# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with is article because U.S. is a

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with the article because just case 80 percent of america is poor doesn't mean that we are regressed from developed nation to a developing nation

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article because the US is developed compared when you compare it to other countries. The US as a whole has high-income and

# data[].attributes.body
I don't completely agree with the article, but I do agree that there is a huge gap between the upper class and middle class in jobs and opportunity, and are missing out on what those 80% of people could provide for us

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article because compared many developing nations, we are doing well

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because for the US to go from developed to developing it has to take more than infrastructure and low wage sector to bring its economy down.

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with the author because it is not just the middle class with lower wage that is dropping the  economy.  the 20% that has "better" jobs happen to have a bigger impact on the economy.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because The US as a whole is not poor but the US does have poor areas.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because people are people and they make themselves out of what they do. I understand what the author is trying to say but you cant change

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this article because the US is a developed country and not all of it is in poverty. Many people have a home

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with the article because the US compared to developing countries is very developed and

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree because the United States is already pretty developed and has gained many

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because we cannot simply regress to a developing status "without a robust middle class".

# data[].attributes.body
Although poverty is an issue this one problem wont cause the US to revert into a developing country.

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with the author, we are one of the best countries with so many opportunities left for us, it isn't that we aren't capable of working people here in america are born poor and die poor you can cause that change.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because being poor would not make the US be an developing country .

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree ,because yes the amount of homeless people is increasing , but the united states is a highly developed country in comparison to other countries . the amount of homeless people doesn't necessarily mean the country is regressing.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because a lot of the population has a bad job or no job and the rich people control the US' economy

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article because even though 80% of the population are in the low-wage sector the United States isn't as bad as developing countries in the world.

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree that were going back to developing but things are going bad for us. 80% of us are apart of the low wage sector and many of the country is facing debts and hardships with work. But not enough to make us a developing country.

# data[].attributes.body
I honestly disagree with the author because a place like the United States can´t become a developing country without some disaster such as a war. So what the author is saying is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because the United States is a very developed country compared to other countries, the low wage middle class is not completely dropping economic numbers. Just because some areas are less wealthy than others does not mean that the entire country is in a developing stage.Countries have to work to maintain a developed status so it doesn’t mean that if one area needs work that the entire country has to claim that it’s on a developing stage.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because the united states is already a developed country and comparing to other countries it's more devoloped, maybe 80% of the country that in the low wage

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the article because though we are more developed than some,we have issues like the aforementioned racism that are dragging us down.

# data[].attributes.body
I understand what the author is trying to say but the poor and the homeless within the united states aren´t going to completely bring down the economy because a majority of people have homes, job, and are able to sustain themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because the information does not back up the statement. For example theres more reasons then just homeless people that is effecting the US economy .

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article because even though we are developing we have

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like a country cannot become undeveloped because of how big of an economy we already have. There  isn't enough proof to suggest that we are going back to a developing country.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the statement about the US going from developed to developing, because only parts of the country are homeless, or in poverty. The rates of poverty and homelessness here is nothing compared to some actual developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article because although there are many places in poverty the country itself  is not

# data[].attributes.body
Compared to some developing countries we are developed but we can get better so I can understand why they want to go back to the developing status.

# data[].attributes.body
it's understandable that we are regressing back to a developing countries with having low wages and homeless people, but you also have to consider that there are still alot of people who still has a good job and has a home so calling the U.S as moving back to a devloping countries is a stretch

# data[].attributes.body
i agree only because if theirs only poor people and rich people how are we supposed to develop it would be hard to go from poor to rich were gonna have to be a developing country again

# data[].attributes.body
I agree and I also disagree. I agree because in the article, it says that 80% of the US population is in the low wage sector. That’s a lot of people without financial security. However, I also believe that we aren’t turning into a developing nation because we are still so far ahead in technology and money, for example, compared to other countries.

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with the article because its not accurate. Yes, there are homeless people in the US but the majority of people do have a home, it might not be fancy or big but they dhave a roof over there heads. Sure, some things need to change but things need to change everywhere not just the US.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this argument because the U.S. is in many ways the strongest country in the entire world but also that our poverty and homelessness does not seem to get better but seems to stay the same, i know there has been change, but how much change? Instead of changing one community for the better good, lets change all of them. But anyways with the U.S. becoming a developing country.... that could never happen due to our factors in this country.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree and disagree because this countries economy is obviously bias twords rich people and, there are also still some of us living in poverety. one thing i am really in between is that " The economy should be working on improving all american lives INCLUDING RICH PEOPLE.

