 84% of registered voters opposed lowering the voting age to 16. The poll found every age group was against 16-year-olds voting, with the most support found among those under 35 where still only 39% were in favor." This piece of evidence explains how many people voted that the age should not be lowered and shows the percentage of people. To sum up, This is my own opinion on why the voting age should stay the same.

# data[].attributes.body
My name Is Sean and I'm a Politician I think we shouldn't change the voting age because we won't be the kids opinion it would be the influences of there parents. According to Time for kids the text states "A 16-year-old does not have the same maturity as an 18-year-old. They may vote for someone because he or she is popular."This piece of evidences proves that 16 years old doesn't have the same mind set as 18 year old and 16 year old would vote for someone because the person is famous. Another reason for not changing the voting age is to 16 because they wouldn't be mature enough. According to the website "David Davenport, JD, research fellow at the Hoover Institution, said, “My concern is if 16-year-olds were allowed to vote on any kind of broad scale, what we’d actually be doing is bringing the least politically informed," This evidence shows 16 year old aren't informed enough for them to vote accurately.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
From the 1990s to the present, elected officials in several U.S. states have made unsuccessful attempts to lower the voting age to 16, and sometimes even younger.

Student activism in the wake of the Feb. 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, brought new life to the debate about letting younger people vote in elections.

Internationally, about a dozen countries allow citizens to vote at age 16, sometimes with conditions such as being employed or married, including Argentina, Austria, Brazil and Ecuador.

A constitutional amendment to lower the U.S. voting age to 16 would require approval from two-thirds of both houses of Congress and three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 states). Alternatively, state legislatures could pass laws allowing younger people to vote in their states.

Until the 1970s, the voting age in America was 21. A debate over lowering it to 18 began during World War II when President Franklin D. Roosevelt decreased the military draft age to 18. President Eisenhower called for citizens ages 18 to 21 to be included in the political process in his 1954 State of the Union address. But lawmakers didn't take action until marches and demonstrations drew attention to the fact that young people who were being drafted to fight in Vietnam did not have the ability to vote in most states.

Congress proposed the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1971, which stated, "The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age." The ratification process, which required approval from 38 states, was completed in about three months, the shortest amount of time of any amendment in U.S. history.

While the push to lower voting age for state and federal elections is still an uphill battle, some smaller jurisdictions are lowering the voting age. A handful of cities in California, Maryland, and Vermont allow 16- and 17- year olds to vote in local elections, including school board elections as of Sep. 2023.

Should the Voting Age Be Lowered to 16?

Pro 1

16-year-olds are just as knowledgeable about civics and have the same ability to make good voting choices as older voters.

A study in the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science found, "on measures of civic knowledge, political skills, political efficacy, and tolerance, 16-year-olds, on average, are obtaining scores similar to those of adults... Adolescents in this age range are developmentally ready to vote."

Scientists believe that "cold cognition" skills, those used to make the kind of informed, well-thought out choices needed in voting, are solidly established in 16-year-olds.

Austria lowered the voting age to 16 in 2007. According to Markus Wagner, Social Sciences Professor at the University of Vienna, and his coauthors, studies of elections after the Austrian voting age was lowered show "the quality of these [younger] citizens' choices is similar to that of older voters, so they do cast votes in ways that enable their interests to be represented equally well."
Read More

Pro 2

Lowering the voting age to 16 increases voter turnout and develops lifelong voting habits.

The United States has one of the lowest voter turnout rates among developed countries. A person who votes in one election has a 13% greater probability of voting in a future election. Researchers say that people who participate in elections when they first reach voting age are likely to develop the habit of voting, and those who don't are more likely to remain nonvoters.

16-year-olds are learning about government and civics in high school, and the structured environment would lead to higher turnout among 16- and 17-year-olds as teachers and parents help them overcome typical obstacles for first-time voters, such as the registration process and finding their polling places.

By contrast, many 18-year-olds are in a time of transition, making them less likely to participate in elections.

Involving young people in voting can have a "trickle up" effect that mobilizes their parents and other adults in their households to vote, increasing the overall voter turnout rate. Turnout among 16- and 17-year-olds in Takoma Park, Maryland, the first U.S. municipality to lower the voting age for local elections, was double that of eligible voters 18 and older.
Read More

Pro 3

At age 16, people should have a voice in the laws that affect their lives and a stake in the future of their country.

A U.S. Senate report cited student activism and protests as reasons for lowering the voting age to 18 in the 1970s during the Vietnam War: "We must channel these energies into our political system and give young people the real opportunity to influence our society in a peaceful and constructive manner."

