# data[].attributes.body
I think he is not guilty because the jurors have evidence that the old man did not get to the door fast enough to know it was the kid. Plus there was a L-train going by so he couldn't of heard the boy say, "Im going to kill you.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that he is innocent. The old man couldn't be fast enough to make it in time to see the kid. It also makes a lot of sense that the old man would do that for attention. Even tho he has a rough past that doesn't make him a killer nor is it substantial evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe its innocent, because in act 2 the old man couldn't really walk, so how was he able to run for 15 mins just to see the boy. I think they had to help him run over there just to see the boy.

# data[].attributes.body
i vote not guilty because all the information didn't make like the knife that everyone can buy in a little shop

# data[].attributes.body
There was not enough evidence showing that it was the boy who killed his dad and there could have actually been another person already in the house which killed the father. since the re-enactment didnt take as long as the actual killing.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the boy is innocent because the old man wasn't fast enough to be a witness of the scene.

# data[].attributes.headline
Cynthia Karumba...…………. I vote not guilty because the old man had a limp and couldn't get to the window/or door fast enough to see who killed the man

# data[].attributes.subject
Cynthia Karumba...…………. I vote not guilty because the old man had a limp and couldn't get to the window/or door fast enough to see who killed the man

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the boy is innocent because the old man wasn't fast enough to had seen him run down the steps because the old man had a limp.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the boy is innocent, because act two all 12 jurors tested the evidence and, when they did. It was presented to be false.

# data[].attributes.body
I vote innocent because, there isn't enough evidence to support that the boy is proven guilty, and the knife that the boy use was the same knife that Juror 8 brought into the Juror room, which proves my point that there isn't enough evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe he is innocent, because in act two they state the old man is barely able to walk, so how was he able to run in 15 seconds across his home to seeing the boy flee. " They had to help him into the witness chair".

# data[].attributes.body
I would vote Innocent, because if you had a hard childhood doesn't mean your going to kill a person.

# data[].attributes.body
i think he is innocent because so far juror 8 has been proving the evidence presented in the trial to be false and now it is looking better for the kid being tried.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the boy is Innocent because the el train was going by at the time and the old man would have had to heard the boy yell “I’m going to kill you” but the el was so loud that it is not possible for the man to have heard him because of how loud the el was.

# data[].attributes.body
i think the defendant isn't guilty because there is not enough evidence and so much to disprove the evidence
presented. like the evidence presented when proved that the train was passing and it was stated that you wouldn't be able to hear disproving the old mans story.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the teen is innocent because there are only two witnesses with not enough evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the defendant is not guilty or innocent because one evidence was the witnesses, for example the old man took longer to get to the door and did not see who the killer was but just the boy leaving and most of the witnesses don't really have hard proof if the boy stabbed his father.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the defendant is GUILTY or INNOCENT because

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the defendant is GUILTY or INNOCENT because

# data[].attributes.body
I vote guilty because there is enough evidence stating that a bought the knife the same exact day when his dad was killed.

# data[].attributes.body
I Think the defendant is innocent because the young women could have not seen the boy will the train was passing by.

# data[].attributes.body
I

# data[].attributes.body
Here is why ! Because the evidence doesn’t add up for the boy to be guilty .

# data[].attributes.body
i think that the kid is guilty because the evidence is almost substantial but its really clear to see that he killed him

# data[].attributes.body
I feel he is guilty because it was said that he bought a knife the same day his dad was killed

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the defendant is innocent because, there is simply not solid enough evidence to prove he's guilty. For example, The old man who lived downstairs said he heard the boy scream, “I’m going to kill you!” Although this is a piece of evidence that goes against the boy it's not a strong enough piece because the old man could be lying and many factors could change this evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the kid is innocent because all the juror's were showing an example on how long it would for the old man to the door.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the defendant is innocent because the old man couldn't have taken 15 seconds to walk from his bed to the hallway to see the boy running he might also misheard the boy shouting"I am going to kill you" to his dad.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that he's in innocent because they where able to find a knife that look like the one who killed his father and also they didn't they say it was one of the kind.

# data[].attributes.headline
i think that the kid is guilty because the evidence is almost substantial but its really clear to see that he killed him with the knife. That he bought that same day.

# data[].attributes.subject
i think that the kid is guilty because the evidence is almost substantial but its really clear to see that he killed him with the knife. That he bought that same day.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel he is guilty because he bought a knife the same day his dad was killed

# data[].attributes.body
I think the kid is innocent because the old man walks to slow for him to see the kid run away and the light hallway is to dim to see the if it was the kid.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the boy Is innocent because that boy has been having a bad time In the city and the old man witnessed the boy running down the stairs and the lady witnessing the body falling from across the streets.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe he is innocent because the evidence that was used against him didn't really work because the old man said he walk over and I believe he hear and saw and walked back in 15 seconds and the jurors they tried the same thing bassicly recreating the story and 8 did it in 41 seconds something dosen't add up the odds of the old man tell the truth is very small he probably heard it and assumed it was the boy and only because he bought a knife dosen't mean he killed some one.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the defendant is not guilty because their isn't enough evidence that points to him being the murder. Like the old man who believe he heard screaming coming out of his apartment and he saw the boy run away from his house and he heard a voice saying "I'm gonna kill you" right after he heard the screaming of a little boy. He also saw it through the el train window where he "believed" that the boy killed his father and then a woman screamed outside the apartment.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the defendant is guilty because there are more than 1 evidence that points towards the kid being guilty. Such as old man hearing the argument between the father and the boy and the woman across the el train seeing the murder happen.

# data[].attributes.body
The old an took longer than what he said. He said 15 seconds but it actually was 41 seconds he could have just assumed it was the boy running away. The knife the kid bought most likely fell out if his pocket and someone grabbed it and stabbed the father. The old man probably had a grudge against the boy and just wanted him behind bars or something :)

# data[].attributes.body
He is not guilty there's not enough evidence to prove he is guilty there's on part which proves he is not that's the part where the lady saw him kill him but she was on a moving which means she couldn't see if it was the boy or not because she was moving and couldn't see when she didn't even stop.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe he is guilty because of the evidence about the old man hearing the murder and getting in time to see the boy run away. Which makes him seem guilty if the old man was able to see him run away.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think the kid is guilty because a lot of the evidence we got was from the old man and we've figured out that a lot of the evidence that the old man said doesn't because one there was a train going by trains are vary loud two the old man can not make it to the stairs in time and three the knife that the boy dropped is vary common.

# data[].attributes.headline
i feel like the defendant is guilty because he brought a knife the same day that his dad was killed      NICOLAS

# data[].attributes.subject
i feel like the defendant is guilty because he brought a knife the same day that his dad was killed      NICOLAS

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the boy is innocent because the evidence the witness has was not accurate , The Jurors reenacted the scene that the old man used as evidence for the defendant to be guilty and it ended up being inaccurate because the time was 41 seconds instead of " 15 ".

# data[].attributes.body
the defendant is not guilty because the evidence on the defendant to put him in jail.

# data[].attributes.headline
𝙢𝙪𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙚-  𝙈𝙖𝙭 𝙂𝙤𝙤𝙛 

# data[].attributes.subject
𝙢𝙪𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙚-  𝙈𝙖𝙭 𝙂𝙤𝙤𝙛 