# data[].attributes.body
Lauri Ruohonen: Leonardo Da Vinci

His grammar was not that good and the language was not really that clear. He replaced some difficult words with Finnish and the presentation was a little too short.

Overall the presentation was mind boggling and he talked about most of Leonardo's paintings. The subject was also interesting since Leonardo is still well known.
I learned more about the story behind Leonardo's paintings.

Tia-Maria Liljeroos: Wassily Kandinsky

The presentation itself was great, but her language was a bit unclear and she used a little too much of "umm". There were some little grammar mistakes but nothing too noticeable. The presentation was a little bit too long for me but interesting.

She did a great job with correcting her mistakes during the presentation without failure and told us a lot about  the artist's life and art.
I myself learned more about the artist since I knew very little about him.

Saini Koivuniemi: Marc Chagall

She has clearly planned the presentation really well and did a great job. She spoke clearly and her grammar was good. She gave us a huge amount of information about the paintings of Marc Chagall.

She talked a lot about the colors and themes behind the paintings and also gave us sources.
Great Job!
Only mistake was with the word opera.

# data[].attributes.body
Eelis, Hokusai: Last a little under 5 minutes. I had never heard of the artist but the presentation was good and it was pleasant to listen. Difficult words were spelled nicely and Eelis didn't tangle with them. Good powerpoint and good grammar.

Iina, John Constable: Very good presentation. Well practiced, and very nicely designed. Powerpoint was clear and pronunciation was excellent. Lasted little under 5 minutes but I think all the important things were said. I would rate the presentation excellent.

Kivi, Hiroshige: Pronunciation was good and Kivi spoke with clear voice. Powerpoint was timed and well thought out. I think there was enough information even thought the presentation was short. There were some interesting facts included.

# data[].attributes.body
Lauri Ruohonen: Leonardo da Vinci

In the presentation there was a bit too little information and it took a very short time. Lauri could have shown more paintings and also more interest for the subject. Although there was interesting peaces of information there. I learned that Mona Lisa

Henrik Marttunen: Raphael

Henrik's language was very understandable and easy to listen. There was much information and plenty of Raphael's works of art. I learned that Raphael's painting can be found at the Vatican palace.

Tia-Maria Liljeroos: Kandinsky

The presentation was full of beautiful works of art and it was lovely to listen. I liked the way she talked and she had also made plenty of research. I learned so much of this, thank you!

# data[].attributes.body
Lauri Ruohonen: It was really interesting presentation. Lauri spoke well with clear voice. The presentation was a bit short. I learned that Leonardo invented tank. Lauri could have shown more paintings of Da Vinci.

Henrik Marttunen:
Henrik spoke nicely about Raphael. He showed a lot of Raphaels' paintings and explained things behind them. Henrik used difficult words and pronounced them nicely. MInus was that he didn't talk much about Raphaels' life. I learned that Raphael didn't like his stepmother.

Saini Koivuniemi:
Really good presentation with interesting information. Saini spoke really good english with clear sentences. I learned alot. The presentation lasted just right amount of time.

# data[].attributes.body
Milja Leinonen: She talked clearly but read straight from the phone. Could´ve been more photos. There was a lot of good information. I learned that he did a major change to books.
Good
Sylvia Koponen: It was good that there were a lot of photos and good information. I learned about the technique he used.
Good
Ville Valio: There was interesting information. Good presentation with a lot of photos. I was impressed about improvising.

# data[].attributes.body
Sylvia Koponen
+ understandable english
+ a lot of good and interesting information

I learned that he used very expensive pigments in his works and that almost all his paintings are set in two smallish rooms

Good

Alina Katto
+ understandable english
+ good pronounce
+ good information

I learned that he paid a lot of attention to the colours in his paintings. He travelled a lot inside France and painted a lot of different landscapes.

Excellent.

Ville Valio
+ understandable english
+ Nice pictures

I learned that she loved to paint self-portraits. I learned that people thought that she had a depression or other mental illness. I also learned that the only place you can see her paintings is her old home.

Excellent.

