# data[].attributes.body
Good questions. Clear instructions. Voice tone is well maintained.
Better: It would be nice to have the questions on the slide.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good :-
1. Topic was good enough for the strategy

1 Better :-
1. PPT was not in detail. Had only a slide and the presenter was speaking.
2. Instructions could have been more clear.

# data[].attributes.body
Very confident in presenting.
PPT can be most visualized to understand.

# data[].attributes.headline
Good content and a confident presentation

# data[].attributes.subject
Good content and a confident presentation

# data[].attributes.body
Better : Visual interaction could have been better

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good :-
1. Was very lively.

1 Better :-
1. Could have included some tool to get the quotes.
2. Grade and the age of the children was not clear for me.

# data[].attributes.body
good-very interactive, high confidence less ,assertive communication.
better-better strategy could have been applied.

# data[].attributes.body
Lavanya
Very interactive, fun.

# data[].attributes.body
1. confident voice.
2. Instructions can be better

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good :-

1 Better :-
Too many text in PPT which takes time to go through and understand what needs to be done.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Well presented with confident.
2. Instructions could be little slow to follow.

# data[].attributes.body
Better - Voice was low

# data[].attributes.body
Lavanya

1 good- well presented
1 better- could  go a little slow

# data[].attributes.body
Slide is very catchy. You have a wonderful voice. You used the right tone. Confidently presented.
Better: May be too much text on the slide.

# data[].attributes.body
Better - text was lengthy

# data[].attributes.body
good-exit ticket on pythogorus was apt
better-could have gone a little slow.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good :-
Voice was friendly

1 Better :-
The slides were not related with Plenary

# data[].attributes.body
Lavanya
Well prepared
Plenary should be at the end so no teaching only conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
Better: Slides and information are not plenary related
Good: Good information.

# data[].attributes.body
good-good voice modulation
better-time management ,strategize plenary

# data[].attributes.body
1.Good - Tone and voice modulation was good

1 Better : We need not bring in the part of session in the plenary and timeline could be managed.

# data[].attributes.body
Good: Its actually good that you have covered the topic and concluding with plenary.
Better: Time couldn't be managed.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good :-
Starting of plenary was good

1 Better :-
1. Could be more elloborative on what needs to be done.

# data[].attributes.body
Lavanya

1 good-  well presented

1 better- felt rushed

# data[].attributes.body
Good : Inspired by the way you presented, pictures , your  confidence .Also the Timeline is managed

Better:  Better give us some chance to comment here.👌

# data[].attributes.headline
Good content, Involved the class, Enthusiastic teacher

# data[].attributes.subject
Good content, Involved the class, Enthusiastic teacher

# data[].attributes.body
better : Honestly- none.

# data[].attributes.body
better - can be presented much better

# data[].attributes.body
Good - Love the use of this strategy. Makes students actually think about what they will do to reduce air pollution.
Better -  | Could have encouraged students to type in the chat so as to see their responses in the class

# data[].attributes.body
better: could have been simpler for a plenary

# data[].attributes.body
better -

# data[].attributes.body
Good - Very well made slide. Good question was used to gauge students' understanding.
Better - Could have adapted this strategy to make the students in today’s class to engage in the activity. We did not have the file – so that you can check student responses.

# data[].attributes.body
Better : Time management could have been better

# data[].attributes.body
Good: Clear instructions, well planned.
Better: Bubble activity slide could have been better

# data[].attributes.body
could have been simpler

# data[].attributes.body
Good - Good connection with the current climate. Slides are aesthetically pleasing.
Better - The activity was right at the end so it was rushed. You can just go ahead with the activity (teaching the lesson not required).

# data[].attributes.body
good-321 strategy used well for the topic
better;would have been more effective if questions were put on the slide

# data[].attributes.headline
new concept and was tough to understand all at once 

# data[].attributes.subject
new concept and was tough to understand all at once 

# data[].attributes.body
Good - The bubble map was well prepared. I liked the 3-2-1 questions too.
Better - The time given for the activity was a bit short (but I understand the time constraint for today).

# data[].attributes.body
better - grade was missing

# data[].attributes.body
1 good- well presented, colourful ppt

1 better -  time plan

# data[].attributes.body
good-colourful ppt, tool used effectively
better-5-3-1 activity long instruction, time constraint

# data[].attributes.body
Good: Slides are very good. Well planned activity.
Better: Long plenary activity.

# data[].attributes.body
better:slow presentation

# data[].attributes.body
1.Good : What else padlet creation for the activity. well Prepared and Presented.

1 Better : Home Assignment was really good but it took off some time

# data[].attributes.body
Good - Love the effort put into this. The questions asked were good, and the grouping was a great idea too.
Better - Could have eliminated the HW slide so that we could have started the activity. The instructions took a bit long.

