# data[].attributes.body
Large Language Models (LLMs) are advanced AI systems trained on massive datasets to generate and interpret human-like language. Most modern models are multimodal (text, image, audio, code, video) and can use connected tools to browse, analyze files, or run code. They generate probable continuations based on patterns in training data, not verified facts.

Privacy defaults vary by vendor and change over time: ChatGPT offers options to disable training on user data, with additional protections in Enterprise, Team, and Edu plans; Gemini for Education and Microsoft 365 Copilot have stated they do not use tenant data to train base models under certain licenses. Always verify current privacy policies with your institution and vendor documentation before use.

Accuracy, bias, and transparency remain key concerns—LLMs can sound confident while being wrong. Always verify outputs with trusted sources and teach students to do the same. Use institution-approved accounts, avoid entering identifiable student data, and treat AI responses as drafts for review, not final answers. Be aware that regulations regarding AI use with minors and in educational settings continue to evolve.

# data[].attributes.body
Enhances creativity and expression: Helps with drafting, revision, and generating ideas.​

Personalized tutoring: Provides on‑demand explanations tailored to student needs.​

Language support: Useful for English learners and multilingual communication.​

Equity booster or divider: Potential to democratize learning—but also risk deepening gaps if access is unequal.​

Accessibility aid: Converts or adapts content for diverse learning needs (text‑to‑speech, simplification, captioning).​

Metacognitive support: Encourages reflection, self‑assessment, and feedback on reasoning or writing processes.​

# data[].attributes.body
AI Agents are autonomous or semi‑autonomous software systems that perceive input from users or connected systems, make decisions, and take multi‑step actions to accomplish defined goals. They can automate workflows, coordinate tasks across applications, and adapt dynamically to changing information.

Unlike standard chatbots or standalone LLMs, AI agents operate with greater independence—looping through reasoning steps, invoking tools or APIs, and interacting with external systems.

Common examples include scheduling assistants, research bots, grading or feedback tools, and curriculum advisors that adjust recommendations or lesson plans based on learner performance.

# data[].attributes.body
Explicitly teach learners to critically evaluate LLM outputs, compare them with multiple sources, and identify misinformation or bias

Design assignments that require students to analyze, justify, or challenge AI-generated content, encouraging critical thinking over passive use

Provide clear instruction on how to cite AI tools properly (e.g., MLA, APA, Chicago), and when citation is appropriate

Discuss the limitations of AI detection tools, and emphasize reflective dialogue over punitive measures

Promote ethical use by highlighting issues of privacy, consent, and responsible sharing of AI-assisted work

Encourage transparency in process: Have students share prompts, drafts, and revision notes to document how AI shaped their thinking

Address access and equity: Ensure all students have equal opportunity to learn and experiment with AI tools within institutional guidelines

# data[].attributes.body
Personalized learning: Adapts to learners’ needs, interests, and pace of learning.​

Subject‑specific support: Provides assistance aligned with curriculum standards and classroom objectives.​

Scaffolding: Differentiates instruction to support varying readiness levels within the same group.​

⚠️ Caution: Can reduce inquiry‑based learning and critical thinking if learners treat AI responses as infallible.​

# data[].attributes.body
Set clear guidelines: Define how and when Custom GPTs may be used (e.g., for brainstorming or feedback, not unsupervised grading or high‑stakes decisions).​

Design for reasoning: Create assignments that assess students’ thinking processes, not just final answers.​

Encourage reflection: Ask students to explain how they used AI, what decisions they made, and what they learned from the interaction.​

Reinforce source checking: Remind learners that Custom GPTs are tools, not authorities, and their responses should always be verified against trusted sources.​

# data[].attributes.headline
Reasoning Models  (Analytical and Problem-Solving AIs)

# data[].attributes.subject
Reasoning Models  (Analytical and Problem-Solving AIs)

# data[].attributes.body
Reasoning models go beyond conventional text generation by specializing in structured problem-solving. They break complex challenges into smaller steps, evaluate evidence carefully, and compare multiple approaches before forming a conclusion. Many also integrate external tools—such as calculators, code interpreters, and web search—to validate their reasoning in real time.

Unlike standard language models, reasoning models emphasize logical structure and evidence-based analysis, showing stronger performance on intricate or multi-step problems through systematic verification. This deeper analytical process requires more computational power and longer response times.

As of July 2026, many reasoning models offer adjustable reasoning effort, tool use, citations, intermediate calculations, or summarized reasoning traces, but users should not assume they can see the model’s full internal chain of thought.

# data[].attributes.body
Microsoft 365 Copilot: AI assistant built into Microsoft 365 apps such as Teams, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook, with expanding agent and workflow features.

