# data[].attributes.body
Record your group's thinking. Which statement did you choose? Is it true or false? What evidence supports this?

# data[].attributes.body
For Scenario 1, did your group think this should be identified as green, yellow, or red on the AI traffic light? Why? Change the colour of your background to match your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
For Scenario 2, did your group think this should be identified as green, yellow, or red on the AI traffic light? Why? Change the colour of your background to match your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
For Scenario 3, did your group think this should be identified as green, yellow, or red on the AI traffic light? Why? Change the colour of your background to match your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
We want you to share your understanding of the ISP AI Traffic Light.

Use Canva AI or another tool of your choice to create a song, an image, a game, or a video that will help students, teachers, and parents understand the role of the AI Traffic Light at ISP.

# data[].attributes.body
We chose statement 1: the integrity dilemma. We agree with the statement that it's OK to use AI to correct spelling and grammar and punctuation IF the assignment isn't grading the grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

However, it would not be OK to use AI to generate the thoughts or the sentences for you, or to rewrite them, as that is doing the thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
"Orange" because it is two distinct tasks

Red: making research questions

"Orange" / yellow: a compromise because getting the short summary is a green. but making research questions make it red because that task requires your own thinking

Green: effective use of AI for efficiency is green

# data[].attributes.body
We chose statement 1: The integrity dilemma.

Green because its the same process as spellcheck and for example, Grammarly does the same and many spellcheckers uses AI as well.

# data[].attributes.body
We chose statement 1:

the integrity dilemma

# data[].attributes.body
We chose statement 1; we decided that it was true, this is because Grammarly is allowed, and it fixes grammar. Also, in science, having correct sentence structure is less important than your actual ideas, and the sentence structures only improve the readability.

# data[].attributes.body
We felt this was generally okay depending on the circumstances. If reading comprehension was being tested then it would not be okay and some skill development would be lost by using AI. We might also miss some details from the text.

# data[].attributes.body
Using AI to find a source but then do your own analysis and thinking - ok

AI is doing the mundane, long, boring work but the student is doing the thinking.

The student is open and honest about their use of AI.

It is basically the same as using a search box in a database or Google.

What about finding counter-arguments? It can help the student learn how to find other perspectives, but if the student uses it too much, they will become reliant and not learn.

# data[].attributes.body
we chose statement 1:

we got two opinon, that it is true and No idea, but at the end we both think it is true, because when you do this work with ai or grammer checker, we got same result from both tool.

# data[].attributes.headline
Statement 1: Using AI correct grammar is NOT academic dishonesty. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Statement 1: Using AI correct grammar is NOT academic dishonesty. 

# data[].attributes.body
We think this is TRUE.

It is helpful to distinguish the difference between spell-checkers and AI, but we think this is acceptable for students to do. We believe this because it preserves the student's original ideas while refining their communication.

What if an EAL student would like to use this strategy who knows what they want to say but doesn't know how to spell the words or communicate it?

What if the students wants to use AI as a tool to learn how to use grammar better?

However, it is worth considering why students feel the need to do this. Is it possibly because there is a lack of teaching grammar, spelling, or refined vocabulary in actual classrooms?

# data[].attributes.body
Green / yellow

Green: provided by the school; this is basically the equivalent to a tutor

Yellow: if it is a planner, it is green, but if it provides points and evidence, it is telling you what to say and you do not do the thinking. Again, the first part of green, the latter parts are yellow.

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on the task. Is the goal reading comprehension / building reading skills, detailed analysis, skimming for main ideas as part of a research project that requires reading many sources?

Best use: do not always go to AI first. Try tackling the texts yourself first, then use AI if you do not understand something or do not understand fully. Also, beware AI may misinterpret, oversimplify or miss something.