Students today live under threats to their futures such as school shootings and climate change, and they deserve to have influence over their elected officials beyond the protests they've organized.

Sofie Whitney, a survivor of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, says, "If 16-year-old students are old enough to be affected by the laws, and realize that there is a problem, then they should have the power to help change it."

The age of 16 is when people's relationship with the law changes as they often start driving, working, and paying taxes. Further, in most states, 16-year-olds can be emancipated from their parents and live independently.
Read More

Con 1

Kids under the age of 18 aren't mature enough to participate in elections.

Experts say that 16- and 17-year-olds demonstrate lower interest in politics, have less political knowledge, and lack the experience needed to participate in elections.

Social scientists Tak Wing Chan and Matthew Clayton say that 16- and 17-year-olds wouldn't be competent voters because "research in neuroscience suggests that the brain, specifically the prefrontal cortex, is still undergoing major reconstruction and development during the teenage years." They add that the prefrontal cortex is what "enables us to weigh dilemmas, balance trade-offs and, in short, make reasonable decisions in politics."

People under 18 are subject to different labor, contract, and criminal responsibility laws, and aren't allowed to join the military without parental consent or serve on a jury.

Most 16- and 17-year-olds are still living at home and would be influenced by the voting choices of their parents.
Read More

Con 2

The 18-29 age group has extremely low voter turnout numbers, suggesting that people aren't ready to vote until later in life.

Only 12.5% of 18-year-olds participated in the 2014 midterm election, compared to 42% of the general population.

According to the United States Elections Project's analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data, just 16% of eligible voters ages 18-29 voted in the 2014 election, compared to 30% for ages 30-44, 43% for 45-59, and 55% for age 60 and up. Over the last 30 years, voter turnout for 18- to 29-year-olds has never exceeded 21% in a midterm election.

Only 23% of students scored at or above the "proficient" level on the last National Assessment of Educational Progress test of civics knowledge and skills.

David Davenport, research fellow at the Hoover Institution, says, "My concern is if 16-year-olds were allowed to vote on any kind of broad scale, what we'd actually be doing is bringing the least politically informed, the least politically experienced, the least mature in terms of making long-term judgments and trade-offs, directly into and potentially affecting our voter turnout and results."
Read More

Con 3

The vast majority of Americans of all ages and political views agree that 16-year-olds should not be given the right to vote.

A 2019 Hill-HarrisX poll found that 84% of registered voters opposed lowering the voting age to 16. The poll found every age group was against 16-year-olds voting, with the most support found among those under 35 where still only 39% were in favor.

A different survey found only 8% support for lowering the voting age to 16; 45% want to keep it at 18; and 46% would like to raise it back to age 21.

A Twitter poll by WJLA, the ABC news affiliate in Washington, DC, found just 18% support for a proposed bill to lower the voting age to 16 in the District of Columbia, compared to 77% against. The local NBC news affiliate ran a similar poll online in which 83% of participants were against the bill.
Read More
Discussion Questions
1. Should the voting age be lowered to 16? Why or why not?

2. Would lowering the voting age increase voter turnout? Explain your answer?

3. Would lowering the voting age lead to increase civic knowledge and participation? Why or why not?
Take Action
1. Explore the campaign to lower the voting age with Vote16USA.

2. Learn more about the 26th Amendment at the Constitution Center.

3. Explore " Preregistration for Young Voters " at the National Conference of State Legislatures.

4. Consider David Davenport's con argument, including that other laws (governing activities such as driving, drinking, and smoking) have increased ages instead of lowering them based on the immaturity of teenagers.

5. Consider how you felt about the issue before reading this article. After reading the pros and cons on this topic, has your thinking changed? If so, how? List two to three ways. If your thoughts have not changed, list two to three ways your better understanding of the "other side of the issue" now helps you better argue your position.

6. Push for the position and policies you support by writing US national senators and representatives.
Sources

47.

The Hill, "
Poll: Americans Overwhelmingly Reject Lowering Voting Age to 16," thehill.com, May 3, 2019

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Should the Voting Age be Lowered in the US? Top 3 Pros and Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Proponents say teens are knowledgeable enough to vote. Opponents say kids aren't mature enough to vote. Explore both sides of the debate.

