# data[].attributes.body
🎯 Motion: It is better to be kind than to be honest
⏰ Deadline: 10/07

✅ Yêu cầu:

1. Chuẩn bị bài nói theo quan điểm được phân công: ủng hộ hoặc phản đối.

2. Quay video bài nói, độ dài từ 2–3 phút.

3. Bài nói cần đảm bảo các yếu tố sau:

Trình bày quan điểm rõ ràng

Có lập luận hợp lý, mạch lạc

Có ví dụ minh họa cụ thể

Phản biện ngắn gọn với ý kiến trái chiều

🎥 Hãy chuẩn bị kỹ nội dung, luyện tập trước khi quay để bài nói trôi chảy và tự nhiên nhất nhé!

# data[].attributes.body
Motion: “Should children use AI to do homework?”
⏰ Deadline: 03/07

✅ Yêu cầu:

1. Chuẩn bị bài nói theo quan điểm được phân công (ủng hộ hoặc phản đối).

2. Quay video bài nói, độ dài khoảng 2–3 phút.

3. Bài nói cần có:
– Quan điểm rõ ràng
– Lập luận hợp lý
– Ví dụ minh họa
– Phản biện ngắn gọn với ý kiến đối lập.

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentlemen,i am Ngoc Minh ,i come from the negative side,and i felt very pleased to meet you here.Today our topic is "Should children use AI to do homework"Now gostriaght to my argurment.If a robot does your homework today, will you know how to think tomorrow. Homework helps children learn and think. If they use AI to do it, they may not understand the work. They might stop learning and just copy answers. AI cannot replace the support and feedback that teachers give through homework. When students do homework on their own, teachers can check their work to see what they understand and what they still need help with. But if AI does the work for them, the teacher only sees perfect answers — not the student’s real thinking.This is a big problem. If teachers don’t see mistakes, they won’t know how to help the student improve. Also, when students use AI, they miss out on the chance to ask questions, make errors, and learn from them. These are all important parts of growing and learning. AI can give answers, but it cannot understand each child’s needs like a real teacher can. That’s why using AI for homework can actually hurt students in the long run — it blocks real learning and stops teachers from giving the right suppoort.With all argurment i have mention above i strongly belive that "Student shouldn't use AI to do homework".Thank you for spending your time to listen to my presentation.Iam Ngoc Minh and i will see you soon!

# data[].attributes.body
🎯 Motion: “Should children use AI to do homework?”
⏰ Deadline: 26/06

✅ Yêu cầu:

1. Chuẩn bị bài nói theo quan điểm được phân công (ủng hộ hoặc phản đối).

2. Quay video bài nói, độ dài khoảng 2–3 phút.

3. Bài nói cần có:
– Quan điểm rõ ràng
– Lập luận hợp lý
– Ví dụ minh họa
– Phản biện ngắn gọn với ý kiến đối lập

📥 Gửi video đúng hạn để cô nhận xét và góp ý trước khi luyện tập trên lớp.

# data[].attributes.body
💡 Chủ đề: Should healthcare be free?

🎬 Nhiệm vụ:
Các con hãy quay một video trình bày bài argument (lập luận) về chủ đề trên – đây là bài mà chúng ta đã cùng thảo luận trên lớp. Tuy nhiên, lần này các con cần phát triển bài nói đầy đủ và mạch lạc hơn theo phương pháp PEEL mà cô đã hướng dẫn, cụ thể gồm các phần:

1. Main Point – Nêu rõ quan điểm chính của con.

2. Explanation – Giải thích lý do tại sao con chọn quan điểm đó.

3. Evidence – Đưa ra ví dụ, số liệu, dẫn chứng cụ thể để làm rõ ý.

4. Link – Kết nối các ý trên để làm rõ lập luận của mình.

5. Counterargument – Phản biện một ý kiến trái chiều, sau đó bác bỏ hoặc làm rõ lại quan điểm của con.

6. Conclusion – Kết luận, nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình một lần nữa.

🎤 Yêu cầu về video:

Giọng nói rõ ràng, to, dễ nghe.

Nội dung mạch lạc, đầy đủ các phần theo yêu cầu.

Thời lượng tối thiểu: 2 phút.

# data[].attributes.body
📌 BÀI TẬP VỀ NHÀ – VIDEO ARGUMENT

💡 Chủ đề: Should people have plastic surgery?

Các con hãy quay video trình bày lại bài argument về chủ đề này mà mình đã thảo luận trên lớp. Tuy nhiên, cần bổ sung thêm các phần sau để bài nói hoàn thiện hơn:

✅ Example (Ví dụ cụ thể): Minh họa quan điểm bằng tình huống thực tế.
✅ Evidence (Bằng chứng): Đưa ra số liệu, nghiên cứu hoặc ý kiến từ chuyên gia để củng cố lập luận.
✅ Counterargument (Phản biện): Đề cập đến ý kiến trái chiều và phản biện lại.

⏳ Deadline: Thứ 5, ngày 13/10.

📹 Yêu cầu:

Video rõ ràng, giọng nói to, dễ nghe.

Nội dung chặt chẽ, có đầy đủ các phần đã yêu cầu.

Độ dài tối thiểu 1 phút 30 giây.

🔥 Hãy thể hiện quan điểm của mình một cách thuyết phục nhé! 💪

# data[].attributes.headline
sorry cô giờ con mới làm bài đc nhiều bài quá:))))

# data[].attributes.subject
sorry cô giờ con mới làm bài đc nhiều bài quá:))))

# data[].attributes.body
Do you think children can use social media like tiktok,facebook,instagram ?With me this is the worst idea in the world,wich may destroyed their future life.Good morning ladies and gentelment i am Ngoc Minh and today i stand here to belive that children shouldn't use social media.Now let come to my argurment.Children who use too much social media can be come addicted.they always want to see their "friends "new post.They will use their iphone or computers to use tiktok,facebook,instagram,...and WILL NOT go out side anymore.This can damage their future life.According to a national survey, 33% of girls 11 to 15 years old feel addicted to social media and more than half of teens say it would be hard to give up social media. The fear of missing out, or FOMO, is real.Use social media can help children to know more about the world however this still a bad idea.Thank you for listening to my presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
SHOULD WE ALLOW CHILDREN TO USE SOCIAL MEDIA?

Nhiệm vụ của các con tuần này là sẽ trình bày lập luận của mình một cách rõ ràng về motion "should children be allow to use social media?".

