# data[].attributes.body
research taking a systems-based, multidisciplinary approach (can follow up with details on how to operationalize this as there is not enough space/time to provide these here)

# data[].attributes.body
research which has clear policy use target from the outset

# data[].attributes.body
research involving co-design with relevant stakeholders (e.g. decisionmakers, community beneficiaries, climate and/or health practitioners, other end-users)

# data[].attributes.body
WHO Regional Office capacity to utilize research results, and the institutional gaps and needs of WHO national/regional offices using the same criteria as the research prioritization areas.

# data[].attributes.body
Research which requires multiple disciplinary collaboration (i.e. data integration, sharing, data analysis) to generate actionable research findings

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluation, this evidence was evaluated

Availability, is this evidence already available in the literature

Feasibility, it is possible to obtain this evidence with the available resources

Relation with the first causes of mortalility or morbility

# data[].attributes.body
Address the evaluation, monitoring and action on populations in vulnerable situations: the homeless, informal settings, indigenous populations,

# data[].attributes.body
Interdisciplinary studies (climate, environment, health)

# data[].attributes.body
Overarching theme of circular economy as part of the triple planetary crisis to align with the current climate political dialogue (i.e., and not to silo as climate and health which moves away from current industry dialogues).

# data[].attributes.body
innovation

# data[].attributes.body
Equity: addresses the health impacts of climate change in an equitable way - to reduce inequalities and reduce disproportionate adverse impacts of disadvantaged groups (e.g. children, women, people living in poverty).

# data[].attributes.body
research that can be translated quickly to fill gaps

# data[].attributes.body
Research using lived experience and qualitative approaches- so a methodological criteria as well

# data[].attributes.body
Promote global research capacity symmetry

# data[].attributes.body
research that reflects transdisciplinary thinking and participation of people/communities with lived experience

# data[].attributes.body
Solutions-oriented (Actionability with regards to finding interventions that work)

# data[].attributes.body
Research tackles the ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE that drives Climate change and global injustice.

# data[].attributes.body
research using action and implementation approaches

# data[].attributes.body
The ability to involve multiple stakeholder groups especially those with vulnerable or priority groups

# data[].attributes.body
vulnerability of the population

# data[].attributes.body
Encompass with the UN Initiative, conferences and reports on Strengthening Synergies between the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the 2030 Agenda for

Sustainable Development

# data[].attributes.body
Indigenous knowledge, research and inclusion is a high-priority and particularly on health worldviews.

# data[].attributes.body
Local

engagement (healthcare providers, other professionals and communities) in climate mitigation and adaptation for impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Intersectionalities and integration with existing mechanisms on climate issues so as to not overburden States, systems, mechanisms

# data[].attributes.body
Research themes impacting the most vulnerable/neglected populations

# data[].attributes.body
will this research fill a known and important gap?

# data[].attributes.body
Research that can be applied in multiple contexts given resources are scarce.

# data[].attributes.body
The sustainability of the potential outcomes of the research results that could be generated

# data[].attributes.body
Has cross-sector benefits (as in HiAP) approaches

# data[].attributes.body
Research questions that are community-driven

# data[].attributes.body
Interseccional and intersectorial approaches

# data[].attributes.body
The cost of inaction

# data[].attributes.body
Co-created between researchers and practitioners or decision-makers

# data[].attributes.body
Political Need for WHO to support Member States in urgent topics (i.e., setting the direction, capacity and coordination on interconnecting issues).

# data[].attributes.body
The future impact of the exposure

# data[].attributes.body
EQUITY and INCLUSIVENESS : the Americas and their populations are not a monolith

# data[].attributes.body
Reduces past environmental health injustices

# data[].attributes.body
research that brings health into the decision- making; change how decisions have been traditionally made

# data[].attributes.body
demonstrated improvement in reducing health inequities

# data[].attributes.body
Capacity to promote health equity (attention to most affected peoples and areas)

# data[].attributes.body
Politically feasibility

# data[].attributes.body
Cost effectiveness of the research project that would be needed to arrive at the result

# data[].attributes.body
Will this item lead to systems change (in terms of change of systems that determine how we do research on climate change and health, essentially including how that research is supported (or not) by funders/policy makers to be intersectoral, interdisciplinary, and co-designed)

# data[].attributes.body
Actionability of the research result: prioritize already existing solutions, which need to be tested and provide evidence based or cost-effectiveness studies

# data[].attributes.body
evidence-based

# data[].attributes.body
Maximimizes health benefit after full life-cycle assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Explicit inclusion of intersectionality and equity deserving groups

# data[].attributes.body
Embodiment of non-Western knowledge frameworks and values

# data[].attributes.body
Capacity to benefit multiple geographic regions within the LAC

# data[].attributes.body
universality

# data[].attributes.body
Impactful

# data[].attributes.body
The scale of impact of the potential outcomes