Microsoft Copilot Studio: Platform for building custom AI agents that connect to Microsoft 365, organizational data, websites, and external systems.

OpenAI GPTs / ChatGPT agent / Agents SDK: OpenAI tools for creating custom assistants and agentic workflows that can use tools, work with files, connect to data, and complete multi-step tasks.

Anthropic Claude API: Developer platform for building AI assistants and agents using Claude models with tool use, extended context, coding support, and multi-step reasoning.

Google Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform / Vertex AI Agents: Google tools for building and managing AI agents that use Gemini models, organizational data, integrations, and workflow orchestration.

Google Workspace + Gemini: Gemini assistant and agent-style features connected to Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Chat.

Cognition AI’s Devin: Autonomous software engineering agent designed to assist with coding, debugging, and software development workflows.

Note: Custom assistants and agent platforms change quickly. Model names, tool access, data connections, security controls, licensing, privacy terms, and institutional availability should be verified before recommending a specific platform for teaching, research, student work, or administrative workflows.

# data[].attributes.body
Bias and Misinformation: Custom instructions may reinforce bias or spread inaccuracies if not reviewed critically

Security and Ethics: Risks include uploading copyrighted material, confidential data, or student information without proper safeguards

Overdependence: Excessive reliance can limit creativity, reflection, and independent problem-solving

Quality Control: Poorly configured GPTs may provide incorrect, outdated, or misleading information

# data[].attributes.body
Automate administrative workflows: Handle repetitive tasks such as grading rubrics, attendance tracking, form completion, scheduling, and basic record management.

Provide personalized recommendations: Adapt suggestions, feedback, or next-step activities based on real-time learner data, behavior, or system input.

Act as classroom assistants or tutors: Deliver scaffolded explanations, monitor progress, and adjust support dynamically while keeping educators in control.

Connect multiple apps and tools: Integrate across platforms (e.g., LMS, calendars, email, analytics dashboards) to coordinate educational tasks and resources.

Conduct structured research or content curation: Search, filter, and summarize high-quality sources to build reading lists, overviews, or lesson materials.

# data[].attributes.body
Custom GPTs are available in ChatGPT on eligible paid and workspace plans, with creation, sharing, and administrative controls varying by plan and organization settings.

These tailored models can be refined through example prompts, detailed instructions, or uploaded reference materials, enabling them to serve as tutors, content reviewers, technical assistants, or peer collaborators.

By combining the broad capabilities of large language models with focused expertise and a defined instructional tone, Custom GPTs make it easier to create consistent, purpose-built AI tools for teaching, learning, and research support. Note that OpenAI's model lineup has evolved significantly in 2026, with GPT-5 series and o3/o4 reasoning models now powering these custom assistants.

# data[].attributes.body
Microsoft 365 Copilot: AI assistant for Office that automates cross-app workflows and orchestrates meeting/data preparation.

Copilot Studio: Low-code platform for building custom agents; supports GPT-5, Claude 4.6, and third-party API connections.

OpenAI GPT Agents: Multi-step autonomous agents using GPT-5 and o3/o4 models for advanced planning and execution.

Anthropic Claude API: Developer tool for building "Agent Teams" using Opus 4.6 with 1M token context and native tool use.

Google Gemini Gems: Customizable assistants using the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Personal Intelligence to sync with Workspace data.

Devin (Cognition AI): An autonomous AI software engineer capable of managing entire development lifecycles and delegating to sub-agents.

Note: AI agent capabilities and availability evolve rapidly. Check vendor documentation for current features and access requirements.

# data[].attributes.body
Create subject‑specific tutors, quiz generators, or reviewers tailored to a course or program.​

Summarize content at the reading level or conceptual depth appropriate for each learner.​

Offer scaffolded feedback and step‑by‑step explainers on complex topics.​

Support accommodations such as audio summaries, visual aids, and multilingual assistance.​

Enhance differentiated instruction by adapting materials and feedback to individual learning needs.​

# data[].attributes.body
Lack of Transparency: Agent decision‑making processes may be opaque, making it difficult to trace reasoning, identify errors, or evaluate reliability.​

Data Privacy and Security: Agents connected to apps or systems may inadvertently access, store, or share sensitive student or institutional information if permissions and data‑handling rules are not carefully configured.​

Bias and Error: Automated decisions can reproduce or amplify existing biases, leading to inequitable or inappropriate outcomes without human oversight

Autonomy Creep: Agents may act beyond their intended scope—initiating actions, sharing data, or making inferences users did not anticipate

# data[].attributes.body
Streamlines Administrative Load: Frees educators to focus more on instruction, mentoring, and individualized feedback

Supports Personalized Learning: Enables adaptive planning, customized feedback, and content pacing based on learner data

Reduces Human Contact in Decision-Making: A potential downside if critical academic or disciplinary decisions are delegated to AI

Improves Access: Allows tutoring, advising, or content delivery to scale efficiently for large, diverse, or remote groups

# data[].attributes.body
Use human oversight: Always review AI agent outputs before acting on them, especially when they affect important decisions, data, or communication.