They do not need the same treatment as the unfortunate living on the streets.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article US because the is still developing in different ways and the whole country isn’t in poverty or homeless

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because not everyone is homeless and not able to provide according to their needs.

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree, we are not going back to a developing nation because we are in debt, more than half of the country doesn't have a very good job or a good pay, but that wouldn't send us back to developing

# data[].attributes.body
I can see why people can agree to it regressed

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author, but I do understand what he's saying. There are many poor people that are causing our economy to go down, but there are more factors that would determine a developed country going back a developing.

# data[].attributes.body
I wouldn't say that we are going back to a developing nation at all. Less and less people are going through poverty with more people who aren't in debt. Racism is also becoming less of a problem. If so that we are becoming a developing nation again. We change our economy to ones that make products and less on trade.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because we have a pretty good percentage of urban cities in america we do not go out to gather food and most of us do not work in the agriculture business

# data[].attributes.body
i can see why people think that the us regressed to a developing nation but i don't think it has i mean of course people most people are worried about losing their jobs but to be a developing nation we wouldn't have all of this technology here. of course we have people in poverty but its not to the point where there is at least 4 people homeless in the suburbs but the city is completely is a different thing. I would consider ourselves regressed when our infrastructure and economy is crashing

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with that statement, cause if you compare all of the other developing nations to the US, the US is clearly different compared to most of the developing nations, with its life expectancy, to the GNIPPP, the US shouldn't even be close to returning as a developing nation.

# data[].attributes.body
I somewhat agree on the statement but see why others do not, as while economically the US is one of, if not the strongest nation, The Policy and hardwired injustice within our system will slowly cause of to not revert but be overtaken, as due to the United states economic structure the wealthy accumulate more wealth faster than the other demographics combined. This causes a problem in our future as when the middle class is far reduced due to the policies instated by wealthy via funding those in power will cause an overproduction, this will lead to a spiral as the demand for goods is so great that the wealthy alone cannot meet it. This will cause more problems as those production facilities will shut down as there is no demand, reducing demand even more as less people have the capital to spend.

# data[].attributes.body
We are not becoming a developing country. Just because we have people in poverty and homeless people doesn’t mean we are losing our developed status. And honestly there is no reason for anyone to be homeless u can get a job doing anything in this country. So it’s not the country’s fault that people are in poverty. But I don’t wanna get into that right now. I’m just gonna say that I disagree.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article because the U.S, as a whole, isn't necessarily in poverty and going backwards in the developing process. One portion of the country doesn't reflect the whole. It's kind of like saying all of the U.S is all desert just because one section of it is. Compared to other parts of the world, the U.S is developed and perfect while in other parts of the world, we're falling behind.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the US because just because one person is in debt doesn't mean that the whole country is, it said that 80% of the population is receiving a lower wage, but the other 20% aren't so I wouldn't say that the whole country is in debt just a large portion. Even though many people are becoming homeless and losing jobs or struggling to keep one does't just automatically make the country developing. It just means that the population needs to get there stuff together.(not sure if that makes sense but it does in my head

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree and agree at the same time.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally believe that this is true. If their is a system to keep people poor instead of letting them reach full potenial, then no progress is being made.If it has something to do with race, then it should have been left behind.As we see more and more from a system like this is anger.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because the US is still growing technologically, developing countries don't grow as quickly technologically. Nowadays, the increase in jobs from major factories moving back to the US also lowers unemployment and job insecurity.

# data[].attributes.body
Well, really, the article is claiming that the United States is regressing from developed to developing. This we know. But it all depends really on your perspective and definition of developing.

If you compare the US, the literal powerhouse of the world, with one of the best economies out there, to any developing nation- the US doesn't really fit that stigma.

In the sense of "how does the US compare to other developing nations", no, we wouldn't be considered developing. While it's quite obvious that places such as Venezuela (which was compared to us in the article) aren't nearly as developed as we are economically or financially, we do have some flaws also presented that could consider us to be developing.

The article brings up the point of the minorities normally being lower on the economic scale, this is not a mistake, of course. This country is inherently built upon the status of minorities being at the bottom. In this situation, we could be considered "developing". Developing as in coming to understand our own country, which we don't. We can't work in harmony as a country and in this form we ARE developing. But economically, the 20% that we have are substantially holding up the country.

It's hard to say what the definition of developing is. Whether it's how well and efficiently we work together and hold up our country, or whether our economy provides the status.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because US is one of the developed countries, although we do have homeless and others poor families but it not just US, is all around the world and we are not the worse one.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with The United States because not all of the country is in debt and in poverty. Only a percentage is in while the rest is living well. We cannot classify something that is not fully into the issue, without looking at all the possibilities the people are in.

