# data[].attributes.body
Changing climate + more usage: less water, quality challenges

Consideration for all stakeholders needs to improve

Water allocation needs to include community engagement. Allocation decisions impact costs and business plans, and all stakeholders are interdependent because it's the same water.

Create a governance model: include government bodies, industry, first nations, local communities more widely. Look at allocation but also usage.

# data[].attributes.body
Establish inter agency reporting across governance boundaries. How do we sustain the framework? How do we respond like and emergency in a "slow burn" scenario?

# data[].attributes.body
River vs Ocean -what's the catchment?

# data[].attributes.body
Water allocation, enhance the model to decide allocation to include quality and other metrics?

# data[].attributes.body
What do we measure, what are the triggers for action?

# data[].attributes.body
What's the right time to act (preventative vs response)

# data[].attributes.body
Align with community

Government leads and agencies bring the knowledge (or not, if they don’t have it)

Listening to each other to hear the issues and solutions.

Emergency vs Recovery actions.

# data[].attributes.body
Maintaining relationships, governance framework, trust between crises

# data[].attributes.body
Ongoing collaboration between science departments and agriculture organisations

# data[].attributes.body
Task forces for early planning if a crisis commences

# data[].attributes.body
Public education to be strengthened

# data[].attributes.body
Better planning and collaboration

Earlier engagement between stakeholders

Proactive >> reactive

# data[].attributes.body
We should have noticed nutrient load in the system changing and increasing.

We have not made bold choices but would suggest getting ag and fisheries influence for decision making incorporated further.

Use technology and partnerships with sustainable ag. Companies etc.

There is also a role for changes in policy and legislation.

# data[].attributes.body
Ensure monitoring results are set up to trigger a response

# data[].attributes.body
Data transparency

# data[].attributes.body
Choices

Clear and early knowledge on what where is safe. Or not

# data[].attributes.body
Industry may want clarity on water restrictions early.

# data[].attributes.body
Establish industry groups that can take views to/lobby Govt

# data[].attributes.body
Local communities raising concerns

# data[].attributes.body
How risk adverse or risk accommodating SA Health will determine how water utility can implement.

Water utility affects many stakeholders - customers are the main people affected

# data[].attributes.body
Strong and defined Data from many sources and locations.

Prediction models from the data.

Wider system data eg satellites and other agencies.

# data[].attributes.body
Agencies having aligned reporting criteria, risk framework.

# data[].attributes.body
Water monitoring data e.g. unusual water temperatures, below average rainfall

# data[].attributes.body
Have community bodies on the ground and pathways to report emerging concerns. Clear governance

# data[].attributes.body
Climate and water quality

# data[].attributes.body
Awareness of flags through various media.

# data[].attributes.body
Increased demand on water supply, feedback from operators, climate changing, growth projections, storage levels

# data[].attributes.body
Delay waiting for evidence to act and make decisions hurts on the ground

# data[].attributes.body
Voice of the community

# data[].attributes.body
Local knowledge