Be transparent about AI use: Inform students, colleagues, or collaborators when agents are involved in a task or interaction, and clarify their role and limitations.

Limit scope of tasks: Give agents clearly defined, low-risk responsibilities (e.g., scheduling, summarizing, reminders) and avoid using them for high-stakes or evaluative decisions without direct supervision.

Encourage critical thinking: Treat agent outputs as drafts or suggestions—verify important information against trusted sources before accepting or sharing.

Monitor for unexpected behavior: Regularly check performance and outputs. If responses appear off-topic, biased, or overly confident, pause use and review configuration or permissions.

Maintain human-in-the-loop oversight: Always include human review when AI agents interact with grading systems, communications, or any environment handling personal or institutional data.

# data[].attributes.body
AI tools can assist with grading, feedback, and identifying learning gaps. They are commonly used to automate routine evaluation tasks, detect patterns in student work, and provide quick, personalized responses. Many systems can highlight trends across submissions or flag inconsistencies for instructor review. While they can save time and improve feedback consistency, they work best when paired with human judgment—particularly in areas involving creativity, ethics, or subjective evaluation.

# data[].attributes.body
Authenticity & Originality: AI media can blur the line between genuine and generated content, challenging trust and authorship

Misinformation & Deepfakes: Advanced tools can easily produce convincing but misleading or harmful visuals, voice‑cloned audio, and narratives

Copyright & Licensing Confusion: Many tools are trained on copyrighted or unlicensed datasets, raising unresolved legal and ethical questions that may vary by country and institution

Over-Reliance: Heavy dependence on AI tools may discourage original design skills, creative exploration, and critical curation

Disclosure & Attribution: Users should label AI-generated or AI-assisted media to maintain transparency and ethical communication

# data[].attributes.body
Khanmigo (Khan Academy): Socratic AI tutor for math, humanities, and coding that provides guided problem-solving and lesson planning tools for teachers.

Duolingo Max: AI-powered language learning featuring roleplay conversations and "Explain My Answer" feedback for real-time error correction.

Knewton Alta: Adaptive higher-ed platform that identifies knowledge gaps to provide targeted remediation and dynamic practice across multiple subjects.

DreamBox Learning: K–8 math and reading environment that adapts based on student problem-solving strategies and conceptual understanding.

Carnegie Learning MATHia: AI math coach providing step-by-step feedback and hints; proven to significantly accelerate student learning growth.

Century Tech: Neuroscience-based platform that creates personalized "Nugget" learning paths by analyzing individual micro-skills and needs.

# data[].attributes.body
AI tools for media creation can generate or enhance visual, audio, and video content using text, images, or voice prompts. They support creative expression, streamline production workflows, and empower users of all technical skill levels to produce compelling media.

In education, marketing, design, journalism, and entertainment, these tools assist with storyboarding, captioning, localization, and adaptive visuals that improve accessibility and engagement. As capabilities expand, ethical use—such as respecting intellectual property, representation, and disclosure—is becoming an essential part of media literacy.

# data[].attributes.body
AI-powered adaptive learning systems personalize instruction based on each learner’s performance, pace, and preferences. Using real-time data and predictive analytics, these platforms dynamically adjust content difficulty, sequence, and feedback to match individual needs. They provide immediate, targeted support—particularly in subjects like math, science, and reading—while giving educators insights into progress and misconceptions. Modern systems increasingly integrate multimodal inputs (text, speech, handwriting, or video) and emphasize ethical data use to ensure personalization remains transparent, equitable, and privacy-conscious.

# data[].attributes.body
AI accessibility tools support individuals with visual, auditory, cognitive, or learning differences by improving how content is presented, navigated, and understood. They can automate captions, generate transcripts, describe images, translate text, and adapt layouts for different devices and user needs. By enhancing usability across platforms, these tools promote inclusive learning environments where all learners can access information equitably.

# data[].attributes.body
Gradescope (AI-assisted grading for handwritten or scanned submissions) — Supports AI-assisted answer grouping and rubric workflows; can read English handwriting and common math notation when answers are constrained to a line.