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with the article because yea of course there are gonna be a lot of homeless  and hungry people everywhere. regardless the country your in . its not like the entire country is homeless . the author says more than 80 percent of the pop. is in the lower wages but it doesnt mean the 80 percent is under the poverty line . its just saying not everyone can afford a big nice house and nice cars .

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this statement, because yes people are starting to go into debt and loose money that doesn't mean we all fall as a country. It said that 80% of our population is lower class but I don't think that's true, because that's a lot of people. Maybe 60% but now 80%.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the article, The article says that the key solution to the issue is education, i agree with this because as it had said earlier in the article, people are more socially accepted.Leading to jobs The US has taken a step backwards, I would like to say things would be leading to another great depression, caused form the lack in 80% of the US populations income. Further on that note things are gladly different, but things need to change before another depression becomes a possibility. Education can change the matter of acceptance socially and economically.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because every country  has poor parts there are developing parts if the US but not the whole part so i wouldn't consider it being a developing nation state and because that's reality not everyone isnt going to be fortunate like others are.We still have production working effectively.Even though 80% of the population is "considered" low wage or poor doesnt define our society we have declined but we shouldnt be able to go back to a developing country

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this article because one portion of the United States can’t label the country as a whole. Yes, there are things like poverty that are in the U.S. without a doubt, but there are also extremely wealthy parts of it. With that being said, I feel like the many parts of the country that are “nicer” overpower the less wealthy parts.

# data[].attributes.body
I with what the author has to say because the ¨80% of people are part of the US low wage sector¨ quote from this author is simply not true in my opinion. There may be an immense growth in poverty from the nation that we once were, but for the vast amount of people in this category would not be considered low wage, and their burdens and debts are a big part of it, but that does not make the nation regress.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article because even though (as it's stating) more people are becoming homeless and being poor and some are in and out of jobs doesn't mean that the United States has become a developing nation. They're trying to make the United States look like we're supposed to have absolutely no homeless people or any people without jobs. That the United States is supposed to be this picture perfect place and it's not. Just because rates have increased for homeless/poor people doesn't mean we've gone backwards and have become a developing nation.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article saying that the United States has gone back to a developing nation status  because of how 80% of the workers are part of the low-wage sector and has debts and is anxious about the availability in jobs. The article also ended with how receiving proper education can offer many more advancements and benefits to the nation from Mr. Temin. ( Mr Temin says that education is the solution to offer everyone in society better opportunities and calls for investments in public schools and public universities. ) This necessarily doesn't mean the U.S is going back to the developing status because what we really need is a reform.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the artickle because the majority of people live in the poorer sector the the US. In the article, it says, "On the other hand, the remaining 80 per cent, he said, are part of the US’ low-wage sector, where the world of possibility has shrunk and people are burdened with debts and anxious about job security." That's a lot of people.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the article. I agree that the United States is becoming a developing place againbecause of the difference between the cities that are more advance than regular cities.

# data[].attributes.body
Although it is true that more and more people are in debts and there are nervous worrying over job security, I don't think the United States is going back to a developing nation status. Maybe in the future if this continues to happen, the US probably can regress back, but so far the supporting evidences suggested by the article are too few. This problem can also be solved by having infrastructures that provides education so that the United States won't go back to the developing nation status.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article, even though the U.S. may have some poverty and social issues, that doesn't downgrade its class of development. You can't just say one of the biggest superpowers in the world is not fully developed. I do agree that there is still room for improvement given the current status in our country's government. But, that does not classify it as undeveloped. All though it may be developed, we still need to work on fixing the social rankings in our population in order to not be questioned weather our country is still developing.

# data[].attributes.body
I can partially agree with the article however some of the statements coming from the article is both unproven and sounds rather quite vulgar to read. For example the dual - economy having a racist undertone, i can see how some of it is true but some of it is not, more and more black people or the "minority" is achieving many things such as owning a business, but is some places the statement is true, however it is false to assume the rest of the united states is like that. But it is true that most people in the U.S. are fairly racist, towards the minorities, or people that are different in general. However it certainly does seem the U.S. is slowly reverting back from its progress, the amount  of homeless people and low income families is growing larger either due too social or economic changes. According to a Los angles times article one in five Americans have been laid off in work for the past 5 years, therefore showing our economy is declining.