# data[].attributes.body
As a parent of 3 I believe the that the voting age should stay at 18 and up. I believe this because I don't trust a 16 year old to help chose our next president.  My research supports my view mentions in https://www.procon.org/headlines/lowering-the-voting-age-top-3-pros-and-cons/ it states "Social scientists Tak Wing Chan, PhD, and Matthew Clayton, DPhil, say that 16- and 17-year-olds wouldn’t be competent voters because “research in neuroscience suggests that the brain, specifically the prefrontal cortex, is still undergoing major reconstruction and development during the teenage years''. Due to these experiences I feel 16 year olds shouldn't vote.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
From the 1990s to the present, elected officials in several U.S. states have made unsuccessful attempts to lower the voting age to 16, and sometimes even younger.

Student activism in the wake of the Feb. 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, brought new life to the debate about letting younger people vote in elections.

Internationally, about a dozen countries allow citizens to vote at age 16, sometimes with conditions such as being employed or married, including Argentina, Austria, Brazil and Ecuador.

A constitutional amendment to lower the U.S. voting age to 16 would require approval from two-thirds of both houses of Congress and three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 states). Alternatively, state legislatures could pass laws allowing younger people to vote in their states.

Until the 1970s, the voting age in America was 21. A debate over lowering it to 18 began during World War II when President Franklin D. Roosevelt decreased the military draft age to 18. President Eisenhower called for citizens ages 18 to 21 to be included in the political process in his 1954 State of the Union address. But lawmakers didn't take action until marches and demonstrations drew attention to the fact that young people who were being drafted to fight in Vietnam did not have the ability to vote in most states.

Congress proposed the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1971, which stated, "The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age." The ratification process, which required approval from 38 states, was completed in about three months, the shortest amount of time of any amendment in U.S. history.

While the push to lower voting age for state and federal elections is still an uphill battle, some smaller jurisdictions are lowering the voting age. A handful of cities in California, Maryland, and Vermont allow 16- and 17- year olds to vote in local elections, including school board elections as of Sep. 2023.

Should the Voting Age Be Lowered to 16?

Pro 1

16-year-olds are just as knowledgeable about civics and have the same ability to make good voting choices as older voters.

A study in the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science found, "on measures of civic knowledge, political skills, political efficacy, and tolerance, 16-year-olds, on average, are obtaining scores similar to those of adults... Adolescents in this age range are developmentally ready to vote."

Scientists believe that "cold cognition" skills, those used to make the kind of informed, well-thought out choices needed in voting, are solidly established in 16-year-olds.

Austria lowered the voting age to 16 in 2007. According to Markus Wagner, Social Sciences Professor at the University of Vienna, and his coauthors, studies of elections after the Austrian voting age was lowered show "the quality of these [younger] citizens' choices is similar to that of older voters, so they do cast votes in ways that enable their interests to be represented equally well."
Read More

Pro 2

Lowering the voting age to 16 increases voter turnout and develops lifelong voting habits.

The United States has one of the lowest voter turnout rates among developed countries. A person who votes in one election has a 13% greater probability of voting in a future election. Researchers say that people who participate in elections when they first reach voting age are likely to develop the habit of voting, and those who don't are more likely to remain nonvoters.

16-year-olds are learning about government and civics in high school, and the structured environment would lead to higher turnout among 16- and 17-year-olds as teachers and parents help them overcome typical obstacles for first-time voters, such as the registration process and finding their polling places.

By contrast, many 18-year-olds are in a time of transition, making them less likely to participate in elections.

Involving young people in voting can have a "trickle up" effect that mobilizes their parents and other adults in their households to vote, increasing the overall voter turnout rate. Turnout among 16- and 17-year-olds in Takoma Park, Maryland, the first U.S. municipality to lower the voting age for local elections, was double that of eligible voters 18 and older.
Read More

Pro 3

At age 16, people should have a voice in the laws that affect their lives and a stake in the future of their country.

A U.S. Senate report cited student activism and protests as reasons for lowering the voting age to 18 in the 1970s during the Vietnam War: "We must channel these energies into our political system and give young people the real opportunity to influence our society in a peaceful and constructive manner."

Students today live under threats to their futures such as school shootings and climate change, and they deserve to have influence over their elected officials beyond the protests they've organized.

Sofie Whitney, a survivor of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, says, "If 16-year-old students are old enough to be affected by the laws, and realize that there is a problem, then they should have the power to help change it."

The age of 16 is when people's relationship with the law changes as they often start driving, working, and paying taxes. Further, in most states, 16-year-olds can be emancipated from their parents and live independently.
Read More

Con 1

Kids under the age of 18 aren't mature enough to participate in elections.