Chú ý: TẤT CẢ CÁC PHẦN CẦN ĐƯỢC ĐẦU TƯ TIME NGHIÊN CỨU, PHÂN TÍCH VÀ LÀM CHẤT LƯỢNG. NHỮNG BÀI COPY TỪ CÁC CHATBOT AI ĐỀU BỊ LOẠI, HOẶC NHỮNG BÀI LÀM SƠ SÀI. MAKE SURE LÀ CÁC CON THỰC SỰ HIỂU NHỮNG GÌ CÁC CON NÓI VÀ VIẾT.

Hướng dẫn:

Bước 1: Lựa chọn side cho mình, nó là positive hay negative.

Bước 2: Trình bày lập luận ra giấy hoặc đánh máy, phải follow đúng các bước cô dạy như đâu là argument, đâu là explanation, đâu là examples, và đừng quên counterargument.

Bước 3: Practice nội dung đã trình viết bên trên nhiều lần cho thành thạo

Bước 4: Quay video các con đứng và trình bày quan điểm của mình, chú ý body language, tông giọng.

DEALINE: THỨ 6 NGÀY 20/02/2025

# data[].attributes.headline
WILL ROBOTS REPLACE HUMANS IN THE FUTURE?

# data[].attributes.subject
WILL ROBOTS REPLACE HUMANS IN THE FUTURE?

# data[].attributes.body
Nhiệm vụ của các con tuần này là sẽ trình bày lập luận của mình một cách rõ ràng về motion "will robots replace humans in the future?".

Chú ý: TẤT CẢ CÁC PHẦN CẦN ĐƯỢC ĐẦU TƯ TIME NGHIÊN CỨU, PHÂN TÍCH VÀ LÀM CHẤT LƯỢNG. NHỮNG BÀI COPY TỪ CÁC CHATBOT AI ĐỀU BỊ LOẠI, HOẶC NHỮNG BÀI LÀM SƠ SÀI. MAKE SURE LÀ CÁC CON THỰC SỰ HIỂU NHỮNG GÌ CÁC CON NÓI VÀ VIẾT.

Hướng dẫn:

Bước 1: Lựa chọn side cho mình, nó là positive hay negative.

Bước 2: Trình bày lập luận ra giấy hoặc đánh máy, phải follow đúng các bước cô dạy như đâu là argument, đâu là explanation, đâu là examples, và đừng quên counterargument.

Bước 3: Practice nội dung đã trình viết bên trên nhiều lần cho thành thạo

Bước 4: Quay video các con đứng và trình bày quan điểm của mình, chú ý body language, tông giọng.

DEALINE: THỨ 6 NGÀY 14/02

# data[].attributes.body
CÔ ƠI CÔ GIÚP CON CON CHƯA CÓ LINK CỦA CẢ 2 CÔ CÔ GIÚP CON VỚI CÔ REPLY CON ĐƯỢC KHÔNG Ạ CON CHƯA NÔP BTVN CỦA CÔ LY :(((((((((((((((((((((((

# data[].attributes.body
Con nộp bài debate ạ. Lúc đấy con không quay được cam nên cô thông cảm cho con ạ :((((((((((((((((

# data[].attributes.body
Các con xem video mà cô đính kèm link về các bước make a rebuttal.

Vậy trả lời các câu hỏi sau:

1. Các bước đó là gì?

2. Các tips cho making a rebuttal là gì?

3. Áp dung đối với bài tập trong file đính kèm.

DEADLINE: 18/07/2024

# data[].attributes.body
Have you ever wonder that can a simple object

like a fountain really be consider art? Marcel

Duchamp shocked the world by presenting a

urinal as art. Fountain in this case is not just

just an normal object for daily life, it an artwork

that famous all over the world. As the most of you

will think it a strangest think ever right? But it actully

was stolen by someone and until now they can't

not get it back yet. What in the world the person that

stole that fountain is? : said my little brother. Today

we have confront the question: Is Marcel Duchamp

fountain importance for modern art. =))

# data[].attributes.headline
Present the argument: Our world has been better compared to the past. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Present the argument: Our world has been better compared to the past. 

# data[].attributes.body
A long time ago, many people got sick and don't have good treatments. Now, we have good medicine that help us live longer and healthier lives. Vaccines, antibiotics, and hospitals have made it possible to cure diseases that used to be very dangerous in the past. For example: in olddays, if someone get a seriously ill, the doctors may not have medicine to cure. But in the nowadays, we can easily cure the illness. In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. It's clear that our world has been better compared to the past. Let's keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentament esteem

judges opponents, and all members of the

audience. I am here to strengthen our argumen.

First let compare with the past. Around the BBC

people doesn't use computer or mobiphone or

electrical equipment. Until 1822 they was invited

the first electrical equipment. But have you ever

wonder that how they get to travel in the BBC.

They usually walk but if they lived near the

ocean or on a river, boats and ships were a major

way of travel. Up to the time of 1885 Gottlieb

Daimler and Wilhelm Mayach was invented the

first moterbike. One year latter Karl Benz have

invented the first car in the world. Now let example

if people in the past have becom better so people

may not trying to get a perfect socore or they don't

belive on them self and may not make the better

world. In con concluding Now, as the final speaker,

I urge you to reflect on the weight of our position

and the depth of our reasoning. Once more,

We firmly stand here as the belief that our world has

become better compare with the past because of all

the argument we have give above.As we move forward,

let's remember the importance of speaking up, staying

strong, and creating the change we wish to see.

Thank you for being a part of this journey with us.

# data[].attributes.body
Goodmorning ladies and gentlemen,esteemed judges,opponents, and all members of the audience. Today,I stand before you as the leader of A team and before we dive into the heart of our disscussion,allow me to introduce our team members: Lam Vy the second speaker,Thai Bao the last speaker and me the first speaker. Let me paint a vivid picture for you: Imagine a world where people lived shorter lives,disease was everywhere, and communication was painfully slow. Now, picture our world today, where we live longer, healthier lives and can connect instantly. Clearly, our world is much better than it used to be. Today, we confront the question: 'Has our world become better over the years?' Before we begn our argument, lets ensure we're on the same page regarding the key terms in the motion. 'world' is the Earth and everything on it, including al people, places, and natural features. Our team firmly stands on the proposition has become better compared to the past. Lets come to my argument, through advancements in technology,medicine, and societal progess, our world has experienced significant improvements in quality of life, healthcare,and connectovity, making it indisputably better than in previous eras.Life expectancy has increased globally due to advancements in medicine and healthcare. For example, in the past century, average life sapns ave extended by several decades, demonstrating the tanbible benefits of medical progess. Critics argue that while technology and medicine have improved aspects of life, they've also caused widened social inequalities, raising doubts about our world is unequivocally better than before. In conclusion, we've presented a by evidence and logical reasonong. Our argument stands strong. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.headline
VÕ THÀNH NAM NỘP BÀI "Our world has become better compared to the past"

# data[].attributes.subject
VÕ THÀNH NAM NỘP BÀI "Our world has become better compared to the past"

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning, everyone. As the second speaker for the negative side. I am here to strengthen our argument and address the points made by the opposition.

