# data[].attributes.body
1) What is the motivation behind netizens' behaviour?
2) How will our students respond to such behaviour?
3) What is the difference between online vigilantism and cyber bullying?

# data[].attributes.body
1)Motivation
- Justice
- for some, Intention is to punish. It is easier hide behind anonymity
- For fun
- To create content- Irresponsible behaviour

2) Watch and laugh over it
Handful may add to the fire?

3)  Online vigilantism may start with good intentions but things may get out of hand when people start to behave irresponsibly e.g. start posting unrelated details like ic number, childrens' photos, address

# data[].attributes.body
1) For some people, it is seeking justice. But the idea of justice might not be accurate as people starts to "compete" among themselves to be the most sensational and intelligent and get the most like. Anonymity also encourages people to be more "vocal" online.

2) Some might quote the netizens as evidence in their essays.. It is possible that they will form their point of view based on the most "liked" comment. They might also be tempted to comment on the fiasco. Some might like and not comment, some might comment and not like whereas others might just "share" . All three actions are making a stand towards the issue. Things might be taken out of context. It depends on the maturity of students.

3) Online vigilantism will start off with good intention but it might escalate into cyber bullying. Most of the time, things will spiral out of control into cyberbullying.

# data[].attributes.body
Some netizens could have empathised with the TPY uncle, perhaps due to having a close relative of that profile, and hence felt the need to speak up as a form of justice.
Some netizens could have participated as a form of entertainment and as a means of gaining attention.
The spoof videos could have been created as a means to gain fame for the network.
There seems to be a militant sense of morality behind cyber bullying, where people do genuinely want to condemn wrong doing, yet lack the proper investigative means to do so, leading to the execution going awry.
Psychological transference could also be a push factor.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Motivated by personal agenda, e.g, to gain popularity. Netizens want an avenue to be heard/vent their frustrations.
2) Students might think that it is fun and interesting and learn to do all these things as well e.g, creating their own memes. Their real intention might not be to be malicious but they simply find it funny and want to share.
3) Online vigilantism- seeking justice for others, cyber bullying-cause hurt. There is a fine line of difference and sometimes what started out as online vigilantism might end up as cyber bullying. Intentions might be good, but because of the words or comments used, it actually hurt others

# data[].attributes.body
1) Motivation:
a) Seek justice for the old man
b) Gain popularity
c) Use the online platform (accessible and convenient) to voice their opinions about the matter

2) Laugh and share the videos

3)
a) Intention / Motivation is different
- Online vigilantism - seek justice for the innocent --> use social pressure
- Cyber bullying - personal attack against someone they dislike / seek to bully

# data[].attributes.body
1.
(i) SOCIAL JUSTICE - e.g. they would like to do something to 'help' the uncle.
(ii) PUBLICITY - to get people to come to their websites, e.g. for people to go to their websites to view their parodies and other content
(iii) FUN - some just wish to make light of the situation
2. They might share these links or videos
3. Cyber bullying - personal
Online vigilantism - caring (?) for the public or society by acting on general issues

# data[].attributes.body
1. Motivated by self-righteousness and to show that they are with the 'good' side. Their postings are to show that they are trying to defend the old man. They also want to join the bandwagon of people condemning the couple.
2. Students may not be able to discern between rational and irrational opinions that they read on the internet. They may also be inclined to voice their opinions online without thinking about the consequences.
3. Difference between online vigilantism and cyberbullying:
a. Vigilantism may be motivated by good intentions whereas cyber bullying is not
b. Vigilantes may feel that their actions are justified whereas bullies know theirs are not justified

# data[].attributes.body
1) - Teach the couple a lesson
- Channel all frustrations onto easy victim
- Self-righteousness
2) - Chip in by sharing, trolling
3) - Thin line
- Language used
- Intentions (online vigilantism = self-perceived justice? cyber-bullying = not verifying facts? OV leads to CB which cannot be prevented?)

# data[].attributes.body
Before:
1. To see that justice is served; An outlet to make their opinions heard and have other people do something about it.
After:
1. Feel that the punishment is insufficient and they want to promote their own brand of justice. But these people seem to never be satisfied. Malicious intent: hurt more than necessary. Gain more followers/have more hits.

# data[].attributes.body
1)The motivation is a good one, but the action may not be appropriate. It may be a form of harassment.Taking the role as a judge, and punish the person involved. It is a desire to shame the couple as a injustice, it is the fastest way to punish them. This is no t about the fine and punishment but how we should do when we face such accident.
The uncle is quite dramatized as the couple is as young as his children.
2) Students should be aware of the situation. It should be very thoughtful and mindful about it. Condemn the action and realizing the wrong action. We have to educate our students as CCE teachers.  how do they react to sudden situations.

Section B
1)Low self-confidence. Depressed students.
Adventurous ones, see it as a dare. Bullied students.
2)Whole school approach.
Students are resistance to teachers' advice or selective to some teachers.
Develop empathy. Perspective activities, learning for the

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sense of righteousness (anger).
- Feel good to stand up for someone who has been unfairly treated
- They just want to jump on the bandwagon (engaging with others)
- Gain viewership

2. They may join in
- Unable to discern what is true/untrue
- may think it is the correct platform to sir their views
- May take it as entertainment and not pay much attention to issues.

3.

# data[].attributes.body
1) - Seeking justice for the victim
-  Human's nature to express their opinions and views, and they enjoy to critique others
- Since its anonymous, they feel safe commenting as no one knows who they are
2) - Laugh at the content and then continues to pass it on
- Gossip about it between themselves
- A small percentage of students will rebute, and response to the comments made
3) Online Vigilantism: trying to seek justice by showing others what has really happened
Cyberbully: When someone gets hurt from what is being shown or said

# data[].attributes.body
They would think it is fun or see it superficially as a form of entertainment without considering the larger implications of the issue.
Students inevitably see the comments online as a model of online behaviour. They may not be able to discern the differences between character assassination and misidentification, and vigilantism.

# data[].attributes.body
Intentions may be different, with online vigilantism being that of a noble intent and cyber bullying being out of malice.

# data[].attributes.body
2. Mimic this behaviour and think that it is okay to do so. Students might be divided too, where some will immediately whip out their phones to record it down or some will step in to intervene by asking an adult to help

# data[].attributes.body
3. Intention. Tone