# data[].attributes.body
I can see why the article would say that the U.S. has gone back to a developing status based off of the information it provided. By saying that 20% of the population is well educated and enjoys good jobs and supportive networks, then how the other 80% is on the low side of the wage sector and how instead of enjoying the luxuries of good jobs and supporting networks they have to deal with the burden of debt and the worry of job security. I do disagree though with the article, yes our country does have some developing parts but I don't think that that means our country as a whole is a developing country.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article because although there are poor and developing parts in the United States (like any other developed county) that does not define the whole country (unlike developing countries). In the article it says "the remaining 80 per cent, he said, are part of the US’ low-wage sector" which seems like a stretch. I don't think 80% of the country is in the lower class. Maybe by that they mean not living in a nice suburban home but they are still above the poverty level. For the united states to be considered a developing country many people would have to be below the poverty line, therefore struggling for the basic necessities. In this case I feel like the author is just saying that all families can't live "comfortably"

# data[].attributes.body
Even though poverty is a growing problem in the U.S. America hasn't fallen to a developing nation. The article doesn't mention how much actual power the U.S. has over the world economy and other countries.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with this article in that the US has certainly become far less developed than it used to be, especially with the major gap between low-income and high-income that is plaguing us. The fact that about 80 percent of the population has a low-income shows that the economy has declined greatly. The fact that the vast majority of the low-wage people consist of minorities shows that most people, despite all of the hate of this, are still generally racist to those unlike them in culture or skin color. This defines our country as a formerly great one that has gradually declined for its entire life.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author, the United States is developing in major ways, lt is one of the most developed countries in the world, the part of the US with “low wage factors” is of course contributing to the population but not monumentally to the point where it would affect the devolpment.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because they are not providing enough reasons on why it would go back into the developing stage just like it talks about the roads and brides there are some worst places and they will not fix those so the article is wrong because i feel like that if we were going in a developing stage everything that is damaged would get fixed and none if of it will be how it is now. And yes there is the lower wage sector but nobody wants to help you say the things about it but nobody want to help protest to help to get those people up to help get the minim wage mark up but no "rich" people just sit on there 🤬 and help nothing but they protest everything else.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this article, because even though the U.S. does have a high poverty rate that is not a factor that would regress it into a developing nation

# data[].attributes.body
yes we  have homeless and hungry people in the U.s ,but sadly thats how it is in all countries some less then others,but to say the U.S is becoming a developing nation because of that ...is a reach ,but i do agree with the last paragraph of the article

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree I understand that the amount of poor people is growing as said in the article, but that does not mean the whole nation has regressed and is a developing nation. We still have advancements that make us a developed nation. people may be in and out of jobs but that is not a big enough problem to cause us to go backwards to a developing nation

# data[].attributes.body
"America is regressing to have the economic and political structure of a developing nation"  America is one of the worlds developed countries.
When it comes economic,sure we have ome poor states but the rest of us have enough money to give to poorer state

# data[].attributes.body
disagree with the statement that the US has gone back to a developing nation. a quote from the article “We have a structure that predetermines winners and losers." makes me believe my opinion. i think the US has the power to give to the lower classes, i believe the 80% 20% is a problem we made and could fix. The US probably could find a way to make it easier to get jobs but with things like having to have a certain amount of education for a good job. not everyone can or does it so those people just have to deal with the fact they are going to be put in the lower class. i don't think we should provide for everyone but instead we should make it easier for them to have things like a home, and food.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article, while the claims it has made are true, there is bigger evidence that his claim of the US being a developing country is wrong. The economy is way to strong and big for the US to be considered a developing country, And while there might be some places that might not be very wealthy, that does not determine the economy in the whole country. In the article the author states that with the Lewis Model he found that the low-wage sector has little influence on the public policy, like i said that could only be in one part of the US.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this article because the US is already developed, there is a certain part of the pop that's not labeled as the " low wage sector". In the article it states that 80 percent of our population is in the low wage sector. It doesn't mean we are regressing , throughout the whole article it wasn't very concrete and had an ideal reason why the US is "regressing."

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this article. The article does not provide good reasons for the U.S. going into a developing country status. Saying that 80% percent is in the low wage sector does not directly mean anything. There is poverty in some areas of the country, but the entire country is not poor just because of this.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article, we are not going back are in the developing stage. Sure 80 of our people are part of the US low-wage section. But that does not mean we are going backwards in the development of our country.

# data[].attributes.body
i don’t think the author of the article is correct because it’s not providing enough information or reasons to why the us has been “ regressing “ in the past years, we do have populations that are homeless in the us like skid row but every country has parts where people are homeless and don’t have the resources either , some countries are like that everywhere you go aswell.

# data[].attributes.body
Disagree, just because some parts of a country is poor doesn't mean the entire country is poor and homeless. The poor regions in the US are inconsistently spread out across the country. Although 80% of the population have low-wage jobs, it doesn't specify what qualifies as "low-wage."

