# data[].attributes.body
They needed to speak more clearly. Their movie had nothing to do with cyber smart. They needed to lower the music level.
You couldn't see why he was on his phone for.

Their lighting was good and so were the types of shots they used. They had good timing with their cuts.#

# data[].attributes.body
They need to speak clearly and turn down the background music because we can't hear them talk you can't tell what is going on, the tittle does not relate to the topic.
Good lighting on some senes cool music.

# data[].attributes.body
What they could improve.

- Didn't understand what was going on.
- Couldn't hear what they were saying.
- Bad Volume
- phone.

What was good about it.

- Something good was the message and that message was to be cyber smart.
- Cuts

# data[].attributes.body
bad volume, not related to the topic, can't see the phone screen.

# data[].attributes.body
It had nothing to about cyber smart. They need to talk clearer.
They need to be more serious actors.

# data[].attributes.body
What was Bad
Bad Volume
Bad lighting on phone
Poor Acting - Sounding like Robots.
Non-related music?

What was good
Camera changing
Cuts
Filmer

# data[].attributes.body
BAD THINGS
The audio quality - Mumbling and overpowering music
Acting skills - they laugh a lot
Maybe have a girl being a girl

GOOD THINGS
It was funny
We can relate
It had a good message

# data[].attributes.body
Bads:
We think that they need to speak clearer.It had nothing to do with cyber smart.And change the lighting on the phone .
Goods:
The music was good.  The cuts were good. The camera was still.

# data[].attributes.body
It had nothing to do with being cyber smart. They were talking like robots. They needed to talk clearer. You can't tell what is going on. Some of the lighting was bad. One of the boys could of talked English not gibberish. You couldn't see what he was doing on the phone.

One of the good things were the cuts. At the end they acknowledged the actors.Some of them were good at acting. The editing was okay. The music didn't over take the actors. How they did the slow mode was cool.

# data[].attributes.body
Bad things
1. It had nothing to do with being cyber smart.
2.  The volume  -  you can't really hear them talking.
3. They are not speaking clearly.
4. you couldn't see the phone
Good things
1. The cuts were good.
2. The lighting was good on the scenes.
3. The music didn't over power the actors talking.
4. The background was appropriate

# data[].attributes.headline
Thomas, Major, Izaiah, Tarquinn and Reitu

# data[].attributes.subject
Thomas, Major, Izaiah, Tarquinn and Reitu

# data[].attributes.body
Nothing to do with cyber smart.
Not speaking clearly.
Need to change the lighting.
The volume was bad.

The cutting was good.
The editing was great.
The music was catchy.
The background was appropriate

# data[].attributes.body
Bad:
It had nothing to do with cyber smart. some people were mumbling. Some scenes were bad lighting. The could of spoke more clearer and the volume could of been better. The camera won't keep still it was shaking a lot.

Good:
camera changing to different scenes. The music was good.

# data[].attributes.body
.The tittle does  not relate to the movie cyber smart.
.The aido is not go in the movie.
It is not clear .
At the end of it they do not so who was the n