# data[].attributes.body
It is widely acknowledged that numerous environmental problems are posing serious threats to today’s world. Because of this, the protection of the environment has been a topic of general interest. A school of thought holds that only governments can tackle environmental issues as citizens' contribution is insignificant. However, I believe that both politicians and individuals have the responsibility to protect the planet.

On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that only authorities can deal with environmental problems. For example, in Vietnam, a large amount of industrial waste has affected severely the environment by being dumped illegally into the rivers, lakes, or fields. In response to this, the government has imposed harsh punishments on corporations that violated the law. Those can only be done by governments because they have authority and sufficient budget as ordinary citizens could not carry out.

On the other hand, I believe that individuals also have partial responsibility. Every resident could help in various ways, such as using eco-friendly facilities, recycling, or planting more trees. The change in each small daily action may have minimal effect, but with the cooperation of every citizen, there would be a great contribution to environmental preservation. Moreover, for instance, if the residents were not aware of the harmfulness of using private vehicles such as motorcycles or cars, regardless of the government’s regulations, air pollution would never be mitigated.

In conclusion, while many people subscribe to a view that only governments could deal with environmental problems, I am of the opinion that protecting the environment is the obligation of both politicians and individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
Higher education has been a vital determinant of economic growth. Therefore, more and more people are heading their concerns to the pros and cons of different pedagogies. There has been a notion that vocational training is ahead of academic learning, to which I completely accede for several reasons.

On the one hand, academic education provides a number of benefits, which mainly resolve around the comprehension of knowledge. This is proved by the intensive coverage of all disciplines, enabling student to become generally knowledgeable. Owing to this, they stand golden chances of mastering a wide variety of profession. Nevertheless, it is apparent that this extra amount of expertise will not exert a great bearing on their future career in that they should only focus on one particular job to ensure stability at work. This not only discredits the method of academic learning, but also further proves the superiority of the other pedagogy.

On the other hand, as mentioned, vocational teaching is of more advantage because of its concentration on only one field of work. Furthermore, learners are exposed to the working environment from an early stage, enabling their quick adaptation and flexibility to their first workspace as a school-leavers. They are also inclined to build interpersonal connections with others, thus are highly likely to get as much support from colleagues as possible. By dint of this, it is conducive that they can work in harmony with others. Eventually, their hard work shall be recognized, helping them get more chances of promotion.

In summary, practicality and experience are the main reasons that justify my preference of vocational tertiary education. To whom it may concerned, they should adapt my guideline on this problem to conduct a significant positive change on the process of teaching and studying.

# data[].attributes.body
Environmental protection has garnered a great deal of public attention since the global warming era. Some people believe that politicians should be responsible for protecting the environment but not individuals because they can do too little. I agree with the statement because of a great deal of money the politicians have that can subsidize the environmental protection idea.

Firstly, environmental protection should be the duty of the government due to the fact that the government has more money that can fund large and efficient environmental protection ideas. For example, a wind turbine generator, which produces energy that is much more eco-friendly than fossil fuels- the main culprit for global warming, is expensive to construct but funds from the government can immediately guarantee a better environment. Moreover, funds from the government can make the plan of protecting the environment become reality immediately, whereas an individual's actions only affect in the long-term and in some cases, does not bring the expected result. In short, environment protection is solely the responsibility of the politicians, as their money can immediately make the plan of preserving safeguarding environment works.

Certain people still contend that the individuals can come up with more creative and ground-breaking inventions to safeguard the environment than that of the government. While admittedly true that an individual can bring much more creative and ground-breaking designs, it is not always accompanied with efficiency and practicality. There are numerous designs made by individuals that are seemingly good in theory and prove potential figures in small experiments, but when it is brought to work on a large scale, the design fails miserably. By contrast, the existing products may seem old and unattractive at first, but they yield much more visible positive results than designs that are on paper. The aforementioned point can be perfectly exemplified in the products particularly solar panels, wind turbine generators and electric cars.