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the article, I do not think a nation can just go down for being developed back to being developing the U.S. has a strong economy and then it also goes on about how 80% of the population is on the low-wage side but that doesn't mean they are in poverty and they aren't starving or anything, could they be? Yes, but they are most likely not. They are probably struggling to get enough money but I don't think having some people who are poor will affect a nation that much, its pretty much inevitable to have poor people.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because the US is definitely not a developing country, although some of the issues in the article are true they're not widespread all over the country to really say the US is going back to a developing country. The author states "much of the low-wage sector had little influence over public policy, the high-income sector was keeping wages down to provide cheap labour, social control was used to prevent subsistence workers from challenging existing policies and social mobility was low". I think that statement is true and definitely can be proven but just because that happens doesn't mean we're a developing country. There definitely a big gap between the wealthy and people in poverty but overall the country is developed.

# data[].attributes.body
There is not enough evidence in the article to show that the U.S. has gone back to a developing nation. I utterly disagree with the author because there are many areas in the U.S. that are less developed than others, but that does not mean the whole division has gone back to being a developed nation. In the article, the author talks about how far inequalities has progressed through the U.S. and that 20% of the U.S. is well educated. I think that the 80% does not affect the whole nation and this tells that not all of the U.S. is bad.

# data[].attributes.body
I honestly don't agree with this article. The U.S. is not regressing to a developing nation. The author is presenting data that doesn't directly show that the US is going back. For example, there are 80% of people who are in the low wage sector. Okay? Does this tell us anything about the technological advances? the availability of food and water? the economy? which really--more than wages--determine the stage of development of a country? Because a country has problems regarding one specific thing in one specific area, does not mean that the country as a whole has the problem. That's like saying: There is a roach on the floor; this house must have roaches on the ceiling and in the toilet and screw it. The roaches are everywhere

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like the article is coming off wrongly. Even though (as said in the article) 80% of the US Americans are part of the low-wage sector and only 20% of Americans have good jobs and social networks, I don't think that means that the US is falling into a developing country. The article even stated that the US is the "worlds largest economy"; Because of that, I don't think that it would be so easy to just become a developing nation from where the US is at the moment (unless certain decisions are made and certain actions are taken). Just because part of the nation is in a low-wage sector, the remaining 20% is still keeping the US from becoming a developing nation.

# data[].attributes.body
The US has an extremely strong economy and the article while providing some evidence that US has a problem with its lower class, such as the 80% low income Americans. However this is not enough of an economic trouble to have the US revert back to developing status especially due to its ever increasing technology and other advancements.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think that the U.S. has gone back to being a developing nation. The article doesn't provide enough reasons to prove that a change has occurred with its economy. 80% of people in the U.S. are in the low wage area, the other 20% do have a good and stable job. Even though there are more in the low wage area and it is unbalanced it does not mean that the country itself is developing or is in a bad place. That is not the entire country. If it were the entire country then it would be considered developing, but as of now they are not in a giant crisis. There are many areas that are poor in the U.S. but that won't lead it back to developing. That is one area, not the entire country.

# data[].attributes.body
I don´t agree with the articles claim because it isn´t specifically stating large areas that are falling back into a developing country status. Yes, I agree there are many places that are ¨poor¨ but looking at the U.S. as a whole it is a developed country. Also, the author says the 80%  that are uneducated are in low wage sectors. However, most of that 80% are working hard and have managed to stay above poverty level. The U.S., in my eyes, has proven that it´s people can survive without education.

# data[].attributes.body
I Disagree With The Article. I Don’t Think There’s Enough Evidence Presented In This Article To Convince Me That There’s A Change In The US Economic Status. The Article Presents The Unbalance In Power Between The High-Income And Low-Income, Which To Me, I Can’t See How That Would Revert The US Back To A Developing Stage. Although I Do Understand The Winner And Loser System, As There Is Unfairness In Wages Between Different Demographics.

# data[].attributes.body
The United States of America might have some poor areas, but that doesn't mean the whole country is a developing country. One portion of the country cannot describe the whole country. To say that the United States of America is going back to developing is to say Zimbabwe will be a m.d.c. next year. The article was meant to persuade you into thinking that this country is going back.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because there's only a portion of the US are not highly developed, so in my opinion that shouldn't affect/effect on how the US is developing.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the author because there is a part of the US population that isn't classified under the "low wage sector" category. Which I think sets it a part from being a developing nation.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that the U.S has gone back to the developing nation. The fact that the author said that there is a large percentage of our population who are living in debt or worrying about money is correct, but that doesn't exactly mean that we have gone back. We are still overall a developed country even if some parts of it are less developed than others.