# data[].attributes.headline
Disruptive protest are more likely to get attention

# data[].attributes.subject
Disruptive protest are more likely to get attention

# data[].attributes.headline
They protest group “Just Stop Oil” blocks people from their getting to their commune and blocks emergency vehicles.

# data[].attributes.subject
They protest group “Just Stop Oil” blocks people from their getting to their commune and blocks emergency vehicles.

# data[].attributes.headline
The suffragettes are considered to be more successful in getting the vote for women and they used disruptive tactics 

# data[].attributes.subject
The suffragettes are considered to be more successful in getting the vote for women and they used disruptive tactics 

# data[].attributes.body
If there’s no disruption then it doesn’t leave an impact

# data[].attributes.headline
Disruptive protests don’t need to be violent

# data[].attributes.subject
Disruptive protests don’t need to be violent

# data[].attributes.body
Disruptive protests draw attention to crucial issues that might otherwise be ignored and elevate them as topics worthy of an urgent response by those in power.

# data[].attributes.body
But where do you draw the line on what is disruptive?

# data[].attributes.body
A peaceful protest can still be disruptive

# data[].attributes.headline
30 people got killed due to protests in Mozambique in a week.

# data[].attributes.subject
30 people got killed due to protests in Mozambique in a week.

# data[].attributes.body
In Korea, when a politician they didn’t really like was elected, they protested with candles and no destruction and they got what they wanted. But that’s just Korea, I know for a fact in other countries, they would get almost no where, sometimes you need to shout your words if no one’s willing to listen to your whispers

# data[].attributes.headline
If something is annoying, you want to put a stop to it.

# data[].attributes.subject
If something is annoying, you want to put a stop to it.

# data[].attributes.body
Protests that disrupt people’s daily lives will annoy people, so they will want something done about it.

# data[].attributes.body
Imagine your in the government you’ll you rather give a disruptive possible law breaking person what they want or someone who has stuck to your rules trying to get your approval in a much more public friendly way

# data[].attributes.headline
Protests that are disruptive to daily life

# data[].attributes.subject
Protests that are disruptive to daily life

# data[].attributes.body
This isn’t a point to neither sides, but a question. Is what is interrupting your daily life less important than what people are protesting for? Is women’s rights worth less than your McDonald’s? Is the war in Gaza less than traffic in the roads? Think about it.

# data[].attributes.headline
Zachary popped off with the fact checking 

# data[].attributes.subject
Zachary popped off with the fact checking 

# data[].attributes.headline
The opposing team keeps bringing up protests where people get hurt, but disruptive protests aren’t just protests that end in violence, we’re talking about protests that disrupt someone’s daily life, even if it’s just slightly, i agree that protests shouldn’t be violent, emphasis on violent, but if all protests can’t be disruptive in ANY way shape or form, then it won’t have as much of an impact, you can’t say that protests can’t be any kind of disruptive

# data[].attributes.subject
The opposing team keeps bringing up protests where people get hurt, but disruptive protests aren’t just protests that end in violence, we’re talking about protests that disrupt someone’s daily life, even if it’s just slightly, i agree that protests shouldn’t be violent, emphasis on violent, but if all protests can’t be disruptive in ANY way shape or form, then it won’t have as much of an impact, you can’t say that protests can’t be any kind of disruptive