# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Continued……. Blood stained socks Blood in ford bronco & back gate

# data[].attributes.headline
Matching Glove evidence that was found in OJ Simpson's apartment

# data[].attributes.subject
Matching Glove evidence that was found in OJ Simpson's apartment

# data[].attributes.body
It is sourced from CNN.

# data[].attributes.headline
A view of what was in OJ Simpson's vehicle

# data[].attributes.subject
A view of what was in OJ Simpson's vehicle

# data[].attributes.body
The picture is from CNN

# data[].attributes.body
OJ Simpson's murder case is one of the cases that have had twist when it was clear from the outset that the prosecution was going to win. However, racial discrimination which was manifested in the Los Angels Police Department in brutality against African Americans was used as the defense by Cochran's legal team. The case was governed by statutory law since criminal law has been codified and it is written in the USA constitution.

# data[].attributes.headline
explain the defense strategy and include the category or type of defense used and how the Defense Attorney attacked the Prosecution

# data[].attributes.subject
explain the defense strategy and include the category or type of defense used and how the Defense Attorney attacked the Prosecution

# data[].attributes.body
The major issue surrounding the case of OJ Simpson is how the defense team that was led by the charismatic Cochran turned the case from an easy win for the prosecution into a not guilty verdict. The major strategy that was used is the expression of racial police brutality of the Los Angeles Police Department by accusing them of attempted framing of Simpson of the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and her alleged boyfriend Ronald Goldman. The defense team made sure that the trial focused on Mark Furham who was a detective taking on the case of Simpson by bringing to the table his use of the n-word (paywall).  Therefore, the major defense used here is racial discrimination and the loss of the case will be blamed on Furham’s questionable past about racial hatred as evidenced by the interview of A law professor at UCLA Law School, Peter Arenella.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/oj/interviews/arenella.html
It is important to take note that OJ Simpson might have been innocent as evidenced by the   three letters where he expressed himself that to have been innocent as charged.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/video/oj-simpson-charged-murder-23976703

# data[].attributes.headline
3) List the elements of the main crime(s) in the case and discuss the evidence that was used to satisfy each element.

# data[].attributes.subject
3) List the elements of the main crime(s) in the case and discuss the evidence that was used to satisfy each element.

# data[].attributes.body
The elements of the case against OJ Simpson was the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her alleged boyfriend, Ron Goldman. There were more than 5 pieces of evidence that were presented before court to convict O.J. Simpson of murder that includes blood drops, matching gloves, crime scene hairs and fibers, bloody shoes prints, bloody socks and a knife which were enough to proof beyond reasonable doubt that OJ Simpson had murdered the two.
Bloody drops were detected at the gate of the murder scene that happened to be near bloody shoe prints of the crime scene too.  The prosecution team claimed that the drops had OJ Simpson’s genetic marks . During an interview with the police, he was photographed having a cut on his finger.  Additionally, there was a matching glove of the extra Aris leather type on the scene of the murder near the two bodies that was similar to another one that was found on Simpson’s compound. What is more surprising is that matching glove had blood that contained the genetic markers of Simpson with that of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman’s blood.

# data[].attributes.headline
1) Illustrate whether common law, statutory laws or both were applied to the crime.

# data[].attributes.subject
1) Illustrate whether common law, statutory laws or both were applied to the crime.

# data[].attributes.body
Common law is a set of laws that are derived from the customs and principles of the society that are employed in court case decision in instances where the civil law statutes do not cover such a law. It is worth noting that such decisions by judges set the precedent that must be applied for cases that will be handled thereafter.   Therefore, majority of the rulings that are made in the common law system depend on the decisions that were reached on similar cases.
Refer to the course in the url below
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkkECkt2gY8
On the other hand statutory laws heavily rely on the legislative process whereby laws and ordinances are developed and then voted by a certain group of people that represent the larger majority of the populace. In states that have adopted common law, murder is regarded as a homicide committed with a malicious a foresight. The case is under the statutory law since murder is codified and the United States of America constitution and the judge did not use any similar past case to decide  the case of O. J Simpson.  Therefore, statutory laws was applied which has it that nobody should take someone’s life since every USA citizen has a right to life.

1.www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/publications/PU00009908.pdf