# data[].attributes.body
We would need to check we understand the summaries. The RQ would be a red light

# data[].attributes.body
it takes away the human aspect of the art;

if you're trying to get it to synthesize other artists' work - it can be helpful, save time and give you more time to develop your own skills, get ideas and become more efficient

if we get stuck (artist's block), it can help us get unstuck

it can be used as a source of prompts - just like teachers give students a prompt

using it for things that are doable by humans is not ethical - it takes away real jobs

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow because the Ai is not doing all the work. You're still actually writing the essay itself.

# data[].attributes.body
We chose Statement 1:

Using AI to generate ideas is OK because you are still making the art. The AI usually gives very general ideas as such when you ask it for inspiration it will only tell you "make a waterfall," But most of the development such as how it looks like and what color it is is still your work.

Furthermore, its ok to take inspiration because no idea is truly yours everyone always gets inspired by others and its impossible to create anything without any inspiration

# data[].attributes.body
We believe it would be orange because if the research paper is hard to understand then you can use it to help you understand what it is about but you shouldn't use AI to summarise and do the work for you.

# data[].attributes.headline
traffic light image Amy, Charlotte and Fabian

# data[].attributes.subject
traffic light image Amy, Charlotte and Fabian

# data[].attributes.body
We have mixed opinions. Some of us think that asking AI to summarize articles is OK; others feel that THAT is the thinking work of the research paper (not to mention the student is only using 3 articles).

Some feel that generating the RQ with AI is the thinking work and not ok at all. Others feel it is a great use of AI to help you come up with ideas.

So nothing definitive here.

One piece of advice is to use AI to summarize, but then to go back and read the article so you better understand it AND so you pick up on the things AI misses - because AI misses stuff.

# data[].attributes.body
If you are analysing a passage in English class, you need to actually understand the wording, not a summary. You could use it to get a general understanding of what is going on, but you can't analyse.

It can help with a language barrier, or you can use it to help with a science/math text if you don't understand.

In both scenarios, you should go back to the original passage and try to see what each part means.

# data[].attributes.body
orange, or green, but it depends on what the purpose of the research paper was. If it was to simply collect information and present it, then it could be alright. However, if it was for the understanding of the student then it might be considered improper use of AI in such a scenario.

Another point would be, most papers require or at least advise you to include direct quotes from the articles, thus making it unclear if a summary is okay. If they used the summaries simply to comprehend the general direction of the text along with some key information points, and then pulled direct quotes to validate their points, then it may be excused.

(LRŠ)

# data[].attributes.body
the AI tool is being carefully by the student with the teacher permission.

# data[].attributes.body
AI has been cited to the teacher and the student is doing the work of reading and understanding the perspectives

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow - ok to use for summary, but they should not have used AI for creation of the questions.

Red - Too much AI use in each step - the problem is with the way the student is using it. Try to summarize yourself, then use AI to analyze your summary to determine if you are correct or not.

# data[].attributes.body
green, beacause

using AI to provide sources is comparable to researching by yourself, only with increased speed and perhaps filtering out articles that are irrelevant to your topic. This could, however, prevent the student from uncovering an article that may contain a particularly interesting viewpoint.

As long as they write their own points with regard to the AI (avoiding using direct artificial quotes, etc) I believe that it is absolutely alright to use it to research points.

# data[].attributes.body
If the teacher knows about it, then it is okay

# data[].attributes.body
The AI tool has risks to using it long-term and you can use it to help you learn, but it would cause you to depend on it and would discourage you from actually learning.

# data[].attributes.headline
Elena, Yeon, Emily, Hyeonseo, Penelope, Mireya, Kris, Mark, Andri, Vanya

# data[].attributes.subject
Elena, Yeon, Emily, Hyeonseo, Penelope, Mireya, Kris, Mark, Andri, Vanya

# data[].attributes.body
We actually had discussions about all three, and did the "Tug for Truth" for all. We chose scenario 3 to discuss in detail, and said this was Green/Yellow: this really depends on if you're actually doing the analysis yourself, or if you're relying on AI to "do the work for you," as well as the dangers of relying on AI as opposed to building your own reading and summarising skills. The context of International Schools, where many students don't have English as their native language, adds a level of complexity to the problem with this scenario (and others).

