# data[].attributes.body
1)he believed there was five comports to emotional intelligence: emotional self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills
2)strength: he believed emotional intelligence is just as important as normal intelligence which helped education greatly
3) weakness: many believe the emotional intelligence should be more focused on people around you and not on personal understanding

# data[].attributes.body
1) he believed that there was three types of intelligence: analytical, creative and practical
2) strength: many agree that there are multiple kinds of intelligence versus just one general level of intelligence
3) weakness: many people believe that there are more than just three kinds of intelligence unlike his theory

# data[].attributes.body
1) he believed that there was a general level of intelligence so if someone scored above average in one area they would score above average in the other areas as well
2)Strength: most people who are academically inclined tend to do well in all academic areas
3)Weakness: some people are not academically inclined but they are very good in the arts so this would not apply to them

# data[].attributes.body
1) he believed that people had multiple different intelligences
2) strength: most people that are good at painting or some kind of aren’t as good at other things and savant syndrome is an example of this
3) weakness: a lot people who are good in one subject are good in other subjects as well

# data[].attributes.body
1) he believed that factor-analysis should be done to create groups of personality traits
2)strength: many believe that most traits can be grouped in to categories with other  similar traits to try and understand a personality
3) weakness: many believe that personality traits should not be grouped together and each trait has its own category it would fall into