Now, let’s examine the arguments from the other side. While they have made some strong points, it’s crucial to consider their claims. But it’s clear that this argument falls short because they don’t provide any evidence or examples. Considering the evidence provided, it is evident that our position is more compelling.

And now let’s go back to our argument to support that Our world has become better compared to the past." How do we get here let’s go back in time when the stone age it start around 4,000 BC and 2,000 BC The Stone Age was a broad prehistoric period during which stone was widely used to make stone tools with an edge, a point, or a percussion surface. The period lasted for roughly 3.4 million years and ended between 4,000 BC and 2,000 BC, with the advent of metalworking. Let’s fast for a few years and reach the Middle Ages or medieval period lasted from approximately 500 to 1500 AD. It is the second of the three traditional divisions of Western history: antiquity, medieval, and modern. After that we reach the industrial revolution where the first vehicle that was built; there were more like Maritime technology where the Olympics was constructed the sister ship of the titanic. We will reach the modern period so things always change like us human we keep making and changing and nothing  can stop humanity.

In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. Our world has become better compared to the past. Let’s keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, opponents, and all members of the audience. Today, I stand before you as the leader of A team and before we dive into the heart of our discussion, allow me to introduce our team members: Thành Nam the second speaker, and Trang Anh the third speaker. Let me paint a vivid picture for you; we humans have come a very long way. Around 300,000 years ago, our first ancestors lived, roughly 200 to 250 years ago, electricity was invented, and 145 years ago, Thomas Edison invented the light bulb. Eventually, we come to the present day where we have all the nice things, thanks to lots of people's inventions. Today, we confront the question: "Has our world become better over the years?"

Before we begin our argument, let's ensure we're on the same page regarding the key terms in the motion. The world refers to planet Earth, everything living on it, and all human activities happening on Earth. Years are a time measurement unit consisting of 365 days and a quarter. Our team firmly stands on the proposition that the world has become better than in the past, and now let’s come to my very first argument.

In this rapidly evolving world, advancements in technology, science, and medicine have greatly improved our quality of life. The progress we have made in terms of healthcare, communication, and overall standards of living cannot be overstated. Medical breakthroughs have extended our lifespans, improved treatments for various illnesses, and enhanced overall well-being. Access to education, information, and opportunities has also increased significantly, empowering individuals across the globe to reach their full potential. The world today offers more opportunities for growth, prosperity, and equality than ever before. These advancements have undoubtedly contributed to making our world a better place for current and future generations.

In conclusion, we've presented a compelling argument supported by evidence and logical reasoning. Our argument stands strong. Thank you so much for your attention

# data[].attributes.body
Have you ever think that a simple thing that use in daily life can been use as modern art in 1917 man name Marcel Duchamp 28 July 1887 – 2 October 1968) was a French painter, sculptor, chess player, and writer.  Marcel Duchamp once said art is whatever you can get away with. His fountain changes the world forever. His fountain was actuary  an ordinary piece of plumbing chosen by Duchamp was submitted for the inaugural exhibition of the Society of Independent Artists, to be staged at the Grand Central Palace in New York. When explaining the purpose of his readymade sculpture, Duchamp stated they are "everyday objects raised to the dignity of a work of art by the artist's act of choice. Do you know that somebody say that the fountain was so weird. Today we confront the question: Is  Marcel Duchamp fountain important for modern art.

# data[].attributes.body
Can a simple urinal be considered a groundbreaking artwork? In 1917, Marcel Duchamp challenged the art world with his piece, Fountain.

Duchamp's Fountain, created in 1917, is a famous artwork that caused major changes in how people perceive "art". Essentially a urinal presented as art forced people to question what defines art and who gets to decide.

Duchamp's Fountain is significant because it broke traditional rules about art. Duchamp made people think differently about creativity and originality by turning an ordinary object into art. The piece sparked discussions about the purpose of art and who gets to decide what is considered valuable in the art world.

I believe Duchamp's Fountain is crucial in art history because it challenged old ideas and paved the way for new ways of thinking about art. It inspires artists to push boundaries and explore unconventional forms of expression.

Comparing Duchamp's Fountain with Sherrie Levine's Fountain (Buddha) shows how artists can reinterpret and build upon each other's ideas. While Duchamp questioned the boundaries of art with his urinal, Levine added cultural significance by blending Duchamp's concept with symbolic meaning.

In summary, Duchamp's Fountain remains a key piece in art history for its ability to spark debates and redefine the meaning of art. Its impact on the art world continues to be felt today, encouraging artists and audiences to think outside the box and challenge traditional norms in artistic expression.

# data[].attributes.body
As an artist myself, I believe that obtaining permission to use popular brands or characters in one's work is essential, especially if it involves copyrighted material. This not only shows respect for the original creators but also ensures that legal issues are avoided.

The distribution and reception of the artwork can indeed play a role in determining whether permission should be sought. If the artwork significantly benefits from or references a brand or character in a positive manner, obtaining permission may be necessary to maintain a good relationship with the brand owner and enhance the artwork's credibility. However, if the use is transformative, parody, or falls under fair use, this might not always be required.

MInh chau

Ultimately, it's crucial for artists to be mindful of copyright laws and ethical considerations when incorporating popular brands or characters into their work.

# data[].attributes.body
Have you ever think that a simple thing that we use every can be a modern art?Marcel Dumphan's Foutain is a examples of this special art .Foutain is a peice of art made by Marcel Dumphan's in 1917.Foutain is not like orther art,he use the thing we use every day.Foutain is not spectacular art or some thing is just a up side down toilet .Do you know that somebody say that Foutain was so weird but its weird so it make it special.Today we confront the questions:Is Marcel Dumphan's Foutain important for modern Art?

# data[].attributes.body
Improved Living Standards: More people have access to basic necessities like clean water, sanitation, healthcare, and housing. This improves their quality of life and overall well-being.