Turnitin AI (AI writing detection and originality analysis) — ⚠️ Detection accuracy is variable and should be treated as advisory, not sole disciplinary evidence; Turnitin’s own notes and multiple universities emphasize caution.

Writable (feedback on writing with rubric-based AI) — Provides rubric-aligned comment suggestions and draft scoring to speed targeted feedback.

Knewton Alta (adaptive assessments for higher ed) — Adaptive courseware that personalizes practice and assessment in supported subjects.

# data[].attributes.body
Score quizzes, short answers, and structured rubrics

Provide rapid feedback on writing, coding, or project-based assignments

Identify common learning gaps or misconceptions across individual students or entire classes

Support formative and summative assessments with automated hints, comments, or improvement suggestions

Flag potential plagiarism or AI-generated content for instructor review rather than automatic penalty

# data[].attributes.body
Lacks Nuance: Struggles to evaluate creativity, personal voice, or originality in student work

Bias in Output: May reflect or reinforce preferences embedded in training data (e.g., favoring certain linguistic or cultural styles)

Academic Integrity Concerns: A dual‑use challenge—students may misuse AI to complete assignments, while AI‑detection tools can generate false positives and should not be used as sole evidence for misconduct.

Over-Automation: Risks replacing meaningful, individualized teacher feedback with formulaic or generic responses

Transparency Limits: Many tools do not disclose how scoring models are trained or weighted, making it hard to audit fairness or reliability

Data Security Risks: Grading tools that process uploaded student work may store identifiable or sensitive information if privacy safeguards are weak

# data[].attributes.body
Frees Educator Time: Allows teachers to spend more time on mentoring, planning, and differentiated instruction

Enables Fast Feedback: Provides quick responses for revision cycles and low-stakes practice activities

Reduces Feedback Gaps: Particularly useful in large or high-enrollment classes where individualized feedback is difficult to scale

⚠️ Caution: May limit critical engagement or reduce meaningful human interaction if overused

# data[].attributes.body
Pair AI with Human Review: Always use AI alongside human judgment, especially for subjective, creative, or high-stakes grading tasks

Be Transparent About AI Use: Inform students when AI is part of the grading or feedback process, and clarify what is (and isn’t) generated by AI

Promote Academic Integrity: Teach responsible AI use and clearly define acceptable vs. prohibited assistance in assignments and assessments

Design for Process, Not Just Product: Create assessments that emphasize reflection, reasoning, and iterative feedback rather than polished output alone

Train Educators for Oversight: Provide faculty and staff with guidance on when—and how—to review, override, or escalate AI-flagged submissions

# data[].attributes.body
ChatGPT Images 2.0 / GPT Image models: OpenAI image-generation and editing tools available through ChatGPT and GPT Image models, including GPT Image 2. Useful for images, posters, mockups, visual examples, and instructional materials.

Midjourney V8.1 / V8 Alpha: Image-generation tools useful for stylized, polished, and highly aesthetic visual concepts. V8 models are still described by Midjourney as alpha/early testing, so availability and defaults may change.

Adobe Firefly: Generative image, text, and design tools built into Adobe apps such as Photoshop, Illustrator, and Express. Relevant for education because many users already encounter Firefly through Adobe tools, and Adobe uses Content Credentials for transparency.

Runway Gen-4.5 / Gen-4: AI video-generation and editing tools for creating, extending, or transforming video. Useful for short conceptual videos, visual storytelling, media projects, and creative experimentation.

ElevenLabs: AI voice, speech, dubbing, and audio platform for narration, multilingual voice work, podcasts, accessibility resources, and audio production.

Suno: AI music-generation tool for creating songs, vocals, lyrics, and instrumental music from prompts. Useful for multimedia projects and discussions of authorship, copyright, and responsible AI use.

Note: Media-generation tools change quickly. Specific model names, availability, copyright terms, data-use policies, and commercial-use rights should be checked before use.

# data[].attributes.body
Create images, illustrations, and logos for presentations, storytelling, or marketing projects

Generate music or sound effects for media, podcasts, videos, or games

Produce voiceovers or narration for training, accessibility, or explainer content

Build short videos or animations directly from text, image, or storyboard prompts

Support accessible and inclusive design through text-to-image, voice-to-text, or automatic captioning tools

Enable multimodal storytelling: Combine visuals, audio, and text to create cohesive, adaptive learning materials

Lower barriers to entry: Empower non-experts to produce professional-quality media quickly while accelerating creative production

# data[].attributes.body
Encourages Creative Expression: Empowers users to visualize, design, and share ideas in new and imaginative ways

Democratizes Design: Makes visual, audio, and video production accessible to anyone—no expensive tools or formal training required