In conclusion, I am of the point that the duty of protecting the environment should be solely by the politicians, since they can subsidize on much larger and ambitious projects but can still guarantee the efficiency of finishing the goal of protecting the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Environment plays an important role in the existence of human society. As its paramount importance, human have to protect where they live. There is a school of thought that Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. While this thinking is valid to some certain extent, I adopt a view that both politicians and individuals have to protect the environment.
As the government has a lot of authority, they possess the rights to enforce laws governing activities that harm the environment and impose strict punishment. For example, a corporation dumped waste into the river, polluted the water system. If there is nothing to stop these actions, the life of many people will be directly affected.
However, I believe that individuals also need to take responsibility for environmental protection. As individuals, we can help in various ways, such as recycling more, buying more energy-efficient household items or planting more trees in our gardens. I think that without the cooperation of both politicians and individuals, environmental issues will never be effectively tackled. For example, if farmers continue to burn forests for their own purposes, regardless of the government’s regulations, the problem of climate change will never be successfully mitigated.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that protecting the environment is the obligation of both politicians and individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
Since time immemorial, the natural environment has exerted a tremendous impact on myriad aspects of mankind. Thus,  protecting it has been a heated debate in recent decades. Some people adopt the view that the public sector should be in charge of establishing environmental protection instead of the negligible duty of individuals. Despite the justification of this thinking to some extent, I am inclined to the view that the role of citizens is a substantial factor aside from the politicians in protecting the environment

On the one hand, concerning the role of authority, should the government surges the price of non-renewable energies such as gasoline, the air pollution in the environment may be eliminated. Means of transport consume a remarkable amount of these energies and emit Co2 into the atmosphere. Without a doubt, this phenomenon spells trouble for the environment as it leads to air pollution. However, by using the policy in which the cost of non-renewable resources is pricy, the public sector can deal with such a calamity since citizens will no longer buy them as well as the vehicle which consumes these resources. The situation manifests itself starkly in the case of the cost of gasoline in the USA as of late. This nation has increased the price of this energy three-time higher than it used to be so as to decline the number of people using it. Consequently, the number of citizens consuming gasoline and the number of private vehicles have decreased remarkably which is great merit to the quality of the air in this country. This is a testament to why the authorities should utilize this method to protect the environment.

On the other hand, regardless of the aforementioned role of politicians, I am in accordance that residents also play a vital role in ensuring environmental protection. Provided that the residents reuse or recycle plastic commodities, the natural environment will be sharpened considerably. Since burning these items will bring about global warming, some people naively throw them into nature. However, these products decompose in such a long run that they stick around in the environment for ages. Additionally, animals may mistake them for their food which is tremendously detrimental to their organ once they eat these products. This can be observed in the fact that turtles mistakenly eat the plastic bags in the ocean as the shape of these bags is the same as the jellyfish which is the turtle's beloved food. As a result, the organs of these turtles are unable to be fully developed, and absorbing plastic bags can even risk their lives as they clog the digestive system of the turtle. This is evidence demonstrating why people should recycle the

In short, from my perspective, irrespective of the crucial role of politicians, the play of everyday individuals should not be underrated. Whilst the public sector can put up the price of non-renewable resources so as to decline the amount of Co2 pumping into the atmosphere, the residents can recycle plastic commodities.

# data[].attributes.body
Environmental protection has been widely regarded as governmental responsibility, however, I believe that each individual should also acknowledge and attend in committing natural preservation.

On the one hand, humanity is facing enormous environmental issues such as global warming, natural resource depletion or deforestation, which cannot be solved by any individual. These problems require the larger affections of organizations and political figures for their capability regarding financial resource as well as facility and profession. Moreover, only politicians have the power to set up laws or decrees in terms of environmental protection. For example, taxes could be raised for the factories that produce eco harm product particularly nylon bags or for fossil fuels production and consumption- the main spring of greenhouse gases.

On the other hand, any politicians or any member of any big organizations was once a normal citizen too. That emphasizes the importance of informing every member of the society about such a bad condition our habitat is in and how little actions, like bringing an extra bag from home or saying no to plastic straws, is needed. Therefore, although a sole members' effort is not enough to tackle massive natural issues, the person's actions still play a vital role in raising and spreading awareness even among societies. Besides, donations from citizens will also help the bigger particles on the tremendous funds required in order to take measure to environmental problems.

In conclusions, I believe that the involvement of both politicians and normal individuals on protecting the environment are of equal importance.

# data[].attributes.body
It is widely acknowledged that countless number of environmental problems have arisen as a result of human's action to thrive in different aspects of life. Because of this, environmental protection has aroused much controversy. On the one hand, a school of thought holds that it depends solely on the government to preserve our wildlife, not citizens since they make merely small contribution to protecting it. While this thinking is justifiable to some extent, the writer, on the other hand would contend that the responsibility of protecting the environment belongs to all people.