Community Support: Communities are coming together to support each other during difficult times. This includes helping neighbors, volunteering for charities, and advocating for positive changes.

Cultural Exchange: Globalization has allowed people to learn about and appreciate different cultures and traditions. This cultural exchange enriches societies and promotes understanding and tolerance.

# data[].attributes.body
Các con sẽ chọn đúng role mà mình đã làm trên lớp, first, second hay last speaker, sau đó lựa chọn một quan điểm mà con thích nhất, có thể là negative hoặc affirmative side để triển khai đầy đủ theo các bước trong form tương ứng với mỗi role. Motion "Our world has become better compared to the past"

Chú ý: Các con cần làm đúng theo form cô hướng dẫn, cần phải có evidence, examples để support. Chỉ trừ phần rebuttal là các con bỏ qua. Không được lạm dụng chat GPT, sử dụng ngôn ngữ đơn giản dễ hiểu, thuyết phục.

DEADLINE: by 11/07/2024

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Dear các con, đây là bài tập cho phần viết - Persuasive về chủ đề Tái hiện thế giới thông qua nghệ thuật mình đã học ngày hôm nay (6/7). Bài tập về nhà của các con là viết phần mở đầu của bài viết Persuasive cho đề bài: Is Marcel Duchamp's Fountain Important for Modern Art?Con hãy viết một đoạn văn thuyết phục ngắn theo dàn ý cô gợi ý dưới đây và quay video lại. (Lưu ý video dưới 2 phút). 

# data[].attributes.body
Persuasive Writing Task

Topic: Is Marcel Duchamp's Fountain Important for Modern Art?

Background: Marcel Duchamp's Fountain is a famous piece of art from 1917. It is a porcelain urinal signed "R. Mutt." Duchamp's work made people think differently about what art can be.

Task: Write a persuasive essay saying if you think Duchamp's Fountain is important for modern art or not.

1. Opening sentence:

Start with a sentence to catch the reader’s attention.

Example:

Start with a Question:

"Can a simple object like a urinal really be considered art?"

"What makes a piece of art truly revolutionary?"

Begin with a Surprising Fact or Statement:

"In 1917, a urinal became one of the most controversial pieces of art."

"Marcel Duchamp shocked the world by presenting a urinal as art."

Use an Interesting Quote:

"As Marcel Duchamp once said, 'Art is whatever you can get away with.'"

"A famous artist once claimed, 'Anything can be art.'"

Make a Bold Claim:

"Duchamp's Fountain changed the art world forever."

"No other artwork has challenged the definition of art like Duchamp's Fountain."

Describe a Scene or Scenario:

"Imagine walking into an art gallery and seeing a urinal on display."

"Picture an artist signing a urinal and calling it art. This is what Marcel Duchamp did."

Use a Provocative Statement:

"What if art is not about beauty but about ideas?"

"Is it possible that a urinal can be more significant than a painting?"

Begin with a Personal Opinion:

"I believe that Duchamp's Fountain is one of the most important artworks of the 20th century."

"In my opinion, Duchamp's Fountain redefined the boundaries of art."

2. Write a few sentences about what Duchamp's Fountain is and why it is famous.

3. Say clearly if you think Fountain is important or not.

4.Compare "Fountain" with one of these recreations

below:

Fountain (Buddha) by Sherrie Levine: An artwork that reinterprets Duchamp's piece through a different cultural lens.

Fractured Fountain by Mike Bidlo: A version that explores the deconstruction of Duchamp’s original idea.

# data[].attributes.body
Timmy is a boy that obsessed with business .He is dreaming to become a bussinessman . So he asked his AI friend ,chatgpt. They says: “ You can follow Elon Musk a famous businessman,but first you need to hit the book and read more book. After talking with chatgpt timmy feels inspired,so he decided to burning the midnight oil.He is excited for his future and believes in him and make it piece of cake.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGKFnXiIzc/OYaj1BSoefRXtdg0-izMlw/edit?utm_content=DAGKFnXiIzc&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

# data[].attributes.headline
Present the argument: Filmmakers should not change important details about real events when creating movies based on true stories.

# data[].attributes.subject
Present the argument: Filmmakers should not change important details about real events when creating movies based on true stories.

# data[].attributes.body
The stories often involve real people who went through these events. Imagine if something big happened in your life, and someone made a movie about it but changed what you did or said. It wouldn’t feel right because it’s not what really happened. Changing the story might make it look like they did things they didn’t do or missed out on their true bravery or struggles. It’s respectful to tell what really happened to honor their true experiences. For example: filmmakers present what ancient people do, but changing important details about real events in histories can maybe a huge problem.In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. It's clear that: Filmmakers should not change important details about real events when creating movies based on true stories. Let's keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Tom is a 11-year-old boy who love the environment. he dreams to becoming an environmentalist. One day he asks his friend beta is an AI now let’s get back for advice on what to do today. Beta said that go to the park he dig a few hours and find a chest after he open it, it is full of gold incredibly the have found treasure.

# data[].attributes.body
Movies about real events should stay accurate to preserve the story's historical value.

Getting facts right helps viewers learn the truth about events and people, promoting a deeper understanding of history.Changing details can disrespect the real people and events, altering their legacy and confusing audiences.Filmmakers have a duty to truthfully represent real events to avoid legal issues and uphold ethical standard. Sticking to facts builds trust with the audience, ensuring they can rely on the movie as a reliable source of information.

The film "Braveheart" (1995), while popular, was heavily criticized for its historical inaccuracies regarding the life of William Wallace and the events of the Scottish Wars of Independence.Let me give you a examples:The film faced criticism for glorifying Belfort's behavior and failing to adequately depict the victims of his financial crimes. Legal issues arose from individuals depicted in the film claiming misrepresentation and seeking damages.

# data[].attributes.body
Anatasha is a little girl who loves to sing. She dreams of following her sister's footsteps and becoming a famous singer. She asks her AI friend, Nova for some career advice. She gave useful advice and encouraged Anatasha to keep practicing, gradually because the sky is the limit.

# data[].attributes.body
Thành Nam nộp bài

# data[].attributes.headline
Part 3: Discussion: After learning about Andy Warhol's "Campbell's Soup Cans" (1962), shoot a 2-minute video expressing your opinion (homework 27/6)

# data[].attributes.subject
Part 3: Discussion: After learning about Andy Warhol's "Campbell's Soup Cans" (1962), shoot a 2-minute video expressing your opinion (homework 27/6)

# data[].attributes.body
1. Do you think artists should be required to get permission to use popular brands or characters in their work? Why or why not?