Facilitates Content Creation: Speeds up the production of educational, promotional, and storytelling materials across disciplines

⚠️ Caution: May reduce critical thinking about source credibility, originality, and authorship if users rely on generated content uncritically

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss authorship and attribution: Clarify when and how to credit AI-generated or AI-assisted media, and differentiate between original and machine-created work

Promote ethical and responsible use: Teach users to verify information, avoid manipulative or misleading content, and use tools transparently

Encourage analysis of originality: Ask users to reflect on how media was generated and whether it communicates the intended message truthfully and responsibly

Stay informed on rights and usage: Review each platform’s terms of service, licensing, and data practices before publishing or distributing content, and revisit them regularly as policies evolve

Use Content Credentials (C2PA): Encourage attaching metadata to AI-generated visuals or audio to ensure authenticity and traceability

Model transparency: Instructors and institutions should model clear disclosure of AI use in their own materials to normalize ethical standards

# data[].attributes.body
Adapt learning paths in real time based on each student’s responses and performance patterns

Identify and address knowledge gaps through targeted practice and review activities

Provide just-in-time feedback and scaffolding to support understanding as learners work

Track progress across units and recommend personalized next steps or enrichment options

Offer real-time tutoring and differentiated pacing to ensure each learner moves at an appropriate level of challenge

# data[].attributes.body
Data Privacy: These platforms collect detailed learner information, raising concerns about data storage, consent, cross‑platform tracking, and potential third‑party sharing.

Narrowed Perspectives: Algorithms may over-recommend familiar content patterns, limiting exposure to diverse perspectives or alternative problem-solving approaches

Over-Reliance: Continuous AI guidance can reduce opportunities for independent reasoning, collaboration, and human feedback

Equity Concerns: Unequal access to devices, bandwidth, or institutional licenses can widen learning gaps between students

Transparency & Explainability: Adaptive decisions are often opaque, making it difficult for educators or learners to understand why specific recommendations are made or to challenge them when they seem inappropriate.

Teacher Role & Agency: Automated pacing or content delivery can sideline educator judgment, reducing opportunities for professional discretion and relational teaching

# data[].attributes.body
Enhances Engagement: Delivers content that feels relevant, appropriately challenging, and responsive to each learner’s pace

Supports Differentiation: Helps teachers quickly identify student needs and personalize instruction or interventions

Improves Progress Tracking: Provides real-time dashboards that visualize mastery, misconceptions, and growth over time

Boosts Motivation: Uses personalized pathways, feedback loops, and gamified elements to increase persistence and confidence

Fosters Self-Regulated Learning: Encourages students to monitor their own progress and set goals based on adaptive feedback

# data[].attributes.body
Be transparent about data practices: Clearly communicate what learner data is collected, why it’s gathered, and how it will be used or shared

Blend instructional methods: Use adaptive systems alongside varied teaching strategies to support different learning preferences and modalities

Broaden learning inputs: Offer diverse supplemental materials and perspectives to counteract algorithmic narrowing or content repetition

Promote learner agency: Encourage self-directed learning by giving students choice in pacing, tools, and progression pathways

Audit system analytics: Regularly review feedback, recommendations, and performance data for accuracy, fairness, and instructional relevance

# data[].attributes.body
Microsoft Copilot Voice: Hands-free interaction across M365 with "Hey Copilot," real-time transcription, and 40+ languages; optimized for motor and visual accessibility.

Be My AI (Be My Eyes): GPT-4o-powered visual assistant providing real-time image analysis. Now integrates with Meta Smart Glasses (March 2026) for hands-free descriptions and support.

Otter.ai: Real-time meeting transcription with automated summaries, searchable captions, and speaker identification.

Genio (formerly Glean): Note-taking tool for neurodiverse learners that syncs audio to slides and generates AI transcripts, mind maps, and quizzes post-lecture.

Read&Write (Texthelp): Literacy toolbar featuring text-to-speech, word prediction, and spelling assistance for Chrome and desktop apps.

M365 Live Captions: Real-time captioning in Teams and PowerPoint to improve comprehension and accessibility.

Apple Live Speech: On-device text-to-speech that allows users to type to speak in their own customized voice on iPhone, iPad, and Mac.