It is understandable why some people believe that environmental issues should only be tackled by the ultimate authorities, instead of residents. Vietnam is a case in points. As of late, according to daily news, there has been a huge amount of fume from various means of transport being discharged into the atmosphere, causing detrimental effects to our living quality and moreover it causes climate change. In order to solve this the authorities has imposed heavy taxes on vehicles that use fossil fuels as its energy. With ordinary people, they are not able to take this kind of action. For this reason, it completely up to the government to tackle environment issues.

However, notwithstanding the fact that this planet is our habitat, I believe it would be unwise to ignore the paramount importance of every citizens across the globe in our way to protect the environment. Take, for example, non-profit organizations, founded by local people or even just households. Every day, they keep the environment clean and fresh by collecting rubbish, they launch campaign to encourage others to change for a better future. This is a testament to how its everybody responsibility to safeguard our habitat.

In summary, while it seem that only the government can take action, I am convinced that all people should tackle the problems together.

# data[].attributes.body
The economic prosperity enjoyed by many has come at the destruction and harm to parts of the environment. Therefore, the conversation of nature as a whole has attracted a great deal of attention from the public. Because of this, a decent number of residents believed that the preservation should be the duty of politicians as mere individuals are not able to contribute much. While this statement is true to some extent, I believe that the contribution of single member shouldn't be belittled.
It is justifiable why some would believe in such a claim because there are many problems which can not be solved by a sole member of society such as global warming, drought and other extreme weather conditions. The influence of political figures and large environmental organization is absolutely needed to overcome these issues. The reasons being special equipment and technology as well as knowledge of specialists are required to properly tackle these dilemmas. Furthermore, a massive amount of funds are also needed to support and invest in big environmental projects.
However, I believe that individuals should also play apart in restoring our natural world. From little things such as recycling, limit the littering can have a major impact when many start doing it. And one individual can inspire others to do the same to do their part in helping the environments. Moreover, people can also safeguard natural habitats such as forests and jungles by stopping others from cutting down or burning them, which is synonymous with the improvement of the climate.
In conclusion, I believe that despite politicians' involvement are of paramount importance in aiding the recovery of the environment but the effort of individuals shouldn't be discounted.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people think that politicians are responsible for environmental conservation, not people because individuals can only do little. However, I think that protecting the earth is the responsibility of both governments and individuals.
It is true that some environmental issues are too big for individuals to deal with. In order for serious problems, such as global warming, prolonged droughts, violent storms or other extreme weather events, to be effectively addressed, it requires the efforts and cooperation of politicians and large environmental organisations. This is because solving such problems requires special equipment, the use of modern technological devices and large numbers of experienced scientists to work together. For instance, it takes years for researchers to collect various samples and analyse huge amounts of data in order to know the major causes of global warming, and to help them to find the most effective solutions to tackle this problem. Only governments can have sufficient funds and resources to invest in this.
However, I believe that individuals also need to take responsibility for environmental protection. As individuals, we can help in various ways, such as recycling more, buying more energy-efficient household items or planting more trees in our gardens. I think that without the cooperation of both politicians and individuals, environmental issues will never be effectively tackled. For example, if farmers continue to burn forests for their own purposes, regardless of the government’s regulations, the problem of climate change will never be successfully mitigated.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that protecting the environment is the obligation of both politicians and individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
It is true that economic prosperity, which humans have enjoyed recently, has come at the expense of the environment. Because of this, the conservation of natural surroundings has attracted a great deal of public attention. According to this, some people state that it is solely politicians' affair due to citizens' little contribution. While this thinking is justifiable to some extent, I would contend that it is in the interests of country residents to put more efforts into protecting the environment, as well.

It is understandable why some people think that only government can carry out these activities. Take, for example, in Vietnam, a considerable amount of waste is anticipated to be dumped into the nature every year. In response to this, the government should enforce stringent regulations on people who violate environmental laws like filthy industrial waste disposal, and illegal dump site establishment. These law proposal and introduction can only be executed with the acceptance of the authorities. For this reason, normal citizens have very little influence on the legal terms.

However, notwithstanding the fact that there are many crucial areas for countries to pay attention to, I believe it would be unwise to ignore the unshaken importance of natural preservation as human have an inextricable relationship with the environment. The littering issue is a case in point. Without residents' awareness, the government cannot handle to address the problem at its core, let alone any organisation or political party. In fact, numerous governmental campaigns are aiming towards citizens' actions, which highlights the undeniable influence of them to the matter. This is a testament to how efforts to preserve the nature surroundings of residents are equally important as that of the authorities.