2. How do you think the distribution and reception of the artwork should affect whether permission is needed?

3. Can you think of any other examples where artists have reimagined popular brands or characters? How were these works received?

4. What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of requiring artists to secure permission for their work?

# data[].attributes.body
Hello everyone, today im going to debate why flim makers should not change important details about real events when creating movies based on true stories.

Firstly, when flim makers change important details, the audience will get confused and especially children who doesnt know about the true event and will think that the movie is showing the true event and will never change their mind about the real one. Secondly, if flim makers dont change the important details, true stories and events will get more attention. According to Liam Gaughan, a based on a true event/story flim should show the audience how it happend, for example: 12 Years A Slave, the flim has successfully capture the essence of a true historical event and making millions people believe it.

Now once again, i disagree that flim makers changing important details in a based on a true story flim and with being said, thank you for your attention.

# data[].attributes.headline
Triều Dương ( Argument: will AI replace teachers in the future?)

# data[].attributes.subject
Triều Dương ( Argument: will AI replace teachers in the future?)

# data[].attributes.body
Will AI replace teachers in the future? There is a highly chance that AI will not replace teachers because of these reasons: number 1: AI dont have feelings. Unlike teachers AI dont have feelings so when a students is sad or angry AI will simply just ignore it and continue to teach other students, while teachers can take care students who are sad and angry.

Number 2: AI lack of creatives unlike teachers. AI just simply gives education and homeworks without any creatives and that can make students felt boring while studying while teachers creatives excited assignments, education and homework. Number 3: Students will not have any respect for the AI. The reason why students not have any respect for the AI teacher is because the AI dont have feelings so they can bully, swear at the teacher without any punishment and consequences. Number 4: Waste of energy and electricity. Having a AI teacher will make the electricity bill will go high and energy will ran out quickly because AI needs those resources to continue to teach the students. Thats my argument. Thanks for reading my argument!

# data[].attributes.body
Các con sẽ chọn đúng role mà mình đã làm trên lớp, first, second hay last speaker, sau đó lựa chọn một quan điểm mà con thích nhất, có thể là negative hoặc affirmative side để triển khai đầy đủ theo các bước trong form tương ứng với mỗi role. Motion "filmmakers should not change important details about real events when creating movies based on true stories."

Chú ý: Các con cần làm đúng theo form cô hướng dẫn, cần phải có evidence, examples để support. Chỉ trừ phần rebuttal là các con bỏ qua. Không được lạm dụng chat GPT, sử dụng ngôn ngữ đơn giản dễ hiểu, thuyết phục.

DEADLINE: by 03/07/

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning esteemed judges, opponents, and audience members. As a last speaker for the negative side. I'm here to strengthen

our argument. Now let come to my argument.

Computer may not good in felling while human may not good at teaching but they know what the student felling and can take care of them. On the other hand Ai don't have felling, they can't help the student overcome their sadness. Let's imagine a children felling sad Ai just appease by don't cry or even stop cry because they don't have felling so the children felling lonely.

Second, next we will talk about the teaching. Ai is know as the artificial intelligence that made by human right?

So Ai is same as a human, but human can teach useful thing like advanced exercise even human can open lots of tops school as: Standford, Oxford, Harvard, Cambride, ...

nevertheless AI can't! Ai just teach the things they have and don't teach the advanced so children can not know the bigger thing.

Now as a last speaker I urge you t reflect on the weight of our position and the depth of our reasoning. Once more, we firmly stand here as the belive that we confuly disgree with the motion because of Ai doesn't have evidence and logiacal reasoning, felling and boundaries of knowledge. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.headline
Present the argument: Computers will not replace teachers in the future.

# data[].attributes.subject
Present the argument: Computers will not replace teachers in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
Teachers understand how students feel. They can tell when a student is happy, sad, or frustrated. When a student is unhappy, a teacher can offer kind words or a hug. If a student is frustrated, the teacher can explain things in a different way to help them understand. Computers can’t feel emotions or see when someone is having a tough time. Computers can give information, but they can’t give comfort or encouragement. This is why teachers are so important, they make students feel cared for and understood. In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. It's clear that computers will not replace teachers in the future. Let's keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning, everyone. As the second speaker for the negative side. I am here to to strengthen our argument and address the points made by the opposition.

Now, let’s examine the arguments from the other side. While they have made some strong points, it’s crucial to consider their claims. They suggested that computers should replace teacher. But it’s clear that this argument falls short because they don’t provide any evidence or examples. In light of the evidence provided, it is evident that our position is more compelling.

And now let’s go back to our argument to support computers shouldn’t replace teachers in the future.

First, teachers is far more than impacting knowledge and developing skills; it’s also helping students become more responsible ethical members of society. Teachers promote trust, honesty, and integrity in a classroom and server as role models for students to emulate.

Second, what if computers replace teachers in schools, there will be less fun, and more boredom to be had in the classroom.

Finally, what if the computer malfunction or stop working, if that happen students will play. The cost for repairing is very high and time-consuming.

In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. Computers shouldn’t replace teachers in the future. Let’s keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, opponents, and all audience members. Today, I stand before you as the first speaker of a team, and also leader of our team. Before we dive into the hearts of our discussion, let me introduce my 2 teammates, Thành Nam as our second speaker, and Trang Anh the third speaker. Allow me to paint a vivid world for you, Today, we unfold the question "Will computers replace teachers".

Before we begin our argument, let's ensure we're on the same page. Computers are complex machines programmed to do various things like calculating and serving people in their everyday lives, some are known as AI or artificial intelligence. Teachers are people who help students learn by planning lessons, leading discussions, checking progress, and encouraging personal growth. Replacing means removing something and putting in something else instead of the previous item.

Our team firmly stands on the preposition that teachers shouldn't and will not be replaced by computers and now, let's come to my very first argument.

While computers excel at certain tasks like data processing and information retrieval, they lack the empathy, creativity, and intuition that human teachers possess. Teachers offer personalized guidance, emotional support, and mentorship that computers simply cannot replicate.

Furthermore, the dynamic nature of the learning environment necessitates human interaction and adaptability. Teachers can adjust their teaching methods based on individual student needs, provide real-time feedback, and create engaging learning experiences that cater to diverse learning styles. Dr. Linda Darling-Hammond, an education professor at Stanford University states, "Computers can provide information, and teachers can provide the human touch. When students are struggling, it's crucial to have a caring and knowledgeable teacher there to guide them through their learning journey. Computers may offer resources, but it is the teacher's guidance, encouragement, and support that truly makes a difference in a student's academic and personal growth." This viewpoint underscores the essential role that teachers play in education and highlights the limitations of computers in providing the nuanced support and mentorship that students need to thrive.