# data[].attributes.body
Milja Leinonen:
+good information
+spoke clearly
i learned that he painted self-potraits
good

Sylvia Koponen:
+good pronounciation
+lot of information
i learned that he used very expensive pigments
good

Alina Katto:
+good information about his paintings
+easily understandable
i learned that had a big affect on kubism
good

# data[].attributes.body
Milja Leinonen:
+ understandable english
+ a lot good information
I learned that he made big contribution to the history of book design
presentation was good
Alina Katto:
+ a lot very interesting information
+pronunciation was clear
I learned that he was kubism's "father"
presentation was excelent
Ville Valio:
+ english was good
+ information was interesting
I learned that we can't see hers paintings in museums
presentation was good

# data[].attributes.body
Anna Holappa: (William Blake)
+ There were enough content
+ Language was easy to understand
+ Slides were good
I learned that William Blake wasn't appreciated in his time
This was a good presentation

Arttu Mikkola: (Paul Klee)
+Content from his life was good
- Could have been more information about his art
Presentation could have been littler smoother
Still very good presentation overall
I learned that Klee was near ending his career early on

Samuli Suppula: (Henry Matisse)
- Could have been more information about his life
+good presentation overall
I learned that I've seen few of his art works

# data[].attributes.body
Anna Holappa

Very good pronunciation
clear english
easy to listen
not much told about his life

Sauli lindroos

Bit unclear sometimes but overall good english

spoke a lot about his life

not much about his art

Samuli Suppula

Lots of information about his life and art

clear english

easy to understand

good mindboggling facts

# data[].attributes.body
Anna Holappa
-There was very much information in her presentation
-pronunciation was good and language was easy to understand
-Excellent
Arttu Mikkola
-good presentation, which contained much information
-I learned interesting facts about
Paul Klees life
-good
Sauli Lindroos
-There was interesting facts, but his voice could have been clearer
-good

# data[].attributes.body
Eelis, Hokusai

Eelis had a great amount of content, good slides and he dealt well with difficult words. There were some grammar flaws but nothing serious. I learned that Hokusai was also a great influence for japanese art as was my Hiroshige If I recall right Hokusai might have actually been the teacher of Hiroshige. I would give this a rating of good.

Iina, John Constable

Great pronounciation and lots of information. The visual aids were also well done and thought out. She also showed and told fact about many different paintings. As I didn't know anything about John Constable I learned many various things about his life, art and family.
I would rate the presentation as excellent

# data[].attributes.body
+good information
Sylvia Koponen
Sylvia Koponen
Milja Leinon
+ understandable english
+ a lot good information

Sauli Lindroos
Sauli Lindroos 
Anna Holappa:

Arttu Mikkola
Arttu Mikkola
Anna Holappa


Samuli Suppula
Samuli Suppula
Anna Holappa
- Sometimes used Finnish
 - Sometimes used Finnish words 
Eelis, Hokusai
Eelis, Hokusai
Eelis had a great amount of content, good slides and he dealt well with difficult words 
 
add

# data[].attributes.body
Eelis:

Language and the words used were easy to understand. Pronounciation was good. And it was easy to follow the presentation as the slides were very good. Perhaps there could have been more eye contact to the audience. One thing I learned was that his artist Hokusai used several pseudonyms.

Kivi:

There was a lot of information in the presentation. Pronunciation was very good and the language was easy to understand. And especially the slideshow was very well done. I learned that his artist Hiroshige has also inspired many European artists.

# data[].attributes.body
Mikael Lenander
+good information
+clear voice
+dealt well with difficult words

Niko Somppi
-few difficult words
+good grammar
+good pictures
+a lot of information

Sandra Majuri
+good grammar and pronunciation
+clear voice
+excellent presentation

# data[].attributes.body
Henrik: Raphael
+ good grammar
-  some weird words
+ enough pictures
+ I learned about Raphaels work
Saini: Marc Chagall
+ good pronouncing
+ well introduced works of art
Tia-Maria: Wassily Kandinsky
- too slow pace
+ calm
+ clear pronouncing
+ interesting facts

# data[].attributes.body
Mikael Lenander
+ Much information also from works
+ Voice was clear
+ Few difficult words but dealt well
+Good and clear pictures in slide show

I learned about artist that i have never heard and it was very interesting. Presentation was good

