# data[].attributes.body
Utkarsha and Vincent

# data[].attributes.body
Both use inclusive language.
Both use the same anecdotal evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
The age article depicts upon the emotions of its readers in order to gain support on issue.
The letter remains stern and factual based on the matter, disapproving of the editorials accusations.
Age editorials states council needs to do more to support community members whom are suffering financially due to graffiti vandalism.
Letter states council is doing best to support community and such opposing claims should not be made especially by responsible publishers.

Months & Charly

# data[].attributes.body
- emotive language
"confronted with an imposing mixture of offensive sexual diagrams"
" paper's dismissive assessment"
- inclusive language
"the issue of graffiti is a public one"
"nor do many of us like to see..."
- attack
"dragged its heels for months"
"irresponsible journalism"
-

# data[].attributes.body
grace and leigh

# data[].attributes.body
the age:
more opinions
kim nguyen:
rhetorical questions
appeal to cultural-ism

elisha and brian

# data[].attributes.body
Evangeline, Tom, Meg

# data[].attributes.body
Attacking tone in employed.

Logic and reasoning is used to formulate arguments.

Both have disappointed tones on the matter.

Evidence is used.

- Monish and Charly

# data[].attributes.body
the age editorial
- attacking the actions of the council
- dismissing graffiti as being a 'disgrace'
letter to the editor
- defending the actions of the council
- condoning the practice of graffiti in 'the right context'
grace and leigh

# data[].attributes.body
Similarities in Argument -
- Both expect the other side of the argument to deal with the issue
- Both don't directly condone vandalism

Similarities in Language features -
- Attacking and defensive tone
- Uncommon descriptive language

Differences in Argument -
- Articles are on opposite sides of the issue

Differences in Language features -
- Editorial uses emotional appeal
- Letter to the editor changes in tone more often
- Editorial has evidence and examples

# data[].attributes.body
Olivia and Callum

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Comparison Points Summary The Age Editorial and Kim Nguyen

# data[].attributes.body
the age editorial
- imagery
- call to action
letter to the editor
- defensive tone
exaggeration
metaphor
appeal to logic
grace and leigh

# data[].attributes.body
- editorial is more opinionated
- editorial is more personal, the author tells the story about the challenges the locals face instead of using structured arguments
- letter to the editor is more based on logic and reasoning

holly & kelvin

# data[].attributes.body
the age: graffiti
poses an offensive view on society.
the effect of this incident on young business owners.
The issue of graffiti is a public one.

kim nguyen:
it's their business so their responsibility.
The office indicates that the bergers received written correspondence.
Graffiti is a cultural art for.

elisha and brian

# data[].attributes.body
both articles suggest that vandalism should not be condoned

# data[].attributes.body
stern tone
inclusive and exclusive
emotive language
vary in sentance lengths

elisha and brian

# data[].attributes.body
- Editorial uses attack and has a more aggressive tone, whereas the Letter to the Editor has a more defensive tone.
- Editorial exaggerates its facts in order to express to the reader the seriousness of the issue, and relate to others who may have possible had to wait a long time for a reply from the council.
- Editorial has more emotional appeal.

# data[].attributes.body
Both parties do not condone vandalism and its disruption to society.
Both value the people of the community, their safety and support.

- Monish and Charly