In conclusion, we've presented a compelling argument supported by evidence and logical reasoning. My argument stands strong. Thank you so much for your attention

# data[].attributes.body
good morning everyone, as the second speaker from the affirmative side, I'm here to strengthen our argument and address the points made by the opposition.

Now, lets examine the arguments from the other side. While they have made some strong points, it's crucial to consider their claims. they suggest that computers shouldn't replace teachers in the future because computers can't t cheer up negative emotions. But it is clear that this argument falls short because teachers sometimes make students afraid of school but computer is not. In the light of evidence provide, it is evident that our argument is more compelling.

And now let's go back to our argument of to support computers should replace teachers in the future.

Computer teaching is a creative and good way of teaching. Teachers may have some stress and may release anger to the students' heads, but computers don't. Computers even can answer the questions in many ways and make children
interested in learning. Base on PROVEN Robotics, there are 3 evidence provided. First, computers know everything so they can answer any question. Second, computers never get sick so schools will never need to find more teachers. And finally, computers can speak any language. So the computer can understand what any student anywhere is saying. Some people might say that computers can't remind students about transgress of rules, but however the school can still mount cameras and set rules.

In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. It is clear that computers should replace teachers in the future. Lets keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.body
In the realm of education, robots are making significant strides in supporting learning environments. They excel in tasks such as automating administrative duties, providing personalized tutoring, and even facilitating interactive learning experiences through simulations and virtual environments. These advancements promise greater efficiency and accessibility in education, particularly in addressing individual student needs and enhancing educational outcomes.

However, while robots can handle specific tasks effectively, the role of a teacher extends far beyond the transfer of knowledge. Human teachers bring a unique blend of empathy, intuition, and adaptability to the classroom. They establish meaningful connections with students, understand their emotional and developmental needs, and inspire creativity and critical thinking through personalized guidance and mentoring.

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oaFcUMfw6aTbOHKypykwHk88KRwEi4EE/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=111241338408371108553&rtpof=true&sd=true

# data[].attributes.body
good morning esteemed judges, opponents, and audience members. A last speaker from our side, I'm here to strentheng our team position and respond to any opposing viewpoints. Now, let's examine the arguments from the other side. While they've made some strong points, it's crucial to consider their claims. They suggested that student should be aloud to bring mobile phones because they can help teachers in answering students question, but upon closer examination, it's clear that this argument falls short because phones also can help student cheat. Given the evidence presented, it's apparent that our stance remains strong.

Now lets turn to our original argument in support of phones shouldn't be aloud in classrooms.

Mobile phone is a cheat way when student do test, also makes students don't listen to lectures. They can search questions can then cheat and play games in class. Base on RICE UNIVERSITY, Parents and principals who favor banning cell phones in classrooms argue they distract students and diminish focus, can provide students access to questionable content, increase cyberbullying and other disciplinary issues, create physical and mental health issues. Some people may think mobile phones might be useful for students questions, but however, like I've said, mobile phones are the savior in difficult questions.

Now, as the final speaker, I urge you to reflect on weight of our position and depth of our reasoning. Once more, we firmly stand here as the belief that mobile phones shouldn't be aloud in classrooms because of mobile phones can distrub students learning. As we move forward, lets remember the importance of speaking up, staying strong , and creating the change we wish to see. Thank you for being a part of this journey with us.

# data[].attributes.body
Các con sẽ chọn đúng role mà mình đã làm trên lớp, first, second hay last speaker, sau đó lựa chọn một quan điểm mà con thích nhất, có thể là negative hoặc póitive side để triển khai đầy đủ theo các bước trong form tương ứng với mỗi role. Motion "Will computers replace teachers in the future?"

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentlemen, estemmed judges, opponents and all members of audience. Today, I stand before you as the leader of A team and before we dive into the heart of our discussion, allow me to introduce our team members:

Let me paint a vivid picture for you,  imagine a world where:

children always get distracted when they were learning just because of a phone.

Today we confront the question:

Before we begin our argument, let's ensure we're on the same page regarding the key terms in the motion.

should mobile phones be allowed in the classroom

Our team firmly stands on the oposition that we shouldn't bring mobile phone to school

and now let’s come to my very argument.

if we bring mobile phone to school children can easily get distracted. Ho? Mobile can have many application and most of them is for entertaining so they can hide the teacher and play games for the whole lesson.In conclusion, we've presented a compelling argument unsupported by evidence and logical reasoning. It's clear that  our argument stands strong. Thank you so much for your attention

# data[].attributes.headline
Present the argument: Mobile phones shouldn't be allowed in classrom.

# data[].attributes.subject
Present the argument: Mobile phones shouldn't be allowed in classrom.

# data[].attributes.body
Mobile phones can be a big distraction for students in the classroom. When students have their phones with them, they might want to check social media, play games, or text their friends during lessons. This takes their attention away from what the teacher is saying and the school work they should be doing, making it harder for them to learn and understand the lesson. When students are distracted by their phones, they might miss important information that the teacher is teaching the students about. In conclusion, our arguments stand strong and address the opposing side's points. It's clear that mobile phones shouldn't be allowed in the classrooms. Let's keep pushing for the boundaries of knowledge to make a difference. Thank you so much for your attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentlemen, estemmed judges, opponents and all members of audience. Today, I stand before you as the of latspeaker and before we dive into the heart of our discussion, allow me to introduce our team members:

Let me give you a example :When the student from all the world use mobie phone and the student don’t focus to learn they use mobie phone every where .The school from a school to like a place when very people use mobie instand of learning.That’s good?Ofcourse that’s not good .

Now lets come to my frist argument.

  Mobile phones are a constant source of distraction for students. The allure of social media notifications, text messages, and online entertainment can easily divert their attention away from the lesson at hand. Even if students intend to use their phones responsibly, the temptation to check for updates or messages can be overwhelming. This distraction not only disrupts their own learning process but also affects the entire classroom environment by detracting from the teacher's ability to deliver lessons effectively.

  Let me give you a evidence to support my team opinion: Michael Rich, an associate professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, explains that students can’t meaningfully absorb information while also texting, scrolling, or watching YouTube videos. The human brain is incapable of true multitasking, and rapid-switch-tasking doesn’t allow for deep understanding of subjects

# data[].attributes.body
Các con sẽ chọn đúng role mà cô đã giao hôm trước, sau đó chọn một quan điểm mà con thích nhất, có thể là negative side hoặc affirmative side để triển khai theo đầy đủ các bước trong form.