Experts say that 16- and 17-year-olds demonstrate lower interest in politics, have less political knowledge, and lack the experience needed to participate in elections.

Social scientists Tak Wing Chan and Matthew Clayton say that 16- and 17-year-olds wouldn't be competent voters because "research in neuroscience suggests that the brain, specifically the prefrontal cortex, is still undergoing major reconstruction and development during the teenage years." They add that the prefrontal cortex is what "enables us to weigh dilemmas, balance trade-offs and, in short, make reasonable decisions in politics."

People under 18 are subject to different labor, contract, and criminal responsibility laws, and aren't allowed to join the military without parental consent or serve on a jury.

Most 16- and 17-year-olds are still living at home and would be influenced by the voting choices of their parents.
Read More

Con 2

The 18-29 age group has extremely low voter turnout numbers, suggesting that people aren't ready to vote until later in life.

Only 12.5% of 18-year-olds participated in the 2014 midterm election, compared to 42% of the general population.

According to the United States Elections Project's analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data, just 16% of eligible voters ages 18-29 voted in the 2014 election, compared to 30% for ages 30-44, 43% for 45-59, and 55% for age 60 and up. Over the last 30 years, voter turnout for 18- to 29-year-olds has never exceeded 21% in a midterm election.

Only 23% of students scored at or above the "proficient" level on the last National Assessment of Educational Progress test of civics knowledge and skills.

David Davenport, research fellow at the Hoover Institution, says, "My concern is if 16-year-olds were allowed to vote on any kind of broad scale, what we'd actually be doing is bringing the least politically informed, the least politically experienced, the least mature in terms of making long-term judgments and trade-offs, directly into and potentially affecting our voter turnout and results."
Read More

Con 3

The vast majority of Americans of all ages and political views agree that 16-year-olds should not be given the right to vote.

A 2019 Hill-HarrisX poll found that 84% of registered voters opposed lowering the voting age to 16. The poll found every age group was against 16-year-olds voting, with the most support found among those under 35 where still only 39% were in favor.

A different survey found only 8% support for lowering the voting age to 16; 45% want to keep it at 18; and 46% would like to raise it back to age 21.

A Twitter poll by WJLA, the ABC news affiliate in Washington, DC, found just 18% support for a proposed bill to lower the voting age to 16 in the District of Columbia, compared to 77% against. The local NBC news affiliate ran a similar poll online in which 83% of participants were against the bill.
Read More
Discussion Questions
1. Should the voting age be lowered to 16? Why or why not?

2. Would lowering the voting age increase voter turnout? Explain your answer?

3. Would lowering the voting age lead to increase civic knowledge and participation? Why or why not?
Take Action
1. Explore the campaign to lower the voting age with Vote16USA.

2. Learn more about the 26th Amendment at the Constitution Center.

3. Explore " Preregistration for Young Voters " at the National Conference of State Legislatures.

4. Consider David Davenport's con argument, including that other laws (governing activities such as driving, drinking, and smoking) have increased ages instead of lowering them based on the immaturity of teenagers.

5. Consider how you felt about the issue before reading this article. After reading the pros and cons on this topic, has your thinking changed? If so, how? List two to three ways. If your thoughts have not changed, list two to three ways your better understanding of the "other side of the issue" now helps you better argue your position.

6. Push for the position and policies you support by writing US national senators and representatives.
Sources

47.

The Hill, "
Poll: Americans Overwhelmingly Reject Lowering Voting Age to 16," thehill.com, May 3, 2019

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Should the Voting Age be Lowered in the US? Top 3 Pros and Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Proponents say teens are knowledgeable enough to vote. Opponents say kids aren't mature enough to vote. Explore both sides of the debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Student to student comments, feedback and additions 

# data[].attributes.subject
Student to student comments, feedback and additions 

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback to Jason from Ar:Reread your sentences and add periods and uppercase I's.
Glow:You stated your reasons and backed up with relevant evidence-Ar to Jason
Grow:try to enhance your writing with different transitional words when stating evidence-Ar to Jason
Feedback to Aiden from ar: GROWS: reread you sentences and add missing quotation marks.
Feedback to Aiden from ar Glows:you gave your opinion and have three reasons with relevant evidence.
Feedback to Ar from Aiden Grows: use commas where needed. Glows: you used relevant evidence and supported it with an explanation on why you used that piece of evidence.
feedback from Jason to Arleen - You  did a good job with explaining on why you  want to keep the voting age to 18 and up I like the way how you give evidence on why we should keep it 18 and not lower it to 16