Sandra Majuri
+Good pronunciation
+Dealt well with difficult words
+language was good and understandable
+Slides were good and clear

Again i learned about artist that i have never heard. I also learned about works artist made. Presentation was good

Emma Perttula
+Good and clear pictures
-Bit short could be longer
+voice was bit silent but pronunciation was good

And one more time i learned about artist that i have never heard. Presentation was good

# data[].attributes.body
Mikael Lenander:
+good amount of information
+no difficult words
+clear voce and good pronunciation
+good pictures

I got to know a new artist

Niko Somppi:
+nice slideshow and pictures
+clear voice
+interesting information
+dealt good in difficult words

I didn't know that Warhol used drugs and didn't like talking to other people

Emma Perttula:
+Nice pictures
+good pronunciation
- a little short
+ good and clear voice

I liked the paintings and learned about a new artist

# data[].attributes.body
Niko Somppi
+much information
-difficulties with hard words
+clear and loud voice
-pronunciation needs practice
+good enthusiasm
-not much eye contact for the audience
Satisfactory presentation. learned a lot about Warhol's life and personal stuff

Sanda Majuri
+good pronunciation
+understandable language
+much information
+no major problems with difficult words
Excellent presentation. I learned about the artist himself and about the paintings.

Emma Perttula
-voice could have been louder
-lack of enthusiasm
+good pronunciation
+understandable language
-not that much information
Satisfactory presentation. I learned basic things from the artist.

# data[].attributes.body
Iina

-There were just the right amount of contents

-Any words did not seem difficult for her to pronunciate

-Pronunciation was excellent

-Language and grammar were also both very great

-The slides were interesting

-She was presence when speaking and it seemed like she really knew what she was talking about

-Didn’t learn anything specific else than the artist’s life

-I rate the presentation excellent and the reasons are listed above

Kivi

-The contents were interesting

-Any words didn’t seem hard for him to pronunciate

-language was easily understandable and grammar was great

-The slideshow was great

-He didn’t seem very enthusiastic but he certainly knew what he was talking about

-I learned that Hiroshige influenced a lot of Japanese and European art (as did Hokusai whomst I made a presentation of)

-I rate the presentation excellent and the reasons are listed above

# data[].attributes.body
ANNIKA ARO: REMBRANDT

The contents of the presentation were very interesting and I got new information about the artist’s life. Annika’s language was quite fluent and mostly easy to understand as her voice was clear. There were also minor flaws, as in every presentation, but Annika dealt with them easily and professionally. The slides, made with Sway, were also clear. It seemed to me that Annika was really interested in telling us about her artist, as she liked to analyse thoroughly the paintings that were seen on the screen.

I would give the presentation the rating of excellent. It stayed fluent all the time and gave me new information about Rembrandt and his finest works.

MARJUT LEHMONEN: VINCENT VAN GOGH

The contents of Marjut’s presentation were sufficiently good and she didn’t need any aids in presenting the work, which is always a plus. Her language was an interesting and good-sounding mix of British and American accents and given the fact her voice was clear and soft; the presentation was easy to understand the whole time. At the beginning of the presentation, Marjut had a minor black-out, but after that she managed to get herself together in a fantastic way. I liked the way she used her hands during explaining, it gives me a feeling of self-confidence. The slides were also easy to understand and I liked the graphics of the presentation.

The presentation didn’t give me any new facts about van Gogh, as I have read articles about him, but nevertheless, in my opinion the presentation was excellent. It showed us necessary things about van Gogh and I really liked Marjut’s self-confident style of presenting on the stage.

HANNA MCCARTHY: PABLO PICASSO

Before she started her presentation, Hanna warned us about her possibly unclear English accent. At the end of the day, the accent wasn’t unclear at all and I understood almost every single word she said during the presentation. The contents of the slideshow were fine and Hanna presented it with proficiency and knowledge of Picasso. I also liked the explaining way Hanna used her hands during the presentation, it indicated some kind of enthusiasm and absorption into the work. Occasionally there were hard words to pronounce, but Hanna dealt with them mostly in a fine way.