# data[].attributes.body
Transcribe speech in real time for meetings, lectures, or live discussions

Generate captions for recorded or live video content to improve accessibility and comprehension

Convert written text to speech or simplified formats for diverse reading and learning needs

Translate text between languages to support multilingual users and inclusive communication

Auto-generate alt text for images, slides, and visual materials to enhance screen reader compatibility

# data[].attributes.body
Accuracy Limitations: AI‑generated captions, alt text, and translations can contain errors or omissions—especially for domain‑specific, multilingual, or technical content—and should always undergo human review

Over-Reliance: Users may become dependent on assistive tools instead of developing independent strategies or digital literacy skills

Privacy and Data Concerns: Tools that capture voice, video, or written content can expose sensitive personal information if not properly secured or managed

Equity of Access: Advanced AI accessibility tools may require premium plans or powerful devices, creating uneven access for some users

# data[].attributes.body
Promotes Inclusive Learning: Expands participation for students with disabilities, neurodiversity, or different learning preferences

Enhances Understanding: Clarifies complex material by converting content into more digestible, multimodal, or multisensory formats

Builds Confidence and Self-Advocacy: Empowers students to access and manage learning materials in ways that best support their needs

Improves Universal Design: Enhances the overall learning experience for all students—not just those with formal accommodations or IEPs

# data[].attributes.body
Check AI outputs for accuracy and bias: Review all generated content carefully, and address privacy concerns related to how data is collected, stored, and used. Provide training and support so users understand how to verify and interpret AI-generated information.

Audit accessibility features regularly: Review captions, transcripts, translations, and alt text for accuracy, especially in technical, multilingual, discipline-specific, or low-audio-quality contexts.

Ensure inclusive design compliance: Verify that AI-generated accessibility materials meet institutional and legal standards (e.g., WCAG 2.2, Section 508, ADA) to maintain equitable access for all learners.

# data[].attributes.headline
Disclosure: This Padlet was created and maintained by the Houston H. Harte Center for Teaching and Learning at Washington & Lee University. Content has been updated with assistance from ChatGPT. Last updated: 5 July 2026.

# data[].attributes.subject
Disclosure: This Padlet was created and maintained by the Houston H. Harte Center for Teaching and Learning at Washington & Lee University. Content has been updated with assistance from ChatGPT. Last updated: 5 July 2026.

# data[].attributes.headline
Balancing Innovation and Humanity: Guiding Principles

# data[].attributes.subject
Balancing Innovation and Humanity: Guiding Principles

# data[].attributes.body
As artificial intelligence reshapes academia and the broader world, Washington and Lee University confronts a defining challenge: the imperative to embrace AI’s transformative capabilities and simultaneously resist its seductive convenience—the temptation to simply "press the button," instantly solving complex intellectual tasks without genuine effort or insight. Our future relies on striking this careful balance, ensuring we cultivate minds that are both effective in the technological world as it is and profoundly human.

Achieving this balance is complex. Over-reliance on AI risks producing graduates who are polished automatons—unengaging at dinner parties, uninspired in boardrooms, and ineffective on Capitol Hill. A mind that delegates every challenge to algorithms dulls its edge, losing originality and the spark of humanity. Yet rejecting AI is equally shortsighted. In a world increasingly driven by technology and automation, those who learn to harness its power will be positioned to lead with vision and purpose, advancing W&L’s mission of developing leaders of consequence.

This is not a simplistic choice between tradition and innovation but a deliberate call to thoughtfully integrate both. Productive struggle—grappling independently with ideas—builds intellectual grit and originality that distinguish exceptional individuals. Meanwhile, AI, when employed judiciously, amplifies our capacity for creativity and innovation on a previously unimaginable scale. Together, they yield something extraordinary: graduates and faculty who pose incisive questions, craft nuanced insights, and radiate intellectual vitality. Through this careful integration, W&L can equip its community to navigate and shape an AI-driven world without sacrificing the human qualities that define excellence.

# data[].attributes.body
AI research tools assist with literature review, citation discovery, summarization, and academic exploration. They can generate research questions, synthesize findings across disciplines, and map scholarly networks or emerging topics. Newer systems also analyze multimodal sources—such as PDFs, data tables, and figures—and surface connections between datasets and publications. When used critically, these tools can greatly enhance research speed, scope, and accessibility, but they work best when paired with source verification and human evaluation to ensure accuracy and academic integrity.

# data[].attributes.body
ChatGPT (GPT-5.4 / o3 / o4): Flagship for brainstorming and outlining. Pro tier includes o3-pro reasoning mode and advanced document analysis.

ChatGPT Deep Research: OpenAI feature for planning, researching, and synthesizing complex questions into a documented report using web, uploaded files, and connected apps when enabled.

NotebookLM (Google): RAG-based assistant that converts sources into Mind Maps, Audio/Video Overviews, and Infographics via the new Studio panel.

Elicit: AI agent for systematic reviews and data extraction from 125M+ papers. Pro plan ($49/mo) includes advanced literature mapping tools.