In conclusion, while it seems that politicians' roles in environment preservation are dominant, I am convinced that it is of great importance that those who live in the country should cooperate on equal terms with them to achieve the best result.

# data[].attributes.body
It is universally believed that solving environmental issues which are posing severe  threats to humanity merely belongs to the authority due to the limited ability  of individual. While this thinking is valid to some extent, I am in accordance with a view that both government and citizen are responsible for this problem.
On the one hand, with their massive right and budget, the government can alter the policy  which immensely ameliorate the ecosystem. For instance, recently, a company in Viet Nam was extremely fined owing to the excessive amount of sewage they deposited  to Me Kong river, a  major water source in this country. This testament is served to prove that governmental law enforcement not only enhance industrialism's attitude against our habitat but also raise national budget used later for running a chain of environmental schemes.
On the other hand, individual also play an overwhelmingly essential part of the practical solutions to environmental destruction. To cite an example, citizens in many countries such as Netherlands have shift towards using bicycle instead of trains for their daily travel which so far have reduced tremendous emission into the air. Thus, from minimal support at individual level, we can generate radical changes for our surrounding.
In conclusion, I hold the view that apart from individual crucial aid, government alone can not be deal with all environmental troubles.

# data[].attributes.body
It is true that some parts of humanity is destroying the environment for some reasons. Because of this,  environmental protection  has become one of the most controversial topic nowadays. However, many people discuss that whether the government or individual is responsible of protecting the natural. In my opinion, both politicians and individuals exert a considerable bearing on protecting the environment.
On one hand, politicians can prevent illegal deforestation. Fine can be put on to civillains from taking down trees for finacial purposes. Moreover, greenhouse effect can be greatly reduce if government take action to stop poarchers from stealing rare trees. This will lead to the improvement of the air condition

# data[].attributes.body
It is widely acknowledge that environment plays a crucial role in human-being life. Environmental protection,  therefore, has always been a topic of general interest. A school of thought holds that protecting the environment is  politicians duty instead of small doings of individuals. While this thinking is justifiable to some extent, I contend that each welfare needs to contribute to this urgent task.

It is understandable why some people believe that it's politicans job to preserve the environment. Take, for instance, France, the government banned single-use plastic bags and inject a gigantic load of money in order to reduce the nation's plastic pollution. It does not merely solve the non-biodegradable material overuse, but also save the marine's diversity. This is a testament to the importance of politicals in the situation since it requires drastic measures created by the government and huge federal budget.

Nevertheless, notwithstading the fact that politicans exerts a considerable bearing on conserving the environment, I believe it would be unwise to undermine the impacts of each individuals. For example, if people keep on commuting by personal vehicles, greenhouse effect will only be worsen, let alone alleviating it. Each welfare could show responsible and protect the environment by recycling, using public transportations, consume sustainable items and most importantly, plant trees.

In short, politicans is closely associated with residents so as to tackle the environment declines. Taking everything into account, preserving the environment is not only the responsible of governments, but also individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
It is widely regarded that environmental protection is solely the responsibility of politicians . In my opinion , politicians should not be the only ones that have to be responsible for the environment , normal citizens should also be accountable for said matter.

On one hand , the government should impose taxes on carbon-intensive energy .Such taxes can reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emitted into the environment, thus leading to the alleviation of global climate change. In addition , the rate of illegal deforestation can also be significantly reduced if the government decides to enforce stringent regulations, such as long-term imprisonment and heavy fines toward those who cut down trees illegally .

On the other hand , I believe that the willingness of the people to participate in cleaning the environment is vital , if we want to preserve earth in the long run. Just from small acts such as voluntarily cleaning the streets , cleaning beaches, diving into ocean to get rid of rubbish one can play a part in diminishing soil pollution , water pollution and so on. Moreover , one can also greatly contribute to protecting the environment by shifting towards using bicycles and public transportation for one's daily travel instead of cars, which has so far helped reduce a tremendous amount of CO2 released into the air, and improved air quality.

In conclusion, the act of protecting and preserving the environment should not be fall upon the shoulder of politicians only , everyday citizens should also play a part in said notions

# data[].attributes.body
Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?