# data[].attributes.body
the people in this video only talk about trump brokering the ceasefire. the headline is also very directly saying it was president Trump who brokered the ceasefire.

# data[].attributes.body
This has a target audience of American people and people who support America. Because this article supports the American president and his power, and promotes his strength.

# data[].attributes.body
The claim is that president Trump brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan because the headline says trump has done that. Even if it might not be true.

# data[].attributes.body
in this video Indian official only choose to tell the part of a story where they were the only ones that brokered the ceasefire.

they show a video of Trump speaking but some words or sections are blurred out to make Indias argument correct and agreed on by him.

# data[].attributes.body
The audience is for people pro india and generally people who support india because they reject that trump helped broker the ceasefire this is for people who believe india is a more reliable source.

# data[].attributes.body
They are claiming that Trump was not the one who brokered the ceasefire deal even though he claimed he did. This article says that Indian and Pakistani officials agree that Trump did not broker the ceasefire.

# data[].attributes.body
This source is fairly neutral because the country is not directly involved of the Ceasefire, but they do say more about Trump in this article than India or Pakistan regarding the ceasefire.

# data[].attributes.body
The target audience is for people who don't want to hear about the arguing over who caused the ceasefire but why it happened and about it because this article does not specifically state who brokered the ceasefire.

# data[].attributes.body
The central argument is that there are multiple countries involved in the cease fire and it wasn't just the US or India and Pakistan who brokered the ceasefire, it was many countries.

# data[].attributes.body
Pompeo,  Mike, “Trump announces immediate ceasefire between India and Pakistan”, Fox News, May 10th 2025,https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372630827112.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Trump announces ‘immediate ceasefire’ between India and Pakistan | Fox News Video

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo joins ‘Fox News Live’ to discuss President Donald Trump’s announcement that India and Pakistan have agreed to an immediate ceasefire, following escalating tensions between the two nuclear-armed nations.

# data[].attributes.body
Parashar, Sachin,” finally India makes it official:Trump didn't broker the India-Pakistan ceasefire, Times of India, May 14th 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/finally-india-makes-it-official-trump-didnt-broker-india-pakistan-ceasefire/articleshow/121149120.cms.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Finally, India makes it official: Trump didn’t broker India-Pakistan ceasefire | India News - The Times of India

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
India News: NEW DELHI: India on Tuesday reiterated its rejection of US President Donald Trump’s offer to mediate in the dispute with Pakistan over J&K, and said I.

# data[].attributes.body
Kleiderman, Alex India-Pakistan ceasefire appears to hold after accusations of violations, May 11th 2025, al pages. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg9d913v20o

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The announcement came hours after military strikes by India and Pakistan intensified overnight

India and Pakistan have said they have agreed to a ceasefire after four days of escalating cross-border military strikes.

The news was announced on social media by US President Donald Trump who said the "full and immediate ceasefire" had happened after US mediation.

However, hours after the announcement, residents and reporters in the main Indian-administered Kashmiri cities of Srinagar and Jammu reported hearing the sounds of explosions, although neither India or Pakistan has commented on them.

In the last few days there has been a series of drone and missile attacks since Delhi launched attacks against Islamabad over the killing of Indian tourists by militants in the Indian-administered Kashmir region. Pakistan had denied any involvement.

Kashmir is claimed in full by India and Pakistan, but administered only in part by each since they were partitioned following independence from Britain in 1947.

It has been a flashpoint between the two nuclear-armed nations and they have have fought two wars over it.

Speaking on Saturday,India's external affairs minister S Jaishankar said the two nations had "worked out an understanding on stoppage of firing and military action".

"India has consistently maintained a firm and uncompromising stance against terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. It will continue to do so," he added.

Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar said: "Pakistan has always strived for peace and security in the region, without compromising on its sovereignty and territorial integrity."

India's strikes on Wednesday sparked a chorus of calls for de-escalation from the international community.

China had urged both countries to prioritise peace and stability and a statement from G7 nations called for "maximum restraint".

Speaking after the ceasefire announcement, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said India and Pakistan had agreed to start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site.

He said he and US Vice-President JD Vance spent the prior 48 hours with senior Indian and Pakistani officials, including their respective Prime Ministers Narendra Modi and Shehbaz Sharif.

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he welcomed "all efforts to de-escalate the conflict".

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said Britain has been "engaged" in talks for "some days", with Foreign Secretary David Lammy speaking to both sides.

"I'm pleased to see today that there's a ceasefire," he said. "The task now is to make sure that that is enduring and is lasting."

India confirms ceasefire with Pakistan

The recent fighting came after two weeks of tension following the killing of 26 tourists in the resort town of Pahalgam.

Survivors of the 22 April attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 25 Indians and one Nepali national, said the militants were singling out Hindu men.

The Indian defence ministry said its strikes this week were part of a "commitment" to hold "accountable" those responsible for the attack. Pakistan described them as "unprovoked".

Pakistan says Indian air strikes and cross-border fire since Wednesday have killed 36 people in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, while India's army reported at least 21 civilians deaths from Pakistani shelling.

Fighting intensified overnight on Friday, with both countries accusing each other of targeting airbases and other military sites.

India's military said Pakistan had launched mass drone attacks and shelling along its western border, endangering civilians - a claim Pakistan denied.

Pakistan said it had taken retaliatory action for Indian missile strikes on airbases at Rawalpindi - 10km (6.2m) from Pakistan's capital Islamabad - Chakwal and Shorkot.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
India and Pakistan agree ceasefire after days of strikes

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It comes after fighting intensified overnight, with both countries accusing each other of targeting military sites.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at differing perspectives is needed because it helps us discover different biases that different sources have.  One of the main reasons why you need to consider different perspectives is because in the Fox News video (Pompeo) they only talk about President Trump brokering the ceasefire, they prove this by using select quotes from Trump and the Indian government to prove their point. You need to view different sources if you want to find the real truth in what you are researching or learning.  This source only showed us that Trump brokered the ceasefire whereas other sources may prove different. The India Times also published a video saying that Trump did not have anything to do with making the ceasefire happen and that it was only India and pakistan. This source is very important because this is a source that is in the country where the ceasefire is happening. If we had only listened to the fox news source we would think that Trump was an instrumental part in the ceasefire but we know from this source that he really wasn't. This source may also be sceptical because by saying that only they brokered the ceasefire for themselves makes their country seem more powerful and capable. These sources are all part of the truth because they all have something to benefit from saying only certain information, unlike BBC which has no connection or benefit so they may be unbiased because they say that many countries have contributed to making the ceasefire happen. This is one of the most important sources we looked at because it is fairly unbiased and therefore may tell the most truth. This country had no benefit from saying who brokered the ceasefire; the  only benefit was getting good news, therefore making it more likely to be true. Looking  at many different perspectives and sources to understand the different biases and learn the truth because some sources make us believe one thing, but looking at more widespread sources can help uncover the whole unbiased truth.