Scite.ai: Evaluates citation trust by showing if papers support or contrast findings with confidence scoring.

Semantic Scholar: Free AI search engine that ranks papers by influence and topic relevance.

ResearchRabbit / Connected Papers: Visual discovery tools that map citation networks and conceptual proximity between studies.

Consensus: AI search engine that summarizes peer-reviewed evidence on research questions.

Note: Research AI tools update frequently. Verify current features, paper counts, and access requirements with providers.

# data[].attributes.body
Support literature reviews and help organize, cluster, or annotate academic sources

Summarize complex or lengthy texts to extract key arguments, methods, and findings

Suggest research questions and keywords based on patterns in existing scholarship

Recommend relevant papers, authors, or citations tailored to a given topic or query

Visualize scholarly relationships, trends, and gaps across disciplines or research areas

# data[].attributes.body
Teach source verification: Train students to verify sources, trace citations, and cross-check claims across multiple databases or original texts

Clarify ethical use: Explain when and how to cite AI‑generated content, emphasizing transparency and intellectual honesty, and remind students that citation guidelines for AI are updating frequently

Frame AI as an aid, not an authority: Reinforce that AI tools support—but never replace—critical reading, synthesis, and judgment

Promote critical interpretation: Guide learners in evaluating AI-generated summaries, recommendations, and visualizations for accuracy and bias

Follow proper citation standards: When citing AI tools, use the most current MLA or APA guidelines (e.g., MLA 9th Edition, APA 7th Edition), including the model name, version, access date, and URL if applicable

# data[].attributes.body
Inaccuracy Risks: AI tools may hallucinate sources, misattribute citations, or oversimplify complex academic arguments

Bias and Omission: Algorithms often prioritize highly cited or Western-centric research, excluding diverse or emerging perspectives

Over-Reliance: Excessive use can reduce independent reading, source evaluation, and critical analysis skills

Visualization Oversimplification: Topic maps and graphs can appear authoritative but may obscure nuance, disagreement, or methodological diversity

Transparency and Traceability: Many tools don’t fully disclose which databases or journals they index, making it difficult to verify completeness or reliability of results

Citation Integrity: Auto-generated references can contain subtle formatting or metadata errors, requiring users to double-check every citation before submission or publication

# data[].attributes.body
Efficiency Gains: Speeds up topic exploration, literature scanning, and early-stage research planning

Confidence Building: Helps students engage with academic texts more comfortably and develop familiarity with disciplinary language

Supports Inquiry-Based Learning: Encourages questioning, pattern recognition, and hypothesis formation across sources

Skill Development Risk: May hinder critical reading, source evaluation, or synthesis if used as a shortcut rather than a guide

Bridges Access Gaps: Makes scholarly information more discoverable for students and institutions without extensive journal subscriptions or research databases

# data[].attributes.body
GPT-5.5 Thinking / GPT-5.5 Pro: Proprietary OpenAI reasoning-focused models used for complex problem-solving, coding, research synthesis, planning, document review, data analysis, and multimodal work.

Claude Opus / Claude Sonnet: Proprietary Anthropic models used for writing, coding, research, analysis, planning, and agentic workflows. Opus models are generally positioned for more complex work, while Sonnet models are often used for strong everyday performance.

Gemini Pro / Gemini Flash: Proprietary Google models used for reasoning, coding, multimodal analysis, long-context work, and tasks involving text, images, audio, video, PDFs, or large document sets.

Mistral Magistral: Mistral’s reasoning-focused model family. Useful to include because it represents an open/open-weight alternative to major proprietary reasoning models.

DeepSeek-R1 / deepseek-reasoner: Reasoning-focused model used for mathematical reasoning, coding, technical problem-solving, and multi-step analysis. Useful to include because it is another major open/open-weight reasoning-model example.

Note: Reasoning models are useful when tasks require multi-step reasoning, careful comparison, structured feedback, planning, or work across long documents and multiple sources. They may show summaries, citations, calculations, plans, tool-use steps, or reasoning traces, but users should not assume they can see the model’s full internal chain of thought. Model names, access, licensing, and capabilities change quickly, so examples should be checked before use.

