# data[].attributes.body
1. There must be at least 3 reasons
2. Nouns to convey a certain reason
3. A connector

# data[].attributes.body
Paper books are better than E-books as they can work without the internet and electricity , although E-books are thinner , people should use paper book as they are better than E-books .
30words

Although E-Books require electricity to be read, E-Books require no paper to be produced and little space to be stored, therefore E-Books are better and should be used more than paper books.
32 words

# data[].attributes.body
Paper books are better than E

# data[].attributes.body
Paper books

# data[].attributes.body
Draft 1:
Paper books are better than Ebooks as they do not require charging and is durable. Although they waste paper, Ebooks should not replace books.(24 words)

Draft 2:
Paper books are more preferable than E-books as they do not require charging and is more durable. Although they waste paper which are non- renewable, E-books should not replace hardcopy books. (30 words )

# data[].attributes.body
Draft 1:
Although paper books have more accurate data, E-books have a greater variety of books to choose from and have a large download capacity which makes E-books more convenient.
( 28 words )

Draft 2:
Although paper books can be used for long periods without recharging, E-books have a greater variety of books to choose from and have a large download capacity which makes E-books more convenient and superior than paper books.
( 39 words )

# data[].attributes.body
Draft 1:
People who use e-books instead of paper books strain their eyes more, thus people should not read e-books. Paper books also have a more real feeling when you flip a page instead of tapping a E-book. E-books also require charging while paper books do not . (40 words)
Draft 2:

# data[].attributes.body
E-books are better than paper books as they are readily available, environmentally friendly but uses electricity, hence everyone should use E-books.  Word count : 21

E-books are superior to paper books. This is due to the fact that E-books are readily available, environmentally friendly albeit the electricity consumption. Thus E-books should be used instead of paper books.  Word count : 32

# data[].attributes.body
Draft 1:
E-books would be a better choice over hardcopy books as they are more convenient to access, less expensive option to buy and do less damage to the environment.( 28 words)

Draft 2:
E-books would be a better choice over hardcopy books as they are more convenient to access and the less expensive option to buy. However, E-books affects the human eyesight more as compared to paper books. (36 words)

# data[].attributes.body
Draft 1:
As Paper books take up a lot of space, waste paper and are heavier compared to e-books, e-books should be better than paper books.
24 Words

Draft 2 (Better):
Although paper books can last longer, e-books waste less environmental resources, take up less space and are also light-weight while being able to store hundreds of books. Thus e-books should be superior compared to paper books.
37 words.

# data[].attributes.body
Despite having that paper books contribute to the waste of paper resources in the near future, paper books may be found to be more convenient and lighter in weight.

Despite having that paper books are a waste of resources, they are comparatively better than e-books as electricity is not required and they are eye friendly. Thus, paper books should be more preferable relatively to e - books.

(36 words)

# data[].attributes.body
Draft 1:
E-books should be used instead of books as it saves paper, reducing teh need for chopping trees down. E-books saves more space compared to thick books, E-books contain many stories and books on one tablet.
Number of words: 35

Draft 2:
E-books are exceptional, and they should be used instead of books as it saves paper, reducing the need for chopping trees down, they save more space compared to thick books, they contain many stories on one tablet.
Number of words: 37

# data[].attributes.body
Draft 1:
As cyber pets are low cost and low risk as no lives are at stake, however, cyber pets lack the physical connection between pet and owner. Hence, cyber pets are better than real pets.
No. of words: 34

Draft 2:
As cyber pets are easy to maintain and they are disposable, meaning they will not die. Cyber pets do not stimulate the responsibility needed to take care of them in their "owners". Therefore, cyber pets are better than real pets.
No. of words: 40