# data[].attributes.headline
Wolf, Artur, May, Sophie, Julia, Ollie, Emiel, Sasa, Dara, Nina, Lukas

# data[].attributes.subject
Wolf, Artur, May, Sophie, Julia, Ollie, Emiel, Sasa, Dara, Nina, Lukas

# data[].attributes.body
We chose Scenario 3.

Overall, the statement leans towards being mostly true, as we think that it will help with understanding and learning, but it's important that the whole text is still read to avoid misunderstanding. We would use AI as a tool, however to not submit work.

# data[].attributes.body
We chose statement 3 and mostly classified it as yellow, as it could be helpful in some scenarios but students could become overreliant. There were some opinions that the color should be different per area(red for humanities, yellow for STEM) as humanities subjects require more in-depth, analytical thinking of individual linguistic choices.

# data[].attributes.body
In my group we chose statement 3, because we thought that its something that is happening often in our school and we were mostly interested in that one. This is mostly true for most students because, for example if you have a lot of homework or a lot of tests coming up, you might decide to use AI to save time which might be really useful, but its still really important to communicate with your teacher about it.

# data[].attributes.body
We chose statement 3: I think using AI to get the main points of the text is OK to analyze the most important parts but if it comes for it to write the analyzation text for you than thats a red light, however if you are working on the text by yourself by the important parts that you have analyzed from AI I would say it would say its generally fine.

# data[].attributes.body
The problematic aspects were summarizing "instead of" reading and since the research questions were then "based on the summaries," even though they wrote their own paper, the paper may not be accurate or have original thought.

# data[].attributes.body
This AI tool sounds very helpful for students because it helps them make a special learning plan just for them which is helpful for organization. The student just have to be carful that the AI isn't doing all of the thinking for you and they have to make sure thats it not over offering help for there essay so they keep their own thinking in it.

# data[].attributes.headline
Elena, Yeon, Emily, Hyeonseo, Penelope, Mireya, Mark, Kris, Andri, Vanya

# data[].attributes.subject
Elena, Yeon, Emily, Hyeonseo, Penelope, Mireya, Mark, Kris, Andri, Vanya

# data[].attributes.body
GREEN: Having AI do a degree of summarising is OK.

YELLOW: This really depends on the subject and learning goals.

RED: You shouldn't use AI to make a research question - this should be done by a student.

# data[].attributes.body
The student did the reading and cited their work with support of their teacher.

# data[].attributes.body
not sure.

it could be okay, by giving the student a personalised list of things to read and write. Possibly, it could aid the student in their understanding and knowledge of their topic, and asking and understanding relevant questions could further their observations from materials, helping them write an essay or complete a project– or whatever the assignment appears to be.

This could, however, barricade the student from being able to connect personalised views into their understanding of the texts. For example, getting a friend or a teacher recommend texts to you based on what they know you like or find relatively easier to read would be more beneficial to you and your understanding of the subject rather than just being assigned by a bot who does not know you outside of schoolwork, stress, as well as assignment struggles.

Another positive outcome from having your peers or mentors recommend articles, books & various media is that they know the things you specifically don't like, or are triggered by. This could save time and make learning these subjects easier for you in the long run.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group decided that this scenario would be identified as a yellow light.

We had some disagreements since some of us thought differently. However, we decided that it depends on what type of prompt you give the AI to brainstorm your ideas. Using AI for art should be done in a way that doesn’t disrupt your creative process of producing your own ideas, the same as not taking too much inspiration from a different artist to the point that you don't just copy it.

# data[].attributes.body
For Scenario 1, we agreed overall on yellow~red. The summaries can be helpful at the beginning, but you can become overreliant, and it depends on where we are in the learning journey.