MOTION: Should mobile phones be allowed in the classrooms?

# data[].attributes.body
While zoos have made strides in conservation and education, they also pose significant challenges to wildlife welfare. Confined spaces and artificial environments can induce stress and suffering in animals. Breeding programs, though aimed at conservation, can lead to genetic issues. Capturing wild animals for display disrupts ecosystems and contributes to species decline. Moreover, focusing on animal display for entertainment may foster a disconnect from nature. Thus, while acknowledging their contributions, it's crucial to prioritize animal welfare and support conservation efforts in the wild.

# data[].attributes.body
While some argue that zoos serve as vital educational institutions and play a crucial role in wildlife conservation efforts, others raise valid concerns about animal welfare and the ethics of captivity. Zoos can provide valuable opportunities for education and research, but we must also acknowledge the inherent complexities and ethical dilemmas associated with confining wild animals for human observation.

The claim that zoos inspire conservation awareness is valid to some extent, as they offer visitors a chance to see and learn about exotic animals they might not encounter otherwise. However, research suggests that the long-term impact of zoo visits on conservation attitudes and behaviours is mixed, with factors like interpretive quality and visitor engagement playing crucial roles.

Regarding conservation efforts, while zoos participate in breeding programs and species reintroduction initiatives, critics argue that these efforts prioritize charismatic species over less glamorous ones. Moreover, the effectiveness of captive breeding programs in bolstering wild populations remains a subject of debate, with some studies questioning their long-term viability.

# data[].attributes.body
Các con sẽ hoàn thành exercise số 2: Rebut lại từng quan điểm về zoos. Chú ý bám sát vào form rebut ở trong bảng bên trên, đưa đầy đủ giải thích, ví dụ để phản biện ngược lại nhé.

SAU ĐÓ CÁC CON QUAY VIDEO TRÌNH BÀY.

# data[].attributes.body
Con chưa up lên pad

# data[].attributes.headline
Let me give you a example about the motion 1:When students use video games to learn students have to think about and explore different ideas in order to find valid solutions.

# data[].attributes.subject
Let me give you a example about the motion 1:When students use video games to learn students have to think about and explore different ideas in order to find valid solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
Let me give you 2 ecidance to support the motion 1:

1.According to Dominka Hatodziuk ,she have say: Using video games in eLearning can greatly improve user engagement and comprehension. Effective animation should be clear, consistent, and functional, enhancing the learning experience.

2.According to the news.harvard/ Students who actively participate in classrooms employing active learning strategies learn more than they think they do

Let me give you a example for the idea 1 for the Negative side :When student use many video games they will fell very like to learn but on the anorther side it can harm children health.

Let me give you 2 evidance to support the motion:

1.According to R.S. Paffenbarger Jr., R.T. Hyde, A.L. Wing, et al.

They have said:

Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni

2. More than two-thirds of Americans children play video games and being weaker beacause playing to much video games.

Let me give you a example for the idea 2 on the Negative side:When they play videos games to much they will be lazy and they will have very small amount of time to do homework.

Let me give you 2 evidance to support the motion:

1. What’s really motivating about a good learning game is the learning,” says Louisa Rosenheck, researcher at MIT’s Education Arcade Lab and a an adjunct lecturer at HGSE. “Humans like to learn, and we like to get better at things.” But, she observes, many games used in classrooms or that are deemed “educational” tend to focus on content and procedural skills, and don’t necessarily encourage learning that sparks intrinsic motivation and genuine engagement.

2.According to Science Direct they have say What’s really motivating about a good learning game is the learning,” says Louisa Rosenheck, researcher at MIT’s Education Arcade Lab and a an adjunct lecturer at HGSE. “Humans like to learn, and we like to get better at things.” But, she observes, many games used in classrooms or that are deemed “educational” tend to focus on content and procedural skills, and don’t necessarily encourage learning that sparks intrinsic motivation and genuine engagement.

# data[].attributes.body
Negative: Idea 2

"In spite of the importance of video game play to adolescents, however, over the past few decades psychologists have focused primarily on the link between video game use and negative outcomes, such as addiction and aggression.".

"According to a study published in the journal Pediatrics, children who played video games for less than an hour a day showed better psychosocial adjustment than those who didn't play at all. Furthermore, a report by the Entertainment Software Association revealed that 70% of parents believe video games have a positive influence on their child's life. These statistics underscore the potential benefits of gaming for children's development."

"Experts in child development, such as Dr. Peter Gray, a research professor at Boston College, advocate for the benefits of play, including digital play. He argues that well-designed video games offer opportunities for children to explore, experiment, and learn in engaging ways. Additionally, researchers like Dr. Cheryl Olson, co-director of the Center for Mental Health and Media at Massachusetts General Hospital, emphasize that gaming can improve problem-solving abilities and spatial skills, which are valuable in academic and professional settings."

# data[].attributes.body
Các con sẽ tìm 3 loại evidence, đó là dạng example, expert opinions và numerical facts cho các mỗi argument dưới đây.

Motion 1: Are Video Games Beneficial for Kids?

Positive side:

Idea 2: Make learning more interactive and enjoyable.

Negative side:

Idea 1: lead to physical health problems such as eye strain, poor posture

Idea 2: video games can detract from homework and study time

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence: Benefits of homework

By having homework as one of their main obligations, they learn how to prioritize things that might not be enjoyable to them, but ultimately are beneficial to them in the long run.

A study in 1986 by Hill, Spencer, Alston, and Fitzgerald found that there is a positive link between homework and student achievement.

Alfie Kohn says students benefit from certain types of assignments, these home-appropriate assignments are kitchen experiments and activities that can involve family members such as completing puzzles, watching informative videos, and reading.

# data[].attributes.body
benefits of hw evidence:

"In student surveys conducted over the four years, over 90% of the students feel they learn using the system."

"According to this survey, 87% of teachers believe that homework is an effective way to reinforce learning. It also found that 75% of students agreed that homework was useful"

"Harris Cooper, a leading researcher in the field of homework, conducted a meta-analysis and found a positive correlation between homework and academic achievement. He concluded that homework is beneficial, particularly for older students."

"A study conducted at the University of Michigan found that homework can improve students' academic performance, especially in subjects like math and science."