I would give the presentation a rating of excellent, as it was finely put into effect from start to finish. And the language was completely understandable, too. No need to worry! 😊

ALEKSI KERONEN

# data[].attributes.body
Aleksi Keronen:
Michelangelo
full of information
Nice touch with the italian
nicely pronounced sometimes wast hard to catch what you were saying but otherwise nice
Language: good so was the grammar (I think so)
voice loud enough and quite clear
slides were good
present and energetic!
Learned new things here and there
Excellent because it was full of information the slides were good as well as the language. Preformer was present and energetic.

Marjut Lehmonen:
Van gogh
contents was good there was a good amount of information and it wasn't boring.
There were some difficult words but you conquered them.
Some times there were some words that sounded a little off, but it was fine that happens to us all.
Language was easy to understand and grammar was good also your voice was clear and loud enough
Slides were good
You were present and calm which I enjoyed.
I learned some new things like the fact that Gogh painted the starry night in an asulym.
Excellent, because it was very interesting and you were easy to follow without falling off track and there was a good amount of information.

Hanna McCarthy:
Picasso
Good amount of information
There were difficult words but didn't seem they really bothered you or your talking.
Voice and pronunciation was good, easy to listen and loud and clear voice. Loved the accent. Understandable and grammar was good.
Nice slides and fun touch with the evolution of Picassos self-image.
You were present and lively.
Learnded that Piacasso was probably mentally ill.
Excellent, because the presentation was good and interesting, there was new information and it was well done.

# data[].attributes.body
Aleksi Keronen

- Enough information, well selected

- Vocabulary was diverse but understandable

- Sometimes you could speak a bit more slowly, it would be easier to follow

- The slides were nice and you knew what you were talking about

The presentation was excellent, because you seemed like a professional and used advanced vocabulary.

Annika Aro

-       a lot of interesting information

-       Pronunciation was good, language understandable

-       You could speak a bit louder

-       I learned details about different paintings

The presentation was excellent, because you had educated yourself well on the subject.

Hanna McCarthy

-       Great pronunciation and use of vocabulary

-       The presentation was easy to follow, there were a lot of nice pictures

-       (You could maybe look a bit more towards the audience)

-       I learned that Picasso made a huge amount of artworks.

The presentation was excellent, because you spoke confidently and enthusiastically.

# data[].attributes.body
"Lauri Ruohonen"
Henrik: Raphael
+ good grammar

# data[].attributes.body
Arttu Mikkola

·       Good amount of information especially of Paul Klee’s life. I would’ve liked to hear a little bit more of the meaning of his work.

·       Very understandable English, easy and nice to listen to. Voice was loud enough, could’ve been a little more louder though. Grammar was also fine.

·       Only two pictures were shown, so a short slide show would’ve been nice.

·       Overall the presentation was good: I understood everything and learned something new. A proper slide show and a bit more confident performance were the only things missing.

Sauli Lindroos

·       There was more information about his life and I would’ve liked to see a picture or two of his paintings as well as some explaining about them.

·       Pronunciation was ok, I understood most of it. Remember to be confident. Otherwise it was nice to listen to the performance.

·       Presentation was ok: I would’ve wanted to hear a bit more information about his work but overall well done.

Samuli Suppula

·       Good amount of information and pictures of the artist and his work as well.

·       Understandable English, remember to look at the audience and be confident.

·       Again, learned something new about an artist I knew nothing about.

·       It was a good presentation. A lot of good information included and there was only a little confidence missing.

# data[].attributes.body
Aleksi Keronen, Michelangelo

Aleksi was well spoken and had a good presentation. He had some difficult words that he used and pronounced very well. Aleksi had a lot of fascinating information on  the paintings but there could have been a little bit more on the artist.

He was very interested in what he was doing and extremely good at speaking in front of people. The presentation was excellent.

Marjut Lehmonen, Van Gogh

Marjut spoke good English in a loud and clear voice. The slides were very pretty and clear. She seemed very interested in the topic. I learned that the artist had spent a lot of time in a mental asylum. Marjut remembered difficult facts very well. The presentation overall was excellent.

Annika Aro, Rembrandt

Annika had a good amount information on the artist and the paintings. She spoke clearly and informatively. The slides were very interesting and nicely done. I thought it was extremely good that she new so much about the paintings in question. Overall the presentation was excellent.