Research Question: maybe leaning towards red, because it is the core the entire paper is based on and should be from the student themself.

# data[].attributes.body
yellow.

The reason why we do this kind of work is to improve our summerization skill, but when we use that, we might get decreese of skil but also increase of skill, because we saw the good example that ai made

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow - get AI to get different viewpoints is fine, but getting sources to counter those points, because AI is doing the work for you (RED). Taking away the thinking process. They need to make sure that they are not solely basing their ideas on the sources from AI, they need to add in some personal ideas/viewpoints.

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow because the student is using AI to summarize the text and that doesnt show learning and they should be able to read 3 paragprahs themsleves and however when they asked AI to create research questions based on the summaries, that can be used for good for example a student can use their own summaries they made and asked AI to make research questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Red

It shows that you don't understand the topic. You would also need to cite the AI (depending on the AI used), which shows that it is less credible.

# data[].attributes.body
We thought this was generally green as it was acting like a teacher. The yellow part was the amount of feedback and guidance around structure

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow Light - This could be helpful for students to clarify certain parts of paper that they don't understand. We think students should not paste the entire paper into the AI platform.

The research question part, however, is definitely not acceptable. Teachers stress this as an important skill for critical thinking and consideration of information.

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow - It is ok to use AI for summarizing long text, as students who have weak vocabulary or aren't native English speakers might struggle to read the text, but summarizing it will allow the students to be able to understand the text and create ideas.

Red - Creating a list of research questions is not ok, as it removes the ability for the student to think of them by themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Its yellow because while AI can help in essay writing a lot the AI can be easily used to just write the essay for you. However this student just uses it to make the sources simperet

However the reaserch question part is a bit more complicated. Because it is using AI to partially write it for them

# data[].attributes.body
We think that this scenario is green because she showed the teacher what she was using AI for. We think that this is good because she uses her critical thinking while looking at the sources when she asked for the counter points in the debate.

# data[].attributes.body
If you're assessed by the creativity skill, it woulb cheating so no however, when it's assessed for actual painting or drawing skill, it would be okay since it doesn't affect the actual drawing skill.

# data[].attributes.body
Part 1- Yellow: The student wrote the paper themselves, just used AI to help them understand the topic more.

Part 2- Dark yellow: The student lacks the effort to come up with their own ideas. Sometimes assignments directly assess the guiding question, meaning that in this case, the student had AI do it for them.

# data[].attributes.body
Grammarly would be green because of other AI like chat gpt, it would be yellow since it can change the style of writing or write a new sentence

# data[].attributes.headline
Scenario two (Tilde, Erika, Stella, Joy)

# data[].attributes.subject
Scenario two (Tilde, Erika, Stella, Joy)

# data[].attributes.body
Our group said yellow/green, because the student spoke to their teacher beforehand, however the student should be able to do their own research and find their own sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Student is transparent about what they're doing with AI with the teacher.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that using AI for finding information and arguments in the case of a debate is a great way to use AI, as long as you cite serious and scientific sources to back your arguments. As you still have to determine what arguments and informations are more relevant than others and learn at least a bit about them as you will still have to explain and discuss about them in the debate, the thinking process of information gathering is not completely eliminated.

# data[].attributes.body
Green because the student had a hard time with different viewpoints. The students first was transparent with the teacher telling the teacher about what they did and the AI was used in a proper way as the student asked AI to generate a list of different perspectives on the topic but also asked to list of sources used for those perspectives and went to read the different sources and citing the sources making it a green

# data[].attributes.headline
Elena, Yeon, Emily, Hyeonseo, Penelope, Mireya, Mark, Kris, Andri, Vanya

# data[].attributes.subject
Elena, Yeon, Emily, Hyeonseo, Penelope, Mireya, Mark, Kris, Andri, Vanya

# data[].attributes.body
GREEN: What makes this OK is that the student is doing the reading and thinking (selecting the relevant ideas/points) as well as citing the sources.

