# data[].attributes.body
By 2011, the amount of money by O2 was double to about 2.6 billion dollars and still sustainable was the highest figure. Additionally,the amount of money by O3 was stayed the same as in 2008, to 1.5 billion dollars. A slight increase was seen in the quantity of donations from O1 to 0.75 billion dollars while an opposite trend was registered in O4 and O5 to only 0.3 and 0.4 billion dollars, respectively. The amount of money by O3 was remain unchanged to 1.5 billion dollars.

# data[].attributes.body
The amount of money given to developing nations by Organization 1 in 2009 increased significantly, then decreased remarkably to 0,7 billion dollars and remained unchanged in the following years, at about 0.7 billion dollars. The figure for Organization 2 witnessed a considerable growth in 2009, reaching 1.5 billion dollars, and doubled in 2011. The donation for developing nations from Organization 3 experienced some fluctuations and eventually stayed the same as in 2008, at 1.5 billion dollars. There was a significant decline in the amount of donation by Organizations 4 and 5, to only 0.3 and 0.4 billion dollars, respectively.

# data[].attributes.body
In 2008, the quantity of donations by O4 was the highest, at 1.5 billion dollars, followed by the amount of money in O2 and O5 , was similarly at 1.25 billion dollars. Additionally, the amount of investments in O1 was the lowest, at about 700 million dollars and the amout of money from O4 was higher than O1, at 750 million dollars.

# data[].attributes.body
In 2008, the donation amount for developing nations from Organization 3 was the highest, at 1.5 billion dollars, followed by 1.3 billion dollars from Organizations 2 and 5 of each. By contrast, the figures for Organization 1 and Organization 4 were the lowest, at around 0.6 billion dollars and 0.7 billion dollars, respectively.

# data[].attributes.body
overall it can clearly be seen that there was a significant increase in the amount of donation to developing nations of organisation 1 and organisation 2. At the same time, organisation4 and organisation 5 also witnessed an reverse trend. while the organation 3 remained unchanged. additionally the quantity of money given to developing in organistation was the highest, while the figure for organisation4 was the lowest over the course

# data[].attributes.body
the given bar chart gives imformation about the quantity of money to developing countries by five organisations between 2008 to 2011

# data[].attributes.body
The given bar chart illustrates the quantity of money given to developing nations by five separate organisations between 2008 and 2011.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart illustrates the quantity of donations to developing countries by 5 organisations between 2008 and 2011

Body1:

In 2008, the largest amount of money was donated to developing countries by Organization 3 at 1.5 billion dollars, followed by about 1.3 billion and 1.4 billion dollars from Organization 2 and Organization 5, respectively. The lowest figure was recorded in Organization 1, which was 0.1 billion dollars lower than that of Organization 4.

Body 2:

Over the period, the amount of money given to developing nations by organization 2 doubled after 3 years and still remained the largest investment organization . the figure for organization 1 registered a slight growth in 2009 to 0.8 billion dollar. by contrast , the figure for organization 3 was underwent a fluctuation trend , that rose

# data[].attributes.body
The given bar chart illustrates the quantity of money given to developing nations by five different organisations between 2008 and 2011.

# data[].attributes.body
HA LINH

The given bar chart illustrates the quantity of money spent to developing countries by five separate organisations between 2008 and 2011.

Overall, it can clearly be observed that there was a significant increase in the amount of money given to developing nations of Organisation 1 and 2, while an opposite trend was seen in Organisation 4 and 5. Additionally, the investment which Organisation 3 donated fluctuated over the period surveyed.

In 2008, Organisation 3 led the group of 1.5 Billion dollars donated, followed by Organisation 2 and 5 at 1.25 and 1.35 billion dollars, respectively, which doubled that of the figure for Organisation 4. At the same time, Organisation 1 donated the lowest figure at only 0.6 billion dollars.

Over 3 years, Organisation 2 experienced the most dramatic rise in the number of money donated to reach 2.6 billion dollars and kept being the leader of the group, Organisation 1

registered a slight increase to 0.7 billion dollars at the same time. By contrast, Organisation 4 and 5 experienced an downward trend to only 0.3 and 0.4 billion dollars. Additionally, Organisation 3 remained unchanged after a fluctuated period at 1.5 billion dollars

# data[].attributes.body
The given bar chart illustrates the amount of currency given to developing nations by five organisations between 2008 and

2011. Overall, it can clearly be seen that there was a significant increase in the amount of money given to developing countries by organisation 1 and organisation 2, while an opposite trend was true for organisation 4 and organisation 5. Noticeably, there was a fluctuation in the quantity of donations in organisation 3. Additionally, the organisation 2 consistently donated the largest contribution in the nations while the lowest figure for was seen organisation 4 during the period surveyed.

In 2008, the largest amount of money was donated in organisation 3 at 1.5 billion dollars, followed by organisation 2 and 5 both at 1.3 billion dollars. The lowest quantity of donations was registered in organisation 1, at 0.6 billion dollars, which is slightly lower figure from organisation 4, at 0.7 billion dollars.

By 2011, the quantity of money donated by organisation 2 was twice as much as over its initial figure and then maintained its position as the largest investing institution. By contrast, the amount of organisation 1 increased slightly to 0.8 billion dollars in 2009, then it minimally decreased to 0.6 billion dollars and stayed at that figure till the end of period. Albeit the amount of money donated organisation 3 experienced some fluctuations, the amount of money donated remained the same as it figure in 2008. Additionally, organisations 4 and 5 witnessed a remarkable decrease to 0.35 and 0.5, respectively.