# data[].attributes.body
Solve logic-based problems and multi-step reasoning tasks

Conduct research and evaluate evidence across multiple sources

Write formal arguments or essays that require structured, step-by-step logic

Generate advanced code and assist with debugging or algorithm design

Support mathematical reasoning through proofs, problem decomposition, and verification

Apply reasoning models in context: Especially valuable in computer science, mathematics, debate, law, and scientific research

# data[].attributes.body
Lack of Explainability: The reasoning process may not be fully transparent, making it difficult to verify how conclusions are reached

Amplified Bias: Biased or incomplete data can produce flawed logic, false inferences, or skewed conclusions

High Computational Demands: Reasoning models require significantly more processing power and time to run effectively

False Confidence: Their structured, step-by-step outputs can appear more reliable than they actually are, encouraging misplaced trust

# data[].attributes.body
Improves Analytical Skills: Strengthens learners’ ability to break down complex problems, evaluate evidence, and build logical arguments

Enhances Research Capabilities: Supports hypothesis testing, coding workflows, and idea organization—but may reduce engagement with primary or raw data if overused

Promotes Deeper Thinking: Encourages processes like cause-and-effect analysis, structured comparison, and multi-step reasoning

Builds Metacognitive Awareness: Helps students reflect on their reasoning steps and understand how they reached conclusions

Bridges Disciplines: Applies logical reasoning methods across fields—from STEM to law, philosophy, and the humanities—supporting transferable problem-solving skills

# data[].attributes.body
Use human oversight: Use reasoning models with human oversight and train learners to question and verify each reasoning step.

Compare with human explanations & enable transparency: Encourage comparison with human-sourced explanations, and use settings that allow step-by-step rationales, intermediate calculations, tool traces, or cited sources (when available).

Require student rationale: Ask students to explain the reasoning behind an AI’s answer and evaluate whether the logic holds across sources or contexts.

Prioritize explainability & teach fallacies: Prefer models/features that surface intermediate reasoning artifacts; explicitly teach how to spot faulty reasoning and false assumptions.

Document the process: Have students submit prompt logs, intermediate steps, and citations (with sensitive data removed) so the reasoning pathway can be audited.

Assess robustness, not just answers: Use oral defenses, variant problem sets, or counter-examples to test whether conclusions generalize.

Protect data: Do not include sensitive or identifiable information in prompts, reasoning traces, or logs; anonymize where possible.

# data[].attributes.body
Generate various types of content: creative writing, summaries, code, essays, slide decks, and data visualizations.​

Translate and explain complex concepts in simple language.​

Support brainstorming, outlining, and revision across multiple formats.​

Convert speech to text or generate voice/audio responses in real time.​

Analyze images, charts, diagrams, and even scanned handwritten notes.​

Search or browse the web, summarize sources, and help check factual accuracy (depending on settings and license), while still requiring human verification.​

Act as personal tutors, editors, study companions, or idea‑generation assistants.​

# data[].attributes.body
Factual inaccuracies: May generate confident but incorrect or outdated responses.​

Bias in training data: Can reflect or reinforce harmful stereotypes or inequalities.​

Over‑reliance: May weaken student critical thinking or creativity if used passively.​

Privacy & data concerns: Risks around student data being shared or reused.​

Hallucinated sources: May cite non‑existent articles, authors, or data.​

Disinformation amplification: Can create misleading or manipulative content easily.​

Uneven performance: Accuracy and reasoning can vary widely across subjects, languages, or cultural contexts.​

Transparency limits: Many models do not reveal full training data or update history, making verification difficult.​

Equity & access gaps: Premium features, faster models, or privacy‑safe plans often require paid or institutional accounts.​

# data[].attributes.body
GPT-5.5 Instant / GPT-5.5 Thinking / GPT-5.5 Pro: OpenAI’s proprietary ChatGPT model family for everyday use, complex reasoning, coding, research, document work, multimodal tasks, and data analysis. Availability varies by plan.

o3 / o4-mini: OpenAI reasoning-focused models for coding, math, technical problem-solving, and complex analysis.

Claude Opus / Claude Sonnet / Claude Haiku: Anthropic’s proprietary model family. Opus is generally used for complex work, Sonnet for balanced speed and intelligence, and Haiku for faster, lighter-weight tasks.

Gemini Pro / Gemini Flash: Google’s proprietary model family for reasoning, coding, multimodal analysis, long-context work, and tasks involving text, images, audio, video, PDFs, or large document sets.

DeepSeek models, including DeepSeek-R1 and newer V-series models: DeepSeek models are open/open-weight alternatives used for coding, reasoning, math, technical work, and multi-step analysis.

Mistral Magistral / Mistral Large / Mixtral: Mistral models used for reasoning, general-purpose language tasks, coding, and open/open-weight experimentation. Magistral is the better reasoning example; Mixtral is an earlier general-purpose mixture-of-experts model family.

Llama variants: Meta’s open-weight model family for local hosting, experimentation, customization, research, and institutionally controlled deployments.

Note: Model versions, names, access, licensing, data-use terms, and availability change frequently. Verify with vendor documentation before recommending a specific model for teaching, research, student work, or institutional use.