YELLOW: For subjects like I&S, this might not be OK if actually finding and collecting sources is part of the learning. This is a skill that should be developed.

# data[].attributes.body
Can't make the AI create a research question and summary only available if approved by the teacher

# data[].attributes.body
Green: The student communicates with the teacher when using AI. They asked for sources which then the student read themselves without using AI.

# data[].attributes.body
It is acceptable if the student struggles to think from different viewpoints. However, the student should be cautious of the sources that the AI uses since they may be unreliable.

# data[].attributes.body
Scenario 2:

Green and yellow, because it isn't using any of the AI-generated content directly, but in real life situations where these skills matter, they might not develop properly as the students overrelies on AI. Also, in those real life situations, AI might not be available.

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow.

They give learning plan not providing answear which can fully help students who have struggle to learn something

# data[].attributes.body
Red because even though the AI is allowed by the school and made to help the students academically, there are points like when they write it will offer writing help as they go takes away the thinking process the student has to got through while making an essay and seems like the AI tool is writing the whole essay and telling them what to do each step.

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow towards to red because the writing wasn't written by the AI however, it was mostly guided by AI

# data[].attributes.body
A rock song made by Hyojun, Minjoon and Tate. Made with Suno.

# data[].attributes.body
Yellow/Red

We believe a generated tutor is not the same as having a real tutor (human) and there's a risk of losing skills like communication and social skills. The yellow part is that we suppose its more personalized learning and if your real teacher is bad or doesn't explain well, AI could be an alternative. The negative outweigh the positives though

# data[].attributes.body
Valid as they have different viewpoints to improve their work, and is their authentic work

# data[].attributes.body
Using AI as a tool to understand the article will work as a helpful assistance since it allows the person's understanding. However, using AI to generate the questions limits the person's learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Green - like a tutor but in AI version. But only to a certain extent. If the student is completely reliant on AI to build their essay, they will lose their skills over time.

Green - there is learning happening. It is allowing everyone to explore their own interests. Its very personalized.

# data[].attributes.body
Its green because the AI is helping the student understand the other perspective but all the research is still done by them

# data[].attributes.body
It is not that bad, but it still helps you a lot, so yeah

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Turn ideas into videos | AI video creator | invideo AI

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Make videos easily by giving a prompt to invideo AI. Ideal for content creators, YouTubers and marketers, invideo AI offers a seamless way to turn your ideas into publish-ready videos with AI.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like this scenario is in the yellow side because he should have read them in order to understand them better and have better ideas to write in his research paper, but he only told AI to summerise them and then he wrote the paper by himself, and its his own writing.

# data[].attributes.body
orange for paragraph 1 because of how they used to summarize the texts

red for the last one because of the command + C and Command + V

# data[].attributes.body
For scenario 1, we think that it is both yellow and red light as for the summarrizing section, it can help you garner an initial understanding of the tests yet would need at least a sense of further research and reading further along in the project. Furthermore, asking AI to come up with a set of research questions would be considered red light as it takes away a valuable thinking opportunity for student and strictly goes against our schools academic policies.

# data[].attributes.body
The student is actually going in and reading the articles and writing/constructing their arguments. Sometimes, it is hard to find counterarguments, so they use a helpful tool to find some. They also were open with the teacher about their struggle and use.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is yellow light since the student used AI for understanding the complex reading and wrote some in their own, but using that summery to their own paper is inappropriate.

# data[].attributes.body
Too much support. The reading list is helpful but it seems like it increases a dependency on AI than actual thinking. The AI even feels a bit controlling in this scenario that may restrict thinking.

# data[].attributes.headline
First part of scenario 1 seemed to be in green territory where the RQ should be authentic student's work and belongs ro orange or red territory.

# data[].attributes.subject
First part of scenario 1 seemed to be in green territory where the RQ should be authentic student's work and belongs ro orange or red territory.