# data[].attributes.body
1.) This graph has a title explaining all the information.
2.) This graph has a source explaining exactly when and where the information was collected.
3.) The graphics on the graph only make it easier to understand the data instead of making it more confusing.

# data[].attributes.body
1.) This graph has no title explaining the information.
2.) The two 37% bar graphs are different sizes, indicating that one is greater than the other.
3.) There is no source for where this information came from.

# data[].attributes.body
(Shaye Williams)

First, the graph starts at 0 so the graph is not misleading to whoever is reading the graph. Second, the title is very descriptive so the viewer has an understanding on what the graph is showing. Lastly, all of the units in the y-axis have the dollar sign which allows the viewer to know what the y-axis represents.

# data[].attributes.body
The spacing between the bars are sized correctly, each axis has a title that explains what is going on, and the design is clear where you can read all the information clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
(Shaye)

First, the units on the graph do not start at 0, so the graph is very exaggerated. Also, the units on the Y-axis should all have the percentage symbol rather than one unit having the percentage symbol. Lastly, rather than saying “now” underneath the most recent bar, there should be a date for a better understanding for all people looking at the graph.

# data[].attributes.body
The title of the graph doesn't explain enough about what is going on, the vertical axis doesn't have a title telling what the numbers mean, and the design of the bars are confusing because there are trash specs that go higher up.