# data[].attributes.body
better - quiet lengthy

# data[].attributes.body
Good: Good information and slides are well done. I liked how you recapped before the activity.
Better: Tweet it time for each question can be increased.

# data[].attributes.body
good-awesome voice modulation
better-very descriptive
better-add in different strategy tool for quiz

# data[].attributes.body
before could understand fully it ended

# data[].attributes.body
better -  can use some other stratedgy

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good -
Responses were asked
1 Better -
Time given in tweeting could have improved

# data[].attributes.body
Lavanya

Good - well presented, clear instructions

# data[].attributes.body
1.Good :  Confident, well prepared and sincere rendition. The strategy used ,slides were well suited for the topic and the effort was great.

1 Better : The question requires more time. the numbers could have been small in the plenary.
(its just my idea. not a fact.)

# data[].attributes.body
Good - very well presented, the questions were great and the slides were so well prepared. I loved the encouraging words used throughout.
Better - could have encouraged today's participants to type in the chat since we didn't have a padlet :)

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good :-

1 Better :-
Very formal for a class. Instructions were not very clear on what needs to be done.

# data[].attributes.body
Good: Creative slides. Voice is very encouraging for grade 1 students.
Better: instructions can little more clear. You can repeat them as its for grade 1

# data[].attributes.body
better - can be more clear

# data[].attributes.body
good-colourful slides
better-better clarity on what needs to be done

# data[].attributes.body
lengthy and slow

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good : Well done. Beautiful quote at the end. Nice voice modulation for small children and the take away.

1 Better : Instructions could have been more easier for the children

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good :-
Instructions are clear
1 Better :-
Time given could have been more since students have to write down details

# data[].attributes.body
Good - Interesting question for the exit ticket. I like the quote included at the end.
Better - instructions were a bit rushed, so a little clarity is required.
Since it’s a plenary, it would have been good if the students could work on the task right away. The would have to be completed at home later on so was more like a homework.

# data[].attributes.body
Very confident and clear
Time management can be worked on.

# data[].attributes.body
Better : Time management

# data[].attributes.body
little faster it was

# data[].attributes.body
good , lourful clides

# data[].attributes.body
Better: missed out on mentioning the grade , otherwise apt

# data[].attributes.body
1. worked on padlet its great
2. Too lengthy

# data[].attributes.body
good-clear instruction
better-could have been more interactive

# data[].attributes.body
Lavanya
Good : well colourful ppt
Better : instructions not clear

# data[].attributes.body
Very confident and clear.
Could be more engaging.

# data[].attributes.body
better : clarity

# data[].attributes.body
Lavanya

Good- nice ppt

# data[].attributes.body
Good - Very neat slide and good usage of the strategy.
Better -  Time can be little more for the activity.

# data[].attributes.body
Better - present much better

# data[].attributes.body
1. Good presentation.
2. Could be engage all the participate.

# data[].attributes.body
Better : strategy could have been applied better

# data[].attributes.body
Good - Very well framed questions. A good way to summarize learning. Conducted the activity gracefully!

Better - Could have asked the current participants to respond on chat to make it a bit more engaging 😊

# data[].attributes.body
1 good - good ppt

1 better- instructions could be clear

# data[].attributes.body
good-good strategy used .and ppt was good
better-better at giving instructions for the plenary

# data[].attributes.body
Good: Good usage of strategy for the topic.
Better: Little long as its a plenary activity, no need to go through the lesson

# data[].attributes.headline
very good presentation and easy to understand

# data[].attributes.subject
very good presentation and easy to understand

# data[].attributes.body
Good - Stayed cool during the presentation despite tech glitches. Conducted the activity gracefully.

Better - Could have made the instructions a bit clearer (what exactly students are supposed to write). Also, explanation was not necessary since it's a plenary.

# data[].attributes.body
Good presentation.
Could be much clear on instructions.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good : Excellent use of the strategy 3 2 1 and the way the questions were formed.

1 Better: Slides could have been better.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good :  Your language is nailing everyday. Well prepared and well presented.

2. Better : A different Strategy could have been used.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good : Confidently presented with grace. Your tone and modulation was also  apt👌
1 Better : Felt like 2 strategies were used.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good : Presenting after a glitch is tuff but managed very composed.

1.Better: Instructions could be better. I felt that explanation is not necessary as its a plenary

# data[].attributes.body
1 Good -
I felt a bit of confidence in the voice
1 Better -
Explanantion slide could have been avoided as its plenary presentation.