# data[].attributes.body
What are the benefits of homework for parent involvement in their child's educations?Acording to liber texts they have say that:"They have the opportunity to incorporate their religious and spiritual beliefs without standards and rules to abide by. According to the Journal of College Admissions, home schooling is the fastest growing forms of educating children (Ray, 2004, paragraph 2). It is estimated that there are 1.7 to 2.1 million students in grades k-12 that are enrolled in home school as of 2003 and that number seems to be growing every year (Ray, 2004, paragraph 2). Home schooling began as a way for parents to have more control over the curriculum being taught to their children (Cooper and Sureau, 2007, paragraph 9)"

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges and opponents, and all members of the audience. Today, I stand before you as the first speaker of the negative team, before we dive into the heart of our d may I introduce my teammates, Thành Nam, the second speaker, and our leader, Trang Anh also the third speaker. Let me paint a vivid picture for you, imagine a world where students have to do the things that must be done and homework after a long day of study. It'll be hard and pressuring, especially on the test times. Today, we confront the question, should students do chores?

Before we begin our argument, let's make sure we're on the same page. Chores are tasks that are tedious but should be done anyway. Students are generally children who study at schools. Our team firmly stands in opposition to students shouldn't do housework. And now, let's come to my very first argument.

Students should prioritize their studies over chores to excel academically. Chores can increase stress and distract from learning, hindering academic performance. Studies show that students who spend more time on household chores have lower academic performance. Prioritizing studies over chores is crucial for academic success.

Chores can negatively impact students' mental health, leading to burnout and exhaustion. Prioritizing well-being over chores allows students to recharge and succeed in their studies. According to the American Psychological Association, stress from balancing academic responsibilities and household chores can lead to increased levels of anxiety and depression among students. Prioritizing mental health by reducing the burden of chores can help prevent burnout and improve overall well-being.

While chores teach valuable skills, students already have a heavy workload. Prioritizing education allows students to develop skills through other means without added stress. Students can develop important life skills, such as time management and responsibility, through extracurricular activities and part-time jobs. Prioritizing education over chores allows students to learn these skills without added stress.

In conclusion, we've presented a convincing argument with evidence and logical reasoning. It's clear that students should not do chores. Together, we can help students achieve the highest academic heights they can physically do.

# data[].attributes.body
Các con sẽ hoàn thành exercise số 2, tìm evidence để support cho chủ đề : Homework is beneficial"

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentaments,estemmed and all members of audience.Iam Ngoc Minh the frist speakers of the positive team.Today I stand here as the leader of the positive team and before we dive into the hearts of discussion allow me to introduce our team members:Mai Khanh,Lily,and finnaly me Ngoc Minh.Have you ever wonder if children do not do any chores and their parents do all of that?Hve you ever being lazy about doing chores?How do you fell about it?Our team frimly stands on the prosition that should children required to do choresand now let come to my arguments.

I think when children do chores it not just help their parents it also give them more skills.If they just play games and do what they want in their free times they will do nothings,they will be lazy.Beside they are just loosing their times for doing thing that is not useful.When the children do not do chores what will happen?Of course their parents will do all of them,that’s not fair.They just wait for their parents to do all the chores.They can’t do anything.Let me give you a example:When their parents went outside to do work they will not sitting there and waiting for there parents to come home and cook diner for them.Sometimes doing course with family is fun.Spending there valuable times together will help family to link together.Thank you for listening and good bye!

# data[].attributes.body
huhu cô ơi thi nhiều quá bj mới làm được

# data[].attributes.body
Các con sẽ trình bày dưới góc độ của first speaker. Xem lại cách intro và define motion và the hook  của first speaker để làm cho chính xác hơn, sau đó triển khai ideas của mình.

Motion: Should students be required to do chores at home?

# data[].attributes.headline
Võ Thành Nam gửi bài nhờ cô xem giúp con.

# data[].attributes.subject
Võ Thành Nam gửi bài nhờ cô xem giúp con.

# data[].attributes.body
Vẫn với vai trò là first speaker, các con sẽ hoàn thành đầy đủ các phần từ intro đến argument, rồi đến conclusion. Dưới đây là motion:

Should zoos be abolished?

Các con tự chọn side negative hoặc positive. Thực hiện các research cần thiết để có các evidence, examples để support nó.

CHÚ Ý, CÁC CON QUAY VIDEO BÀI NÓI CỦA MÌNH.

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentlemen, estemmed judges, opponents and all members of audience. Today, I stand before you as the leader of A team and before we dive into the heart of our discussion, allow me to introduce our team members Thai Bao,Bao Giang,Lam Vy and me.Let me paint a vivid picture for you: Have you ever thinks that learning daily Physical Education in schools may do more harm than good?So today we confront the question"Should schools have mandatory physical education classes every day?" Before we begin our argument, let's ensure we're on the same page regarding the key terms in the motion. " Mandatory physical education" means that studends are required to participate in and attend physical education classes as part of their school cirriculum.Our team firmly stands on the proposition that “school shouldn't have mandatory physicals education classes every day” and now let’s come to my very first argument.Ensuring that all physical education instructors are trained to deliver high-quality instruction on a daily basis pose challenges.Schools may strungle to recruit and retain qualified physical education teachers,lesding to conflict in the delivery of physicals education curriculum.Lets come to the evidence,a study published in the journal of educational Research suggests that excessive time spent on physical education may detract from instructional time in core academic subjects.Thank you for listening!😊

# data[].attributes.body
Nay tất cả các con đều đóng vai trò là first speaker nhé. Chúng ta cùng ôn tập lại các bước của first spkear cùng làm và sau đó các con sẽ triển khai phần nội dung, sau đó quay video nhé.

MOTION: "Should schools have mandatory physical education classes every day?"

Nay các con tùy chọn affirmative hoặc negative side, sau đó trình bày đẩy đủ role của first speaker.

# data[].attributes.body
Hello everybody, we're living in life with colorful things and imagination. So now, imagine you woke up in a morning and saw every thing around you have no colors. How do you think this will change the world? In my opinion, this will make the world less fun than the days with colors. Now go back to the real life and imagine you are standing under an oak. The bright sun shines through the green foliage. Then now turn to the world with no colors, the sun is white and the foliage is black, the sky is grey and our self have different tones of grey, that's quite board, isn't it? And if it is board, our imagination can't grow and you will fell hard in art. This also attack our life. You can't know what's in a cup drink. It can be water or juice or milk and you can be allergy with that drink, that's very dangerous. Generally speaking, the no colors world will change everybody life.